|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
10-03-2018, 03:10 PM
|
#1 |
|
I help you SUCCEED
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
|
Is overregulation killing the crypto market?
I agree that there MUST be REASONABLE regulation. However, is restricting ICOs to 'accredited investors' a good move considering how restrictive that classification is?
|
|
|
|
10-03-2018, 04:13 PM
|
#2 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26,732
|
ICOs are what is killing the crypto market...none of them do shit except make money for the founders...restricting it to accredited investors is a good move in the long run...
|
|
|
|
|
10-04-2018, 01:28 AM
|
#3 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Taipei
Posts: 25,198
|
Fact, bitcoin never needed an ICO, i have to rarely agree, anything regulating ICOs should be good thing since so many ICO scams have hurt crypto overall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| investors, icos, accredited, restrictive, classification, move, restricting, regulation, crypto, market, killing, overregulation, agree, reasonable |
Report a suspicious cracker: 
