Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 03-23-2010, 04:11 AM   #1
curiousdog
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 81
2257 records on exotic ilands and other unproven addresses?

http://www.youngcourtesans.com/2257.html
The Custodian of Records for this Website is:
Meniss LTD
Melville Hall 12
Roseau, Dominica

Is this any good? I know these guys probably are safely somehwere in Russia, and don't even need 2257 records.

But if you host some of their galleries, or just one single picture on your server, you could be toast?

I try to host only non-sexually explicit photos of such sites, but I guess if they are slightly sexually suggestive that is already a problem!? I also make sure there is a watermark showing the original site.

Also if they close down the original site with the 2257 link, but the photo stays on my server, I could be in trouble!?
__________________
curiousdog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 06:25 AM   #2
pornlaw
Confirmed User
 
pornlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,741
If the photos/videos are on your server you need to have the docs and IDs as though it was your content.

The law no longer cares about primary or secondary producers when it comes to who has to maintain the records. Both are now required to have the same docs and IDs. And a watermark isnt going to make a difference.
__________________
Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
pornlaw is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 06:29 AM   #3
TheDA
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
If the photos/videos are on your server you need to have the docs and IDs as though it was your content.

The law no longer cares about primary or secondary producers when it comes to who has to maintain the records. Both are now required to have the same docs and IDs. And a watermark isnt going to make a difference.
Unless you are not in the US and 2257 means nothing right?
TheDA is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 06:38 AM   #4
Quagmire
Confirmed User
 
Quagmire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stinkin' up your bathroom
Posts: 6,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDA View Post
Unless you are not in the US and 2257 means nothing right?
Unless you plan to never travel to the US.
__________________
Quagmire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 08:19 AM   #5
Jim_Gunn
Confirmed User
 
Jim_Gunn's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where The Teens Are
Posts: 5,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
If the photos/videos are on your server you need to have the docs and IDs as though it was your content.

The law no longer cares about primary or secondary producers when it comes to who has to maintain the records. Both are now required to have the same docs and IDs. And a watermark isnt going to make a difference.
It should be noted that all the many tens of thousands of blogs, free sites, tube sites, forums and other sites (whether using sponsor content with permission or not) are essentially just completely ignoring this and getting away with it.
__________________
Jim Gunn
Filming Cinematic Porn
Skype JimGunnProductions
Jim_Gunn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 09:14 AM   #6
curiousdog
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 81
still leaves open the address question: for someone subject to 2257 with some ties to US, (like US server), an adress in Finland, St. Kitts, or other exotic places probably would NOT qualify. do I see this correctly? any documentary evidence for the location requirement?

I still prefer to be located in the US, because in many countries like Germany one gets in trouble just for LINKING. One is responsible for the content of the sites one LINKS to. Ridiculous.

Like the Brazilian webmaster who got arrested for linking to legit US Teen sites with 2057 documentation.

The US at least has legal security
__________________

Last edited by curiousdog; 03-23-2010 at 09:23 AM..
curiousdog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 09:32 AM   #7
andrej_NDC
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by curiousdog View Post
Like the Brazilian webmaster who got arrested for linking to legit US Teen sites with 2057 documentation.
I do not think that ever happened...even if I read it on some media site, I wouldn't believe it. There is always more to such stories...
andrej_NDC is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 09:48 AM   #8
Zorgman
Confirmed User
 
Zorgman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
If the photos/videos are on your server you need to have the docs and IDs as though it was your content.

The law no longer cares about primary or secondary producers when it comes to who has to maintain the records. Both are now required to have the same docs and IDs. And a watermark isnt going to make a difference.
I know for a fact no sponsor in his right mind would give out 2257 release forms and docs of their models.

Thankfuly I can say I hotlink content.
__________________
---
Zorgman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 10:11 AM   #9
fuzebox
making it rain
 
fuzebox's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 21,676
I would like to point out that porn is illegal in China, and you will go to jail for being an adult webmaster there.
fuzebox is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 10:21 AM   #10
Agent 488
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
If the photos/videos are on your server you need to have the docs and IDs as though it was your content.

The law no longer cares about primary or secondary producers when it comes to who has to maintain the records. Both are now required to have the same docs and IDs. And a watermark isnt going to make a difference.
create a 2257 safe for affiliates.
Agent 488 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 03:46 PM   #11
Ladyboy King
Confirmed User
 
Ladyboy King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ladyboy Land
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
If the photos/videos are on your server you need to have the docs and IDs as though it was your content.

The law no longer cares about primary or secondary producers when it comes to who has to maintain the records. Both are now required to have the same docs and IDs. And a watermark isnt going to make a difference.
Exhibit A: This holds true unless you are a content thief. Then you get away with it. Steal all you want, doesn't matter if it's compliant or not. The hosting companies will host for you and some of the billing companies will process for you. No one cares. It's the wild west for porn these days, and until the "law" everyone speaks of is actually put to good use, nothing will change.

Exhibit B: Even though the USA wants to be the world police, US law only applies to US citizens. Of course, unless you are a terrorist, then they will snatch you while you sleep in your cave in the middle of Afghanistan, and hold you without charge, indefinitely. Regardless of who hosts where, the USA is simply not going to extradite foreign nationals so they can check their 2257 records. It's simply not going to happen. Ever. To take it a step further, they are not going to hassle US citizens living abroad over this, when there are 1000s and 1000s of sitting ducks right in their own back yard.

Exhibit C: Those living in the USA need to get in line and play by the rules, or you may get fucked up when you least expect it. Unless you're a content pirate.
__________________
I'll make you feel dirty and 13.7% gay.
XXX - All your ladyboys are belong to me!

Last edited by Ladyboy King; 03-23-2010 at 03:47 PM..
Ladyboy King is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
2257, legal



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.