House intelligence chair announces sweeping investigation into Trump's finances and Russia

[2MuchMark]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/06/polit...ler/index.html

(CNN)House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff announced Wednesday a broad investigation his committee would undertake "beyond Russia" into whether President Donald Trump's financial interests are driving his actions.

Schiff said the investigation would "allow us to investigate any credible allegation that financial interests or other interests are driving decision-making of the President or anyone in the administration."

"That pertains to any credible allegations of leverage by the Russians or the Saudis or anyone else," Schiff told reporters after the House Intelligence Committee's first meeting in the new Congress.

In a statement, Schiff said the investigation would include a continued probe into Russia's actions during the 2016 election and contacts between the Russia and Trump's team, as well as an examination of "whether any foreign actor has sought to compromise or holds leverage, financial or otherwise, over Donald Trump, his family, his business, or his associates."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/06/polit...ler/index.html

[BaldBastard]

And now the shit hits the frying pan ;)

[Bladewire]

Nunes is fucked

[TheSquealer]

Oh thank God!!...


Any day now......

[Rochard]

The Republicans seem to think this is going to end. It's not. Watergate went on for six or seven years. Sixty people got indicted. Mueller could wrap up his investigation in the morning and we still have years of investigations.

I honestly don't care any more. The Republicans had a four year witch hunt into Hillary Clinton for NO REASON. Four years and not a single indictment. Anyone involved in that should go to prison. They used Congressional powers to take out a political enemy.

Now here we are with Trump and everyone who worked on his campaign has been found guilty of something. It's clearly not a witch hunt. A witch hunt doesn't turn up anything.

What the fuck did people expect?

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by Rochard

What the fuck did people expect?

[pimpmaster9000]

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

[Acepimp]

You'd have to be a clueless mofo to believe anything shifty Schiff says. LOL !!

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Nearly all of these are either not his accomplishments, routine, or just bad.

One of the items on your list there is moving the US embassy to Jerusalem. This is not a good thing; It's a very very bad thing. It didn't make discussions in the Middle East "more difficult" but instead completely ended them.

The Veterans Accountability act is also a very bad thing. They made it easier to fire people. So now instead of being merely understaffed, they are completely understaffed.

[Busty2]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

You'd have to be a clueless mofo to believe anything shifty Schiff says. LOL !!

You love Chump, so i guess you qualify

[RedFred]

[RedFred]

[beerptrol]

Time to lock up those traitorous russian loving sons a bitches!

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

You'd have to be a clueless mofo to believe anything shifty Schiff says. LOL !!

Sure Ok Ace:

"Schiff is an influential voice for the Democratic Party on foreign policy and national security issues in the House of Representatives.[1] He currently serves as the chairman of the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. He is currently on leave from the House Appropriations Committee which he joined in 2007. He previously served on the United States House Foreign Affairs Committee and serves on the State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs Subcommittee of the Appropriations Committee.

....

...He graduated from Monte Vista High School[4] and received a political science degree from Stanford University and a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School.

After Harvard Law School, Schiff began working as a prosecutor in the Los Angeles branch of the U.S. Attorney's Office. While an assistant U.S. Attorney, he gained attention by prosecuting a case against Richard Miller, a former FBI agent convicted of "passing secret documents to the Soviet Union in exchange for a promised $65,000 in gold and cash."[5] The first time Miller was tried, it resulted in a hung jury; the second time, it resulted in a conviction overturned on appeal,[6] and the third time he was convicted.[7]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Schiff

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by RedFred

Thats HAWT!!!!

[bronco67]

I want to know which Republicans in the judiciary committee voted NO to release the testimony transcripts to Mueller. If they voted yes now, then why didn't they want to release the transcripts when they were in charge?

And what can they do about putting Devin Nunes behind bars for obstruction of justice? That motherfucker needs to pay some price for his treasonous behavior.

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Most of the stuff on that list is like a wet dream for assholes.

And a lot of it is either in effect or is successful. How many of those things are concrete plans of action with clear results? A lot of it is just horseshit they said they were going to do and never did. And I thank god that they're too incompetent to execute their own shitty policy. It's shit, just like you are shit. Kill yourself. But seriously, it's time to end your family's suffering. Make them the happiest mongoloids on the planet.

[OneHungLo]

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard

And now the shit hits the frying pan ;)

Yeah blumphhh is finished!!! He's done this time.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by bronco67

Most of the stuff on that list is like a wet dream for assholes.

And a lot of it is either in effect or is successful. How many of those things are concrete plans of action with clear results? A lot of it is just horseshit they said they were going to do and never did. And I thank god that they're too incompetent to execute their own shitty policy. It's shit, just like you are shit. Kill yourself. But seriously, it's time to end your family's suffering. Make them the happiest mongoloids on the planet.

Remember this?



Piles and piles of nothing.

[GAMEFINEST]

Let the rain begin

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Sure Ok Ace:

Mark, citing Wikipedia? LOL Didn't your college professors ever tell you to never cite wikipedia?

Ok seriously, if you'd like to know why he sucks:

From Dec 2017:

The New FBI Agency Everyone Forgot – Did Adam Schiff Just Get Caught in an Elaborate Counterintelligence Sting?…

By now everyone is likely aware of the Fake News story run by CNN on Friday surrounding an email received by Donald Trump Jr. The email was part of the investigative evidence shared with the House Intelligence committee; and later leaked from within that committee to CNN – thereby initiating the false reporting on the content.

The central issue in the CNN story was the date of an email.

It was leaked from within the committee, and later reported by CNN, that the date was “September 4th, 2016”; a date convenient for a collusion narrative between Trump Jr and WikiLeaks.

However, the real date, on the actual email, was “September 14th, 2016”; a day after Wikileaks published the content of their DNC leaks and a date that makes the entire CNN report a ‘nothingburger’.

However, CNN reports that two independent sources originally leaked to them the contents of what they had seen on the email in question. But CNN never saw the email, until later in the day.

♦Two “independent sources” both looked at an email, and both came away from reading that email with the wrong date? How is that possible?

It has been CTH contention for several weeks that a counterintelligence sting operation has been going on within the IC community. False trails of information, seeded by ‘White Hat’ investigators, intended to be captured by ‘Black Hat’ leakers – and delivered to their usurping allies in media. The stories are fake, the leaks are real.

All investigative documents, relating to the witness, are provided to the congressional committees prior to the interviews with the witnesses; or, if the information is classified, each committee member has an opportunity to review the documents via a controlled SCIF environment when no physical copies are allowed as part of the evidence.

The Don JR./Wikileaks email could very easily be part of a ‘sting’. The date was intentionally seeded as incorrect. The resulting story is fake. The leak, however, is real.

Each nugget of disinformation exposes a specific leaker. Each trail used in the sharing of that disinformation exposes the enabling media. The White Hat plants the fake news seed, and then watches to see where, when, how, to-whom, and from-whom, it shows up.


CNN's initial reporting of the date on an email sent to members of the Trump campaign about Wikileaks documents, which was confirmed by two sources to CNN, was incorrect. We have updated our story to include the correct date, and present the proper context for the timing of email

— CNN Communications (@CNNPR) December 8, 2017

Video: Here's how @MKRaju corrected his reporting on @CNNNewsroom https://t.co/zy33tA3NIa

— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) December 8, 2017

I'm seeing lots of tweets saying CNN should out the sources that misinformed @MKRaju. But @CNNPR says the network does not believe that the sources *intended* to deceive… https://t.co/wKl9rX7Ibc

— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) December 9, 2017

In this example, we believe it is most likely House Intelligence Committee Minority Chairman Adam Schiff was the recipient of the disinformation, and has now exposed himself as a leaker to an elite, previously undisclosed, investigative unit specifically assembling evidence of corruption and leaking at the highest levels of government.

The scale and strength of the CNN push-back, and specifically the tone in their refusal to even consider discussing source of the false information, further supports our supposition.

Keep in mind, Representative Adam Schiff is -as an outcome of his minority ranking on the House Intel Committee- a member of the elite congressional oversight “Gang of Eight”.

This is a VERY BIG deal. The Gang of Eight holds oversight on every covert intelligence operation going on around the world. The Go8 oversee the NSA, CIA, FBI, DNI, and every single intelligence unit and operation. The Go8 are the only group with oversight on the CIA action from Presidential Finding Memos authorizing covert operations.

The back-story to CTH theory on this endeavor includes an almost complete, years-long, Dept of Justice Office Inspector General investigation that no-one was paying attention to until recently. And don’t forget the ongoing FBI investigation into the Awan Brothers, and quantifying the potential intelligence compromise therein, plays into this.

That said, it would not be the IG carrying out the counterintelligence operation to identify leakers. In actuality, no official IC agency would be empowered to place fake news in front of congress. Setting traps for congress is generally bad form, and for matters of trust – bad politics. That reality, amid those who follow DC politics, is the central point to dismiss such the “Black Hat Hunting” theory.

However, few people were paying attention four months ago when Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coates told us they were going to do exactly that:

04:30 …”The FBI has created a new counterintelligence unit to manage these [leak] cases”…
08:17 …”these National Security breaches do not just originate from within the Intelligence Community. They come from a wide range of sources within the government, including the Congress.”…

Two days later, Sunday August 6th, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein reiterated he was going to follow through on the investigative demand of AG Sessions and DNI Coates and again referenced a “new counterintelligence division within the FBI”.

00:50 …“we’re responding appropriately. We’re going to devote more resources, re-evaluate our procedures and make sure we investigate every one of those leaks in an appropriate way.”…
1:07 “We have seen a surge in referrals (of leaks). We’ve seen an increase in the number of leaks. And we’re going to respond appropriately and try to establish an effective deterrent. Criminal prosecution isn’t the only way to prevent leaks but it’s an important part of the solution.”…
1:43 “That significant increase has necessitated an increase in resources. And so we have re-prioritized our cases within the National Security Division, we’re providing appropriate supervision at a high level, we’ve created a new unit within the FBI to focus on those leaks, and we’re going to devote whatever resources are necessary to get them under control.”…

If you consider the years-long IG investigation is coming to a conclusion. And there have been several high-profile ‘mistakes’ (from the media perspective) based on leaks recently.

The leaks were real, the underlying information was false..

[Acepimp]

Just watch this and see what a lying weasel shifty Schiff is:

[2MuchMark]

#Schiff2020!

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

#Schiff2020!

Did you watch the above interview? It's plain as day that he's dodging questions and being... shifty. I like the part where Tucker said his responses were "so dumb and you're being duplicitous."

Come on Mark, this clown makes shit up about Russia, it's so obvious

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Just watch this and see what a lying weasel shifty Schiff is:

.. in the eyes of the beholder ....

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

You'd have to be a clueless mofo to believe anything shifty Schiff says. LOL !!

We'd have to be clueless to believe anything you post. You've already proven to be either a deliberate liar or seriously misinformed, or both.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

We'd have to be clueless to believe anything you post. You've already proven to be either a deliberate liar or seriously misinformed, or both.

Says the guy who thinks fake news is a made-up term. Prove me wrong about anything then

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Mark, citing Wikipedia? LOL Didn't your college professors ever tell you to never cite wikipedia?

This is funny coming from someone who cites DailyCaller.

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Says the guy who thinks fake news is a made-up term. Prove me wrong about anything then

I proved you wrong in the other thread, not once but multiple times. Keep citing DailyCaller and telling us about Corsi's arrest for perjury.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Mark, citing Wikipedia? LOL Didn't your college professors ever tell you to never cite wikipedia?

Ok seriously, if you'd like to know why he sucks:

From Dec 2017:

The New FBI Agency Everyone Forgot – Did Adam Schiff Just Get Caught in an Elaborate Counterintelligence Sting?…

You are kidding here, right? We can't use Wikipedia as a source, but you can use a website with the term "conservative" in the name? LOL.

[Rochard]

And now they are looking into his taxes....

[King Mark]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

This is funny coming from someone who cites DailyCaller.

Word, right?

Wikipedia is a hell of a source for info, that posts sources to their info lol.

It ain't 100 all the time, but way more reliable than daily caller, Breitbart, etc.

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

Word, right?

Wikipedia is a hell of a source for info, that posts sources to their info lol.

It ain't 100 all the time, but way more reliable than daily caller, Breitbart, etc.

I have this friend who's a hardcore Trump supporter and no matter what news source I cite he always says "They're so biased," (I usually get my news from BBC, but also CNN and Washington Post). Meanwhile, I happen to know for a fact that he gets all his info from Fox News.

So really it's quite ironic (and hilarious) to hear these Trumpers call out any and every news media that attacks Trump as "fake news," then turn around and post something ridiculous like DailyCaller.

Personally, I think the media has been soft with Trump. It could be a lot worse. When you consider how much Trump has attacked and insulted them (enemy of the people, fake news, etc), he shouldn't be surprised at all to see them out for blood. And neither should his cultists.

[RedFred]

[Busty2]

Originally Posted by RedFred

Creepy

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by RedFred

Trump supporters identity with this

[crockett]

Originally Posted by RedFred

Trump hates Jared because he's a cock blocker..

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

I have this friend who's a hardcore Trump supporter and ...

Whoawwww .... You are friend with AssPimple .... ?????

Amazing ....

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

This is funny coming from someone who cites DailyCaller.

Show us any fake news article from DailyCaller. You will be unable to do so.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Rochard

You are kidding here, right? We can't use Wikipedia as a source, but you can use a website with the term "conservative" in the name? LOL.

So any site that is conservative leaning must be all lies? You sir are unhinged. Which part was untrue?

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Show us any fake news article from DailyCaller. You will be unable to do so.

I don't call news media "fake news," which is nothing but a knee jerk reaction you learned from Trump. I just recognize that they are right wing entertainment and opinion pieces, not exactly the most trustworthy.

Btw, I'm still waiting for you to back up your claim about people being indicted for perjury without lying.

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

So any site that is conservative leaning must be all lies? You sir are unhinged. Which part was untrue?

Anyone who refutes your stupid ass is unhinged - another Trump knee jerk reaction. You sound more like that idiot Squealer every day.

[RedFred]

[TheSquealer]

still no charges?
still no concrete accusations?
no evidence of Trump colluding with Russians?

none?

just random unhinged dipshits posting random nonsense in a frantic Leftist circle jerk of Orane Man Bad manic episodes?

sounds about right.

Trump will be in your debt in 2020.

[TheSquealer]

Senate Intelligence chairman: No evidence of Trump-Russia collusion

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr said Thursday that his committee's Russia investigation has yet to find evidence of collusion between President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and the Kremlin but will soon release a report on the Obama administration's response to Russian interference in the last presidential election.


Awweeeee.... another miss by Dems as the nation thrives.

In other news you fuckwits will pretend didn't happen...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-f...-idUSKCN1PW21C

Ford investing $1 billion, adding 500 jobs in Chicago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co said on Thursday it is investing more than $1 billion in its Chicago operations and adding 500 jobs as it prepares to launch three new SUVs this year and end production of the Taurus.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

I don't call news media "fake news," which is nothing but a knee jerk reaction you learned from Trump. I just recognize that they are right wing entertainment and opinion pieces, not exactly the most trustworthy.

Btw, I'm still waiting for you to back up your claim about people being indicted for perjury without lying.

DailyCaller has reporters with press passes on Capitol Hill. This is not an entertainment website. It's clear you've never even looked at it.

Here is a Democrat Harvard law professor explaining what you're having trouble grasping:

Dershowitz Warns Trump: You Can Be Indicted For Perjury Even If You Tell Mueller The Truth

...if someone else contradicts you, and they are the one lying or perjuring themselves, the prosecutor could choose to believe that person and charge you with perjury.

It's really not that difficult a concept to understand.. at least for some of us

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

Anyone who refutes your stupid ass is unhinged - another Trump knee jerk reaction. You sound more like that idiot Squealer every day.

He didn't "refute" a damn thing. He made an absurd blanket statement, probably without even looking at the article. You can either disprove the information presented, or you can't. Claiming its fake based solely on the name is not a logical argument. But you guys wouldn't know anything about using logic-based arguments

[TheSquealer]

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

DailyCaller has reporters with press passes on Capitol Hill. This is not an entertainment website. It's clear you've never even looked at it.

Here is a Democrat Harvard law professor explaining what you're having trouble grasping:

Dershowitz Warns Trump: You Can Be Indicted For Perjury Even If You Tell Mueller The Truth

...if someone else contradicts you, and they are the one lying or perjuring themselves, the prosecutor could choose to believe that person and charge you with perjury.

It's really not that difficult a concept to understand.. at least for some of us



He didn't "refute" a damn thing. He made an absurd blanket statement, probably without even looking at the article. You can either disprove the information presented, or you can't. Claiming its fake based solely on the name is not a logical argument. But you guys wouldn't know anything about using logic-based arguments

Sean Hannity, really? Your sources keep getting better. This is someone's opinion, and not worth much when spoken as a reply to Hannity on his show.

No, this isn't true at all. This is a lie that conservatives like you are perpetuating. There is no way that you can get hit with perjury without knowingly making false statements. Because that's what perjury is.

A great example of perjury: testifying under oath that you have never had contact with someone via text, when you exchanged dozens of texts with them that same day. Pretty clear that you were lying.

You still haven't shown me an example of someone getting hit with perjury for telling the truth.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

Sean Hannity, really? Your sources keep getting better. This is someone's opinion, and not worth much when spoken as a reply to Hannity on his show.

No, this isn't true at all. This is a lie that conservatives like you are perpetuating. There is no way that you can get hit with perjury without knowingly making false statements. Because that's what perjury is.

A great example of perjury: testifying under oath that you have never had contact with someone via text, when you exchanged dozens of texts with them that same day. Pretty clear that you were lying.

You still haven't shown me an example of someone getting hit with perjury for telling the truth.

DUDE. If you're going to ignore a Democrat Harvard law professor, just because he was on Hannity (the number 1 rated cable news show), I don't know what to tell you. You are biased and just not very smart

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

DUDE. If you're going to ignore a Democrat Harvard law professor, just because he was on Hannity (the number 1 rated cable news show), I don't know what to tell you. You are biased and just not very smart

Says the guy who doesn't understand the definition of perjury and used Corsi's "indictment" as an example... and then used DailyCaller and the Hannity Show to back up his claims, all while screaming "fake news" at the top of his lungs at other sources.