Obama Called War Criminal in the Irish Parliament

[wehateporn]

[just a punk]

And so he is.

[Grapesoda]

probably take another year or so of his administration before the shiit hit the fan

[Linkster]

As long as Americans support the "war on terrorism" story that has been going on since 2001....all presidents, past and future, will be considered war criminals. Just a choice the citizens of the United States have made. As Bush Jr used to say..."either you're against us...or you're with us"

[adultcalltakers]

Definitely not the 1st time the words "Irish" and "war criminal" have been used together.

[Bladewire]

Another WeHateAmerica thread rah rah rah

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by adultcalltakers

Definitely not the 1st time the words "Irish" and "war criminal" have been used together.

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Another WeHateAmerica thread rah rah rah

gotta call your bullshit here bro, not every thing about obama is made up and calling anyone that brings it up an asshole is just completely out of line, just sayin' you know?

[EddyTheDog]

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

gotta call your bullshit here bro, not every thing about obama is made up and calling anyone that brings it up an asshole is just completely out of line, just sayin' you know?

That goes both ways...

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

That goes both ways...

So does GrapeSoda after a couple drinks

[mineistaken]

Obummer the divider.

[adultcalltakers]

As an outsider can I just say that Id rather have a lobotomised Obama running your country than the total and utter tool you've now elected.

[Rochard]

The terms "war criminal" and "war crimes" are used too often.

Recently in Afghanistan US troops opened fire on multiple buildings with civilians in them, and dozens of people were killed. This is not a war crime. US troops were fired on from those buildings, and returned fire. In a combat situation you cannot call a time out and investigate if there are civilians in a certain location.

A war criminal is someone who intentionally targets civilians. This means someone has to say "I want every civilian in this town killed".

Also, you can never ever claim a war was "illegal". There was a lot of discussion about the war against Iraq being illegal. There is no law about declaring war on another country or attacking another country.

[Linkster]

Originally Posted by Rochard

There is no law about declaring war on another country or attacking another country.

Actually I disagree with this...there is a law in the Constitution Art 1 that states Congress shall have the power to declare war...however I know that many wars don't have a specific declaration associated with them...some examples are the Iraq war and recently the Libyan war...they were initiated by UN resolutions and funded by the US congress...therefore congress had their "say"

[Linkster]

I guess the other question I immediately had is why is a video from 4 years ago really that important?? We (assuming most Americans are somewhat intelligent) already knew that we were supplying arms to ISIS in Syria to help them...we did the same thing with Al Quaeda ages ago...and it certainly should have been no surprise that we were using drones 4 years ago to take out targets in our war on terrorism

So why all of a sudden are the people that are vocal about Trump being the best thing since the Emperor got clothes posting libster videos from Ireland??

[celandina]

Originally Posted by Rochard

The terms "war criminal" and "war crimes" are used too often.

Recently in Afghanistan US troops opened fire on multiple buildings with civilians in them, and dozens of people were killed. This is not a war crime. US troops were fired on from those buildings, and returned fire. In a combat situation you cannot call a time out and investigate if there are civilians in a certain location.

A war criminal is someone who intentionally targets civilians. This means someone has to say "I want every civilian in this town killed".

Also, you can never ever claim a war was "illegal". There was a lot of discussion about the war against Iraq being illegal. There is no law about declaring war on another country or attacking another country.

Not so.... Or where the guys in the pictures below war criminals? Not !!! They were heroes !!! No different then they would be today..



Or

[Barry-xlovecam]

Bomb Ireland -- the tax shelter haven of the EU and where American business hides their money in Europe.

OH NOES!

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Bomb Ireland -- the tax shelter haven of the EU and where American business hides their money in Europe.

OH NOES!

A special 6.25% tax rate for income from intellectal property & patents

[pimpmaster9000]

the US army exists for the sole purpose of attacking other countries, they are all war criminals and everybody who commands them is also one...if the USA had to pay war reparations to all the countries it invaded, americans would literally be starving to death...

here are some examples where the US army protected US soil after WW2:


-none-


if any other country did this it would get branded a terrorist nation...there is no diplomacy with terrorists and no nice way to reach an agreement...they will keep invading until somebody stops them...it is up to the world to arm the fuck up and fight any way possible...

and no this is not an anti american thread it is a "pro world" thread...america is only 5% of the world and I hope the other 95% nuke up quick...

[NatalieK]

because he gave arms to Syria, to protect themselves ?

[brassmonkey]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Another WeHateAmerica thread rah rah rah

wonder what the racist drunks called bush! jr. and senior

[Paul Markham]

So anyone who goes to war that results in civilian casualties is a war criminal and the war doesn't result in a great win.

Stupidity at its best.

The West should have backed Saddam, Assad and Gadhafi to save lives. They're evil men ruling other evil men. Now the West is backing Iran another group of evil men. Let's see how that goes.

[Sarn]

Originally Posted by Rochard

The terms "war criminal" and "war crimes" are used too often.

Recently in Afghanistan US troops opened fire on multiple buildings with civilians in them, and dozens of people were killed. This is not a war crime. US troops were fired on from those buildings, and returned fire. In a combat situation you cannot call a time out and investigate if there are civilians in a certain location.

A war criminal is someone who intentionally targets civilians. This means someone has to say "I want every civilian in this town killed".

Also, you can never ever claim a war was "illegal". There was a lot of discussion about the war against Iraq being illegal. There is no law about declaring war on another country or attacking another country.

Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq

MPs say Kosovo bombing was illegal but necessary
Nato's bombing of Kosovo last year was illegal under international law, the Labour-controlled foreign affairs select committee is expected to report today.
After an inquiry into the foreign policy implications of the Kosovo crisis, the select committee has concluded that Nato is a defensive alliance and has no powers under its treaty to conduct a humanitarian operations war without the specific authority of the United Nations.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics....politicalnews

[pimpmaster9000]

Originally Posted by Sarn

MPs say Kosovo bombing was illegal but necessary

this was actually a necessary bombing because it surgically removed the cancer that is kosovo from serbia and it is now the problem of the EU...serbia will never ever ever ever ever ever recognize kosovo as an independent state SO kosovars will never ever ever ever ever ever be able to enter serbia with their passports...it is the biggest favor the west ever did to serbia...kosovars have like 10 children each and breed like locusts...I know because I am kinda from kosovo...even at this rate they are losing 5% of their population every year because they go to the EU...

even though the US bombing was a terrorist and criminal act, focused on nothing more than the arms industry having shit to bomb, serbia should build bill clinton a statue and name streets after him

my message to fellow europeans: enjoy the kosovars : 1orglaugh

[femdomdestiny]

They don't care and they won't see them and will export them back in Serbia like they export all shit there.

As you saw yesterday, Albanians came with guns, armored vehicles and tried to put the explosive on the rail. And what European pussies did? They said it is not their problem.

Again, Albanians went against all agreements and everything that was negotiated and was ready to start the war again. There is only one solution for this and it is a matter of time at this point.

[SekobA]

Whatalow kick for President on leaving

[Sarn]

Originally Posted by crucifissio

this was actually a necessary bombing because it surgically removed the cancer that is kosovo from serbia and it is now the problem of the EU...serbia will never ever ever ever ever ever recognize kosovo as an independent state SO kosovars will never ever ever ever ever ever be able to enter serbia with their passports...it is the biggest favor the west ever did to serbia...kosovars have like 10 children each and breed like locusts...I know because I am kinda from kosovo...even at this rate they are losing 5% of their population every year because they go to the EU...

even though the US bombing was a terrorist and criminal act, focused on nothing more than the arms industry having shit to bomb, serbia should build bill clinton a statue and name streets after him

my message to fellow europeans: enjoy the kosovars : 1orglaugh

Originally Posted by femdomdestiny

As you saw yesterday, Albanians came with guns, armored vehicles and tried to put the explosive on the rail. And what European pussies did? They said it is not their problem.

EU find new problem on own ass

[pimpmaster9000]

Originally Posted by femdomdestiny

They don't care and they won't see them and will export them back in Serbia like they export all shit there. .

no passport...you can not return a kosovar to serbia because serbia does not accept their passports...they can however return them to kosovo

oh an how amusing is it that the prime minister of kosovo is charged with dozens of more new murders (including cutting a babies head off!!!!) after all the witnesses from the old murders got liquidated?

answer to my own question: super amusing!

US "freedom fighter" ramush looks like a solid fellow I mean he has "Freedom" written all over him: