New O.J. mini series, just in time for Black History month.

[LovinNothin]

Hilarious.

You gotta hand it to those racist old Jewish Hollywood producers.

Finishing production and releasing a new high end O.J. Simpson mini series "just in time" for Black History month.

So far the first episode was very interesting and the series looks very promising. Plus, they are screening the episodes at least 3 times a day on the first run and a few more times during the week. Simply, the series will be on all the time.

Gotta love the timing of it all. The Jews really know how to stick it when they want to.

I can just see all the producer's sitting around a big table, "So Herschel, when shall we release our new mini series?" Oye, how about during Black History month?" Ahhahahahahahaha Sounds good to me!

Shalom mother fuckers!

[J. Falcon]

He was innocent, right?

[Horatio Caine]

Brassmonkey be pissed, dogg.

[Rob]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

He was innocent, right?

He was found innocent in criminal court, but guilty in civil court. Now someone explain to me how that works!?!? They said they're allowed to present more evidence in civil court to prove negligence or guilt. Shouldn't it be the other way around?

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by Rob

He was found innocent in criminal court, but guilty in civil court. Now someone explain to me how that works!?!? They said they're allowed to present more evidence in civil court to prove negligence or guilt. Shouldn't it be the other way around?

Yea, being tried more than once is fucked up. In fact you can be tried 3 times for the same crime, state, federal, civil ...

[Yanks_Todd]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Yea, being tried more than once is fucked up. In fact you can be tried 3 times for the same crime, state, federal, civil ...

I have never quite gotten that. I think that once you are tried and found innocent in the criminal sense you shouldn't be allowed to be sued. Odd really

[atom]

Originally Posted by Rob

He was found innocent in criminal court, but guilty in civil court. Now someone explain to me how that works!?!? They said they're allowed to present more evidence in civil court to prove negligence or guilt. Shouldn't it be the other way around?

State was going after him for double homicide. To find him guilty the jury needed have "beyond a reasonable doubt" The prosecution totally fucked that case. It was theirs for the taking.

The Brown family sued him in Civil court for monetary damages. You do not have the burden of proof in Civil court that you do in State or Federal.

I did find it funny they released this series at the start of Black History Month. So far it is pretty good.

[poncabare]

Originally Posted by atom

State was going after him for double homicide. To find him guilty the jury needed have "beyond a reasonable doubt" The prosecution totally fucked that case. It was theirs for the taking.

The Brown family sued him in Civil court for monetary damages. You do not have the burden of proof in Civil court that you do in State or Federal.

I did find it funny they released this series at the start of Black History Month. So far it is pretty good.

Goldmans and browns sued together I thought

[atom]

Originally Posted by poncabare

Goldmans and browns sued together I thought

Yep, I think you are correct.

[#23]

The Juice is Loose

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by LovinNothin

You gotta hand it to those racist old Jewish Hollywood producers.

Damn, another "dass waciss" touter on GFY?

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Rob

He was found innocent in criminal court, but guilty in civil court.

Black privilege!

[LovinNothin]

After the criminal trial, they found a photograph of O.J. wearing the exact same unique and very expensive Italian shoes that left the imprints in blood at the murder site. IF they only had that evidence at the criminal trial, it would be done and done. They used that evidence at the civil trial and was an easy victory.

O.J. bought these pricey Italian shoes that left the bloody tracks. This is what sealed the deal. And they have a picture of him in the same shoes at a sporting event.

It's not like they were Nike's or something common. Very pricey and very unique.

Without a doubt, the Juice is guilty.

Pic of him at Bill's game wearing the shoes.
O.J. Simpson?s Infamous Shoes: The Real Story Behind His Bruno Maglis | Footwear News

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by LovinNothin

It's not like they were Nike's or something common. Very pricey and very unique.

but wouldn't both shoes be treated the same in courts? Unless there was only 1 pair of those shoes made. So either 100 pairs or 1000000 pairs - courts should treat it the same, as not an actual proof.
GFY lawyers?

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by LovinNothin

After the criminal trial, they found a photograph of O.J. wearing the exact same unique and very expensive Italian shoes that left the imprints in blood at the murder site. IF they only had that evidence at the criminal trial, it would be done and done. They used that evidence at the civil trial and was an easy victory.

O.J. bought these pricey Italian shoes that left the bloody tracks. This is what sealed the deal. And they have a picture of him in the same shoes at a sporting event.

It's not like they were Nike's or something common. Very pricey and very unique.

Without a doubt, the Juice is guilty.

Pic of him at Bill's game wearing the shoes.
O.J. Simpson?s Infamous Shoes: The Real Story Behind His Bruno Maglis | Footwear News

The shoe that matches that print doesn't even look like the shoe OJ wore in the picture where it was claimed he wore Bruno Magli Lorenzo boots.


Bruno Magli Lorenzo boots :


What the prosecution claims are those shoes :




On the real, most brothers wouldn't wear those ugly ass Lorenzo boots.


.

[Juicy D. Links]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

The shoe that matches that print doesn't even look like the shoe OJ wore in the picture where it was claimed he wore Bruno Magli Lorenzo boots.


Bruno Magli Lorenzo boots :


What the prosecution claims are those shoes :




On the real, most brothers wouldn't wear those ugly ass Lorenzo boots.


.

OJ dinduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu nuffins?

[escorpio]

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links

OJ dinduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu nuffins?

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links

OJ dinduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu nuffins?

Go make a pizza greaseball.

[sandman!]

[LovinNothin]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

but wouldn't both shoes be treated the same in courts? Unless there was only 1 pair of those shoes made. So either 100 pairs or 1000000 pairs - courts should treat it the same, as not an actual proof.
GFY lawyers?

From the site:

â??There were only 200 pairs of size 12 Bruno Magli Lorenzo boots imported into the U.S. and Bloomingdales was one of only about five retailers to carry it, so the odds were against [him],â?� Poser said.

They never found the shoes. Even though they have a pic of him wearing the shoes, the shoes are "missing." LOL

I'd say those odds were very good. A man with the same foot size, same rare shoe, made tracks in blood at the scene? Toss in ALL the other evidence, my God.
If this was a regular man, they would've thrown away the key. His demeanor during the interviews was also highly suspect. Changing his story and laughing out of pure stress and nervousness.

I think O.J. will confess before he dies. They all do. Once last attempt to clear your conscience and soul before the big one.

[LovinNothin]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

The shoe that matches that print doesn't even look like the shoe OJ wore in the picture where it was claimed he wore Bruno Magli Lorenzo boots.


Bruno Magli Lorenzo boots :


What the prosecution claims are those shoes :




On the real, most brothers wouldn't wear those ugly ass Lorenzo boots.


.

He's not wearing boots. They are shoes.

[LovinNothin]

Footprints, missing shoes, bloody gloves, blood in the bronco, O.J. fleeing the scene before arrest, strange behavior and motif. How much more evidence of guilt do people need? It's funny how we only see what we want to see.

[Rochard]

I think he was guilty as sin. I don't see any way around it. The legal system favors the rich.

In the end he got his and he is in prison.

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by LovinNothin

Footprints, missing shoes, bloody gloves, blood in the bronco, O.J. fleeing the scene before arrest, strange behavior and motif. How much more evidence of guilt do people need? It's funny how we only see what we want to see.

OJ Simpson's Son Jason May Have Killed Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson - Business Insider

Hearing this guy lay it all out is pretty interesting. This video deosn't even get to all the huge pile of facts about his son. Simpson among many other things hired a defense attorney for his son immediately after the killings, has an incredibly violent past, has attacked others with knives, on meds to control rage etc etc etc

There was a long detailed article on business insider listing out all the facts and it was definitely eye opening.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by LovinNothin

He's not wearing boots. They are shoes.

Yeah, exactly!

The bloody foot print was made by the boot pictured in my post.

The prosecution claims OJ is wearing the boots in the other picture and he clearly is not.
This is the only proof the prosecution provided that OJ owned the boots.

There is no sales receipt or credit card charge and even the guy in the store doesn't know if
he ever sold a pair to OJ.

OJ was rich; it's an expensive shoe and that's where people got stuck.
There is no evidence that OJ ever owned those boots except that picture, which is clearly not the boots.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by LovinNothin

Footprints, missing shoes, bloody gloves, blood in the bronco, O.J. fleeing the scene before arrest, strange behavior and motif. How much more evidence of guilt do people need? It's funny how we only see what we want to see.

Jesus, look who's talking.
You're screaming out in yellow so you are obviously passionate and opinionated on the case.

You just rattled off a bunch of non-facts :

- How are shoes missing if he never bought any?
- OJ flew back to LA at the request of the LAPD and was arrested before the Bronco chase.
- What strange behavior; he signed 50 autographs when his plane landed in Chicago after the murders and nobody with an autograph said he was strange.
- Motif??? The nigga is not an artist.

[escorpio]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Jesus, look who's talking.
You're screaming out in yellow so you are obviously passionate and opinionated on the case.

You just rattled off a bunch of non-facts :

- How are shoes missing if he never bought any?
- OJ flew back to LA at the request of the LAPD and was arrested before the Bronco chase.
- What strange behavior; he signed 50 autographs when his plane landed in Chicago after the murders and nobody with an autograph said he was strange.
- Motif??? The nigga is not an artist.

[kronic]

Even the majority of blacks think OJ's guilty now. The reason the prosecution lost the case quite frankly was their own dislikeabilty. The defence was likeable and charismatic and, even though it was clear behind any doubt to me he was guilty, I found myself rooting for the defence. The prosecution on the other hand was EXTREMELY unlikeable. Marcia Clark got her hair done half way through the trial for no other reason than to improve her image to the jurors. Chris Darden? He made OJ look like the friendly black guy in the courtroom. Then you had Mark Fuhrman. Ridiculous to think he planted evidence, but his personality was so unlikeable it was easy for jurors to believe it was possible.

When the verdict was read I was shocked but not surprised. If you look at the look on Robert Kardashian's face when the verdict was read, he also seemed incredulous. It looks like he was literally thinking, "this guy just got away with murder".

[kronic]

Originally Posted by kronic

If you look at the look on Robert Kardashian's face when the verdict was read, he also seemed incredulous. It looks like he was literally thinking, "this guy just got away with murder".

The look on his face for the first minute of this video is just priceless.

[TCLGirls]

Originally Posted by LovinNothin

Footprints, missing shoes, bloody gloves, blood in the bronco, O.J. fleeing the scene before arrest, strange behavior and motif. How much more evidence of guilt do people need? It's funny how we only see what we want to see.

Missing shoes that OJ never had. Bloody gloves that don't fit his hands. Fact is the prosecution ef'd up. Blame them for failing to successfully prosecute OJ.

[Juicy D. Links]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Go make a pizza greaseball.

race monger dinduuuuuuuuuuuu

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links

race monger dinduuuuuuuuuuuu

Brylcreem TV Commercial 1950's - YouTube

[J. Falcon]

Black people sure do act stupid.

[Penny24Seven]

He must be let go because those were not his shoes. That means everything else doesn't count. I mean sure it could of all been planted.
HAHA
OJ not answering his door. Kato sees a figure entering the house and now he answers. Oh he was in the shower cleaning the blood off of him. I mean getting ready to leave town. lol.
Blood in the car you say? Oh that was all planted there. OJs blood too? Yeah that must have gotten it when he was sleeping because they knew she was going to be killed so they could frame him.
The years of abuse means nothing. No he never hit her LOL
The look on his face when they showed him wearing the shoes he just said he never wore.
Dude there are 30 other things that link him to it but it was all set up and faked to hold the black man down.
Fucking whites and their crooked ways

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

Black people sure do act stupid.

That's what you see.
I see disappointed white people who thought a racist lying cop told the truth.

[Penny24Seven]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

That's what you see.
I see disappointed white people who thought a racist lying cop told the truth.

The cop is racist and probably a lier too. He is probably a dumbass and a loser and a lot worse. That doesn't change what OJ did.
I bet there is a racist cop in every town in America. If you ever kill anyone and have the money to find that cop you too can use it to get out of jail.

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

That's what you see.
I see disappointed white people who thought a racist lying cop told the truth.

You can't be that stupid, so I`ll assume you're trolling.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by Brian837

He must be let go because those were not his shoes. That means everything else doesn't count. I mean sure it could of all been planted.
HAHA
OJ not answering his door. Kato sees a figure entering the house and now he answers. Oh he was in the shower cleaning the blood off of him. I mean getting ready to leave town. lol.
Blood in the car you say? Oh that was all planted there. OJs blood too? Yeah that must have gotten it when he was sleeping because they knew she was going to be killed so they could frame him.
The years of abuse means nothing. No he never hit her LOL
The look on his face when they showed him wearing the shoes he just said he never wore.
Dude there are 30 other things that link him to it but it was all set up and faked to hold the black man down.
Fucking whites and their crooked ways

LOL!

The limo driver saw the figure entering the house; not Kato.
Luminol would have lit up the shower if OJ washed off blood there.
Even Mark Fuhrman said he didn't see blood in the bronco.


Bottom Line : Mark Fuhrman pleads the 5th during OJ Simpson trial. - YouTube




If a cop who finds all the evidence against you takes the 5th when you start to ask questions, then trust me to not convict you.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by Brian837

The cop is racist and probably a lier too. He is probably a dumbass and a loser and a lot worse. That doesn't change what OJ did.
I bet there is a racist cop in every town in America. If you ever kill anyone and have the money to find that cop you too can use it to get out of jail.

There might be a racist cop in every town but only one of them is finding gloves everywhere
he looks and only one who had sworn to get OJ for filing a complaint against him.

You are willing to believe a story even after the cop is proven a liar; but I'm not.




.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

You can't be that stupid, so I`ll assume you're trolling.

I'll just assume that you are in denial about a lying racist cop rather than being just
straight up stupid yourself.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by Brian837

The cop is racist and probably a lier too. He is probably a dumbass and a loser and a lot worse. That doesn't change what OJ did.
I bet there is a racist cop in every town in America. If you ever kill anyone and have the money to find that cop you too can use it to get out of jail.

The whole thing with you saying "probably a liar" ( and misspelling liar) shows your deep denial of reality.

Mark Fuhrman was convicted of Felony perjury for his testimony in the OJ Simpson trial.

He was convicted of lying; why are you using the word probably?

[Juicy D. Links]

OJ dinduuuuu nuffin????

We all now he slashed n killed 2 people


dinduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

[Juicy D. Links]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

The whole thing with you saying "probably a liar" ( and misspelling liar) shows your deep denial of reality.

Mark Fuhrman was convicted of Felony perjury for his testimony in the OJ Simpson trial.

He was convicted of lying; why are you using the word probably?

Mark Furhman is my hero

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links

Mark Furhman is my hero

I know; I've seen him eat spaghetti and greaseballs.

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

Bloody gloves that don't fit his hands.

Of course they didn't fit his hands ... he was trying them on OVER other gloves

Look at his expression, he know's what he's about to falsely prove.






.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Of course they didn't fit his hands ... he was trying them on OVER other gloves

Look at his expression, he know's what he's about to falsely prove.






.

Did you ever wonder why a man who had been in prison for 2 years was asked to try on an article of clothing to see if it would still fit?

Would he have been asked to try on a shirt or a pair of pants?
No, because it would be dumb.

It shocking to me that people still don't acknowledge how dumb the whole thing was to begin with.

[bushwacker]

I was not on the jury so I do not hear all the testimony or see all the evidence.
What I do know is that OJ was as bad ass on the grid iron.
One of the greatest running backs of all time.
Was he guilty, I don't know.
But he's in jail now anyway.

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Did you ever wonder why a man who had been in prison for 2 years was asked to try on an article of clothing to see if it would still fit?

Would he have been asked to try on a shirt or a pair of pants?
No, because it would be dumb.

It shocking to me that people still don't acknowledge how dumb the whole thing was to begin with.

If the prosecution couldn't make their case in 30 days then there was no case. My opinion.

[escorpio]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

That's what you see.
I see disappointed white people who thought a racist lying cop told the truth.

[Penny24Seven]

Ron Goldman was stabbed 33 times, they sued OJ and won 33 million and now OJ is in prison for 33 years. HMMMMMMMMMM