Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
08-26-2024, 11:19 AM | #1 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,091
|
San Francisco to sue 'undress' sites
All the sites are apparently based overseas.
Quote:
|
|
08-27-2024, 02:10 AM | #2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Italy
Posts: 86
|
I wouldn't be surprised if those whom sued the deepfake website, did it because they got their barely naked micro-bikini beach dance TikTok video deepfaked...
Let's face it: that two square centimeters fabric makes all the difference.
__________________
Senior Developer, System Administrator and Cloud Architect Hiring Live Cam Performers Ready to Jump in the New Era of Porn? |
08-27-2024, 11:30 AM | #4 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,621
|
lol classic 'frisco, go giants!
|
08-27-2024, 11:47 AM | #5 |
So fucking banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 9,495
|
That's not what they are. You could upload a pic of your grandma and remove all of her clothes in a single click.
|
08-27-2024, 12:35 PM | #6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,091
|
One of the legal grounds they are using is California's 'unfair competition' laws, so you may be correct.
|
08-27-2024, 01:14 PM | #7 |
Masterbaiter
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 27,031
|
Undressing without consent, especially kids (as the article says "women and girls"), is something we should all be against in a normal world.
But of course, we ain't all normal, so you can smell the usual divisive weird white rage brewing about it, which will likely lead to more AVS laws and such since the industry won't collectively get its shit together on its own anymore. |
08-27-2024, 02:09 PM | #8 | ||
So fucking banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 9,495
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
08-27-2024, 02:15 PM | #9 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,621
|
|
08-27-2024, 03:37 PM | #10 |
So fucking banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 9,495
|
|
08-27-2024, 03:43 PM | #11 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,621
|
|
08-28-2024, 01:00 AM | #12 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,091
|
Quote:
We can all agree that undressing kids or sharing undressed images is wrong, but this seems like an attempt to close down all undress tools, no matter what safeguards they have in place. In any case, I was posting the article mainly because of the importance of an American court attempting to sue overseas based sites. Not sure what 'white rage' has got to do with this. In a 'Data For Progress' poll taken earlier this year that measured attitudes in the USA towards a proposed anti-deepfake porn law, it found that 72% of white respondents strongly supported the bill, whereas only 56% of black people did, and 52% of Hispanics. This bill (the DEFIANCE act) only gave victims the right to sue deepfake porn sites, it didn't actually make deepfake porn illegal, or ban undress apps. https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog...l-intelligence What is your view on mentally undressing a person? Do you consider that wrong? What about drawing a nude in your home of your neighbour without her consent? You're correct that "we're not normal". There was a thread here recently asking about advertising on a gore site that features kids being beaten into comas, naked women having their heads stamped on by love rivals etc, and not a single person raised the slightest objection (except myself). There was another thread not so long ago about whether the minimum age for porn should be raised to 21, and all the good people here were competing with each other to say what a great idea it was. The saint who proclaimed it the loudest promotes the 18 teen porn site 'Legal This Week' on his profile. You can literally smell these kind of pornographers here. Is it really normal to make a living from porn, and to take the attitude that some incel geek on his computer making a fake nude image of his neighbour to fap to, is committing something akin to rape? |
|
08-28-2024, 03:47 AM | #13 |
So fucking banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 9,495
|
You don't publish your personal fantasy stash on websites that end up in court.
|
08-28-2024, 10:16 AM | #14 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,791
|
We have druggies and homeless everywhere. Shit all over the streets. People dying daily from Fenty and this is what SF gov is worried about.
SMH
__________________
. "Deja moo - The feeling you've heard this Bull before." Skype: jeffreydillon Email: [email protected] |
08-28-2024, 12:48 PM | #15 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,621
|
Classic sucker free city doing things and people are like "uhhh" and then they happen anyway.
|