GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Cash for clunkers program will end Monday at 8 p.m. ET (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=922882)

baddog 08-20-2009 01:38 PM

Cash for clunkers program will end Monday at 8 p.m. ET
 
http://www.cnn.com/

Did it even make it two weeks?

This health care thing should be a piece of cake

WiredGuy 08-20-2009 01:42 PM

wtf? Already? Didn't they just approve new funds into that program and now they're killing it?
WG

BradM 08-20-2009 01:47 PM

Dear Government: Stay the fuck out of everyone's shit.

JFK 08-20-2009 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 16214240)
wtf? Already? Didn't they just approve new funds into that program and now they're killing it?
WG

thats what I thought as well, or is the money gone already ?

Smiley 08-20-2009 01:49 PM

and they are saying that the govt hasnt paid up or rejected almost 80% of the clunkers for cash requests....dealerships are pissed...

TurboAngel 08-20-2009 01:50 PM

Car dealers on the news here were talking about how they are stuck with all these old cars and the government is taking there sweet time in getting the dealers the money.

IllTestYourGirls 08-20-2009 01:50 PM

Complete failure. This C4C program may have bankrupt more dealerships than it saved. :Oh crap

Cant wait till the national health care system kicks in!

Jago Webcams 08-20-2009 01:50 PM

wow, total failure..

JFK 08-20-2009 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smiley (Post 16214274)
and they are saying that the govt hasnt paid up or rejected almost 80% of the clunkers for cash requests....dealerships are pissed...

:1orglaugh I guess all the scammers came out of the closet?

baddog 08-20-2009 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 16214268)
thats what I thought as well, or is the money gone already ?

I suspect they blew though all the money already. Not really sure how they thought adding a few extra dollars was going to revive it to be something that would stick around.

The first billion ran out in 4 days. What did they think was going to happen by throwing another two billion. Make it a week?

IllTestYourGirls 08-20-2009 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 16214293)
I suspect they blew though all the money already. Not really sure how they thought adding a few extra dollars was going to revive it to be something that would stick around.

The first billion ran out in 4 days. What did they think was going to happen by throwing another two billion. Make it a week?

Well they thought the first billion was going to last months right? So two billion means even more months! :Oh crap

GTS Mark 08-20-2009 01:58 PM

I sure hope they follow suit and offer this kind of incentive here in Canada

Porn Grounds 08-20-2009 02:00 PM

So they sold a bunch of cars very fast....made more money then they have in a while....probably fucked up 3/4 of the paperwork going out to the govt now everyone is complaining that it went to fast and they aren't paid yet? Maybe if they waited more then a fucking week to get their money instead of complaining about it they could have sold more cars.

Fuck everyone....should have let all the dealers go bankrupt. Greedy cunts

EscortBiz 08-20-2009 02:00 PM

well I think people already used 2 billion of the dollars

fucking morons, what will be in a year from now auto companies in trouble again, another clunker program

all these band aids

escorpio 08-20-2009 02:04 PM

http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_ht...pt-420x401.jpg

DateDoc 08-20-2009 02:08 PM

$3 billion was the total allotment for the program. At $4500 that is 666,666 cars. They are fast approaching that. I'd call it a success not a failure. Sure some dealers are having to wait on the $$ but most manufacturers have said they will float the dealerships loans for the money to carry them over.

DateDoc 08-20-2009 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EscortBiz (Post 16214316)
well I think people already used 2 billion of the dollars

fucking morons, what will be in a year from now auto companies in trouble again, another clunker program

all these band aids

A few people have brought this up. Now that everyone with an old car that has the ability to get a new car has taken advantage of the program expect to see a huge drop in sales below predicted levels as there are less people needing to buy a car.

ztik 08-20-2009 02:11 PM

I love how they waste my fucking taxes buying up peoples cars worth $200 for $5000, just to take make car sales men rich on commissions and fund foreign car companies

mother fuckers

baddog 08-20-2009 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 16214301)
Well they thought the first billion was going to last months right? So two billion means even more months! :Oh crap

Exactly. $1 bil was to last 4 months, lasted 4 days.

They thought an additional $2 bil was going to make some kind of difference. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

WebairMetz 08-20-2009 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by escorpio (Post 16214332)

:1orglaugh this cant be truer

Brujah 08-20-2009 02:15 PM

So baddog, and crew in this topic were hoping the C4C program would last indefinitely? They wanted even more money to be spent on the program?

baddog 08-20-2009 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 16214391)
So baddog, and crew in this topic were hoping the C4C program would last indefinitely? They wanted even more money to be spent on the program?

No, actually I thought the second billion they added was throwing good money after bad. I stated it then and still believe it today.

Brujah 08-20-2009 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 16214453)
No, actually I thought the second billion they added was throwing good money after bad. I stated it then and still believe it today.

Yet your original post compared this to any healthcare reform options that may or may not make it. If so, considering the C4C program is considered hugely successful in accomplishing its goals, the healthcare reform should be a smashing success right? Since apparently according to you, there must be some correlation.

Mr. Billy 08-20-2009 02:30 PM

Has anybody told the anal hobbit about this?

EscortBiz 08-20-2009 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EscortBiz (Post 16214316)
well I think people already used 2 billion of the dollars

fucking morons, what will be in a year from now auto companies in trouble again, another clunker program

all these band aids

he should of done this closer to next election, or maybe he will do round 2 clunkers then?

DonovanTrent 08-20-2009 02:44 PM

Well, yep, it's a fantastic failure, people bought cars faster than they were supposed to. We better impeach 'em all and get someone better in to save the day.

http://i307.photobucket.com/albums/n...lin_makeup.jpg

baddog 08-20-2009 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 16214465)
considering the C4C program is considered hugely successful in accomplishing its goals

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :helpme

naughtywitch 08-20-2009 02:44 PM

This quote is from a similar thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dood (Post 16213599)
My brother traded in a Jeep Cherokee for a Chevy HHR.

The dealer refuses to let him take the car home until the feds pay the $4500 which could be a couple of months away, if at all. The dealer said they would rather pay the $15k fine than allow the car to leave the lot before they receive the payment.

I would not call that a smashing success...

Brujah 08-20-2009 02:47 PM

They sold over half a million cars much faster than they thought. Sounds like a pretty big success to me.

Do you think they aren't going to pay the dealers?

Please.

Yo Adrian 08-20-2009 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jago Webcams (Post 16214281)
wow, total failure..

Why? Because they got a shitload of people out of old gas guzzling cars and into more reliable and fuel efficient ones?

The money ran out fast because people flocked to dealerships to buy new cars.

Calling this a failure is like calling Nintendo's Wii a failure since they couldn't keep them on the shelves through Xmas.

IllTestYourGirls 08-20-2009 02:48 PM

No one bought cars faster then they were suppose to. The US sells around 45,000 NEW CARS A DAY. Who the fuck couldnt tell this program wasnt going to last as long as the government thought?

http://ask.cars.com/2008/01/new-cars-sold-i.html

45,000 a day including Sundays. The avg is even higher when you take out Sundays (some states do not sell cars on Sundays)

Brujah 08-20-2009 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naughtywitch (Post 16214551)
This quote is from a similar thread:

I would not call that a smashing success...

Some dealers can't afford to wait for payment, because they don't have the funds to float in the meantime. That doesn't mean the program wasn't a success. Wake up.

Btw, congrats on your wedding. Do you get health benefits working for baddog?

baddog 08-20-2009 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 16214574)
Do you get health benefits working for baddog?

What do you think?

naughtywitch 08-20-2009 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 16214574)
Some dealers can't afford to wait for payment, because they don't have the funds to float in the meantime. That doesn't mean the program wasn't a success. Wake up.

Btw, congrats on your wedding. Do you get health benefits working for baddog?

Thank you, and yes, I do get 100% paid benefits - medical, dental and vision, and now my husband does too. baddog is a generous boss.

Brujah 08-20-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 16214573)
No one bought cars faster then they were suppose to. The US sells around 45,000 NEW CARS A DAY. Who the fuck couldnt tell this program wasnt going to last as long as the government thought?

http://ask.cars.com/2008/01/new-cars-sold-i.html

45,000 a day including Sundays. The avg is even higher when you take out Sundays (some states do not sell cars on Sundays)

Way to manipulate the information, which of course is an inaccurate as almost EVERY SINGLE ONE of your posts, period. How about ditching your 2007 and 2006 data and coming into 2009 with us.

Here we are with a Feb 2009 report, showing almost half the sales you tried to count.
Quote:

In general, carmakers and analysts expect sales this year of 10 million to 11 million vehicles, down from 13.2 million in 2008. Until last year, automakers had been selling about 17 million vehicles annually for nearly a decade.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/business/04auto.html

and then, July sales best since August 2008.
Quote:

The federal government's cash-for-clunkers program (official acronym: C.A.R.S.) kicked off on July 1st, and it gave the auto industry its best sales month in nearly a year. Total light vehicle sales for July were just shy of 1 million units, a milestone the industry hasn't topped since August 2008.
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...les/index.html

IllTestYourGirls 08-20-2009 03:17 PM

Its not misleading. You even said that 17 million had been the avg for the last decade. So why not use those numbers as a starting point? So your point that C4C is a success is that the government over estimated how bad the economy is? Either way, it is a failure of logic and judgment by the government.

Brujah 08-20-2009 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 16214623)
Its not misleading. You even said that 17 million had been the avg for the last decade. So why not use those numbers as a starting point?

Because it's completely inaccurate and not at all representative of the period the C4C program was running during? Obviously. I already pointed out that it was the best month since August 2008, and that was about 2 weeks ago. It's probably even better with more recent numbers. The goal of the program was a success. It spiked new auto sales.

Quote:

So your point that C4C is a success is that the government over estimated how bad the economy is? Either way, it is a failure of logic and judgment by the government.
That's all you got? "the government over estimated how bad the economy is?" Is it that hard for you to accept that the program was a success? :1orglaugh

SonOfaBeach 08-20-2009 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 16214641)
Because it's completely inaccurate and not at all representative of the period the C4C program was running during? Obviously. I already pointed out that it was the best month since August 2008, and that was about 2 weeks ago. It's probably even better with more recent numbers. The goal of the program was a success. It spiked new auto sales.



That's all you got? "the government over estimated how bad the economy is?" Is it that hard for you to accept that the program was a success? :1orglaugh


http://pagels.teamexpansion.org/sqjt...6/01/kool1.jpg

DonovanTrent 08-20-2009 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 16214623)
Its not misleading. You even said that 17 million had been the avg for the last decade. So why not use those numbers as a starting point?

Maybe because logical people who aren't caught up in a political fervor prefer to compare apples to apples.

IllTestYourGirls 08-20-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 16214641)
Because it's completely inaccurate and not at all representative of the period the C4C program was running during? Obviously. I already pointed out that it was the best month since August 2008, and that was about 2 weeks ago. It's probably even better with more recent numbers. The goal of the program was a success. It spiked new auto sales.



That's all you got? "the government over estimated how bad the economy is?" Is it that hard for you to accept that the program was a success? :1orglaugh

When you start a program you want MORE money than you need not LESS. You dont want to have to keep asking for money to sustain your program. So logic would say, you would have to at least use a higher average car sales. (But that would look bad politically, because you cant purposely under estimate the program, then call it a overwhelming success)

After all arent you expecting the program to be a success? Shouldnt you use the higher avg?

But still if you use the low est of 25 - 30,000 cars a day. Did they still have enough money to run the full four months?

So with your logic, medicare and social security are overwhelming successes successes because they require 100s of percent more money than expected? Will you say that the health reform is successful when it needs more money than expected and is costing the state/country more than expected? Like it did in Massachusetts?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123