[SEO] Ahrefs vs. Majestic - GoFuckYourself.com

AdultSites · 04-29-2015, 01:31 AM

Ahrefs or Majestic, which one is better? I am only asking about current links. I know that Majestic has a Historic Index, which can be a plus for them, but it does not matter. I am only interested in the current links.

CurrentlySober · 04-29-2015, 01:37 AM

Barry-xlovecam · 04-29-2015, 05:11 AM

Both are easy to block at the firewall or from server request access

trevesty · 04-29-2015, 08:21 AM

Use what webmaster tools shows. What Google sees as links to your site(s) is all that matters.

Between those 2, though, it's just a matter of preference. Both are good.

SpyCam · 04-29-2015, 12:07 PM

Serious SEOs use all sources: GWT, ahrefs, majestic, open site explorer and some others.

GWT doesn't show all links. If it doesn't see some of them today, but the links exist, it will see them tomorrow, if it's not too late...

rowan · 04-29-2015, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Both are easy to block at the firewall or from server request access

Something that Majestic's crawling software does manages to push my httpd process to 100%. This is not a runaway PHP script that gets killed off 60 seconds later - the process stays at 100%, until I manually kill it. Doesn't happen all the time, but when it does, a Majestic user-agent is involved. I still haven't figured out WHAT they're sending that triggers it.

It's a little troubling that a couple of non-malicious fetches from my web server manages to effortlessly DoS it.

CPA-Rush · 04-29-2015, 06:37 PM

how many of you tried monitorbacklinks ? i need some advice before the end of my free trial

SpyCam · 04-30-2015, 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CPA-Rush

how many of you tried monitorbacklinks ? i need some advice before the end of my free trial

Why spam your ref code?

CPA-Rush · 04-30-2015, 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpyCam

Why spam your ref code?

04-29-2015, 01:31 AM	#1
AdultSites Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 203	[SEO] Ahrefs vs. Majestic Ahrefs or Majestic, which one is better? I am only asking about current links. I know that Majestic has a Historic Index, which can be a plus for them, but it does not matter. I am only interested in the current links.

04-29-2015, 01:37 AM	#2
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,179	__________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

04-29-2015, 06:37 PM	#7
CPA-Rush small trip to underworld Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: first gen intel 80386/nintendo-gb/arcade/ps1/internet person Posts: 4,927	how many of you tried monitorbacklinks ? i need some advice before the end of my free trial __________________ automatic exchange - paxum , bitcoin,pm, payza . daizzzy signbucks caution will black-hat black-hat your traffic ignored forever :zuzana designs {firefox- remove some posters \|skills#1\|skills#2\| email >[email protected] } ツ

04-29-2015, 05:11 AM	#3
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Both are easy to block at the firewall or from server request access

04-29-2015, 08:21 AM	#4
trevesty Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Midwest Posts: 3,792	Use what webmaster tools shows. What Google sees as links to your site(s) is all that matters. Between those 2, though, it's just a matter of preference. Both are good.

04-29-2015, 12:07 PM	#5
SpyCam PoiSEO.com Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: PoiSEO.com Posts: 1,201	Serious SEOs use all sources: GWT, ahrefs, majestic, open site explorer and some others. GWT doesn't show all links. If it doesn't see some of them today, but the links exist, it will see them tomorrow, if it's not too late...