Mark Zuckerberg Just Spent More Than $30 Million Buying 4 Neighboring Houses for Privacy

[SlammedMedia]

To have that much money -- Story here

[RJHere]

Zuckerberg talking about privacy?

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by RJHere

Zuckerberg talking about privacy?

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by RJHere

Zuckerberg talking about privacy?

That's great

[Rochard]

Read the article kiddies, not the headlines.

This is less about his privacy and more about a developer buying up houses next to him so they can use his name to sell them for more. He bought four houses, and leased them back to their original owners.

[~Ray]

I never should have joined fb

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Read the article kiddies, not the headlines.

This is less about his privacy and more about a developer buying up houses next to him so they can use his name to sell them for more. He bought four houses, and leased them back to their original owners.

that's very cool indeed, but we both know facts have little impact here on GFY

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Read the article kiddies, not the headlines.

This is less about his privacy and more about a developer buying up houses next to him so they can use his name to sell them for more. He bought four houses, and leased them back to their original owners.

Reading the article doesn't make the comment less funny.

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Reading the article doesn't make the comment less funny.

the article itself is joking about it

[wehateporn]

He doesn't want nosy neighbors watching his shape-shifting

[sperbonzo]

Originally Posted by RJHere

Zuckerberg talking about privacy?

No real dichotomy there. If you don't want to give up your privacy, then don't do business with him. Not hard to understand.


.

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

No real dichotomy there. If you don't want to give up your privacy, then don't do business with him. Not hard to understand.


.

really?

in a world that says if you don't have a facebook page, you're 'weird' and people won't hire you?

there is plenty of articles everywhere about it

[BareBacked]

that is like you or I spending $30 on a lunch

[Kolargol]

Originally Posted by _Richard_

really?

in a world that says if you don't have a facebook page, you're 'weird' and people won't hire you?

there is plenty of articles everywhere about it

which biz are you talking about?

[Yanks_Todd]

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

No real dichotomy there. If you don't want to give up your privacy, then don't do business with him. Not hard to understand.


.

That is way to logical. I think he should run a massive resource intensive business for the world to use for free and never capitalize on the information at all, not even to begin to break-even.

I hate when people bitch about facebook, like it is forced upon them. Totally agree with you.

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by Kolargol

which biz are you talking about?

any biz with an HR department

[Yanks_Todd]

Originally Posted by _Richard_

really?

in a world that says if you don't have a facebook page, you're 'weird' and people won't hire you?

there is plenty of articles everywhere about it

I would never not hire someone if they chose not to use FB, unless I was hiring a Social Media director, then in that case yes.

[dyna mo]

wait, what? a developer wanted to buy a house and market it as neigboring zuckerberg's so zuck buys it +3 more and he's a good guy for that? if the original home was for sale then why would they give a shit who bought it? and then also lease it back? why would the others all the sudden just up and sell their mult-million dollar pads? to keep away a zuckerberg stalker that can afford to buy $14million home?

huh?

fuck zuckerberf.

[johnnyloadproductions]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Read the article kiddies, not the headlines.

This is less about his privacy and more about a developer buying up houses next to him so they can use his name to sell them for more. He bought four houses, and leased them back to their original owners.

Staying true to the jew in him.

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

No real dichotomy there. If you don't want to give up your privacy, then don't do business with him. Not hard to understand.
.

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

-Ben Franklin

[C H R I S]

Originally Posted by BareBacked

that is like you or I spending $30 on a lunch

More like us spening .30 on a pack of gum.

[Yanks_Todd]

Originally Posted by johnnyloadproductions

Staying true to the jew in him.



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

-Ben Franklin

That quote has no bearing on this situation. If the essential liberty you are giving up is the privacy to your FB data what is the temporary safety being gained?

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by Yanks_Todd

That quote has no bearing on this situation. If the essential liberty you are giving up is the privacy to your FB data what is the temporary safety being gained?

i suppose that depends on if you know who did the seed money for facebook, or several other social sites

[seeandsee]

who cares, he have billions and can do what ever he wants

[freecartoonporn]

Originally Posted by seeandsee

who cares, he have billions and can do what ever he wants

not unless he sells fb. i guess, its all in stocks though...

[Yanks_Todd]

Originally Posted by _Richard_

i suppose that depends on if you know who did the seed money for facebook, or several other social sites

I don't agree. The quote doesn't work here. FB is product we are all free to use or not use.

If the NSA turned on our webcams and watched us walking around the house naked and we as a country stood for it that quote works.

If a group of people get angry because they went to a nudist camp and the owners took pictures and they stand for it that quote doesn't work. Don't go.

I agree that FB should act ethically, however abstinence negates the concern 100%.

The VCs and firms who provided the seed money for the product have no bearing.

[adendreams]

Originally Posted by RJHere

Zuckerberg talking about privacy?

:1or glaugh

[thumbuilderic]

Interesting...

[erikwil]

pretty disgusting

[DWB]

Originally Posted by RJHere

Zuckerberg talking about privacy?

That's rich. HE wants privacy.

[oppoten]

Originally Posted by _Richard_

i suppose that depends on if you know who did the seed money for facebook, or several other social sites

Exactly. The fact that they're all Jewish is coincidence I'm sure.

[Phoenix]

I am okay with Facebook using information to market to me. They know i like golf already my facebook sidebar is filled with golf stuff. I actually like it, and i check out some stuff they present.
I do not like that any fucknut with a hardon for me can search for me and find me via facebook.

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by freecartoonporn

not unless he sells fb. i guess, its all in stocks though...

I suspect it's not really his, the concept of Facebook being his is just part of the marketing

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by Yanks_Todd

I don't agree. The quote doesn't work here. FB is product we are all free to use or not use.

If the NSA turned on our webcams and watched us walking around the house naked and we as a country stood for it that quote works.

If a group of people get angry because they went to a nudist camp and the owners took pictures and they stand for it that quote doesn't work. Don't go.

I agree that FB should act ethically, however abstinence negates the concern 100%.

The VCs and firms who provided the seed money for the product have no bearing.

how does a company owned by goldman sachs run ethically?

how do you tell a teenager that everything they know as social media is actually owned by intelligence agencies to 'fight terrorism'?

i like this argument tho, 'you don't have to use it'. We're still avoiding the fact it's actually happening.. but it's closer

[epitome]

Originally Posted by _Richard_

really?

in a world that says if you don't have a facebook page, you're 'weird' and people won't hire you?

there is plenty of articles everywhere about it

Or the opposite, with many people changing the name on their Facebook (e.g., spelling their last name backwards) when they are looking for a job.

About "plenty of articles," I can find plenty of articles saying that God is real.

[SomeCreep]

Zuckerberg is a panty sniffing weirdo.

[rintintin34]

Originally Posted by RJHere

Zuckerberg talking about privacy?

awesome

[johnnyloadproductions]

nevermind.

[Sly]

Originally Posted by epitome

Or the opposite, with many people changing the name on their Facebook (e.g., spelling their last name backwards) when they are looking for a job.

About "plenty of articles," I can find plenty of articles saying that God is real.

Richard doesn't need a Facebook page for his next job interview. He can point them to all of his fabulous GFY smilies and hypotheticals.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by BareBacked

that is like you or I spending $30 on a lunch

Maybe like buying a new car. People with lots of money still feel the value of millions and its still a serious purchase for them.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by _Richard_

really?

in a world that says if you don't have a facebook page, you're 'weird' and people won't hire you?

there is plenty of articles everywhere about it

Human resources are asking for your FB profile link?
Otherwise how would they know if you even have an account there? You can not always search and find a person even if he is on FB (for example person does not use full name, person does not have any public info or photos so you can not identify which John Smith of the hundreds you found is the one applying for the job and so on)

Smell bullshit.

[Ramirez]

Fuck Facebook and Zuckerberg. I don't use Facebook.

[winter_]

do you think his asian wife is seeing other men on the side or are they open about that sort of thing, they're supposed to be liberals aren't they.

maybe zuckerberg has to get a lot of shit instead of rather the beliebers or now the miley movement or some shit, who mis-use and abuse facebook to bully their peers and then the pedophiles who are provided with this access to an enormous database of profiles, of teenaged girls and boys.

[Biggie Smalls Web Writing]

fuck that motherfucker

[sperbonzo]

Originally Posted by oppoten

Exactly. The fact that they're all Jewish is coincidence I'm sure.

WTF does that mean?


Everytime I go to the EU or the UK I notice the anti semitism growing more and more.... Just sad, really.


.



.

[Mutt]

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

WTF does that mean?


Everytime I go to the EU or the UK I notice the anti semitism growing more and more.... Just sad, really.


.



.

Europe will do what it has always done best, wage war on each other. The next big one we will sit out if we have any sense.

20th century conflicts/wars in Europe

1903 Ilinden Uprising
1904?1908 Macedonian Struggle
1905 Łódź insurrection
1907 1907 Romanian Peasants' Revolt
1910 Albanian Revolt of 1910
1911?1912 Italo-Turkish War
1912?1913 Balkan Wars
1912?1913 First Balkan War
1913 Second Balkan War
1914 Peasant Revolt in Albania
1914?1918 World War I
1916 Easter Rising
1917?1921 Russian Civil War
1917?1921 Ukrainian?Soviet War
1918 Georgian?Armenian War
1918 Georgian-Turkish War
1918 Finnish Civil War
1918 Polish-Czech war for Teschen Silesia
1918?1919 Georgian-Russian conflict over Sochi
1918?1919 Polish-Ukrainian War
1918?1919 Greater Poland Uprising
1918?1920 Estonian Liberation War
1918?1920 Latvian War of Independence
1919 Hungarian?Romanian War of 1919
1919 Christmas Uprising
1919?1922 Greco?Turkish War
1919?1923 Turkish War of Independence
1919?1920 Czechoslovakia-Hungary War
1919?1921 Silesian Uprisings
1919?1921 Polish-Soviet War
1919?1922 Irish War of Independence
1920 Polish?Lithuanian War
1920 Vlora War
1921 Georgian-Russian War
1921 Uprising in West Hungary
1922?1923 Irish Civil War
1924 Georgian Uprising against Soviet Union
1934 Asturian miners' strike of 1934
1934 Austrian Civil War
1936?1939 Spanish Civil War
1939 Slovak-Hungarian War
1939 Occupation of Zakarpattia Oblast by Hungary
1939?1940 Winter War (Soviet invasion of Finland)
1939?1945 World War II
1939 Soviet invasion of Poland
1939?1940 Winter War
1940?1941 Greco-Italian War
1941?1945 Soviet-German war
1941?1944 Continuation War
1944 Slovak National Uprising
1944?1956 Guerilla war in the Baltic states
1945?1949 Greek Civil War
1953 Uprising in East Germany
1956 Uprising in Poznań
1956 Hungarian Revolution
1956?1962 Operation Harvest
1958 First Cod War
1959?2011 Basque Conflict
1968 Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia
1968?1998 The Troubles
1970?1984 Unrest in Italy
1972?1973 Second Cod War
1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus
1975-1976 Third Cod War
1988?1994 Nagorno-Karabakh War
1989 Romanian Revolution
1991 Ten-Day War
1991?1992 Georgian war against Russo-Ossetian alliance
1991?1993 Georgian Civil War
1991?1995 Croatian War of Independence
1992 War of Transnistria
1992 Ossetian-Ingush conflict
1992?1993 First Georgian war against Russo-Abkhazian alliance
1992?1995 Bosnian War
1993 Cherbourg incident
1993 Russian constitutional crisis
1994?1996 First Chechen War
1997 Unrest in Albania
1998?1999 Kosovo War
1998?present Dissident Irish Republican campaign
1998 Second Georgian war against Russian-Abkhazian alliance
1999 Dagestan War
1999?2009 Second Chechen War
1999?2001 Insurgency in the Pre?evo Valley

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

WTF does that mean?


Everytime I go to the EU or the UK I notice the anti semitism growing more and more.... Just sad, really.


.



.

the jew is using the black as muscle

[sperbonzo]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

the jew is using the black as muscle

.