OK, Who The Fuck Thinks The Google/Blogger Thing Was A Fucking Publicity Stunt!!

[Rik Lear]

I'm feeling that this is just a little too fishy.

Smell it?

Major headlines across the board on major media networks?

Motherfuckers. (...or not?)

I'm thinking about the repercussions, and their public statement about .."no commercial porn though.." (i.e. affiliate outbound)

meh

[gnawledge]

I believe the majority of you cheep folks putting all eggs in one basket can now relax and take creamier shits now.

[oppoten]

Yep, I was thinking the same.

There's no way they'd cave in to user pressure if the orders came from above.

[Rik Lear]

Originally Posted by oppoten

Yep, I was thinking the same.

There's no way they'd cave in to user pressure if the orders came from above.

EXACTLY. I'm telling you, there is NO way that they would do this. What made it obvious to me was the immediate PRESS release. It was too close to the announcement of banning to begin with. Fucking idiots.

It's in the way they worded the release, and the message they sent to the end user.

".. NO MORE COMMERCIAL PORN! We'll UP the security monitoring for affiliate links... Yada, yada, yada...

What the fuck does that mean?

So it's OK to post your own porn, but not as affils. Hah. Personally, I think it's a way of driving traffic to Blogger over-fucking-night.

And so the Revenge Porn guy gets 7 years in prison, and now all the husbands around the Net are going to head over to Blogger.

Good tactic against Mangeek. I know they're loving this when fucking Google gets an idea to steal traffic away from them in a PR stint that went waaaay obviously bad.

[Markul]

Not much has changed if you think about it.

Before: Artistic porn was allowed.
Now: Artistic and non-commercial porn is allowed.

[Rik Lear]

Originally Posted by Markul

Not much has changed if you think about it.

Before: Artistic porn was allowed.
Now: Artistic and non-commercial porn is allowed.

I agree Markul, but wtf is non-commercial porn these days. It's fucking comical.

Define "Non-Commercial" and I think Amateur. And then I think stolen Selfie Porn... hahah

It's becoming a very fine line, especially - as mentioned above - about Revenge guy getting 7 years in a box, and who REALLY knows if it was just husbands living their fantasies posting their wives 20/40% of the time without their knowledge?

Igor has been doing that with Voyeurweb since its inception. That's what VW & RC was about!

Fucking bullshit if you ask me.

We are at a major turning point - IMO - online, and all hell is breaking loose. A change is in the air. I fucking know it.




.

[Markul]

I doubt much will change, but non-commercial content is stuff that isn't published with the intent of making money. So I guess that's 99,9% of all porn posted online.

Exhibitionists and artists are allowed I guess. We'll see how this all pans out

[oppoten]

It's in the Daily Mail

Google u-turn on porn ban as it allows bloggers to show X-rated material | Daily Mail Online

[Captain Kawaii]

It seems from the Violet Blue comments and the Google people they are interested in keeping adult "creatives" just not Adult spammers.

[CurrentlySober]

Originally Posted by gnawledge

relax and take creamier shits now.