Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 05-23-2018, 10:59 AM   #1
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,232
Wanna be dictator Trump can't block Twitter followers, federal judge rules


Another day and Trump is forced to follow the law and constitution. When will Trump learn he's not above the law?

"Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald said in her ruling that Trump is violating the U.S. Constitution by preventing certain Americans from viewing his tweets."

Trump can't block Twitter followers, federal judge rules
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:06 AM   #2
beerptrol
Confirmed Asshole
 
beerptrol's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar.
Posts: 12,722
That corrupt snowflake
__________________
“If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
-- Ulysses S. Grant
beerptrol is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:17 AM   #3
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
LOL. You guys got played - AGAIN.

"The social media platform, Buchwald said, is a "designated public forum..."

Guess what it means?

You don't even know. It's so awesome.
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:26 AM   #4
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim View Post
LOL. You guys got played - AGAIN.

"The social media platform, Buchwald said, is a "designated public forum..."

Guess what it means?

You don't even know. It's so awesome.
I predict this will go all the way to the SC. Further, the argument will be that his account, not the platform, is a public forum, while the main defense argument will be the account is private due to his creating it prior to being POTUS.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:26 AM   #5
beerptrol
Confirmed Asshole
 
beerptrol's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar.
Posts: 12,722
Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim View Post
LOL. You guys got played - AGAIN.

"The social media platform, Buchwald said, is a "designated public forum..."

Guess what it means?

You don't even know. It's so awesome.
neither does Chump!
__________________
“If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
-- Ulysses S. Grant
beerptrol is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:38 AM   #6
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
I predict this will go all the way to the SC. Further, the argument will be that his account, not the platform, is a public forum, while the main defense argument will be the account is private due to his creating it prior to being POTUS.
The issue will not be this account - the issue will be, is Twitter (and Facebook, et al) part of the public square? Or are they simply a private corp that can censor whatever they like on their platform?

#internetbillofrights
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:43 AM   #7
The Porn Nerd
Living The Dream
 
The Porn Nerd's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Inside a Monitor
Posts: 19,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim View Post
The issue will not be this account - the issue will be, is Twitter (and Facebook, et al) part of the public square? Or are they simply a private corp that can censor whatever they like on their platform?

#internetbillofrights
Yes because this argument is working so well for file lockers like The Pirate Bay, right?

Assholes always want it both ways. They want privacy when it suits them and public liberties when it suits them. They want control but no regulations. They want freedom for themselves but not freedom for others.

Amazing country I live in. Just amazing. MAGA JO!*
























































































*Make America Great Again - Just Once
__________________
My Affiliate Programs:
Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold (Coming Soon)

Over 90 paysites to promote!
ICQ: 579915163
Skype: peabodymedia
The Porn Nerd is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:44 AM   #8
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim View Post
The issue will not be this account - the issue will be, is Twitter (and Facebook, et al) part of the public square? Or are they simply a private corp that can censor whatever they like on their platform?

#internetbillofrights
Perhaps. I believe the stronger argument may be that the account, not the platform, is in the pubic domain. The platform is simply a conduit. but, I'm theorizing.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:44 AM   #9
Acepimp
All Facts Matter
 
Acepimp's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: East Coast
Posts: 16,236
Twitter allows you to block people who are hysterical idiots sending harassing messages, like Bladewire for example.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim View Post
The issue will not be this account - the issue will be, is Twitter (and Facebook, et al) part of the public square? Or are they simply a private corp that can censor whatever they like on their platform?

#internetbillofrights
^^ Correct, this ruling will lead to the platforms ending their censorship of groups they don't like. Trump outsmarted the clueless libs yet again
__________________
Earn Recurring Money with ➜ Live Adult Webcams | CrakRevenue | Dream Cash

Like Hot Sluts? >> DaniDanielsPorn.com

Just Surfing? Chat with Streamate Camgirls
Acepimp is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:45 AM   #10
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post
Yes because this argument is working so well for file lockers like The Pirate Bay, right?
Ummm. Okay?
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:52 AM   #11
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
Perhaps. I believe the stronger argument may be that the account, not the platform, is in the pubic domain. The platform is simply a conduit. but, I'm theorizing.
It's really not a matter of argument - more about bringing this issue into the open. A huge majority of speech currently takes place on a few platforms. What, if any, rights do people have to ensure their voices are not censored on these platforms based on the views of the people that own or run them?

People like Mrs. Bladewire laugh at what they think is a defeat for the President. They don't understand what is happening in the background and how he keeps using these things to bring attention to them. Hook, line and sinker - over and over again.
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:53 AM   #12
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,232
↑↑↑ Fake nic troll is melting down again

JohnnyClips aka xClips Jim aka Acepimp aka JohnnyNight etc. etc.
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 11:57 AM   #13
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
End Mrs. Bladewire

xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:01 PM   #14
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim View Post
It's really not a matter of argument - more about bringing this issue into the open. A huge majority of speech currently takes place on a few platforms. What, if any, rights do people have to ensure their voices are not censored on these platforms based on the views of the people that own or run them?

People like Mrs. Bladewire laugh at what they think is a defeat for the President. They don't understand what is happening in the background and how he keeps using these things to bring attention to them. Hook, line and sinker - over and over again.
I'm referring to the legal arguments of the case, not GFY arguments.

I don't know the answer to your question, I'm looking to the courts for clarification on that, I think this judge did bring the issue into the open, but a higher court needs to sort it out clearly.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:06 PM   #15
BaldBastard
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14,380
Seems like a stupid decision from the judge, if your not logged in to Twitter.. you can still read Trumps tweets and replies to them. I can imagine the POTUS account has to follow stricter protocols, but his personal account.. should be able to be used like any other personal account.

I always wondered why he uses Twitter, I would of thought it would of been a lot better to get people to his site, rather than promoting someone else's.
BaldBastard is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:10 PM   #16
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
I'm referring to the legal arguments of the case, not GFY arguments.

I don't know the answer to your question, I'm looking to the courts for clarification on that, I think this judge did bring the issue into the open, but a higher court needs to sort it out clearly.
I understand what you meant - you are just out of the loop on this particular issue, most likely. There is a reason this case exists and a reason it's happening now.

The actual answer will come down to US - the people. What kind of country are we going to have? Can the speech of that country be controlled by a few media companies?

That's why these issues are being brought up.

#internetbillofrights
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:10 PM   #17
TheSquealer
BANNED
 
TheSquealer's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Your Head
Posts: 22,581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acepimp View Post
Twitter allows you to block people who are hysterical idiots sending harassing messages, like Bladewire for example.



^^ Correct, this ruling will lead to the platforms ending their censorship of groups they don't like. Trump outsmarted the clueless libs yet again
I think they have no concept of how much censorship there is on twitter, youtube, reddit facebook etc.... because its always left leaning people doing the censoring on these platforms to appease all the snowflakes losing their minds day in and day out anytime someone says something they don't want to hear.
TheSquealer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:16 PM   #18
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim View Post
I understand what you meant - you are just out of the loop on this particular issue, most likely. There is a reason this case exists and a reason it's happening now.

The actual answer will come down to US - the people. What kind of country are we going to have? Can the speech of that country be controlled by a few media companies?

That's why these issues are being brought up.

#internetbillofrights
I've been following the case since the beginning, I don't get my news here. I doubt any GFYers are actually "in the loop" of the proceedings.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:18 PM   #19
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
I've been following the case since the beginning, I don't get my news here. I doubt any GFYers are actually "in the loop" of the proceedings.
That's not what I meant. I actually have zero clue about the proceedings and likely you'd be MORE in the loop on them than I am. I only know what it means.
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:18 PM   #20
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 74,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
I predict this will go all the way to the SC. Further, the argument will be that his account, not the platform, is a public forum, while the main defense argument will be the account is private due to his creating it prior to being POTUS.
It doesn't matter when it was created. He now holds public office and uses his Twitter feed to announce his position on things related to the WH or official policy. He's made his Twitter feed a public information feed so it now falls under all laws another official platform would be accounted for.
__________________
"If Israelis don't want to be accused of being like the Nazis, they simply need to stop behaving like Nazis." - Norman Finkelstein
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:21 PM   #21
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett View Post
It doesn't matter when it was created. He now holds public office and uses his Twitter feed to announce his position on things related to the WH or official policy. He's made his Twitter feed a public information feed so it now falls under all laws another official platform would be accounted for.
I'm totally for this decision, for the record.

I also expect it to be applied to anyone in office that tweets public business.
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:29 PM   #22
Axeman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Swamp
Posts: 5,186
Anyone in office should not be able to block a citizen from sending them communications, so i am fine with it. Same as they can't block their calls or return their mail to sender.

I do have a problem with big companies like Twitter, Youtube and FB controlling and deciding what is good or bad and enabling censorship on a massive scale.

This will lead to either the SC or a true set of regulations for this new digital world, which is sorely needed.
__________________
XXXRewards - Karups - Boyfun - Jawked. Paying on time since 1997. Contact me at brent [at] xxxrewards.com
Axeman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:34 PM   #23
brassmonkey
Pay It Forward
 
brassmonkey's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Yo Mama House
Posts: 75,267
well he's a public figure. he's being paid for that
__________________
EMAIL ==>[email protected] ==> #NOBIDEN2024
TRUMP 2024!!! | END DACA!!!! | HCR2060 <= ILLEGAL ALIENS!!!!...👮
=> TRUMPS PAYDAY!!!!... - Support The Laken Riley Act!!! - Trump Nobel Prize...
brassmonkey is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:36 PM   #24
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axeman View Post

This will lead to either the SC or a true set of regulations for this new digital world, which is sorely needed.
And - this is what it means.
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:37 PM   #25
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett View Post
It doesn't matter when it was created. He now holds public office and uses his Twitter feed to announce his position on things related to the WH or official policy. He's made his Twitter feed a public information feed so it now falls under all laws another official platform would be accounted for.
you can bet this decision will be challenged and then higher courts will decide if it matters or not. I don't agree with the current ruling but it does open the door for it to move to higher courts, where it needs to be defined.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:39 PM   #26
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim View Post
And - this is what it means.
This is what I've been posting.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:43 PM   #27
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
This is what I've been posting.
Well then I shall endeavor to read you more closely.

But really, I mean the last part I quote him on. It's not about this one case.

#internetbillofrights
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:43 PM   #28
2MuchMark
Videochat Solutions
 
2MuchMark's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 45,489
One Day, Trump will be out of the whitehouse.

And we will dance.

and dance.
__________________

VideoChat Solutions | Custom Software | IT Support
https://www.2much.net | https://www.lcntech.com
2MuchMark is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:45 PM   #29
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark View Post
One Day, Trump will be out of the whitehouse.

And we will dance.

and dance.
That's because the world will be great again by then!

We will all dance together.
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:50 PM   #30
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim View Post
Well then I shall endeavor to read you more closely.

But really, I mean the last part I quote him on. It's not about this one case.

#internetbillofrights
I don't really get into the meat of matters, GFY and all. you know.

But I think the judge claiming twitter is a public forum by SC guidelines is murky at best and needs to be specifically defined and sorted out better by the SC.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:53 PM   #31
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
below are the formal guidelines established by the SC that define a "public forum" and the guidelines this judge used in her decision:

Quote:
What is a public forum?
A public forum is a place that has, by tradition or practice, been held out for general use by the public for speech-related purposes.

To determine which of the standards of student expression applies in a given case, many courts first conduct a "public forum analysis." The public forum analysis determines whether individuals may have access to places for communicative purposes.1

There are three types of public forums:

I. A "traditional", or "open, public forum" is a place with a long tradition of freedom of expression, such as a public park or a street corner. The government can normally impose only content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech in a public forum. Restrictions on speech in a public forum that are based on content will be struck down, unless the government can show the restriction is necessary to further a compelling governmental interest.

II. A "limited public forum" or "designated public forum" is a place with a more limited history of expressive activity, usually only for certain groups or topics. Examples of a limited public forum would include a university meeting hall or a city-owned theater. The government can limit access to certain types of speakers in a limited public forum, or limit the use of such facilities for certain subjects. Despite these more proscriptive guidelines, however, a governmental institution may still not restrict expression at a limited forum unless that restriction serves a "compelling interest."

III. A "closed public forum" is a place that, traditionally, has not been open to public expression, such as a jail or a military base. Governmental restrictions on access to a nonpublic forum will be upheld as long as they are reasonable and not based on a desire to suppress a particular viewpoint. This standard is far more deferential to government officials.

With regard to public schools, the Supreme Court elaborated on the public forum doctrine in cases involving the use of teacher mailboxes, Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators’ Association,2 and student newspapers, Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier.3

In Perry, the Court determined that in-school teacher mailboxes were not public forums, and that the school district could allow the official teacher union sole access to the mailboxes, even if it meant excluding a rival teacher union. "Implicit in the concept of the nonpublic forum is the right to make distinctions in access on the basis of subject matter and speaker identity," the Court wrote.4

The Court went on to say that the deferential access provided to the official teachers' union was a reasonable way to "prevent the District's schools from becoming a battlefield for inter-union squabbles."5

In Hazelwood, the Supreme Court determined that a high school newspaper produced as part of a journalism class was not a public forum. Citing Perry, the Court wrote: "Hence, school facilities may be deemed to be public forums only if school authorities have 'by policy or practice' opened those facilities for 'indiscriminate use by the general public,' or by some segment of the public, such as student organizations."6 The majority in Hazelwood also reasoned that because the production of the newspaper was "part of the educational curriculum and a regular classroom activity," it was a nonpublic forum.

Since the Hazelwood decision, many courts have continued to defer to the judgment of school officials. As a result, many forms of censorship that had previously been unacceptable under the Tinker standard of expression have been upheld.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 12:57 PM   #32
magneto664
God Bless You
 
magneto664's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Glasgow, $cotland
Posts: 1,467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladewire View Post
"Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald said in her ruling that Trump is violating the U.S. Constitution by preventing certain Americans from viewing his tweets."
__________________
magneto664 📧 gmail.com
Adult Backlinks 💘Best Website Stats 💘 Best CDN for Adult Content
My Fav: 👍Chaturbate 👍 Stripchat 👍 Dateprofits 👍 AdultFriendFinder
magneto664 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 01:03 PM   #33
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
But I think the judge claiming twitter is a public forum by SC guidelines is murky at best and needs to be specifically defined and sorted out better by the SC.
It isn't required - we could do the same thing without the SC, but if that's what it takes - let's get on it.

Big social media knows they've lost. You don't censor anyone when you're winning - you keep them around so you can make fun of them. Only losers try and silence - because they are afraid.
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 01:03 PM   #34
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark View Post
One Day, Trump will be out of the whitehouse.

And we will dance.

and dance.
Yeah he's a part time employee of the state. He'd be full time if he didn't golf so much and promote all of his businesses & properties
__________________


Skype: CallTomNow

Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
trump, judge, law, rules, constitution, federal, followers, block, twitter, u.s, violating, ruling, preventing, americans, tweets, viewing, forced, follow, day, dictator, wanna, naomi, reice, learn, buchwald
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.