Pharmacist Speaks Out: Get Off Prescription Drugs, Avoid Vaccines

[wehateporn]

https://thepeopleschemist.com/pharma...void-vaccines/

Margaret is a pharmacist. With a Pharmacy (PharmD) degree, and over two decades working in the field of pharmacy, she?s seen firsthand how ?guideline-driven? medicine has artificially forced every patient into the same clinical box, thereby hooking them on drugs. The result is that ?Doctors don?t THINK anymore ? they just do what they?re told, which is to put people on meds. So many people in medicine (doctors, nurses, pharmacists) don?t really question anything,? says Margaret. ?They?re so busy that they just do what the ?guidelines? say to do, rather than look at individuals and what makes sense.?

A former employee of a major pharmaceutical company, Margaret left her job so she could spend more time with her family. At the time, she questioned her former employer?s ?huge marketing budget? and now believes the marketing of drugs to the general public ? along with guidelines-driven medicine ? needs to stop.

?We never get the flu shot,? she adds, referring to herself and her family. ?I?ve read the entire package insert and can take on anyone who tries to tell me that it is useful with just that information alone. My years in pharma taught me just how clinical trials are designed to show the planned outcome ? they aren?t real studies at all.?

In a world where most parents don?t even bother READING the flu vaccine insert, Margaret is a refreshing example of a mother who takes charge.

She initially contacted me to ask: ?Shane, what has been the response been to what you write about vaccines? For those of us with licenses to protect, we don?t feel very safe voicing concerns about vaccines.?

I understood completely.

Big Pharma fires anyone who speaks out. They work hard to cover up the truth.

I told Margaret what I tell everyone: The science can?t be disputed. And since my job doesnt depend on parroting the status quo, I?ve had no problems whatsoever. My four kids are all unvaccinated and are strong, healthy, and vibrant. Attending school has never been an issue, and who cares anyway, health comes first.

Curious to learn more about Margaret?s experience as a pharmacist, I asked for an interview.

She generously agreed to share more of her perspective as a pharmacist. What follows is a candid interview in which Margaret encourages parents to stop, THINK, and get a reality check when it comes to vaccinating their kids. Commenting on how vaccines are pushed ? and sometimes even forced ? on everyone, she says, ?They?ve done a very good job of psychological indoctrination.?

She also shares her thoughts on what needs to change in mainstream medicine, and why she chose to stop vaccinating.

*Not her real name. Name changed to protect her privacy.

TPC #1: Please summarize your overall pharmacy experience and how you?ve generally worked with patients/clients.

Pharmacist: I?m a pharmacist, but not one who is into mainstream medicine. I have broad pharmacy experience, and many years working in Pharma (just like you, Shane)!

I heard the mantra, ?Today?s drugs fund tomorrow?s discoveries?? but after a while, that didn?t justify the huge marketing budget in my opinion. I quit working at one of the world?s largest pharmaceutical companies without a job lined up. I had my first child, and I wanted to hang out with him and figure out next steps.

I think I like retail pharmacy best, because it?s so important to talk to patients about their medications, especially people who want to make lifestyle changes to get OFF their medications. But many people prefer to take a pill rather than change.

2. Why did you choose to become a pharmacist?

Margaret: I really stumbled into it! I never thought of myself as a science person, but I took some science classes and found I liked them. Pharmacy is just more science.

3. What are you most proud of when it comes to your career?

Margaret: I?ve enjoyed helping people. Especially if people are interested in lifestyle changes to get off medications ? that?s a pleasure to help them.

4. What has shocked you the most, while working as a pharmacist?

Margaret: Even in pharmacy school, my professors stressed that things would change in our careers and we had to be adaptable. Yet so many people in medicine (doctors, nurses, pharmacists) don?t really question anything. They?re so busy (the workloads are so heavy!) that they just do what the ?guidelines? say to do, rather than look at individuals and what makes sense.

When I was a student, clinical pathways or guidelines were a new thing, and now they?ve become essentially law ? if you don?t follow treatment guidelines with what you recommend for a patient, you can be sued. The ?art? of medicine has, for all practical purposes, disappeared. Now it?s the Law of Medicine.

5. What is your biggest critique of mainstream medicine?

Margaret: Guideline-driven medicine. Most people have no idea about this and the effect on their health. It makes everyone fit into the same box, and it drives your doctor?s treatment within that box instead of individualizing it. [Everyone gets same drug, same dose.]

Doctors don?t THINK anymore ? they just do what they?re told. The only guideline I think is unquestionable is the one for cardiac arrest ? follow that emergency clinical pathway, for sure. Otherwise, it?s all about hooking patients on drugs.

6. Have you chosen to vaccinate anyone in your family?

Up to 6 months, yes. But not all of them. At that point, I pulled the plug on vaccines (see here why), as well as our pediatrician. Now I use religious waivers. Unfortunately, after the vaccines, one of my children became very lethargic. I had been researching them a lot up until then, and I decided to stop vaccinating. From that point on I focused on nursing and boosting immunity naturally.

Later in life, my child was allergic to virtually all nuts and sesame. It didn?t run in our family. I researched the sesame and found that the allergy is increasing in places like Asia and Israel, where most vaccines are in sesame oil.

Oils in vaccines don?t have to be labeled because they?re considered not active ingredients, and they may vary on the lot. Manufacturers break up lots of vaccines and ship them all over, so that there?s no pattern to any reactions. Unfortunately, this can lead to the onslaught of allergic reactions.

7. Do you get the flu shot?

Margaret: We never get the flu shot. I?ve read the entire package insert and can take on anyone who tries to tell me that it is useful with just that information alone.

It doesn?t work.

If you read the package insert, you?ll see that in the non-treated group, 4% got the flu. In the treatment arm, about 2% got the flu. So your risk of getting the flu is only 4% anyway. They got the 50% reduction in flu from simple math ? 2% is half of 4%. But your odds of NOT getting the flu are 96%.

If you put it that way, then the shot is not very compelling, is it? But they made it sound like it was, by telling you your risk was reduced by 50% without telling you what the real odds of getting the flu were in the first place.

My years in pharma taught me just how clinical trials are designed to show the planned outcome ? they aren?t real studies at all.

8. You mentioned, ?My years in pharma taught me how clinical trials are designed to show the planned outcome ? they aren?t real studies at all.? Can you explain what this means for the average American with respect to vaccines?

Margaret: Study design is not complicated. You have your null hypothesis, which supposes that there is no difference. And you have your hypothesis, which supposes that there IS a difference. To prove your hypothesis, you usually need such a big number of people that the study is too expensive to conduct. So they go cheap and do smaller studies that show numerical differences, but not statistically significant differences?and they run with that. All they ever need to do is show that their drug is not worse than the other drug, and they win. Then they can do a marketing spin with the data, like they have with the flu vaccine.

9. In your experience, how is the truth about vaccines being covered up?

Margaret: Studies and the lack of studies. The studies that are currently out there ? even those for vaccine approvals ? quite clearly show there are serious side effects. We don?t know who is most at risk, yet the uniform mandate that all these vaccines be given is forced on all of us.

People deny that there are serious side effects, and that makes me crazy because the package insert for the vaccines themselves say there are side effects! There is not one other drug where the dose is the same no matter how big the child is?and that is troubling. We should be studying why some children react badly. There are genetic differences among us that influence the efficacy or safety of other drugs?yet if you question vaccines, you?re called ?Jenny McCarthy? or you?re told you don?t know the science.

But I DO know the science, and the science is not being examined at all. That?s irresponsible.

Continued https://thepeopleschemist.com/pharma...void-vaccines/

[The Porn Nerd]

NONE of this shocks or surprises me. As soon as I saw television ads in the late nineties saying 'Ask your Doctor about...." I knew we were fucked. ASK MY DOCTOR? So he is now what, a drug dealer?

Oh yeah, he is.

[sandman!]

[kane]

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

NONE of this shocks or surprises me. As soon as I saw television ads in the late nineties saying 'Ask your Doctor about...." I knew we were fucked. ASK MY DOCTOR? So he is now what, a drug dealer?

Oh yeah, he is.

I also like the commercials for drugs that will say, "Tell your doctor if you have (insert some kind of serious illness/disease)." or they will say, "Tell your doctor what medications you are taking." If I had a serious illness or was on medication shouldn't my doctor already know these things? To me it sounds like the drug manufacturers are assuming you are just going to go to different doctors until you find one that gives you what you want.

[Sly]

Originally Posted by kane

If I had a serious illness or was on medication shouldn't my doctor already know these things?

If you have a serious illness you likely have multiple specialists that you see on a semi-regular basis. There is no way that they could possibly know what you are doing with the other specialists, especially if each specialist is through a different hospital or network.

Over the last few weeks I have seen a general, dentist, an ophthalmologist, pulmonologist, dermatologist, and ENT. Every single one of them asked me what I was taking and if I started taking anything new. There is no way the ENT would have known what I was doing with the pulmonologist, ophthalmologist, or dentist as they are on completely different hospital networks.

[kane]

Originally Posted by Sly

If you have a serious illness you likely have multiple specialists that you see on a semi-regular basis. There is no way that they could possibly know what you are doing with the other specialists, especially if each specialist is through a different hospital or network.

Over the last few weeks I have seen a general, dentist, an ophthalmologist, pulmonologist, dermatologist, and ENT. Every single one of them asked me what I was taking and if I started taking anything new. There is no way the ENT would have known what I was doing with the pulmonologist, ophthalmologist, or dentist as they are on completely different hospital networks.

Makes sense.

[VikingMan]

I used to be anti vaccine but now I highly recommend it. Please ask your friendly corrupt doctor to give you double the vaccines because if one dose of toxins, cancer cells and whatever other garbage they put in vaccines regardless if it is on purpose or is a "mistake" (oops we gave millions of people cancer cells from monkeys and we are truly sorry) then a double dose should be even better.

[clickity click]

Originally Posted by Sly

If you have a serious illness you likely have multiple specialists that you see on a semi-regular basis. There is no way that they could possibly know what you are doing with the other specialists, especially if each specialist is through a different hospital or network.

Over the last few weeks I have seen a general, dentist, an ophthalmologist, pulmonologist, dermatologist, and ENT. Every single one of them asked me what I was taking and if I started taking anything new. There is no way the ENT would have known what I was doing with the pulmonologist, ophthalmologist, or dentist as they are on completely different hospital networks.

All doctors notes should be combined. Then everyone knows what the fuck is wrong with you.

[kane]

Originally Posted by clickity click

All doctors notes should be combined. Then everyone knows what the fuck is wrong with you.

Many of them are. I recently was dealing with some health issues where I saw a few specialists and then had to get some physical therapy. All of these were different doctors in different networks and with the exception of one of them my doctor sent over my files with all my info in them before my appointment so they knew what was going on and what I was taking before I walked through the door.

[PornWorx]

I was trained as a paramedic, we were taught lifestyle changes over medications to treat health conditions in our personal lives and to promote lifestyle changes to patients because the physicians were most likely not doing it. We were also trained that if we had to contact someone regarding a patients medication that they are on, that we should choose their pharmacist over their family physician. The pharmacists spend majority of their university studies specifically on medications whereas physicians spend a fraction of their time studying them. Almost any pharmacist I have spoke to seems to advocate lifestyle changes as well as question why someone would need that specific medication if they thought it was unnessacary. My family physician however seems like he would sign a prescription for absolutely anything I want without even running a single test such as blood work etc...to see if I even need it.

Moderate exercise. Eat well. Manage stress. It's very simple and I wish physicians advocated for that more often although it does seem changes are being made which is good.

[The Porn Nerd]

Originally Posted by Sly

If you have a serious illness you likely have multiple specialists that you see on a semi-regular basis. There is no way that they could possibly know what you are doing with the other specialists, especially if each specialist is through a different hospital or network.

Over the last few weeks I have seen a general, dentist, an ophthalmologist, pulmonologist, dermatologist, and ENT. Every single one of them asked me what I was taking and if I started taking anything new. There is no way the ENT would have known what I was doing with the pulmonologist, ophthalmologist, or dentist as they are on completely different hospital networks.

There have been a fuckload of changes with Obamacare. I took my mom to the Doctor a couple days ago and she (the Doctor) had to enter in all the data into a Gov't website with codes for everything. Maybe this is a Medicaid/Medicare thing but one day ALL data will be combined. Will work great when we are all chipped like animals.

Originally Posted by PornWorx

I was trained as a paramedic, we were taught lifestyle changes over medications to treat health conditions in our personal lives and to promote lifestyle changes to patients because the physicians were most likely not doing it. We were also trained that if we had to contact someone regarding a patients medication that they are on, that we should choose their pharmacist over their family physician. The pharmacists spend majority of their university studies specifically on medications whereas physicians spend a fraction of their time studying them. Almost any pharmacist I have spoke to seems to advocate lifestyle changes as well as question why someone would need that specific medication if they thought it was unnessacary. My family physician however seems like he would sign a prescription for absolutely anything I want without even running a single test such as blood work etc...to see if I even need it.

Moderate exercise. Eat well. Manage stress. It's very simple and I wish physicians advocated for that more often although it does seem changes are being made which is good.

Doctors get special treatment from Big Pharma and are given all kinds of incentives to push their drugs. But what you say is absolutely true that pharmacists know a fuck lot more about the drugs they are fulfilling than the doctors do who are prescribing them.

But hey, I guess if you were into oxycotin or xanax or whatever and were a good bullshitter you could doctor shop all day long. Would anyone care? More drugs = more profits for everyone so have at it. Talk about sick.