Nuclear winter. Are you ready?

[Sid70]

Russia starts nationwide show of force | Reuters

[Barry-xlovecam]

This was posted 3 hours ago ...
NATO In Military Exercise Across Water From Crimean Peninsula

Saber rattling and not an attack ...

[TeenCat]

nobody is, the most fun is that those idiots who are preparing will be the biggest danger for the rest of humans and humanity, fucking animals ...

[2MuchMark]

Pooty can't afford sabre rattling right now.

And then there's this: Putin's tombstone unveiled in Kiev | Video | Reuters.com

[brassmonkey]

sure if it will make the heat go away you do know that is a theory and not fact right?? they said y2k eggs were bad 4 u blah blah blah get a tinfoil hat build a bomb shelter.

[dyna mo]

i predict a nuke detonation within 3 years. prolly in Europe, maybe in USA.

[seeandsee]

Lets do it

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i predict a nuke detonation within 3 years. prolly in Europe, maybe in USA.

That would be a game changer.

If we could point a finger at any country that sets off a nuke in the US, you can bet the general public will be 100% behind sending in troops. It would be an all out kind of thing, similar to how the US population felt during WWII.

[Captain Kawaii]

Tickets for the Snowpiercer are going fast. Grab yours fast or its in the tail for you.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Rochard

That would be a game changer.

If we could point a finger at any country that sets off a nuke in the US, you can bet the general public will be 100% behind sending in troops. It would be an all out kind of thing, similar to how the US population felt during WWII.

Military doctrine calls for an eye for an eye appropriate exchange. If a nuke went off in the US and for a second they thought it was the work of Russia. You can damn sure bet nukes would go off in Russia. Sending troops wouldn't be the question, that's just how it works.. You should know that as ex military.

Also you can bet that if Nato troops invaded Russia as a result, that Russia would retaliate with nukes. Then it would go gang busters and tribal people living in the outskirts of nowhere would be the winners. I really don't think Russia or the US or any other country is dumb enough to use nukes in this day & age. They don't call it mutual assured destruction for no reason. It's the reason we try so hard to keep the absolute nut case countries from having nukes because countries like NK might actually use them..

[Dead]

Are we going to die...Again?

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by crockett

Military doctrine calls for an eye for an eye appropriate exchange. If a nuke went off in the US and for a second they thought it was the work of Russia. You can damn sure bet nukes would go off in Russia. Sending troops wouldn't be the question, that's just how it works.. You should know that as ex military.

Also you can bet that if Nato troops invaded Russia as a result, that Russia would retaliate with nukes. Then it would go gang busters and tribal people living in the outskirts of nowhere would be the winners. I really don't think Russia or the US or any other country is dumb enough to use nukes in this day & age. They don't call it mutual assured destruction for no reason. It's the reason we try so hard to keep the absolute nut case countries from having nukes because countries like NK might actually use them..

I'm not so sure about that. you sound as if nuclear retailation is a foregone conclusion and knowing what i know about military strategy, there are always several different scenarios planned out to choose from.


the other problem with this is you can count on ANY nuke device detonating being from Russia, not necc. directly, but some of that [unaccounted for] Russian nuclear material will ultimately get to the wrong people and they will make a dirty nuke out of it, which i think is more certain than a thermonuclear or wtf ever the mushroom cloud one is.

but yeah, terrorists, with the money they are acquiring, will get nuclear material at some point.

[Dead]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

I'm not so sure about that. you sound as if nuclear retailation is a foregone conclusion and knowing what i know about military strategy, there are always several different scenarios planned out to choose from.


the other problem with this is you can count on ANY nuke device detonating being from Russia, not necc. directly, but some of that [unaccounted for] Russian nuclear material will ultimately get to the wrong people and they will make a dirty nuke out of it, which i think is more certain than a thermonuclear or wtf ever the mushroom cloud one is.

but yeah, terrorists, with the money they are acquiring, will get nuclear material at some point.

Will get??? that's cute.........

[brassmonkey]

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii

Tickets for the Snowpiercer are going fast. Grab yours fast or its in the tail for you.

the secret ingredient "eat them while their still warm"

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

I'm not so sure about that. you sound as if nuclear retailation is a foregone conclusion and knowing what i know about military strategy, there are always several different scenarios planned out to choose from.


the other problem with this is you can count on ANY nuke device detonating being from Russia, not necc. directly, but some of that [unaccounted for] Russian nuclear material will ultimately get to the wrong people and they will make a dirty nuke out of it, which i think is more certain than a thermonuclear or wtf ever the mushroom cloud one is.

but yeah, terrorists, with the money they are acquiring, will get nuclear material at some point.

Well that would be the trick, to make it appear as if it wasn't them, but when the dust settled, we would know by the signature of the bomb where it came from. The thing is Russia wouldn't be dumb enough to do it in the US, they would pick a low tier Nato ally.

There are certain reasons we don't listen to hardliner war mongers like John McCain or Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu. Both would get the world blown up.

It's like in Ukraine.. It's not Nato being weak allowing Russia to do what it wants. It's Nato being smart and understanding what full support could trigger and is Ukraine worth that. Ukraine tried to play both sides of the coin, they tried to be buddy buddy and not upset Russia while trying to cuddle up to Nato. They are not a clear or trusted ally therefore they are not worth the risk of all out war.

This worked against them, and Russia pounced on it. Russia in the mean time gets one step forward while taking 2 steps backwards. Ukraine was not worth the escalation risk for Nato but it was a great way to weaken Russia economy. Russia gains a military base and in the process further isolates it's self and seriously harms it's economy.

Nato wouldn't allow the same to a Nato member and Russia knows not to step over that line, just like Nato understands not to step over the line by sticking troops in Ukraine.

It's all a chess game and a nuke going off by way of Russia in the US or any core members of Nato isn't gonna happen.

[SBJ]

Is this a game? or is it for real?

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i predict a nuke detonation within 3 years. prolly in Europe, maybe in USA.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by SBJ

Is this a game? or is it for real?

It's a game.

Check out DEFCON - Introversion software





And also this:

Global Thermonuclear War - Shall We Play a Game?


Enjoy!

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by crockett

Well that would be the trick, to make it appear as if it wasn't them, but when the dust settled, we would know by the signature of the bomb where it came from. The thing is Russia wouldn't be dumb enough to do it in the US, they would pick a low tier Nato ally.

There are certain reasons we don't listen to hardliner war mongers like John McCain or Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu. Both would get the world blown up.

It's like in Ukraine.. It's not Nato being weak allowing Russia to do what it wants. It's Nato being smart and understanding what full support could trigger and is Ukraine worth that. Ukraine tried to play both sides of the coin, they tried to be buddy buddy and not upset Russia while trying to cuddle up to Nato. They are not a clear or trusted ally therefore they are not worth the risk of all out war.

This worked against them, and Russia pounced on it. Russia in the mean time gets one step forward while taking 2 steps backwards. Ukraine was not worth the escalation risk for Nato but it was a great way to weaken Russia economy. Russia gains a military base and in the process further isolates it's self and seriously harms it's economy.

Nato wouldn't allow the same to a Nato member and Russia knows not to step over that line, just like Nato understands not to step over the line by sticking troops in Ukraine.

It's all a chess game and a nuke going off by way of Russia in the US or any core members of Nato isn't gonna happen.

there's a reason ukraine is not in NATO. I believe they've been denied more than once.

you make a solid observation though, russia would never have to release a nuke directly, they could simply get materials to terrorists, etc, a nuke is a nuke.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by **********

have you seen the reports on the unaccounted for nuclear materials in Russia/eastern europe/europe since the USSR broke up? it's a staggering #.


P.S. the debbie downer thing works better with a youtube, so you can get the wah wahh part too!

[pornmasta]

Originally Posted by Sid70

Russia starts nationwide show of force | Reuters

just move to portugal and don't buy this iphone 6

[RummyBoy]

UKRAINE can slip into Nuclear War - well said by John Browne:



Im suspicious that CyberSEO disappeared at the same time as Putin....

[just a punk]