Hillary email server admin's attornies state he "has reasonable fear of prosecution". - GoFuckYourself.com

dyna mo · 06-07-2016, 03:51 PM

Pagliano, who worked on Clinton?s 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009, stated his intention to the court last week to decline to answer questions.

Sullivan on Friday postponed Pagliano?s deposition and directed both sides by June 13 to address the legal authority for his constitutional claim.

Pagliano?s attorneys Tuesday said case law establishes such a right for people not named in civil lawsuits but who face a ?reasonable fear of prosecution.?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...8e4_story.html

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Pagliano, who worked on Clinton?s 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009, stated his intention to the court last week to decline to answer questions.

Sullivan on Friday postponed Pagliano?s deposition and directed both sides by June 13 to address the legal authority for his constitutional claim.

Pagliano?s attorneys Tuesday said case law establishes such a right for people not named in civil lawsuits but who face a ?reasonable fear of prosecution.?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...8e4_story.html

Republican owned "Judicial Watch" abusing the system & making denied motion after motion to make Republican propaganda news it filters through Vice.com, so shady and dishonest.

plaster · 06-07-2016, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Republican owned "Judicial Watch" abusing the system & making denied motion after motion to make Republican propaganda news it filters through Vice.com, so shady and dishonest.

English mother fucker! Speak it and you will be rewarded.

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster

English mother fucker! Speak it and you will be rewarded.

Google judicial watch vice.com and read the first 10 results

dyna mo · 06-07-2016, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster

English mother fucker! Speak it and you will be rewarded.

He's trying to dodge and deflect the quote by the server guy's legal team that prosecutions are a very real possible outcome of the FBI criminal investigation of hillary

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

He's trying to dodge and deflect the quote by the server guy's legal team that prosecutions are a very real possible outcome of the FBI criminal investigation of hillary

Bryan Pagliano has been pleading the 5th since September 2015. You really need to dig deeper than what's presented to you.

Do you know why the person in charge of administrating the server storing government communications would plead the fifth? Because no matter what, he is responsible.

Its empowering to be proactive instead of reactive. Proactive gives you reactions based on knowledge. Reactive is based on emotion created by consuming what propaganda you're fed.

plaster · 06-07-2016, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

He's trying to dodge and deflect the quote by the server guy's legal team that prosecutions are a very real possible outcome of the FBI criminal investigation of hillary

It would be very rewarding to see her criminal activity prosecuted and her put in jail. She broke the law and should be punished for it. She would throw anyone under the bus to avoid prosecution and could care less. She's a spiteful bitch and deserves time in the pokey.

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster

It would be very rewarding to see her criminal activity prosecuted and her put in jail. She broke the law and should be punished for it. She would throw anyone under the bus to avoid prosecution and could care less. She's a spiteful bitch and deserves time in the pokey.

Beaner's been drinking again lol

pimpmaster9000 · 06-07-2016, 05:47 PM

what is more serious: US elections or bill&teds excellent adventure?

dyna mo · 06-07-2016, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Bryan Pagliano has been pleading the 5th since September 2015. You really need to dig deeper than what's presented to you.

Do you know why the person in charge of administrating the server storing government communications would plead the fifth? Because no matter what, he is responsible.

Its empowering to be proactive instead of reactive. Proactive gives you reactions based on knowledge. Reactive is based on emotion created by consuming what propaganda you're fed.

You want me to dig deeper on Hillary?

Sure thing. There's plenty there, just like the lawyers comments today that you handwaved off because youre not grasping the issue of limited protection for pagliano.

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

what is more serious: US elections or bill&teds excellent adventure?

Bill & Teds Excellent Adventure

A lot of serious soul food in that movie.

Horatio Caine · 06-07-2016, 06:16 PM

Once again we have "has reasonable fear of prosecution" VS Scammer investigated by 2 different states.

Guess who's empty wagon rattle the loudest?

dyna mo · 06-07-2016, 06:20 PM

I've never once compared Trump to Hillary in a which is worse way. I don't cast a vote for the better of the lesser of two Potus candidates, I'm thinking I'll scratch in **********s name if Sanders is not the nom. I certainly won't vote for Trump or Hillary

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

You want me to dig deeper on Hillary?

Sure thing. There's plenty there, just like the lawyers comments today that you handwaved off because youre not grasping the issue of limited protection for pagliano.

Dude educate yourself, or minimally, research what I'm about to tell you:

Bryan Pagliano was a schedule C government employee. Schedule C's can only report to a PAS. In his case the PAS was Senator Patrick Kennedy. He worked at the IRM bureau where he was supervised daily and assigned to setup the Clinton sever.

OMG soooooo nefarious and under the table lol

A government IT employee setting up the Secretary of States email server.

Jigster715 · 06-07-2016, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Bryan Pagliano has been pleading the 5th since September 2015. You really need to dig deeper than what's presented to you.

Do you know why the person in charge of administrating the server storing government communications would plead the fifth? Because no matter what, he is responsible.

Its empowering to be proactive instead of reactive. Proactive gives you reactions based on knowledge. Reactive is based on emotion created by consuming what propaganda you're fed.

Whoever Pagliano was working for is responsible (Not Kennedy). Unless you want to claim he was some sort of rogue employee at this point. Which is quite the farcical point of view.

dyna mo · 06-07-2016, 06:31 PM

You can run around wildly exclaiming this is about me being ignorant all you want but the simple fact is that today pagliano's legal team stated otr they have a reasonable fear of prosecution.

None of which has literally nothing to do with your needing to exclaim nI'm uneducated re: matters to which I speak. In fact, I suggest you're quite obtuse to reality to think that, let alone think it's a valid point.

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jigster715

Whoever Pagliano was working for is responsible (Not Kennedy). Unless you want to claim he was some sort of rogue employee at this point. Which is quite the farcical point of view.

I just told you he worked for the IRM bureau and reported to Senator Kennedy. Bureau of Information Resource Management

Google it. He didn't work for Clinton, or report to her, and he is responsible for how he setup the server, nobody else.

IRM bureau does this:

"The information requirements of the President, the Secretary of State, the Department and its overseas missions, as well as 40 other U.S. agencies in U.S. diplomatic missions overseas, drive the operations of IRM. "

Rogue employee ;)

bronco67 · 06-07-2016, 06:58 PM

Prosecution for murder? rape?

oh...emails. That's some pretty bad shit she's into. Hope they give her 20 years in San Quentin.

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

You can run around wildly exclaiming this is about me being ignorant all you want but the simple fact is that today pagliano's legal team stated otr they have a reasonable fear of prosecution.

None of which has literally nothing to do with your needing to exclaim nI'm uneducated re: matters to which I speak. In fact, I suggest you're quite obtuse to reality to think that, let alone think it's a valid point.

Troll

Dvae · 06-07-2016, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Dude educate yourself, or minimally, research what I'm about to tell you:

Bryan Pagliano was a schedule C government employee. Schedule C's can only report to a PAS. In his case the PAS was Senator Patrick Kennedy. He worked at the IRM bureau where he was supervised daily and assigned to setup the Clinton sever.

OMG soooooo nefarious and under the table lol

A government IT employee setting up the Secretary of States email server.

Excuses, Excuses - its never Hilarys fault - perish the thought!

plaster · 06-07-2016, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

Prosecution for murder? rape?

oh...emails. That's some pretty bad shit she's into. Hope they give her 20 years in San Quentin.

1 year for each email containing information that could jeapordize the country's safety would be suitable.

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae

Excuses, Excuses - its never Hilarys fault - perish the thought!

An IRM government employee, under the supervision of Senator Kennedy, installed the server. Grow up.

dyna mo · 06-07-2016, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

Prosecution for murder? rape?

oh...emails. That's some pretty bad shit she's into. Hope they give her 20 years in San Quentin.

Supreme liberal lynch mob grand dragon, please let me know how many murders and rapes Trump has been prosecuted for and I'll start an approved Trump attack thread.

The FBI doesn't investigate red light runners.

dyna mo · 06-07-2016, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Troll

You're just jealous of my killer pine cone thread.

High 5!

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

My dick is hard bro, Skype me oh and you're just jealous of my killer pine cone thread.

Ssshhh You had me at "My dick is hard bro, Skype me"

Edit: looks like you changed your post.

plaster · 06-07-2016, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Ssshhh You had me at "My dick is hard bro, Skype me"

Edit: looks like you changed your post.

Is it possible for you to not be so gay all the time?

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster

Is it possible for you to not be so gay all the time?

Shut up Beaner get off my dick

Rochard · 06-07-2016, 08:51 PM

Of course this guy has "“reasonable fear of prosecution". He's being questioned by the FBI. Anyone being questioned by the FBI has a "“reasonable fear of prosecution". That's called common sense.

Still not seeing where the problem is. She might have sent classified information via email. There is no law that says one cannot send classified information via email. Oh, someone will try to argue her email wasn't secure, but to date we have no proof it wasn't hacked, and it was more secure than the White House email was (which was hacked). This was a standard practice at the State Department; She wasn't the first one to do this.

In the event they charge her with anything it will be minor.

I'm sorry, but this disgusting at this point. The Secretary Of State was doing her job. In the mean time we have hundreds of FBI agents working on this. Combined with the ten other investigations - all of which turned up nothing - this is a massive waste of time, effort, money, and resources.

dyna mo · 06-07-2016, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Ssshhh You had me at "My dick is hard bro, Skype me"

Edit: looks like you changed your post.

Ahahahahahahahaahahahahaha

Well played!

It's too bad youre a Hillary guy.

Hannes · 06-07-2016, 09:01 PM

This means trump has the win in the bag... Fuck

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Ahahahahahahahaahahahahaha

Well played!

It's too bad youre a Hillary guy.

You change Trumps dirty diapers, you can handle what I'm packin.

dyna mo · 06-07-2016, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

You change Trumps dirty diapers, you can handle what I'm packin.

You've got your Johnson in your hand right now huh!

I knew you Hillary guys are pervie !

Bladewire · 06-07-2016, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

You've got your Johnson in your hand right now huh!

I knew you Hillary guys are pervie !

Cock tease

let me in or I'll take it.

_Richard_ · 06-08-2016, 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Ssshhh You had me at "My dick is hard bro, Skype me"

Edit: looks like you changed your post.

06-07-2016, 03:51 PM	#1
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,994	Hillary email server admin's attornies state he "has reasonable fear of prosecution". Pagliano, who worked on Clinton?s 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009, stated his intention to the court last week to decline to answer questions. Sullivan on Friday postponed Pagliano?s deposition and directed both sides by June 13 to address the legal authority for his constitutional claim. Pagliano?s attorneys Tuesday said case law establishes such a right for people not named in civil lawsuits but who face a ?reasonable fear of prosecution.? https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...8e4_story.html

06-07-2016, 05:47 PM	#9
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	what is more serious: US elections or bill&teds excellent adventure? __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

06-07-2016, 06:58 PM	#18
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,032	Prosecution for murder? rape? oh...emails. That's some pretty bad shit she's into. Hope they give her 20 years in San Quentin. __________________

06-07-2016, 08:51 PM	#28
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 74,324	Of course this guy has "“reasonable fear of prosecution". He's being questioned by the FBI. Anyone being questioned by the FBI has a "“reasonable fear of prosecution". That's called common sense. Still not seeing where the problem is. She might have sent classified information via email. There is no law that says one cannot send classified information via email. Oh, someone will try to argue her email wasn't secure, but to date we have no proof it wasn't hacked, and it was more secure than the White House email was (which was hacked). This was a standard practice at the State Department; She wasn't the first one to do this. In the event they charge her with anything it will be minor. I'm sorry, but this disgusting at this point. The Secretary Of State was doing her job. In the mean time we have hundreds of FBI agents working on this. Combined with the ten other investigations - all of which turned up nothing - this is a massive waste of time, effort, money, and resources. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

06-07-2016, 06:16 PM	#12
Horatio Caine full-time aspiring rapper Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Compton, CA Posts: 5,746	Once again we have "has reasonable fear of prosecution" VS Scammer investigated by 2 different states. Guess who's empty wagon rattle the loudest?

06-07-2016, 06:20 PM	#13
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,994	I've never once compared Trump to Hillary in a which is worse way. I don't cast a vote for the better of the lesser of two Potus candidates, I'm thinking I'll scratch in **********s name if Sanders is not the nom. I certainly won't vote for Trump or Hillary

06-07-2016, 06:31 PM	#16
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,994	You can run around wildly exclaiming this is about me being ignorant all you want but the simple fact is that today pagliano's legal team stated otr they have a reasonable fear of prosecution. None of which has literally nothing to do with your needing to exclaim nI'm uneducated re: matters to which I speak. In fact, I suggest you're quite obtuse to reality to think that, let alone think it's a valid point.

06-07-2016, 09:01 PM	#30
Hannes Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 1,594	This means trump has the win in the bag... Fuck