Quote:
Originally posted by Colin
You think it was ruled unconstitutional to protect bestiality and child porn? No, it was ruled unconstitutional because it violated the court's interpretation of what the first amendment protects.
You are correct that pay sites and AVS would have likely not been targeted. I don't see that argument as any different than the many adult webmasters who think the chance of the current admin prosecuting them in particular as being very low. You are making the same argument Republicans are. "I don't think it will effect me so who cares?"
|
I didn't say I didn't care, I said I would be against it as well. While I don't support it, I do however see the DIFFERENCE between an honest attempt to keep kids away from porn, and shutting down legal adult only websites.
Please don't get the idea that I think Clinton was the almighty perfect President. I do think he was a great man who was honestly trying to make the world a better place, and did, but he also did fuck up several times. Rwanda being #1, I was sending letters to everyone in his administration while that was going on.