The Psychology of Being a ?Non-Conspiracy Theorist?

[wehateporn]

http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/...onspiracy.html

"There is a brand of people amongst us. They have no name but they exist. They are everywhere, at work, at home, at school, and in the streets, stores, and shopping malls. It is highly unlikely to not know someone who belongs in this category. It?s the so called non-conspiracy theorists. You know, the guy who tries to terminate conversations by alleging that you are nothing more than a ?conspiracy theorist? and the information you share is false or not believable. Yes, that guy. Let?s meet face to face with your typical non-conspiracy theorist. We all know them, they often are the ones who hold the ?conspiracy? verbal accusation as a valid logically defined argument in and of itself. The logic works like this:

Conspiracy theorist says: ?You are claiming that fire alone can cause a building to self-implode, descend at freefall speed into its own footprint? That?s physically impossible, what about Newton?s Laws and laws of thermal dynamics and such? ?

Non-conspiracy theorist says: ?No, you are wrong because you are a conspiracy theorist.?

And with that, often the non-conspiracy theorist will walk away. What?s happening? They had nothing to elaborate on, so the non-conspiracy theorist - whose thinking is engineered and controlled by government, mainstream media and Hollywood entertainment - resorted to a socially engineered answer. For this reason it is fascinating to explore the mindset and psychology of the individuals who take this position in place of a logical stance.

Core defect and twisted meanings

By definition, conspiracy means a group of two or more people secretly plotting (or conspiring) a harmful (or evil) deed against another person(s). This behavior is part of human nature. Humans have been conspiring against each other since the beginning of time. There was a never a time in world history when such an elementary behavior (of conspiring against an enemy) did not exist. Can you find a period in history when a certain human emotional trait or action didn?t exist? Was there a time when the human genome didn?t express jealousy, game playing, free trading, rage, or happiness? As odd or ridiculous as this may sound, non-conspiracists unknowingly subscribe to this logic. If evidence points to a conspired crime, why not treat it as such? Why demonize the very concept of conspiring? This is a core defect in the thought process of non-conspiracy theorists. You can easily identify them by their speech.

What the non-conspiracy theorist doesn?t see is that the battlefield is right before them and they have outsourced all critical thought and action to a government thinking service known as mass media. Like being on the football field while the ball is in play, without realizing what is happening. You see people waving at you in the stands to get out of the way, but you don?t understand what they are saying so you continue walking on the field with your headset on. Likewise, non-conspiracy theorists perceive all logic and reason arguments and warnings made by the conspiracy theorist as noise. They don?t understand the warning and so they continue living and carrying on with what they are doing. Like the person on the field not understanding the warning being communicated by those in the stands, non-conspiracy theorists cannot receive the basic signals of logic and reason.

The headsets adding to the confusion is like the TV and mainstream media news. Since they themselves refuse to look at the evidence, they put their faith in the government and in the mass corporate establishment to safely guide them in their reality. They gain a sense of psychological protection from this overall system. Since the information being believed is almost always artificial they need to hear their own opinions repeated to them by the voices on TV so they can confirm (and re-confirm) their own belief system to themselves to be legitimate. At no point will the non-conspiracy theorist plan a day of research or dedicate a few hours every once in a while to research the topic or put any thought into issues.

Information and world problems are but one category in a shelf of categories that make up their lives. The non-conspiracy theorist ignores that government has always implemented social engineering and mass mind control on the general public. In order for the non-conspiracy theorist to confidently walk away from someone who challenges their belief system with scientific facts, they need to have a sustained comfort and assurance that what government and mainstream media is saying is true.

Maintaining the non-conspiracy delusion

The non-conspiracy theorist is thus profoundly psychologically interconnected with today?s mass mind control paradigm. They are a species representing a full byproduct of 21st-century social engineering. The doctrine of this type of social engineering programs its believers to believe that when government and media accuses someone of ?conspiracies? then this accusation is cause for someone being considered diseased. The symptoms being paranoia. But paranoia is based on systematized delusions and delusions are based on false beliefs. A proper exploring of meanings brings us back to proving what is true or false. We come full circle and the spin is over. Non-conspiracy theorists don?t realize they dwell in this circle of misapplied words, never exploring the meanings or doing the work to determine what is true and what is provable.

Non-conspiracy theorists therefore wake up every morning and reach for the mental orientation map known as mainstream media news. Without it they would be disoriented, as they would not know what to believe. They actually believe that if anyone was guilty of wrongdoing at the highest level of government someone would speak out every time and everyone would know about it. They ignore that state secrets are the norm and government operations are conducted in secret. They ignore the consequences each individual at the government and military level faces for blowing the whistle. Despite these consequences many individuals at government level still risk it all and do blow the whistle on government. Despite all this, the idea of maintaining State secrecy is a myth to non-conspiracy theorists. The idea that government would do something immoral, nefarious or criminal is a fiction as well to the non-conspiracy theorist.

The history of war, corruption, tyranny and fascism is incidental, coincidental, insignificant and irrelevant to the non-conspiracy theorist. None of these should be used to gauge the events of our times since history is a thing of the past. Non-conspiracy theorists choose not to connect the historical dots. According to them, there is nothing to learn from the history of tyranny and totalitarianism. Anyone attempting to connect the dots is likely a conspiracy theorist. This goes hand in hand with the logic defect we discussed earlier. As the earlier case of the conspiracy theorist having his scientific arguments debunked by virtue of simply being diseased with the accusation of conspiracy theorist. Note, the non-conspiracy theorists use the name as a loaded, proven concept with power to permanently label someone diseased. In this case, attempting to connect the dots automatically tags you as a conspiracy theorist.

As far as non-conspiracy theorists are concerned, all critical thought is deferred to the authorities. The scientists do their work and then report the facts to the government and mainstream media who carefully announce to the masses what they should know. Any scientists who speak out and claim to have evidence contradicting government claims must first be endorsed and approved by the mainstream media and government. Without this approval the scientists are marginalized no matter how large their numbers are. Without these ridiculous rules the delusion of being a non-conspiracy theorists cannot be maintained. This is the psychology of tyranny. Tyranny and totalitarianism cannot be implemented without mass mind control. This dangerous group-think mentality will ignore all warning signs to help continue advancing the agenda. And so the non-conspiracy theorist is the most important instrument for maintaining control of the masses. Without these non-conspiracy theorist vessels of the global empire, the plan would not be possible.

It is quite possible that years from now the concept of conspiracy will return back to where it belongs right next to other concepts like jealousy, laughter, love, stealing, fighting, friendship, hatred and other human expressions that define who we are. By then perhaps being a friendship theorist, a stealing theorist or a jealousy theorist will be the new propaganda bogey monster term. Or perhaps years from now we will be sick and tired of this vicious cycle of physical and mental slavery. Perhaps people will truly have enough of the control system and will have abolished it by then.


Article continued http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/...onspiracy.html

[Wellness Cash]

So sane people are all nutjobs, as written by a nutjob.

Thanks for that useless conspiracy theorist propaganda.

[dyna mo]

Very few people fall into the category of "conspiracy theorists are wrong because they are conspiracy theorists".

[BFT3K]

I'm of the camp that agrees with this article's sentiment.

Phrases like "anti-semite" and "conspiracy theorist" are always used to misdirect and diminish more complicated matters.

Dismissing something as a "conspiracy theory" gives cover to those who do not want further investigation.

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

ADG

[Sly]

Originally Posted by BFT3K

I'm of the camp that agrees with this article's sentiment.

Phrases like "anti-semite" and "conspiracy theorist" are always used to misdirect and diminish more complicated matters.

Dismissing something as a "conspiracy theory" gives cover to those who do not want further investigation.

Fox News.

Koch Brothers.

Red State.

[BFT3K]

Just a few, that were proven true...

http://listverse.com/2013/05/02/10-n...s-proven-true/

[Jel]

that article shows the mind of conspiracy theorists, and why rational argument, and logic, goes out the window. Everyone not on board 100% must be a non-conspiracy theorist. No wonder you have such a bad name for yourselves.

[BFT3K]

[Barry-xlovecam]

Sounds like an insanity defense case argument that didn't succeed to me

[seeandsee]

When you have people believe in many conspiracy and also people saying almost nothing is conspiracy, you have same people with plus and minus in their heads

[EddyTheDog]

I think boils down to the 'Is the glass half fall or half empty?' question...

Conspiracy theorists are pessimists.....

[BFT3K]

[VikingMan]

History has been shaped by those who realized the masses are basically just blithering idiots mostly concerned with their own comfort who can be easily controlled with a little bit of food/money/entertainment. If anyone could travel back in time and go around warning people that smoking cigs would cause lung cancer, tumors, hearing loss, etc etc etc they would be called crazy. If you could travel back in time and warn people that the lead in their paint would cause health problems people would call you crazy. Same with a long list of other issues that are now common knowledge.

The really funny thing is that with issues like fluoride the morons continue to call you crazy even though the American Dental Association and Centers for Disease Control validated the anti-fluoride movement by recommending a large reduction in the amount added to water supplies because so many kids were showing signs of fluorisis. Harvard even came out and said it was linked to lower IQ in kids. Yet the zombies still try to argue with you. Unbelievable.

It does not matter if the truth is admitted on network news. An idea has to be repeated over and over and over again for the average modern day zombie to get it in his thick head.

[The Sultan Of Smut]

It depends on the event but at times the vast majority of any population won't believe the official story so actually the non-conspiracy theorists are the conspiracy theorists. A lot of people have a distrust of government and rightfully so. Governments consistently lie to get into power and there is no reason to expect that behaviour to subside when they are trying to maintain power.

What's interesting there is a fairly consistent percent of the population that will believe the government's story no matter what. Now THAT is crazy.

[Wellness Cash]

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut

What's interesting there is a fairly consistent percent of the population that will believe the government's story no matter what. Now THAT is crazy.

We call those people 'Republicans' and 'Tea Baggers'.

[baddog]

This place was so much better without that dickhead posting

[noshit]

Originally Posted by baddog

This place was so much better without that dickhead posting

Never understood your anti-wehateporn comments? I musta missed a thread or two?
All I see him posting is reality, that everybody should appreciate; and I look forward to his posts

[Rochard]

I love the 9/11 conversations.

The way the buildings fell does look suspicious. But if you think about it for a moment, it all makes perfect sense. Between the plane impact(s) and resulting fire(s), it's pretty obvious that the structure was weakened and unable to support the weight above the damaged sections.

But it's pretty easy to poke wholes in the official story of any large events - all you have to do is ask the right questions. I am front of my TV right now watching CNN which is taking about the King assassination and they are saying a witness "saw a man in a white hoodie on the street at the moment King was shot. So? There were hundreds of people around that morning that had nothing to do with the shooting. Another witness says it wasn't James Earl Jones "running from the bathroom after the shots were fired". And your point is? There must have been dozens of people in that hotel that day where the shots were fired from, and when the shots were fired... People fled. It surely doesn't mean that James Earl Jones was innocent. But if you keep asking the questions, you keep putting doubt in people's minds.

[2MuchMark]

The article posted by wehateporn misses the mark. I'm not an "Anti Conspiracy theorist". I am a Critical Thinker.

When someone talks about a conspiracy, I let them give me the broad strokes at first, but when the details start coming in to play, thats when critical thinking comes into play.

The 9/11 Conspiracy theories are all very interesting, but some of them, such as the "demolition" arguments, fail when you think about them with a critical eye. Same goes for the "Fake moon landing" CS'ers, and the variant, "Stanley Kubrick Faked the moon landing footage".

The main thing about conspiracy theorists is that they start with an idea, and then follow only the leads that support the original idea, and dismiss the leads that dismiss it. This is the exact opposite of critical thinking.

[noshit]

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut

What's interesting there is a fairly consistent percent of the population that will believe the government's story no matter what. Now THAT is crazy.

Originally Posted by Wellness Cash

We call those people 'Republicans' and 'Tea Baggers'.

WoW damn! Do the rest of your 'We' group spend as much time waking up to the criminal takeover of the USA as you?

[Minte]

Originally Posted by Rochard

I love the 9/11 conversations.

The way the buildings fell does look suspicious. But if you think about it for a moment, it all makes perfect sense. Between the plane impact(s) and resulting fire(s), it's pretty obvious that the structure was weakened and unable to support the weight above the damaged sections.

But it's pretty easy to poke wholes in the official story of any large events - all you have to do is ask the right questions. I am front of my TV right now watching CNN which is taking about the King assassination and they are saying a witness "saw a man in a white hoodie on the street at the moment King was shot. So? There were hundreds of people around that morning that had nothing to do with the shooting. Another witness says it wasn't James Earl Jones "running from the bathroom after the shots were fired". And your point is? There must have been dozens of people in that hotel that day where the shots were fired from, and when the shots were fired... People fled. It surely doesn't mean that James Earl Jones was innocent. But if you keep asking the questions, you keep putting doubt in people's minds.

James Earl Ray

[2MuchMark]

A little more on the subject...

Yesterday I watched a movie called Room 237. It is described as "An exploration of various interpretations of Stanley Kubrick's horror film, The Shining (1980)."



http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2085910/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

I was really looking forward to seeing this film because I thought it would teach me something new about one of my favourite horror films.

Instead though, it is 90 minutes of conspiracy theory nonsense. The narrator of this "documentary" starts with a description of the "extreme terror" he had sitting down to watch the movie, and then takes every strange idea he had and finds reasons for them to be there. He even goes out of his way to use continuity errors in the movie to further his crazy ideas. Instead of being critical of obvious continuity errors, he uses them to further his ideas.

It does have some cool ideas such as the "Impossible Room" (Manager's office has windows where none should be, etc) and they are fun to talk about, but thats about it.

[noshit]

Originally Posted by Rochard

I am front of my TV right now watching CNN

That's just one problem ...with your whole cockeyed, non-reality, lieing establishment loving views

[mineistaken]

You had 9999 posts. Its a conspiracy they are now down to 9997.

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

Originally Posted by Rochard

There were hundreds of people around that morning that had nothing to do with the shooting. Another witness says it wasn't James Earl Jones "running from the bathroom after the shots were fired". And your point is?

There must have been dozens of people in that hotel that day where the shots were fired from, and when the shots were fired... People fled. It surely doesn't mean that James Earl Jones was innocent. But if you keep asking the questions, you keep putting doubt in people's minds.

I think you have your James Earl's wrong.



I wonder what John Wayne would do/say?









ADG

[kane]

I heard a great conspiracy theory yesterday.

The Chinese are slowly sabotaging our economy by sending over their citizens and placing them in large cities. They instruct these people to purposely drive poorly so they cause traffic problems, slow down transportation and thus cost our economy money.

[Wellness Cash]

Originally Posted by Minte

James Earl Ray

You never know, that might have been how James Earl Jones got his big break in acting lol

[Wellness Cash]

Originally Posted by kane

They instruct these people to purposely drive poorly so they cause traffic problems, slow down transportation and thus cost our economy money.

I think you might be confusing that with the Chris Christie 'Bridge Gate' smear campaign by the Democrats.

[kane]

Originally Posted by Wellness Cash

I think you might be confusing that with the Chris Christie 'Bridge Gate' smear campaign by the Democrats.

In all fairness (I don't care about democrats or republicans) it looks like there is plenty of shit to smear around in that particular case.

Not that I think it will end up mattering. By the time people announce that they are running for the 2016 presidential election this will be long since forgotten.

[Phoenix]

Originally Posted by baddog

This place was so much better without that dickhead posting

[bronco67]

This article is a glimpse into the bubble those whackos live in. It basically tries to show conspiracy theorists as the normal people. If it was satire, it would be brilliant -- but it's not, so that just makes it disturbing.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by **********

The 9/11 Conspiracy theories are all very interesting, but some of them, such as the "demolition" arguments, fail when you think about them with a critical eye.

Here's one for you... If the buildings were wired up with explosives, why didn't they just blow them up the moment the planes hit?

Originally Posted by Minte

James Earl Ray

Yeah, I was writing my post while watching TV while talking to the wife.

Originally Posted by noshit

That's just one problem ...with your whole cockeyed, non-reality, lieing establishment loving views

I am realist. I call things as I see them. And I am not always right.

With 9/11, all of the little arguments do not add up. On top of that, no one can say "who did it" no less why.

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Here's one for you... If the buildings were wired up with explosives, why didn't they just blow them up the moment the planes hit?



.

Anyone who entertains the idea that the World Trade Center could be rigged to blow in secrecy doesn't even have a layman's knowledge of what's involved. Just doing one of the buildings would be an astounding feat, and it would have been pulled off by a group of people who couldn't even plant some WMD's in the desert before they went looking for them.

[JockoHomo]

Originally Posted by bronco67

Anyone who entertains the idea that the World Trade Center could be rigged to blow in secrecy doesn't even have a layman's knowledge of what's involved. Just doing one of the buildings would be an astounding feat, and it would have been pulled off by a group of people who couldn't even plant some WMD's in the desert before they went looking for them.

And yet...they did manage to locate a single 4" x 5" paper page of a passport at the World Trade Center site among 100's of metric tons of rubble that just happened to belong to one of the alleged terrorists.

Many rational critical thinkers would look at the statistic probability of that occurring and start to think of other possibilities...

[TNVeric]

You conspiracy guys wonder why we ridicule you?

Please give us what you think the minimum number of government employees from dozens of different and sometimes competing agencies including firemen, policemen, jews, norad, nead, cia, nsa, fbi, tsa, faa, mayors, police chiefs, air force pilots, trade center lease holders, airline workers, white house staff, mosad, illuminati, trilateral commission, bilderbergs, masons, cbs, abc, bbc, cnn, usa today, fox, dia, pentagon, air traffic controllers, and fema, would required to pull off the SEPTEMBER 11 attacks

Now whatever number you come up with know that the number of leaks from all those agencies = 0.

You say finding a passport page is impossible but this makes sense to you????

[idolbucks]

Seems like a waste of time to sit around and do this

[CaptainHowdy]

[Best-In-BC]

If you wanna see what a true out look looks like on this subject, go watch Joe Rogan and Brian Dunning, you will see Joe vs a idiot skpetic .

Here

[Jel]

Originally Posted by TNVeric

You say finding a passport page is impossible but this makes sense to you????

They seem to honestly believe the passport page was the *only* thing found, rather than just 1 thing amongst thousands.

How is it so impossible that with hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of man hours, that the passport page would be amongst all the items sifted through in forensics? "we retrieved nothing whatsoever other than this passport page" would be pretty hard to swallow, but they seemed to have latched onto that mis-statement, as fact, and go around spewing how astronimical that would be, when that isn't even the case.

As has been said - they latch onto 1 train of thought, and fail to see anything else. Yet we are the sheep - even though 99% of us 'non conspiracy theorists' have a very healthy, reality-based dose of mistrust (Rochard excepted ) towards the govt, etc.

[MrBottomTooth]

Originally Posted by noshit

Never understood your anti-wehateporn comments? I musta missed a thread or two?
All I see him posting is reality, that everybody should appreciate; and I look forward to his posts

Reality? That's the problem. If he posted something that might have a chance of being legitimate, he ruined it by posting as many articles that are obviously complete rubbish. So no one ends up taking anything he posts as serious.

Real Dragon spotted over England.
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1124287

Real Santa photos captured
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1129380

Spirits in photos
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1125798

Humans do not come from earth
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1126238

Typhoons caused by microwave pulse
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1125782

[BlackCrayon]

Originally Posted by noshit

That's just one problem ...with your whole cockeyed, non-reality, lieing establishment loving views

yeah 25 year old bloggers posting out of their parents basement or run down apartment are a much more reliable source.

[PR_Glen]

Originally Posted by Best-In-BC

If you wanna see what a true out look looks like on this subject, go watch Joe Rogan and Brian Dunning, you will see Joe vs a idiot skpetic .

Here

finally... some perspective from pothead celebrities..

[JockoHomo]

Originally Posted by Jel

They seem to honestly believe the passport page was the *only* thing found, rather than just 1 thing amongst thousands.

How is it so impossible that with hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of man hours, that the passport page would be amongst all the items sifted through in forensics? "we retrieved nothing whatsoever other than this passport page" would be pretty hard to swallow, but they seemed to have latched onto that mis-statement, as fact, and go around spewing how astronimical that would be, when that isn't even the case.

As has been said - they latch onto 1 train of thought, and fail to see anything else. Yet we are the sheep - even though 99% of us 'non conspiracy theorists' have a very healthy, reality-based dose of mistrust (Rochard excepted ) towards the govt, etc.

NO vacant cunt head...I do NOT think nor did I state that it was the only item found. I sure they found used tampons from the ladies room on the 52nd floor as well however...

I said that finding the single page of a passport from an alleged hijacker that would first have to survive the initial impact...the manage to continue to survive throughout the long fire...and then continue to survive the collapse of the entire building...and then be found are statistically improbable and cause one to wonder - You understand what I said.

You need to cling to the entire story that you refuse to notice the light showing through the cracks but then again you sheep never question what you are told -

[Jel]

Originally Posted by JockoHomo

NO vacant cunt head...I do NOT think nor did I state that it was the only item found. I sure they found used tampons from the ladies room on the 52nd floor as well however...

I said that finding the single page of a passport from an alleged hijacker that would first have to survive the initial impact...the manage to continue to survive throughout the long fire...and then continue to survive the collapse of the entire building...and then be found are statistically improbable and cause one to wonder - You understand what I said.

You need to cling to the entire story that you refuse to notice the light showing through the cracks but then again you sheep never question what you are told -

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by Jel

it's a typical ct spin. To take wonderment about something and turn it into a smoking gun.

I wonder how they found that? Therefore, it must have been planted which means this was an inside job. If you can't embrace how my wonderment turns to conspiracy you're a sheep.


Logic!

[BFT3K]

If someone came by here a year ago, and stated that the government (NSA) could monitor computers, even when they are not online, that person would have been called a "conspiracy theorist" and people would have posted jokes and tinfoil hat wearing images, etc.

It used to take decades for government secrets to leak out, now it takes much less time...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...s-report-says/

Even larger TRUTHS will be revealed soon, but considering how people react to ANYTHING these days, nothing will come of it.

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

Originally Posted by BFT3K

If someone came by here a year ago, and stated that the government (NSA) could monitor computers, even when they are not online, that person would have been called a "conspiracy theorist" and people would have posted jokes and tinfoil hat wearing images, etc.

It used to take decades for government secrets to leak out, now it takes much less time...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...s-report-says/

Even larger TRUTHS will be revealed soon, but considering how people react to ANYTHING these days, nothing will come of it.

I'm amazed that some people were clueless that anything they put on a networked computer could potentially be compromised.













ADG

[PaperstreetWinston]

Originally Posted by Sly

Fox News.

Koch Brothers.

Red State.

all theorists lol

[BFT3K]

It is only a conspiracy theory until it is proven to be true...



Sometimes it just takes a while to peel the layers back.

9/11 will be no different.