Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
07-07-2023, 03:58 PM | #1 |
Too lazy to wipe my ass
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A Public Bathroom
Posts: 38,190
|
Shower Thought: How do they handle compliance for performers that never show their faces?
OK, I lied - As if I take showers!
That said though, how are 'faceless' creators verified? Unless they have tattoos or something like that, how do people know that the woman in the vids, is the same woman thats sent in her ID? If you are never going to show your face, then its plausible to substitute a younger similar looking model into your videos, and just say 'Oh that's me when I was younger' or whatever... Then there is Zero compliance on the substitute model - They could hypothetically be underage? Genuinely wondering as you have all these compliance issues arising these days, where people are requesting the backs of IDs etc... Yet the amount of 'Faceless' content creators seems to have grown exponentially... So what s the deal? One rule for someone that doesn't want to show their identity on film, and another for the producers of legitimate paid content shoots with professional models? |
07-07-2023, 04:55 PM | #2 |
Colonizer
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Your mom's front hole
Posts: 39,969
|
If you were to film a scene with someone that didn't show their face you would still collect their IDs and have them sign a consent form. So I guess it's the same for creators that show their faces.
__________________
2MuchMark - "Fuckoff you fucking faggot. You deserve a fucking bloody beating." |
07-07-2023, 05:03 PM | #3 | |
Too lazy to wipe my ass
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A Public Bathroom
Posts: 38,190
|
Quote:
In other words, if a girl uploads content, and shows an ID to be verified, but never shows her actual face in the video, then whos to say its actually the girl who has proved her age via the ID? |
|
07-07-2023, 07:53 PM | #4 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,090
|
DNA test
|
07-07-2023, 11:53 PM | #5 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 12
|
Faceless creators are subject to the same age verification laws as performers who show their faces. If someone uploads content featuring a faceless performer without having a 2257 and ID on record, they are committing a crime. If they falsify IDs or age verification records, they are committing fraud on top of failing to comply with the 2257 laws.
Would you get away with it? Probably yes, but why though? Why go through the trouble when you can just use the real performer's ID and paperwork? The crime has no payoff and huge, career-ending potential downside if discovered.
__________________
We can film your porn |
07-08-2023, 08:21 AM | #6 | |
Too lazy to wipe my ass
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A Public Bathroom
Posts: 38,190
|
Quote:
Im talking about the compliance from the other side of the coin - The platforms side - Girls uploads video of herself with a dildo, shot on her iphone propped up against a book. Platform says 'Submit IDs' - She submits her ID... But if she never shows HER FACE in the content she uploads, how does anyone know that its the girl who sent her ID in, or somebody else entirely in the videos? That's the side of the fence I am talking about... If they are happy to go ahead with that content for an 'unknown' then its a bit rich for them to be requesting the back of IDs for content shot years ago... That's what I was getting at... As far as I can tell, its just a big 'pantomime' with the faceless creators, but everyone else has to do it properly... |
|
07-08-2023, 08:59 AM | #7 |
STANLEY CUP CHAMPION !
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,700
|
Ive had a persons foot. in the video and was asked for documentation. Of course you can give anyones you want. who is to know
|
07-10-2023, 05:13 AM | #8 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 54,895
|
they would have to submit faces to the provider (onlyfans) to verify who they are, but they dont have to show their face on the site.
__________________
Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. WP Tube Themes |
07-10-2023, 05:41 AM | #9 | |
SEO Connoisseur
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brantford, Ontario
Posts: 15,542
|
Quote:
It's pretty much like POV blowjobs etc. even though you see his dick and/or legs you still need to supply the doc's and release forms (funny name for the forms). Legally just have to cover your ass in case they check.
__________________
|
|
07-10-2023, 01:30 PM | #10 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 377
|
they ask for selfie from the same place from which the video was filmed
|
07-13-2023, 11:52 PM | #11 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 4,034
|
__________________
Join the BEST cam affiliate program on the internet! I've referred over $1.7mil in spending this past year, you should join in. live camss > How to make a live cam site hardlinks > hardlinks.org |
|
|||||||
Bookmarks |
Tags |
compliance, people, woman, substitute, content, model, faceless, creators, amount, ids, requesting, wondering, genuinely, underage, handle, issues, days, arising, legitimate, film, identity, paid, shoots, models, professional |