Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 09-20-2017, 04:54 AM   #51
sarettah
l8r
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,492
Fiddy Rocket Men.....

.
sarettah is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 03:58 PM   #52
ilnjscb
Confirmed User
 
ilnjscb's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,466
Rocket MAAAAaaaaaaaAAAAAAA-haaan, rocket man!
ilnjscb is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 04:21 PM   #53
BaldBastard
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14,478
Before the USA dropped any bombs they need to workout what to do about the million+ army Kim has, and that's before extras are called up.

Got half a million troops ready to deploy? because that's what will be needed.

It's rumoured NK has more than 10,000 artillery shells ready to fire at the South, they alone could kill millions and there is basically fucking nothing the USA can do about it.

The next concern is biological and chemical weapons, biological ones would most likely be already deployed to the USA, you bomb NK, expect there deployment.

Dropping multiple nukes on a country surrounded by two nuclear super powers, Russia and China would be suicide.. for the USA and the rest of the world.

--------

So far the only thing Trump has been doing is selling weapons, I think this whole twitter rant thing has more to do with scaremongering Japan and Sth Korea in to buying nukes from the USA, and that Trump is a total idiot.
BaldBastard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 04:29 PM   #54
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,202
Here's the problem, Bill Clinton gave NK 4 billion dollars to keep them from developing nuclear weapons, I guess that idiot we use to have in office thought his plan on doing the same with Iran would work out better?

The Clinton Nuclear Deal with Pyongyang: Road Map to Progress or Dead End Street? | The Heritage Foundation
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 04:35 PM   #55
pimpmaster9000
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pimpmaster9000's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26,732
how about just leaving them alone LOL they are nuking up because the USA wont leave them the fuck alone...are people really discussing nuking a country because you cant leave them alone?

pack your armies, go home...they will calm down...you cant win...let it go LOL
__________________
Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
pimpmaster9000 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 04:56 PM   #56
NatalieK
Natalie K
 
NatalieK's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 18,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark View Post
Even if NK nukes someone, nuking NK back would be a real disaster and create more problems than it solves.

Even 1 nuke in NK would have devastating consequences for surrounding countries. Hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of survivors would be displaced, putting incredible strain on SK and surrounding countries.

What's left of the army will form new armies, new problems, new fighting, new shit.

The fallout from a single nuke would kill hundreds of thousands more or at best, reduce the lifespan of millions of people in surrounding areas. And don't forget - you can count on your chances of getting cancer going up.

You cannot scare Kim Jung Un into submission. Trump's STUPID threats against Un do nothing but make the US look ridiculous.

What Trump needs to do is consult with real experts and get a super-qualified ambassador to NK to talk with Un and work out some kind of deal, relax tensions, and find ways to normalize things between NK and SK, and NK and the world, through calm, normal, diplomatic means.
exactly this.

In honesty, if Trump wasnīt Donald Trump, this would all be sorted now. NK just want to toy, thatīs what theyīre doing. Theyīre sick of the US thinking they have world power, every country has itīs right to have a nuke if just one other country does.

Itīs so easy to create division and itīs happened too many times since Trump & Brexit. Trump really is an egotistic idiot
__________________
My official site NatalieK.xxx My free porn & affiliate blog Natalie K affiliate programFirst time girls
Skype: gspotproductions - "Converting your traffic into income since 2005"
NatalieK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 04:58 PM   #57
NatalieK
Natalie K
 
NatalieK's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 18,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard View Post
The next concern is biological and chemical weapons, biological ones would most likely be already deployed to the USA, you bomb NK, expect there deployment.
i was concerned with this with ISIS, but seems it hasnīt taken this route at least, scary stuff!
__________________
My official site NatalieK.xxx My free porn & affiliate blog Natalie K affiliate programFirst time girls
Skype: gspotproductions - "Converting your traffic into income since 2005"
NatalieK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 06:01 PM   #58
BaldBastard
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
Here's the problem, Bill Clinton gave NK 4 billion dollars to keep them from developing nuclear weapons, I guess that idiot we use to have in office thought his plan on doing the same with Iran would work out better?

The Clinton Nuclear Deal with Pyongyang: Road Map to Progress or Dead End Street? | The Heritage Foundation
Hang on

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeli...uclear_program

you want to blame anyone for NK getting nukes... look at Russia, Simply because NK was able to offer cash, cash for brains, cash for parts at a time Russia was in turmoil and that trade continues today..

4 billion was nothing compared to what else has been spent, it was worth a shot.. failed but worth the try.
BaldBastard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 09:15 PM   #59
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark View Post
Even if NK nukes someone, nuking NK back would be a real disaster and create more problems than it solves.

Even 1 nuke in NK would have devastating consequences for surrounding countries. Hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of survivors would be displaced, putting incredible strain on SK and surrounding countries.

What's left of the army will form new armies, new problems, new fighting, new shit.

The fallout from a single nuke would kill hundreds of thousands more or at best, reduce the lifespan of millions of people in surrounding areas. And don't forget - you can count on your chances of getting cancer going up.

You cannot scare Kim Jung Un into submission. Trump's STUPID threats against Un do nothing but make the US look ridiculous.

What Trump needs to do is consult with real experts and get a super-qualified ambassador to NK to talk with Un and work out some kind of deal, relax tensions, and find ways to normalize things between NK and SK, and NK and the world, through calm, normal, diplomatic means.
I think a lot of people don't realize something. I may be wrong about this, but I would go further than what you described and say that a nuclear battle on any scale would stop civilization dead in its tracks. I'm not saying it would be the end of the world, but it would be a different world drastically for years after -- or forever. Or maybe if it wasn't a big enough event to wipe out lots of people, it would bring on end times somewhere down the road soon after.

Nuclear weapons are there to not be used....ever. Even an asshole like Putin knows that.

Trump is dying to use some tactical nukes because he thinks they're cool.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 03:23 AM   #60
Sarn
Say for inflation - YES!
 
Sarn's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Russia
Posts: 9,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67 View Post
Nuclear weapons are there to not be used....ever. Even an asshole like Putin knows that.
Trump is dying to use some tactical nukes because he thinks they're cool.
yesterday Putin test nuke missile

Sarn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 05:29 AM   #61
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard View Post
Hang on

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeli...uclear_program

you want to blame anyone for NK getting nukes... look at Russia, Simply because NK was able to offer cash, cash for brains, cash for parts at a time Russia was in turmoil and that trade continues today..

4 billion was nothing compared to what else has been spent, it was worth a shot.. failed but worth the try.
I love it when people post links that they failed to read
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 06:21 AM   #62
BaldBastard
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
I love it when people post links that they failed to read
You shouldn't talk about yourself so harshly, I posted the timeline of events to show that the NK problem has been developing a long time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeli...uclear_program

Most of Clintons ground work was done under Kim Il Sung, no one foresaw then that his son would be 10,000x more nutty. Do note Japan gave them a billion as well to build reactors.
BaldBastard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 06:52 AM   #63
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard View Post
You shouldn't talk about yourself so harshly, I posted the timeline of events to show that the NK problem has been developing a long time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeli...uclear_program

Most of Clintons ground work was done under Kim Il Sung, no one foresaw then that his son would be 10,000x more nutty. Do note Japan gave them a billion as well to build reactors.
How fucking stupid do you have to be to not see that you are offering up every conceivable excuse to explain the truth that giving a country 4 billion to not build a nuke and 20 years later the have them was a mistake?

You probably think the deal with Iran will keep them from developing nukes, you really are a fucking idiot.

You posted a link that explained the timeline after you mentioned Russian envolvment when Russia was only mentioned twice and not for helping them get nukes like you posted. Again, you're a fucking moron!

If you're going to bash someone, get the fucking facts straight!
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 07:11 AM   #64
BaldBastard
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
How fucking stupid do you have to be to not see that you are offering up every conceivable excuse to explain the truth that giving a country 4 billion to not build a nuke and 20 years later the have them was a mistake?

You probably think the deal with Iran will keep them from developing nukes, you really are a fucking idiot.

You posted a link that explained the timeline after you mentioned Russian envolvment when Russia was only mentioned twice and not for helping them get nukes like you posted. Again, you're a fucking moron!

If you're going to bash someone, get the fucking facts straight!
Actually the question should be how fucking stupid are you not to read the article you posted, or are you TOO FUCKING stupid to realise that?

Go back and read that first you numb fuck...


And then.. FUCKING MORON (Russki are you?? )

Look at the issues today, NK has been developing nuclear technology for a LONG time, in many ways they are world leaders in it.

But miraculously they have advanced their rocket technology 1000 fold in a very short period of time.

Clinton or Obama sold them that did they?
BaldBastard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 06:25 PM   #65
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,202
Yep a long time, like since Clinton was in office.
Also, the thing about Japan giving them a reactor? You really think that means shit? Big difference between fision and fusion .
But you're too fucking stupid to know that. One gets warm, the other goes boom.

Fuck, you don't have a fucking clue do you?
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 08:30 PM   #66
BaldBastard
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14,478
Yet again your showing you never bothered to read the article you linked let alone understand the time and conditions that it was written under. Go back there with someone else and ask them to read it to you and explain it to you with a clear mind if that's possible.

----------

The one person who has escalated the NK problem more than anyone else in history is.. Donald Trump, and through his stupid fucking temperament, lack of political experience and total lack of understanding in Nk.. is leading the whole world to nuclear war.

Building a nuke for NK when they sit on one of the biggest mountains of uranium in the world has only ever been a matter of time, its not really that difficult for them to achieve, rogue scientist's from MANY countries have contributed to that since the 1950's.

Someone in the past few years has provided them with rocket technology which takes this from a local problem to a worldwide one.

Here's a good starting point to understand which country in the world that might of been.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hwasong-14

America is not greater and the world is not safer with Bozo the clown trying to run it.
BaldBastard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 08:33 PM   #67
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard View Post
Yet again your showing you never bothered to read the article you linked let alone understand the time and conditions that it was written under. Go back there with someone else and ask them to read it to you and explain it to you with a clear mind if that's possible.
Don't try to make him understand context and perspective. You'll have better luck teaching a dog how to do a card trick.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 10:37 PM   #68
cosis
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Beach
Posts: 5,255
cosis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2017, 12:32 PM   #69
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67 View Post
Don't try to make him understand context and perspective. You'll have better luck teaching a dog how to do a card trick.
Hey shit for brains, what did I say that was wrong, not one fucking thing!

I started with Clinton gave them 4 billion and maybe Obama shouldn't have done that with Iran given that it DIDN'T FUCKING WORK

You're a fucking moron, always will be

Truth and facts over context and perspective every fucking time
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2017, 12:58 PM   #70
RedFred
Confirmed User
 
RedFred's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
Hey shit for brains, what did I say that was wrong, not one fucking thing!

I started with Clinton gave them 4 billion
Wrong.

Politifact - Viral image wrongly blames Bill Clinton for giving North Korea the means to make nuclear weapons and $5 Billion



Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
and maybe Obama shouldn't have done that with Iran given that it DIDN'T FUCKING WORK

Wrong again. It was $1.7 billion and it was money that had been already owed to them for years.

Donald Trump is right: The U.S. did pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash - LA Times
RedFred is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2017, 01:03 PM   #71
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
Hey shit for brains, what did I say that was wrong, not one fucking thing!

I started with Clinton gave them 4 billion and maybe Obama shouldn't have done that with Iran given that it DIDN'T FUCKING WORK

You're a fucking moron, always will be

Truth and facts over context and perspective every fucking time
Listen here you morbidly obese hemorrhoid infested fat fuck.

READ

THE

ARTICLE

You're making yourself look stupid. No offense
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2017, 04:16 PM   #72
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,202
Um, read your article, it says 4 billion was given to NK, whose GDP for this year is about 16 billion, where exactly am I wrong, answer no where.....


Quote:
Wrong again. It was $1.7 billion and it was money that had been already owed to them for years.

Donald Trump is right: The U.S. did pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash - LA Times
LMAO, guess you missed the part in your article where Obama was paying for the release of hostages. If you think that's the right thing to do is to pay every time a government takes a hostage, please stay out of this country!
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
usa, korea, north, action, move, military, hits, mainland, talking, feel, hit, endgame, pretty, corner



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright Đ 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.