![]() |
Quote:
However, if you were to judge an ideology based on its doctrine (and not based on the followers who often in fact don't follow its doctrine at all, especially in the West) I'd even go as far as to state that Islam equally has no place in lands that are not ruled by it. There is one principal reason, this ideology has a very strong political part, a total solution not only for its followers, but for the whole world. More than half of its doctrine is not about how to be a follower of Islam, but about how to plot against those that don't follow it, and how to spread Islam in power and numbers, until its reign is absolute. Based on the history and its doctrine, the nature of Islam is not to come and co-exist. The purpose of Islamic migration (hijra - migration in the name of Allah) which has a massive importance in Islam (after all the Islamic calendar doesn't start with the birth of Muhammad or with his first revelation - 622 AD is the year of Hijra, after he migrated to Medina and started the process of taking over) is different. The purpose is to eventually take over, no matter if by force or by entering the political process. And it doesn't matter how long it takes, in some countries, such as Anatollya (today's Turkey that used to be exclusively Christian) it took centuries to get to the point where Turkey is today 99.7 pct. Islamic. Such is the strength of the doctrine. There is no land in history that Islam ever entered that would become post-Islamic, unless using brute force (reconquista in Spain, to some extent also parts of Eastern Europe eventually liberating itself from the rule of Ottoman Empire). Up until the 1950's or so, it has been common sense that Islam is pretty much incompatible with any secular, democratic, in fact any non-Islamic society. What has changed ever since? Certainly not Islam. Today - the official policy on the West is appeasement, certain "sensitive" type of crime is not reported about, Islam can't be critically discussed in public, stating any facts that are negative towards Islam can as much as land you in jail in some western countries (more than 200 years after we get rid of blasphemy laws related to our own Church), make you lose a job or business. This is a true recipe for disaster, and if there ever is a backlash (and there will be eventually if nothing changes) it may as well be much more due to these policies of appeasement, censorship and "religious" and political prosecution then due to any "-phobia". One can note that one of the major principles of Sha'ria after Islam enters a Kaffir (non-Islamic) civilization is to establish the command over the Kuffir and make them submit to Islamic requests. So far, many governments, businesses and organizations in the West certainly are very good at that. The principal issue, there is an ideology that wants to spread their influence and eventually win, but we just want to tie - get along. Quote:
For sure this is a very pitiful and unwanted thing if people fear or avoid them. But what is also important to understand - these so called moderates and secular guys who simply want to get on with their lives, maybe have affection for their secular country and neighbors, would likely also be the first victims if Islam ever gains enough power. Islam is an authoritative system, there is only one choice - to submit, there's no space for personal choice, under Islamic rule, these so called moderates can be very easily pronounced Takfir (Muslims that don't follow the doctrine and can be treated as Kaffir) and treated as such. Quote:
Islam + natural primitiveness it encourages or the opposite, Islam + smarts and being able to use it to control masses (such as its "prophet" did), leads to horrendous results as we can see throughout the history, all across the Islamic lands and today even across the Islamic communities in the west. I believe that the only thing that can end this is not appeasement, but a thorough education about what Islam is and confronting it ideologically. Not only among those outside of it, but also those "moderates" who often also know very little about it. If there ever will be one thing that will defeat Islam, it will be critical thought. One should also know which principles he wants to live by and where are the borders of what such principles allow and what not. By the way, and this illustrates it well - one of the Shar'ia principles is that "no criticism of Islam is ever allowed" - if there is one thing that threatens the existence of Islam - it is criticism and critical thought. It's not a coincidence that so called "hate speech laws" were first brought up in UN by the Soviet Union in 1948 and then by OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) in 1999 - totality always has to censor speech and prosecute those that criticize it in order to stay in power. |
Quote:
If there ever will be one thing that will defeat Islam, it will be critical thought. I bet that all these brainwashing imams will be so unhappy with it. |
Quote:
https://cs4.pikabu.ru/post_img/2015/..._170148405.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You need a new hobby Paul. You suck at politics and debate on anything as a whole it seems. |
Quote:
How would you react to having all Jews flushed out of your nation because of their beliefs? We are all not so removed from such things and it is hypocritical to think your line of thinking is any different. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
To be a Muslim one must adhere to what the Quran commands. And that is very well described in your post. |
Quote:
Would I label Christians as Right Wing? Good question. Certainly, some are Right of Center, but none demand death for Blasphemy, Flogging, Women as Second Class, Slavery, etc. Well no sane ones. |
Quote:
How do you react to Sunni Muslims killing Shia Muslims today? |
Quote:
your problem is that you have such a small brain that you do not even understand the consequences of what you are praising. 1. I am with you when it comes to the definition what islam is. I really know that this religion (as many others) have no other target as to keep people stupid and make them slaves without knowing that they are. so far so good. 2. what you are planning to do is keep them outside and let them breed. let them teach their children the stories of how much we hate them (what is in parts not even a lie). than wait til they are strong and united (all of them - also the ones what are far for terrorism now) and then they will come to do what they got teached. they will kill us all because they are MUCH MUCH MORE. so what you want is to get them out of our eyes til this day comes. and you REALLY THINK THAT THIS IS SMART. someone who have such a solution in his mind can not be called smart. he can not even be called educated. i wonder how you could make a life with your brain if not in a country where costs are so low that even an unemployed from any other country could live there quite ok. i doubt that you would have survived in the reality - sorry you are simply too dumb for that. if you would be even a bit smart you would see that the one and only chance we have is to try to spread education to them. and no we can not do that with them IN THEIR countries because the education would not reach them. but we can try it with them what are here. and even when we are not successful 100% with each one who got it we have a multiplicator who can possibly change 2 others in his entire life. i did never say this is a fast process - but it is the ONLY possible way to try what has a 50/50 chance to resolve that without loosing millions of life. if this 50/50 chance do not work we are fucked anyway ! |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mass migration encourages the lowest paid/skilled to migrate to a richer country. They bring little and put enormous strain on services like housing, healthcare, education, policing, prisons, jobs and wages. Either you, as someone who earns a decent wage, pay more taxes to meet the new demands or your country sinks into further debt. A quick look at a pie chart or where the US spends its tax revenues shows the problems. https://media.nationalpriorities.org...15_enacted.png Social security, Education, housing, and health rise as more people rely on the Government for support. With falling or stagnating wages, for most, there is no extra tax revenue coming in. Will you or your grandchildren pay the debt? Population reduction is the sensible solution. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
3% education versus 16% military + 4% veterans +6% interest on debt that already answers EVERY question ! but all your spendings on that graphic must have an income part too. so form WHO do you think all this is paid if there are only unemployed in the country? and how much tax is paid by someone who makes 600 dollar per month as housemaid? and WHICH american will do that job? did you ever think about how many american women CAN go to work and pay tax BECAUSE they can pay for a housemaid ? btw.: an illegal immigrant can not ask for money when he is without job - did you realize that? you are in such a small thinking circle and the worst is that you do not have the smallest clue about economy. you think that everybody who was in charge of that yet has no clue but you have. HOW COMES ? and how comes that you think that the one and only who REALLY do not have a clue about world economy (trump) is the right one for this job? and what a fuck have your argumenst to do with REFUGEES ???? letīs close the cicle and say: the refugee problem is caused by 16% + 4% military spendings. with other words: americans made a lot of debts to finance this refugee problem and now looking for the guilty ones what they will NOT find outside of USA. the good old way do not work - they just moving the problem a bit in the future - but the even older ways will not work either. time for new brains - not old rotten ones. |
Quote:
PS: believing in Knowledge and Education atheism and gas Zarin attack as proof only |
Quote:
This is a very important distinction - Muslims do not constitute what Islam is, it goes the other way - Islam is the ideology that should rule over every aspect of their lives (and as codified in the Islamic doctrine, eventually also over those outside of Islam). The level of dedication and piousness among the followers of any cult or ideology may move on the scale from 0 to 100 pct. or anywhere in between. Same way as someone who claims to be Christian may steal, lie and commit adultery, the same way somebody who claims to subscribe to Islam too may not act in accordance with its doctrine. In order to decide about a level of dedication and piousness, one would have to be able to read thoughts of every single one of out of over a billion of them. Some that do not live under Islamic rule may not practice Islam at all, and one can be quite confident that many will know very little or close to nothing about the Islamic doctrine in the first place. Anyway, to advocate or defend a totalitarian ideology based on the fact that a part of its followers do not adhere to it or know very little about it is not exactly comforting either. This is a very bold claim worth a reaction though: "anything to do with Sharia bullshit is extremely limited and an offshoot of most followers." Are you aware what Sha'ria constitutes? Most westerners may have some remote idea about an ancient legal system, that is just a part of it though. Shar'ia is a complete manual on how to run a civilization according to the doctrine of Islam. Based on the fundamental principle that the doctrine is "perfect, universal, final" and nothing can contradict it. It can be divided into two parts one of which deals mainly with the five pillars of Islam and is mostly religious (al-ibadat) and other part that deals with "human interaction" (al-muamalat) that is practical and political and prescribes how to run a society and civilization based on the doctrine of Islam, often in the most meticulous detail. It covers just about any situation in life, religious affairs, family, business, criminal code, rule over the Kaffir, Jihad, war and peace etc. etc. Issues that a western person may find repulsive such as child marriages (selling underage daughters into marriage), stoning for adultery, death for apostasy, first cousin marriage, wife beating, second class citizen status for women and third class citizen status for non-muslims - that all can be found there. What is important to understand here is that everything included in such manual has to be 100 pct. in accordance with the doctrine (found in the Qu'Ran or in the Sunna of Mohammad). It's not some "extreme" application of Islam, it is Islam exactly according to its doctrine - every rule, every prescription in this manual is to be exactly found in the doctrine of Islam. Sha'ria claims to be the only applicable God's law and is supposed to replace any and all man made form of government. It includes the Kaffir (non believers) and is supposed to rule over them (propagation of Sha'ria is even banned on legal grounds in 18 US states if I am not mistaken). Now of course there is formal (mandated to various extent in many lands under Islamic rule) and informal application of Sha'ria (applied voluntarily in the Islamic lands and Islamic communities worldwide). Here's a fine map that may help with getting a better idea about the influence of Sha'ria in today's Islamic world, the article includes also a nice table with details for each country: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applic...law_by_country As you can see, in many countries the presence of Sha'ria is not formally codified in its legal system (a legacy of western presence that usually tried to add aspects of continental law), however, Islamic communities typically still apply Shar'ia among each other informally (see also Shar'ia courts in Britain or across other European Islamic communities). According to Pew Research, the support for Sha'ria being the official law in Islamic lands among Muslims may go anywhere from 8 pct. in Azerbaidjan up to to 99 pct. in Afghanistan. Here's even a graph: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-con...si2-chp1-3.png This is an important metrics, especially if you consider some of Shari'as provisions "extreme". If these numbers would be representative, then we are certainly not talking about "extremely limited and an offshoot of most followers". One could even ask, do we really believe that those coming from these regions will abandon such dedication to the Islamic way of running a civilization instantly the moment they set foot into a non-Islamic country? Whereas the same doctrine commands them to "migrate in the name of Allah"? |
Quote:
i guess it's just part of our culture. |
>Where was the German police that time ?
|
Quote:
Albania - 12 % of Muslims pro Sharia, Kosovo - 20 %, Azerbejdzan - 8 % ???:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Thanks to the communists for the atheism:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup |
Quote:
or they will be beaten like in Imperalist America ?:winkwink::winkwink::winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
thommy: islamic terror attacks across Europe started when the migrant crisis started. Do you think there is a connection? Yes or no answer will do.
|
Quote:
letīs say it like this: 30 years ago there have not been that much broken mobile phones in europe as now - and i am pretty sure that since the netherlands lost the final in 2010 against spain in the football WC there are even more broken mobile phones. so following your logic the netherlands are responsable for broken mobile phones. the number of terror attacks WORLDWIDE is dramatically increasing since bush went into iraq. that means even when there are still not more attacks than 0,1 % are happening in europe that there are automatically more attacks there. and YES the refugee crisis brought also a number of people what should not be here but this is a circumstance what should not blame the majority of the refugees who are NOT terrorists. this is also caused by the NUMBER of people and not on the percentage of terrorists inside this group. you know HOW many deadly problems we have on this planet when we exclude terror? letīs talk about drugs, letīs talk about AIDS letīs talk about other imported crimes what are killing THOUSANDS of people every fucking day in europe. if you do not want that you have to make a wall around your country - stop all flights, cars and ships in and out and stop to negotiate with other countries and you will be fine. welcome to stone age ! you guys have the talent not to see the whole thing. you have the idea that one group of people is responsable for all and everything and you forget that we indeed have MUCH bigger problems we are used to live with already. you also forget that the problem you want to resolve is getting bigger if you cut them off and donīt even try to change something. you mismatch cause and effect in all and everything no matter if it is regards to economy or humanity. farseeing is not your talent but this is what we need in this case. and this is why we do NOT NEED silly ideas from people who think that their own misfortune is made by others as themselves. |
Quote:
since christianity becomes legal in europe it brings mass murderings, genocides, crusades, wars and many more. i did my reading and i can support my opinion with historical facts if someone wanna argue. religion is worse shit ever. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're in favour of housemaids earning $600 a month. You lost your argument there. Think before you type something that dumb. |
Quote:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ity-sharia-law https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/73...-UK-Islam-poll https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7...muslims-survey Read it and see the truth about how they think. Quote:
|
Quote:
The ME ones have been going on for a lot longer. Remember Israel had to put up a wall, that works fine, to reduce the problem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...rorist_attacks At least check Google to see if your logic isn't bullshit. |
Quote:
and not only foreign religions also our own is still used for some ugly things. |
Quote:
A Look at the Israeli West Bank Barrier Wall Quote:
worldwide means: in every country and that includes europe and NO WALL will stop that - it will make the hate bigger AND WITH THE HATE THE PROBLEM ! where do you think the MOST europeans and US citizens where killed - NO it is NOT in THEIR countries !!! have you seen an ISIS beheading video what was made in Germany or in the US or any other part of the western world ??? they have been even killed in turkey because terrorists hate turks. WHAT A FUCK shall turkey do??? a muslim ban for a muslim country ???? you are SOOO FUCKING FAR from any reality and your logic seems to be on holidays. if you want to hide yourself in your bedroom than do it. but it is not a solution for people who want a free world with free travel and free people. bring all europeans all americans and all westerns OUT from all this countries and you will see how fast the worlds economy breaks in pieces. you can not even think from 11.59 am to noon - so stop to try think and finding solutions - you are incapable for this task. |
It would be incorrect to claim that Islamic terrorist attacks started with the migration crisis. In fact, in the light of history, the Islamic motivated violence (violent Jihad) never stopped since the inception of Islam in 622 AD (the year of hijra - migration to Medina as described above).
First of all, it's very important to use the correct terminology - this is not an "act of terror" in the western sense of the word. It's not a certain group wanting something in exchange for holding hostages or for threatening with more terror. This is an act of violent Jihad, entirely in line with the doctrine of Islam. The same doctrine based on which the early Caliphs attacked, conquered and subjugated their neighboring lands, spreading the Caliphate and establishing the rule of Islam. Why the distinction - "violent" Jihad? Because not all forms of Jihad are violent. The doctrine of Jihad ("struggle" or "struggle in the way of allah") has been sold to Westerners as a "misunderstood " concept. And it is quite true, but not in the way you may think. A regular westerner will envision a Jihadist as somebody like the Charlie Hebdo or Bataclan assassins, as a Mujahedeen that blows himself up in a rival mosque, or as the Islamic state Jihadis conquering new territory in their Toyotas. But this is just one part of jihad - called in the Islamic doctrine "Jihad by the sword". There are several forms of Jihad described in the doctrine of Islam, including: - Jihad of the heart (Jihad bis nafs) - Jihad by the sword (Jihad bis Saif)) - Jihad by pen (Jihad bil qalam) - Jihad by the word (Jihad bil lisan) - Jihad by money While the first one is rather spiritual and indeed does not extend to the Kuffir (non-Muslims) the primary goal of the other forms of Jihad is to struggle against non-muslims and to spread Islam. Btw. if a follower of Islam claims that the "spiritual Jihad" is the only meaning of Jihad - he is purposefully silent about the rest of the doctrine - it is a form of deception. The doctrine of Islam commands "every sane male that reaches puberty" to engage in Jihad, however Jihad is "no more obligatory as long as enough followers engage in it". It also rewards "those that arm Jihadis the same as the Jihadis themselves". So if you want to get the highest reward of Heaven, you can either become a Jihadi yourself, or you can support one materially. This was proven to be a very smart and effective rule in order to spread Islam throughout the history. Let's try to put together a couple of examples for better illustration: Jihad of the heart (Jihad bis nafs) - an example may be a follower of Islam working on his faith (for example hajj - the pilgrimage to Mecca, one of the pillars of Islam, could be considered to fall into this category), this is not much prevalent throughout the doctrine (estimated cca 2 pct. of all the verses in the doctrine related to Jihad) Jihad by the sword (Jihad bil Saif) This has been historically practiced either as an offensive jihad under Caliphs (first, second wave of Jihad + the conquests of the Ottoman empire) conquering territory and spreading Islam by force. Or as a defensive Jihad in case that anybody attacks Dar al Islam (the land ruled by Islam). Ever since the last caliphate was officially terminated in 1924, there has been not so much in the way of "official" offensive Jihad, it is perpetrated mostly by various non governmental Jihadi groups. Anyway a several examples of recent large scale application of Jihad that can be considered are for example: - the bloody partition of India and Pakistan - civil wars in Lebanon, Algeria, most of the Africa with Islamic presence - the war between Iraq and Iran (Sunni vs. Shia - the Islamic republic of Iran called for defensive Jihad) - trans national Islamic groups such as Al Qaeda, Al Shabab, Boko Haram, Taliban - a post WW II Rohingya effort to establish an Islamic enclave inside Burma (Western Myanmar) - Hamas and Fatah in PA - Jihad against the state of Israel - the on going wave of Jihad coming from the Islamic communities in Europe and US etc. etc. Jihadi groups are present in pretty much every Islamic community around the world. Btw. I believe the recent truck using Jihadi from NYC was named Saifulo - this is a direct reference to the word Saif ("sword"). Anyway, the violent Jihad itself is not as dangerous at this point of time as the non-violent forms of Jihad. The Jihadis are, at this point of time, not likely to be strong enough to conquer the Western lands by the sword or by terror alone, therefore the relative danger is limited. One thing they already succeeded at though is to spread fear - just how many magazines re-printed the Mohammad cartoons? Zero? They also successfully manage to bleed the Western governmental budgets on surveillance and law enforcement (unless your priority is to tackle online "hate speech" as in Sadiq Khan's London). Anyway, if Islam would plan to take over the West in a way of migration and growing demographic share (as it is officially planned by the Muslim Brotherhood for example). And such as it is also entirely in line with the doctrine - "migration in the way of Allah", it is certainly not very smart if the Islamic communities in the West engage in violent Jihad. But let's examine the non - violent forms of Jihad: - Jihad by pen (Jihad bil qalam) Various Islamic organizations work tirelessly in order to forbid and criminalize any criticism of Islam. When was the last time you saw an open criticism of Islam in mainstream media? Did you know that FBI, in September 2011, succumbed to the pressure from various Islamic organizations and terminated any anti-terror training materials and courses that would include the word "Islam" in it? Who revived the "hate speech laws" to protect "religions" in UN in 1999? Well it was OIC ("the organization of Islamic cooperation") Do you know that, for example the top Google search results for terms such as "Islam" or "Jihad" were suddenly modified in the summer last year, based on the initiative from the Texas Imam Omar Sulleyman? And most of all - the invention of the, completely made up, and absurd term "Islamophobia" that is used to instantly shut down any criticism of Islam whatsoever (see Canadian motion 103 for a recent application). This is btw. entirely in line with Sha'ria principle "no criticism of Islam is allowed". Instead a positive image of Islam is spread - example - most of the recent students at the politically correct schools will definitely know about the so called Islamic "Golden age". But they may have a hard time to answer properly how did Islam spread throughout the history. - Jihad by the word (Jihad bil lisan) An example are these frequent "interfaith" gatherings. A Bishop, Rabbi and an Imam sit down and of course you only hear the early, Meccan verses in the Qu'ran, that we are all brothers in the Abrahamic faith, that there's no compulsion in religion, and no part of the latter, Medinan doctrine targeted against non-Muslims (that abrogates the earlier verses) is ever mentioned. The Bishop and Rabbi don't challenge that since they are either afraid to, or more likely, they themselves know very little about the doctrine of Islam. It feels nice, yet it is again a form of deception. - Jihad by money Did you know that, approximately 70 pct. of the Mosques in US are supposed to be financed from Saudi Arabia? Did you know that pretty much all the Islamic literature and services in the US and western prisons (very fertile ground for new converts) is also often donated by Saudi Arabia or Qatar? These are just marginal examples, but anytime there's another, megalomaniac, Islamic center opened in the city near you, keep in mind that it has, according to the doctrine of Islam, also its distinct political purpose. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No economic migrants congregate in Germany by walking through safe countries because Germany gives them more. They do not register in the first safe country because that would stop them getting to the most benefits. Therefore economic migrants. |
Quote:
Germans killed by the terrorist. http://www.datagraver.com/thumbs/130...l-20170523.png Czech killed by terrorists. For someone who claims to be intelligent, you're a dope. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Islamic terrorist attacks in USA. |
Quote:
why do you want to outsource this problem and wait? because than you hope that you will not see it anymore ???? what do you think will happen in 10 or 20 years after THEY ALL KNOW that we hate them and donīt even let them in our countries or help the ones who need help? are you REALLY that dumb that you are unable to count 1+1 together? WHAT do you want to do against people who are moving to islam in czech and get radicalized there? WHAT do you want to do against the HUNDRED THOUSAND of AMERICAN BORN PRISONERS who join the radicalized islam in us jails? Quote:
you do not have answers !!!! you do not have solutions!!!! you do not even have a brain!!! |
Quote:
The actual number of Muslims killing other Muslims in countries where they are a dominant proportion of the population should tell any logical thinker that Islam has a problem. It's not a few hundred, it's millions of Muslims who believe in violence as a tool to spread their ideology. The problem in the West is they are now teaching it to their children. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jesus taught the parable of the good Samaritan. Islam teaches a different way. |
Quote:
https://www.google.cz/search?dcr=0&e...igious+schools The evidence says NO! Who is going to radicalise Czech people to become Muslims, if there are none in Czech? Once again you display your lack of logical thought. I do quick searches on Google and come up with the facts I find. You talk from the heart. Which is biased. |
Quote:
sometimes you do not even look at the sources where you get the shit from. you try to find the sources what proves YOUR idea. there are billions of people out there MUCH MORE intelligent as you are I am. do you think none of them ever have thought about such ideas? the world is too complicated for you paul. you should stop to think about things that you will never understand in a trillion years. if you do not recognize the connections in the world history and do not see that hate and lock out NEVER was a solution then try it again in the next life to understand. because in this you will not get it anymore |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnmI9eFzO9A&t=28s
BBC Panorama report. So much for educating them. https://barenakedislam.files.wordpre.../2011/09/b.png http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...94_634x536.jpg http://www.poverty.org.uk/06/bh.png http://www.poverty.org.uk/47/ah.png Proof that immigration should be very strictly controlled. So the country accepting them only takes the best and those that are needed. The EU says no to that idea and the uk makes very scant claims to control it. The first rule should be 5 years working before a penny is given in benefits. |
GFY is an echo chamber of your non adult industry foreigner alt-right propaganda posting it here all day every day with multiple fake nics has just pushed people to post on XBiz to do business & get away from your shit :321GFY
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc