Question to photographers. What do you think about the Canon 18-200 IS lens? - GoFuckYourself.com

Raf1 · 03-19-2009, 02:41 AM

I need a new zoom lens for my Canon 40D and saw a few fairly good reviews for this one. I would have never believed this kind of lens could work well a few years ago, but maybe something has changed and I just don't know it yet

Has anyone here tried this one?

The reason I'm asking is because I will be covering a few mainstream events and need a zoom lens that I would be able to keep on the whole time.

Deej · 03-19-2009, 02:54 AM

No experience with it but I have looked at it and if you go with it post some results

Ive been recommended this lens by a pretty damned good photographer...

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...8L_IS_USM.html

I believe it can be found a bit cheaper elsewhere though too.

Raf1 · 03-19-2009, 03:38 AM

yeah, I've seen that lens before and it is fantastic. The only problem is that I need something for shooting up-close as well. Going with two lenses is an option, but after reading a bit about the 18-200 lens I'm kind of excited that I could use just one lens for the job

The quality doesn't have to be superb. High quality, but not fantastic

Mutt · 03-19-2009, 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej

No experience with it but I have looked at it and if you go with it post some results

Ive been recommended this lens by a pretty damned good photographer...

lemme guess - does his name start with J and end with Y?

Paul Markham · 03-19-2009, 03:44 AM

You can't keep changing lenses with a digital camera. It will get too much dust on the chip.

Don't know that lens but always used canon and always liked them.

Raf1 · 03-19-2009, 04:08 AM

my concern is the range this super-zoom lens has. It's seems too good to be true.

dave90210 · 03-19-2009, 04:41 AM

Why not go for a 70 to 300 for a zoom and it's going to be 100s cheaper. An 18 to 200 is for shooting both short and long.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raf1

I need a new zoom lens for my Canon 40D and saw a few fairly good reviews for this one. I would have never believed this kind of lens could work well a few years ago, but maybe something has changed and I just don't know it yet

Has anyone here tried this one?

The reason I'm asking is because I will be covering a few mainstream events and need a zoom lens that I would be able to keep on the whole time.

Freeway · 03-19-2009, 04:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raf1

and saw a few fairly good reviews for this one.

This is one of the few guys i trust for lens reviews. Because he uses real world samples you wont find everything there but he happens to have yours.
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/40...n_18200_3556is

tranza · 03-19-2009, 06:38 AM

Hey, you got a nice camera...!

Raf1 · 03-19-2009, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freeway

This is one of the few guys i trust for lens reviews. Because he uses real world samples you wont find everything there but he happens to have yours.
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/40...n_18200_3556is

thanks for posting this. Quite a bad verdict at the end. I'll read some more on other lenses that might be more suitable.

Paul Waters · 03-19-2009, 01:46 PM

Another thing to consider (from dpreview):

One design decision may however cause a degree of dismay; the lens uses a relatively unsophisticated micro motor system for autofocus, as opposed to the ring-type USM design more commonly seen on mid-range lenses such as the EF-S 17-85mm F4-5.6 IS USM. Consequently, potential buyers may struggle to find any obvious advantage over Tamron's recently announced 18-270mm F3.5-6.3Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF) Macro, which sports a longer zoom range and Tamron's own optical stabilization system. Aside from this, Canon have produced a lens which is clearly designed to counter the undeniable buyer appeal of Nikon's popular 18-200mm VR head-on; so how does it match up to the challenge?

The big problem with a lens like this is not being able to shoot at f/2.8

tony286 · 03-19-2009, 02:31 PM

www.fredmiranda.com great reviews and a great photography site all around

Raf1 · 03-20-2009, 03:58 AM

after reading some more reviews it seems that getting two lenses might be a wiser choice. The two lenses 18-55 and 55-250 with image stabilization will cost less than the one I chose before and seem to be better in performance.

jMEGA · 03-20-2009, 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raf1

I need a new zoom lens for my Canon 40D and saw a few fairly good reviews for this one. I would have never believed this kind of lens could work well a few years ago, but maybe something has changed and I just don't know it yet

Has anyone here tried this one?

The reason I'm asking is because I will be covering a few mainstream events and need a zoom lens that I would be able to keep on the whole time.

What type of event is this? Indoors or outdoors? Sunlight or at night ?

Raf1 · 03-20-2009, 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jMEGA

What type of event is this? Indoors or outdoors? Sunlight or at night ?

indoor and outdoor horse and dog shows mostly. They won't be at night, so mainly sunlight or indoor lighting.

jMEGA · 03-20-2009, 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raf1

indoor and outdoor horse and dog shows mostly. They won't be at night, so mainly sunlight or indoor lighting.

I own a Canon 70-200 4L lens. I would consider this lens for your application. You won't be using/needing the IS due to the fact you'll be using a faster shutter to freeze the movement of the dog or horse. With higher/faster shutter speeds you'll need a faster lens.

Ive used this lens to get some good shots at night games using shutter speeds as high as 1/800. Don't be afraid to bump up your ISO to 1600 or 3200 to take advantage of the faster shutter speeds.

JFK · 03-20-2009, 06:27 AM

I have the Nikon 18-200 love that one

Matt 26z · 03-20-2009, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raf1

after reading some more reviews it seems that getting two lenses might be a wiser choice. The two lenses 18-55 and 55-250 with image stabilization will cost less than the one I chose before and seem to be better in performance.

You don't necessarily get added quality with $1,500+ lenses with a wide focal range. A $100 fixed lens can compete with them. You are paying for the luxury of not having to move around or change lenses.

Raf1 · 03-25-2009, 11:01 AM

after a bit more reading and talking to a few photographers I decided on spending a bit more and buying two lenses. One will be the cheap 18-55 IS mentioned earlier and the other will be a 70-300 IS lens. I hope this combo will work well

Spike D · 03-25-2009, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK

I have the Nikon 18-200 love that one

I have it too, for general shooting, I never need anything else

Raf1 · 03-25-2009, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spike D

I have it too, for general shooting, I never need anything else

that's why I wanted the canon 18-200, but from what I hear it's not as good.

03-19-2009, 02:41 AM	#1
Raf1 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Writer for hire :) Gallery descriptions, articles, blog posts etc. ICQ: 209 356 106 Posts: 12,117	Question to photographers. What do you think about the Canon 18-200 IS lens? I need a new zoom lens for my Canon 40D and saw a few fairly good reviews for this one. I would have never believed this kind of lens could work well a few years ago, but maybe something has changed and I just don't know it yet Has anyone here tried this one? The reason I'm asking is because I will be covering a few mainstream events and need a zoom lens that I would be able to keep on the whole time. __________________ 80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds 3 & 5mins FLVs \| RSS & Tube Feeds \| Matching Thumbs \| FLV Browser & Exporter \| No Prechecked Xsales >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557

03-19-2009, 02:54 AM	#2
Deej I make pixels work Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: I live here... Posts: 24,386	No experience with it but I have looked at it and if you go with it post some results Ive been recommended this lens by a pretty damned good photographer... http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...8L_IS_USM.html I believe it can be found a bit cheaper elsewhere though too. __________________ Deej's Designs n' What Not Hit me up for Design, CSS & Photo Retouching Icq#30096880

03-19-2009, 03:38 AM	#3
Raf1 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Writer for hire :) Gallery descriptions, articles, blog posts etc. ICQ: 209 356 106 Posts: 12,117	yeah, I've seen that lens before and it is fantastic. The only problem is that I need something for shooting up-close as well. Going with two lenses is an option, but after reading a bit about the 18-200 lens I'm kind of excited that I could use just one lens for the job The quality doesn't have to be superb. High quality, but not fantastic __________________ 80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds 3 & 5mins FLVs \| RSS & Tube Feeds \| Matching Thumbs \| FLV Browser & Exporter \| No Prechecked Xsales >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557

03-19-2009, 03:44 AM	#5
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	You can't keep changing lenses with a digital camera. It will get too much dust on the chip. Don't know that lens but always used canon and always liked them. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

03-19-2009, 04:08 AM	#6
Raf1 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Writer for hire :) Gallery descriptions, articles, blog posts etc. ICQ: 209 356 106 Posts: 12,117	my concern is the range this super-zoom lens has. It's seems too good to be true. __________________ 80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds 3 & 5mins FLVs \| RSS & Tube Feeds \| Matching Thumbs \| FLV Browser & Exporter \| No Prechecked Xsales >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557

03-19-2009, 06:38 AM	#9
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	Hey, you got a nice camera...! __________________ I'm just a newbie.

03-19-2009, 01:46 PM	#11
Paul Waters Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Toronto, Ontario Posts: 4,402	Another thing to consider (from dpreview): One design decision may however cause a degree of dismay; the lens uses a relatively unsophisticated micro motor system for autofocus, as opposed to the ring-type USM design more commonly seen on mid-range lenses such as the EF-S 17-85mm F4-5.6 IS USM. Consequently, potential buyers may struggle to find any obvious advantage over Tamron's recently announced 18-270mm F3.5-6.3Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF) Macro, which sports a longer zoom range and Tamron's own optical stabilization system. Aside from this, Canon have produced a lens which is clearly designed to counter the undeniable buyer appeal of Nikon's popular 18-200mm VR head-on; so how does it match up to the challenge? The big problem with a lens like this is not being able to shoot at f/2.8 __________________ Paul

03-19-2009, 02:31 PM	#12
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	www.fredmiranda.com great reviews and a great photography site all around

03-20-2009, 03:58 AM	#13
Raf1 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Writer for hire :) Gallery descriptions, articles, blog posts etc. ICQ: 209 356 106 Posts: 12,117	after reading some more reviews it seems that getting two lenses might be a wiser choice. The two lenses 18-55 and 55-250 with image stabilization will cost less than the one I chose before and seem to be better in performance. __________________ 80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds 3 & 5mins FLVs \| RSS & Tube Feeds \| Matching Thumbs \| FLV Browser & Exporter \| No Prechecked Xsales >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557

03-20-2009, 06:27 AM	#17
JFK FUBAR the ORIGINATOR Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: FUBARLAND Posts: 67,374	I have the Nikon 18-200 love that one __________________ FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

03-25-2009, 11:01 AM	#19
Raf1 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Writer for hire :) Gallery descriptions, articles, blog posts etc. ICQ: 209 356 106 Posts: 12,117	after a bit more reading and talking to a few photographers I decided on spending a bit more and buying two lenses. One will be the cheap 18-55 IS mentioned earlier and the other will be a 70-300 IS lens. I hope this combo will work well __________________ 80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds 3 & 5mins FLVs \| RSS & Tube Feeds \| Matching Thumbs \| FLV Browser & Exporter \| No Prechecked Xsales >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557