Hypocrisy of Red Hats Trump/Smollett

[crockett]

With Trump, the AG refused to consider if Trump committed obstruction of justice because of his own personal feelings. He simply ignored what the Muller investigation found and instead decided Oh well..

Red Hats claim Trump is innocent.. because the AG refused to do his job despite the entire reason the Special Counsel was established was because of the firing of Comey and his obstruction of justice..



With Smollett, the state DOJ decided not to prosecute him for whatever reason. Red Hats are outraged at this miscarriage of justice.


So I ask Red Hats, why is it ok for Trump but not the gay black gay? Both cases are exactly the same, the AG/DOJ refused to prosecute a crime. You guys are joyed at one but outraged at the other..

Please explain..


Is it because you guys are mad that he arouses you so he must be punished?

[OneHungLo]

Yeah man...the 2 are incomparable...not going to work...sorry.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

Yeah man...the 2 are incomparable...not going to work...sorry.

Yes you are sexually attracted to one and the other is your cult leader.

[Diomed]

Originally Posted by crockett

[DECEPTION]With Trump, the AG refused to consider if Trump committed obstruction of justice because of his own personal feelings. He simply ignored what the Muller investigation found and instead decided Oh well..[/DECEPTION]

[Matt-ADX]

Originally Posted by crockett

With Trump, the AG refused to consider if Trump committed obstruction of justice because of his own personal feelings. He simply ignored what the Muller investigation found and instead decided Oh well..

Red Hats claim Trump is innocent.. because the AG refused to do his job despite the entire reason the Special Counsel was established was because of the firing of Comey and his obstruction of justice..



With Smollett, the state DOJ decided not to prosecute him for whatever reason. Red Hats are outraged at this miscarriage of justice.


So I ask Red Hats, why is it ok for Trump but not the gay black gay? Both cases are exactly the same, the AG/DOJ refused to prosecute a crime. You guys are joyed at one but outraged at the other..

Please explain..


Is it because you guys are mad that he arouses you so he must be punished?

How in any way are the cases the same? Let's see the report, you haven't seen it, I haven't seen it so at this point how can you say the AG just ignored this made up evidence you are claiming?

The Chicago PD has video evidence hard proof. To me they aren't even close to the same case at this point in time.

[OneHungLo]

Originally Posted by crockett

Yes you are sexually attracted to one and the other is your cult leader.

Why is crockett homophobic?

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by crockett

With Trump, the AG refused to consider if Trump committed obstruction of justice because of his own personal feelings.

With Smollett, the state DOJ decided not to prosecute him for whatever reason.

So I ask Red Hats, why is it ok for Trump but not the gay black gay? Both cases are exactly the same

Please explain..

Is it because you guys are mad that he arouses you so he must be punished?

Hello Crock-o-Shit. Are you suggesting that the president should be prosecuted for obstructing an investigation into Russia collusion that definitely didn't happen? Tell us, how did Trump obstruct?? This is not Barr's personal "feelings." There was no collusion and no obstruction. It's over. Move on with your life.

Smolllet committed actual serious crimes and tried to frame white Trump voters to spark a race war. The 2 cases are not "exactly the same." Get some fucking facts.

Former Asst. State’s Attorney: Smollett Hoax Likely Implicated Someone VERY IMPORTANT Who Did Not Want to be Implicated

None of this is normal—even for Crook County where I was an Assistant State’s Attorney. Educated guess: this hoax implicated someone very important who had pull with the State’s Attorney, and who very badly did not want to be implicated. https://t.co/HyACqBMGoW

— Randy Barnett (@RandyEBarnett) March 27, 2019

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by crockett

Yes you are sexually attracted to one and the other is your cult leader.

So true

[Bladewire]

Trump blames Democrats for the 2 year investigation started by Republicans and carried out by Republicans.

Smollett blames Trump supporters for what happened to him.

Rich & famous people skirt justice. Pretty simple.

More motivation to get rich.

[astronaut x]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

Yeah man...the 2 are incomparable...not going to work...sorry.

Nothing ever works for you... so nobody gives a shit about your opinion

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by astronaut x

Nothing ever works for you... so nobody gives a shit about your opinion

His job posting here is not to come to any understandings.

His job here is to post hate about minorities, muslims & transgendered and to interject politics into every non political post possible.

[escorpio]

^^^

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Matt-ADX

How in any way are the cases the same? Let's see the report, you haven't seen it, I haven't seen it so at this point how can you say the AG just ignored this made up evidence you are claiming?

The Chicago PD has video evidence hard proof. To me they aren't even close to the same case at this point in time.

The AG himself stated that he ignored any and all information regarding obstruction of justice. Did you not even read his memo?

[OneHungLo]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

...and to interject politics into every non political post possible.

wow

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by crockett

The AG himself stated that he ignored any and all information regarding obstruction of justice. Did you not even read his memo?

That's not what it said. It said no collusion.

[Acepimp]

Hey Crockett- Here's the real hypocrisy:

[Matt-ADX]

Originally Posted by crockett

The AG himself stated that he ignored any and all information regarding obstruction of justice. Did you not even read his memo?

Honest question, can you obstruct justice on a crime that doesn't exist? I am not here defending Trump one way or another, as soon as they said no collusion I logically thought myself that if there was no crime how can you obstruct. Maybe you can and you can explain it to me, I am happy to change my opinion

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Matt-ADX

Honest question, can you obstruct justice on a crime that doesn't exist? I am not here defending Trump one way or another, as soon as they said no collusion I logically thought myself that if there was no crime how can you obstruct. Maybe you can and you can explain it to me, I am happy to change my opinion

Would you say the same thing if Hillary was elected, fired Comey because he was investigating her "emails".. then fired the AG because of the "email thing".. then fired the acting AG because he wouldn't end the investigation then finally put a puppet AG in place who finds she didnt do anything wrong..


I suspect your idea of what is ok and isnt would be 100% opposite of what it is now..

[Matt-ADX]

Originally Posted by crockett

Would you say the same thing if Hillary was elected, fired Comey because he was investigating her "emails".. then fired the AG because of the "email thing".. then fired the acting AG because he wouldn't end the investigation then finally put a puppet AG in place who finds she didnt do anything wrong..


I suspect your idea of what is ok and isnt would be 100% opposite of what it is now..

I have no dog in the fight, so no I would not have any issues. Firing Comey imo was justified by either Hillary or Trump, the guy was an idiot, he may have cost Hillary the election with his last minute email nonsense. Firing his AG who recused himself to me means nothing, I don't think Sessions had any skin in the game for the investigation so moot point. The last point about firing the acting AG because he wouldn't end the investigation is news to me, but ill be honest I stopped watching CNN and any other news because it was mentally gymnastics to even try to keep up with what was real or fake IMO.

The question I asked remains un-answered, can you obstruct if there was no crime?

[King Mark]

One involves our president cooperating against our country with an enemy.

The other is an attention seeking drama whore.

One is way more important than the other, depending on how racist you are.

[Matt-ADX]

If Smollett was accused of some BS like assault or tax evasion or a plethora of other crimes and he got off because of fame and money I wouldn't think twice about it. What irks me is that they had an agent of chaos, someone who was trying to further rip the fabric of the country apart, dead to rights and they just let it go. He himself IMO doesn't matter, it's the crime that is the crux of the issue IMO.

Everything right now is so fragile and he hurt legitimate people who suffer from the current political climate, he used his ''fame'' to further the divide, not even for some type of political or cultural cause, but for sheer personal gain. To me that's so gross

Also Robert Mueller had no problem clapping back when people misrepresented the facts of his investigation in the past and if Barr did so do you not think he would have come out by now or leaked it? It remains to be seen, his going in front of congress might make me rethink that position but at this moment I have no evidence to do so

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by crockett

.



Please explain..

[Matt-ADX]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

One involves our president cooperating against our country with an enemy.

The other is an attention seeking drama whore.

One is way more important than the other, depending on how racist you are.

Why does his race matter? It was the message of the crime that bothers me, could have been any ethnicity IMO and I would be irked the same.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

One involves our president cooperating against our country with an enemy.

The other is an attention seeking drama whore.

One is way more important than the other, depending on how racist you are.

↑↑↑ Truth

[kane]

Originally Posted by Matt-ADX

Honest question, can you obstruct justice on a crime that doesn't exist? I am not here defending Trump one way or another, as soon as they said no collusion I logically thought myself that if there was no crime how can you obstruct. Maybe you can and you can explain it to me, I am happy to change my opinion

In short, yes. Obstructing an investigation is a crime. If the police/feds feel there has been a crime committed and they start to investigate whether or not their was and the person being investigated starts destroying potential evidence and does other things to hinder the investigation, that is a crime onto itself so they can be convicted of that even if there was no actual other crime.

[astronaut x]

Originally Posted by crockett

Is it because you guys are mad that he arouses you so he must be punished?

Maybe they could punish each other in prison?

[onwebcam]

Moron.....

[american pervert]

Originally Posted by crockett

Yes you are sexually attracted to one and the other is your cult leader.

when the weak and stupid can't defend with facts, they resort to libel and slander.

[Bladewire]

^^^ Craves uncut black dick overflowing with aged smegma when he's high on meth while his trailer park is attending church on Sundays.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

One involves our president cooperating against our country with an enemy.

The other is an attention seeking drama whore.

One is way more important than the other, depending on how racist you are.

To be fair they are both attention seeking whores..

[12clicks]

Originally Posted by crockett

With Trump, the AG refused to consider if Trump committed obstruction of justice because of his own personal feelings. He simply ignored what the Muller investigation found and instead decided Oh well..

Red Hats claim Trump is innocent.. because the AG refused to do his job despite the entire reason the Special Counsel was established was because of the firing of Comey and his obstruction of justice..



With Smollett, the state DOJ decided not to prosecute him for whatever reason. Red Hats are outraged at this miscarriage of justice.


So I ask Red Hats, why is it ok for Trump but not the gay black gay? Both cases are exactly the same, the AG/DOJ refused to prosecute a crime. You guys are joyed at one but outraged at the other..

Please explain..


Is it because you guys are mad that he arouses you so he must be punished?

the idiocy of this logic is why this punk has spent his entire life on society's bottom rung

[12clicks]

Originally Posted by kane

In short, yes. Obstructing an investigation is a crime. If the police/feds feel there has been a crime committed and they start to investigate whether or not their was and the person being investigated starts destroying potential evidence and does other things to hinder the investigation, that is a crime onto itself so they can be convicted of that even if there was no actual other crime.

you just described Hillary, not your President.

[adultinnovation]

The President didn't hire 2 Black Men to fake a hate crime against another Black Man because he wanted fame and a pay raise.

The stupidity of that alone should get him life in jail.

[Rochard]

I don't get the obsession with the Smollett case. Lying to police - especially faking a kidnap - is a serious crime. However, if it wasn't for the fact that he is an actor on TV this wouldn't have even made the news.

Republicans are all over this like bears to honey. Suddenly Republicans want to get at the truth; Suddenly Republicans want to have an investigation. They want an investigation into Smollett, but yet want to hide Mueller's report.

This is simple. If a crime has been committed... press charges and go to trial. Easy.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Rochard

I don't get the obsession with the Smollett case.

Republicans are all over this like bears to honey. Suddenly Republicans want to get at the truth; Suddenly Republicans want to have an investigation. They want an investigation into Smollett, but yet want to hide Mueller's report.

This is simple. If a crime has been committed... press charges and go to trial. Easy.

Yeah it's real simple, until the investigation leads to members of Congress who put him up to it. Then they need to shut it down and wipe all the records. Ok well that looks super shady and the FBI is now investigating if the prosecutor committed crimes.

Understand why people want to know if Corey Booker or Kamala Harris hired him to fake a lynching (& smear all Trump fans), which helped them get support for that stupid "anti-lynching" bill?? Nothing to see here according to Rochard! LOL

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by Rochard

I don't get the obsession with the Smollett case. Lying to police - especially faking a kidnap - is a serious crime.

I think one thing we've learned this year, if anything, is that there is little to no price to pay for lying to the FBI or police. I would never have said this before the Manafort & Smollett cases but this is reality.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

I think one thing we've learned this year, if anything, is that there is little to no price to pay for lying to the FBI or police. I would never have said this before the Manafort & Smollett cases but this is reality.

[12clicks]

Originally Posted by Rochard

I don't get the obsession with the Smollett case. Lying to police - especially faking a kidnap - is a serious crime. However, if it wasn't for the fact that he is an actor on TV this wouldn't have even made the news.

Republicans are all over this like bears to honey. Suddenly Republicans want to get at the truth; Suddenly Republicans want to have an investigation. They want an investigation into Smollett, but yet want to hide Mueller's report.

This is simple. If a crime has been committed... press charges and go to trial. Easy.

the unintelligence of this thought process is stunning.

In the Trump witch hunt, there was no crime, there was no evidence of a crime.
In the Smollett case, there was a crime, there was evidence of a crime.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Matt-ADX

If Smollett was accused of some BS like assault or tax evasion or a plethora of other crimes and he got off because of fame and money I wouldn't think twice about it. What irks me is that they had an agent of chaos, someone who was trying to further rip the fabric of the country apart, dead to rights and they just let it go. He himself IMO doesn't matter, it's the crime that is the crux of the issue IMO.

Everything right now is so fragile and he hurt legitimate people who suffer from the current political climate, he used his ''fame'' to further the divide, not even for some type of political or cultural cause, but for sheer personal gain. To me that's so gross

Also Robert Mueller had no problem clapping back when people misrepresented the facts of his investigation in the past and if Barr did so do you not think he would have come out by now or leaked it? It remains to be seen, his going in front of congress might make me rethink that position but at this moment I have no evidence to do so

But Trump's charges were not bullshit multiple members of his campaign are in jail for various things but almost every single one has a charge for lying to the FBI about connectionsto Russia.. Every single one, yet you guys cry.. no collusion. The AG failed to prosecute Trump jr, Kushner for perjury they clearly lied to Congress this is 100% provable fact. We have it on video as well as written Congressional records.

We have still never seen Trump's written answers to the SC questions but they were given at same time Trump was publicly lying about the time frame of his Moscow deal..

It's almost 100% certain Trump lied about the Moscow deal as well because we didn't learn the "real" timeline until much later. Keep in mind Cohen is going to jail right now for lying to protect Trump by lying about the timeline of the Moscow deal..

This in itself should be much more important but Cohen is not going to jail because he lied to protect himself. He lied to protect Trump. He lied about contacts with Russians.

Kushet, Trump jr, Eric Prince, Manafort were all at the Trump tower meeting with the Russian agent.

Stone, Manafort Trump jr are all clearly directly tied to attempting to get access to stolden Hillary emails.

Trump is a unindicted co conspirator in at least 3 felonies involving the Stormy case.

You claim it's all BS but all of this is well known actual facts.. Just the same as its known Smollett filled a fake police report.


In both cases the AG/DOJ allowed criminals to walk free..



You can agree with Trump's policies and MAGA this or that all you want. Yet facts remain he is 100% guilty and a criminal sitting in the WH.

If you care about this country that should greatly disturb you no matter what party you vote for..

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by 12clicks

you just described Hillary, not your President.

Man you guys obsess over that woman like nothing I've ever seen.

When the GOP programs you guys to trigger it's a lifetime trigger that never goes away crazy shit.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Man you guys obsess over that woman like nothing I've ever seen

Just like they obsess over the gay black man..

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by 12clicks

the unintelligence of this thought process is stunning.

In the Trump witch hunt, there was no crime, there was no evidence of a crime.

But... there was evidence of a crime.

This started with the Australian came to the United States government and reported a crime - the Russians hacking the DNC. They knew about the hacking of the DNC because they were told about it by a Trump campaign member.

Of course, that doesn't mention that nearly everyone involved in the Trump campaign has been under investigation long before Trump decided to run for president.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by 12clicks

In the Trump witch hunt, there was no crime, there was no evidence of a crime.

A witch hunt ceated by Republicans when Republicans had the majority in the House and Republicans had the majority in the Senate and with a Republican president in the executive branch.

The Republican attorney general and Republican assistant attorney general assigned a Republican former head of the FBI to investigate the Republican President Trump.

A witch hunt resulting in 199 criminal charges, 37 indictments & 8 guilty pleas/verdicts, so far.

Republicans blame "the media" and Democrats for the investigation Republicans created and stupid Republicans fall for it instead of blaming the Republican party for what they did to destroy Trump's image over a 2 year period resulting in losing the House in 2018 midterms, a record loss of 40 House seats, the most House seats lost in a midterm election in American history.

[King Mark]

^that's why I call them T.U.R.Ds (The Ultra Right party of Denial and Deflection)

Their own people's investigated them and indicted them. But it's the black Mexican libtard Muslim Democrats fault.

[american pervert]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

^^^ Craves uncut black dick overflowing with aged smegma when he's high on meth while his trailer park is attending church on Sundays.

thus proving my point. do you think your words affect me? im not the one who hides, afraid to show his face at a show. you are that weak kids on the playground, ugly, no dad, mom is a slut, who starts shit with the other kids to make themselves fell better then runs and hides behind the teacher sticking their tongue out. too bad you never grew up.

when did you buy this account? how much did you pay for it? how many people use it to post?

post a pic of your face next to a newspaper showing the date.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by bladewire

man you guys obsess over that woman like nothing i've ever seen.

When the gop programs you guys to trigger it's a lifetime trigger that never goes away crazy shit.

fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!
Fap!