why do liberals oppose porn prosecutions that might restore order for the paysite model? - GoFuckYourself.com

Joshua G · 02-10-2017, 03:26 AM

do you libs, what whine about GOP porn prosecutions, understand you are shilling fake news, again?

did porn stop selling during reagan/meese? nope.

did porn survive the COPA vote, where bill clinton attempted to ban onlline porn? yep. the online heyday happened during the COPA threat!

what will sessions go after? the whole industry? nope. just like ashcroft. he will target some bad guys for termination. the federal courts shoot down all blanket bans of adult content, so thats not happening!!!

& who are the bad guys in porn today? Tubes. file share.

Trump will make porn profitable again. & you liberal dumbfucks are too stupid to see it.

Joshua G · 02-10-2017, 03:33 AM

if porn really faces a threat online, its from obama passing ICANN control off to the UN.

the UN is full of left-tards that want to blanket ban porn off the web. thats where everyone should worry...

crockett & bladewire are the biggest threats to this industry.

NewNick · 02-10-2017, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

do you libs, what whine about GOP porn prosecutions, understand you are shilling fake news, again?

did porn stop selling during reagan/meese? nope.

did porn survive the COPA vote, where bill clinton attempted to ban onlline porn? yep. the online heyday happened during the COPA threat!

what will sessions go after? the whole industry? nope. just like ashcroft. he will target some bad guys for termination. the federal courts shoot down all blanket bans of adult content, so thats not happening!!!

& who are the bad guys in porn today? Tubes. file share.

Trump will make porn profitable again. & you liberal dumbfucks are too stupid to see it.

Well that would be lovely Josh. I hope you are right.

Unfortunately I dont share your mindless optimism.

wankawonk · 02-10-2017, 03:47 AM

I shouldn't bite, but I will.

If prosecutions started happening and tube sites started getting blocked, it would just create a black market for a few years until libs are back in power. Webmasters would start streaming from offshore and constantly change their domain names and IP addresses to stay ahead of authorities. Users would sign up for VPNs. It'd be a lot like the situation with torrents.

If things got really bad, webmasters would just block USA traffic until things calm down. Times would be tough but tubesites would survive on foreign traffic. USA is less than half my revenue.

It would certainly create new opportunities, but probably not for paysites.

Joshua G · 02-10-2017, 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick

Well that would be lovely Josh. I hope you are right.

Unfortunately I dont share your mindless optimism.

i'm wrong. without international cooperation, tubes & file share remain prosperous online being out of reach of USA.

the only people sessions can really nail, without having to face 1st amendment issues, is porn sold thats a scam for malware, card bangers, people that do bad things via shilling porn. an average joe making home content for a cam site, an LA paysite producer thats following regs, is not in danger of a pussy grabber president.

but the bigger picture is that the liberal whining about trump "doing something" about porn is liberal fake news.

Joshua G · 02-10-2017, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wankawonk

I shouldn't bite, but I will.

If prosecutions started happening and tube sites started getting blocked, it would just create a black market for a few years until libs are back in power. Webmasters would start streaming from offshore and constantly change their domain names and IP addresses to stay ahead of authorities. Users would sign up for VPNs. It'd be a lot like the situation with torrents.

If things got really bad, webmasters would just block USA traffic until things calm down. Times would be tough but tubesites would survive on foreign traffic. USA is less than half my revenue.

It would certainly create new opportunities, but probably not for paysites.

thats the rub.

people will have to make a greater effort to get free porn. you will need VPN, maybe a tor browser. tubes will still make traffic but not in the same bushels. the dollars made off that traffic will not be the same.

but things that make free harder for the public is helpful to anyone trying to produce an honest porn buck.

Paul Markham · 02-10-2017, 04:40 AM

The fight has to go to blocking domains of a daily basis until they are so severely hurt the advertising revenue fails to pay for the free porn. Torrent link sites can afford to move domains, can Tubes afford the loss of business?

Blocking US traffic is fine, the sites go under with the loss of traffic. If less than half your revenue, that shows the level of your revenue.

Paysites, or recorded porn, were the lifeblood of the porn industry. Which is now it's now anaemic. People should be right behind the UK's intention of blocking free porn. Like others in the West. Manwin would make a lot more money if it sold more memberships than ad space.

I see there's a problem with only blocking domains, But the line between profit and loss is easy to cross. Imagine Pornhub.com going to the FBI Warning day after day, then the new domain doing the same. And a lot more.

US law exposing children to porn. Ultimately this could be the key, not moving servers offshore. The whole company has to go offshore or face fines or prison.

How many will opt to live in Russia and see their domains crashing day after day? Just so they can sell ad space?

Barry-xlovecam · 02-10-2017, 05:27 AM

The US government is not going to be able to shut down offshore tube sites -- that is utter fantasy. In fact, the US Government could give -0- fucks about domestic porn pay-sites losing money and going out of business --- THAT IS THE EXACT GOAL.

When most of the pay-sites go broke, having had their IPs and DNS blocked [if that is even remotely possible], there will be no content left to steal and porn tubes may fade away or survive off of amateur self produced porn distributed free or cheaply on porn social media.

Get on your dinosaurs and ride into the sunset

Only by tying the matter up in court will you be able to survive -- operation by judicial order sucks big time -- been there done that c. 2004-2007

NewNick · 02-10-2017, 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

The US government is not going to be able to shut down offshore tube sites -- that is utter fantasy. In fact, the US Government could give -0- fucks about domestic porn pay-sites losing money and going out of business --- THAT IS THE EXACT GOAL.

When most of the pay-sites go broke, having had their IPs and DNS blocked [if that is even remotely possible], there will be no content left to steal and porn tubes may fade away or survive off of amateur self produced porn distributed free or cheaply on porn social media.

Get on your dinosaurs and ride into the sunset

Only by tying the matter up in court will you be able to survive -- operation by judicial order sucks big time -- been there done that c. 2004-2007

You forgot to mention content stolen by recording cam shows.

Yuge business and growing.

beerptrol · 02-10-2017, 05:39 AM

keep trolling you chumpanzee.

NewNick · 02-10-2017, 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

i'm wrong. without international cooperation, tubes & file share remain prosperous online being out of reach of USA.

the only people sessions can really nail, without having to face 1st amendment issues, is porn sold thats a scam for malware, card bangers, people that do bad things via shilling porn. an average joe making home content for a cam site, an LA paysite producer thats following regs, is not in danger of a pussy grabber president.

but the bigger picture is that the liberal whining about trump "doing something" about porn is liberal fake news.

So you are wrong but its the dumb libs fault ?

wankawonk · 02-10-2017, 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Blocking US traffic is fine, the sites go under with the loss of traffic. If less than half your revenue, that shows the level of your revenue.

You have literally no clue what you are talking about.

Barry-xlovecam · 02-10-2017, 05:58 AM

We don't have a large problem with our video being screen capped.

Most hardcore content is;

Not free access.
Live stream only and costs $1.50 - $3.99 a minute.

We do not sell recorded cam shows for user download either.

You must have me confused with these freemium sites some of whom are on USA soil and in DOJ jurisdiction -- that's who may take the hit not us.

02-10-2017, 03:26 AM	#1
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	why do liberals oppose porn prosecutions that might restore order for the paysite model? do you libs, what whine about GOP porn prosecutions, understand you are shilling fake news, again? did porn stop selling during reagan/meese? nope. did porn survive the COPA vote, where bill clinton attempted to ban onlline porn? yep. the online heyday happened during the COPA threat! what will sessions go after? the whole industry? nope. just like ashcroft. he will target some bad guys for termination. the federal courts shoot down all blanket bans of adult content, so thats not happening!!! & who are the bad guys in porn today? Tubes. file share. Trump will make porn profitable again. & you liberal dumbfucks are too stupid to see it.

02-10-2017, 04:40 AM	#7
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	The fight has to go to blocking domains of a daily basis until they are so severely hurt the advertising revenue fails to pay for the free porn. Torrent link sites can afford to move domains, can Tubes afford the loss of business? Blocking US traffic is fine, the sites go under with the loss of traffic. If less than half your revenue, that shows the level of your revenue. Paysites, or recorded porn, were the lifeblood of the porn industry. Which is now it's now anaemic. People should be right behind the UK's intention of blocking free porn. Like others in the West. Manwin would make a lot more money if it sold more memberships than ad space. I see there's a problem with only blocking domains, But the line between profit and loss is easy to cross. Imagine Pornhub.com going to the FBI Warning day after day, then the new domain doing the same. And a lot more. US law exposing children to porn. Ultimately this could be the key, not moving servers offshore. The whole company has to go offshore or face fines or prison. How many will opt to live in Russia and see their domains crashing day after day? Just so they can sell ad space? __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

02-10-2017, 05:39 AM	#10
beerptrol Confirmed Asshole Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar. Posts: 12,722	keep trolling you chumpanzee. __________________ “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.” -- Ulysses S. Grant

02-10-2017, 03:33 AM	#2
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	if porn really faces a threat online, its from obama passing ICANN control off to the UN. the UN is full of left-tards that want to blanket ban porn off the web. thats where everyone should worry... crockett & bladewire are the biggest threats to this industry.

02-10-2017, 03:47 AM	#4
wankawonk Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2015 Posts: 1,018	I shouldn't bite, but I will. If prosecutions started happening and tube sites started getting blocked, it would just create a black market for a few years until libs are back in power. Webmasters would start streaming from offshore and constantly change their domain names and IP addresses to stay ahead of authorities. Users would sign up for VPNs. It'd be a lot like the situation with torrents. If things got really bad, webmasters would just block USA traffic until things calm down. Times would be tough but tubesites would survive on foreign traffic. USA is less than half my revenue. It would certainly create new opportunities, but probably not for paysites.

02-10-2017, 05:27 AM	#8
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	The US government is not going to be able to shut down offshore tube sites -- that is utter fantasy. In fact, the US Government could give -0- fucks about domestic porn pay-sites losing money and going out of business --- THAT IS THE EXACT GOAL. When most of the pay-sites go broke, having had their IPs and DNS blocked [if that is even remotely possible], there will be no content left to steal and porn tubes may fade away or survive off of amateur self produced porn distributed free or cheaply on porn social media. Get on your dinosaurs and ride into the sunset Only by tying the matter up in court will you be able to survive -- operation by judicial order sucks big time -- been there done that c. 2004-2007

02-10-2017, 05:58 AM	#13
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	We don't have a large problem with our video being screen capped. Most hardcore content is; Not free access. Live stream only and costs $1.50 - $3.99 a minute. We do not sell recorded cam shows for user download either. You must have me confused with these freemium sites some of whom are on USA soil and in DOJ jurisdiction -- that's who may take the hit not us.