GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Judge Halts Mandatory Flu Vaccines for Health Care Workers (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=933692)

Fletch XXX 10-16-2009 10:44 AM

Judge Halts Mandatory Flu Vaccines for Health Care Workers
 
Quote:

?These are not libertarians, they are not lefties, they are not right-wing lunatics,? Mr. Kindlon said of his clients in a phone interview on Friday. ?They are health care professionals, and they think the vaccination is not going to be good for them. They have no confidence that either the seasonal flu vaccine or H1N1 vaccine is going to do any good for them.?
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/20...re-workers/?hp

Thoughts?

GatorB 10-16-2009 10:45 AM

They are retarded and I hope the get the flu and feel like shit.

uno 10-16-2009 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16435104)
They are retarded and I hope the get the flu and feel like shit.

Same, but I'm still for them having the choice to be morons.

GatorB 10-16-2009 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 16435129)
Same, but I'm still for them having the choice to be morons.

If they were taking care of a already sick relative would you feel that way?

uno 10-16-2009 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16435149)
If they were taking care of a already sick relative would you feel that way?

I'm not sure I follow what you're saying. I haven't had my coffee yet.

After Shock Media 10-16-2009 01:24 PM

It has nothing to do with them. It has everything to do with they are dealing with people that are high risk.

Why not have claustrophobic nurses not wear masks or quarantine wardrobes. How about we allow people who faint at the sight of blood to work surgery or collecting blood.
May as well not require them to stay home if they are sick, they need the money after all.

TheDoc 10-16-2009 02:21 PM

The vaccine is the dead flu virus, just because you get the vaccine doesn't mean you won't get the flu, you can get the flu several times a year... and just because you have the vaccine doesn't mean you won't or can't transmit the flu.

That's a smart judge..

stickyfingerz 10-16-2009 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 16436538)
The vaccine is the dead flu virus, just because you get the vaccine doesn't mean you won't get the flu, you can get the flu several times a year... and just because you have the vaccine doesn't mean you won't or can't transmit the flu.

That's a smart judge..


Yes I keep wondering why vaccine people keep saying if you have been vaccinated you can't still pass on the virus lol.

Libertine 10-16-2009 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16436687)
Yes I keep wondering why vaccine people keep saying if you have been vaccinated you can't still pass on the virus lol.

Because you are far less likely to get infected if you come into contact with the virus when you have been vaccinated against it.

Joshua G 10-16-2009 06:35 PM

did they even bother testing the vaccine? when health care workers don't want to take it, that sends a message.
Local news in boston discussed a 24 year old girl that took a seasonal flu shot august 23rd...she can't talk anymore.
i have no confidence in a drug created on the fly...

Elli 10-16-2009 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 16437636)
did they even bother testing the vaccine? when health care workers don't want to take it, that sends a message.
Local news in boston discussed a 24 year old girl that took a seasonal flu shot august 23rd...she can't talk anymore.
i have no confidence in a drug created on the fly...

Exactly. Where are the years of testing? or are we just treating the general population as guinea pigs and in 15 years we'll say "well, we shouldn't have, but we were under tremendous pressure to do SOMETHING."

epitome 10-16-2009 08:22 PM

That's fine. When one of their patients gets sicker and/or dies, the families of the sick/dead patient should be able to sue that healthcare worker for recklessness endangerment and a bunch of other shit. Oh, and since it was a personal decision of the healthcare worker, their malpractice insurance should not cover it. Personal liability all of the way.

Having to get the shot is an occupational hazard. You know that shit going in...

That'd be like an ironworker refusing to tie off when 500 feet in the air; not allowed.

Libertine 10-16-2009 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 16437636)
did they even bother testing the vaccine? when health care workers don't want to take it, that sends a message.
Local news in boston discussed a 24 year old girl that took a seasonal flu shot august 23rd...she can't talk anymore.
i have no confidence in a drug created on the fly...

It's not actually a "drug created on the fly".

Creating different vaccines fairly often works in roughly the same way. When you're merely talking about different strains of a specific subtype of virus, the process is almost exactly the same.

There are a few possible risks with vaccines: a virus that has not been inactivated, adjuvants (agents to help provoke a reaction from your immune system) that turn out to be toxic, and contamination.

Now, the first risk is a rather small one. If something would go wrong there, it would be detected very quickly and the effect would essentially be that you immediately got the disease you were being vaccinated against - the reason it would be detected so quickly.

The third risk is a small one, too. It's essentially the same kind of risk you run when getting IV fluid, or even when you something. Obviously, the standards vaccines are held against are quite high, so you'd typically run a bigger risk getting a hot dog from a corner stand or taking some vitamin pills with breakfast.

Adjuvants, however, could be somewhat of an issue.

They essentially serve to help provoke a reaction by your immune system, helping your body in recognizing the deactivated virus as a potential threat which should be remembered. More practically speaking, they usually induce a tiny local inflammation, which triggers an immune response in the place where the inactived virus is also present, causing your body to basically associate the virus with disease.

Obviously, then, they can't be entirely harmless - after all, don't they trigger a response from your immune system?

The good news is that they've been researched quite well during the past few decades, potentially dangerous ones are no longer being used, and the ones that actually are used with flu vaccines (where it's already known what kinds are most likely to be useful - something that varies per type of virus) have been well-tested.

Moreover, they're not the scary, dangerous materials the alarmists make them out to be. For example, what's often used are aluminum salts, which are also present in your deodorant, your food, etc. The immune reaction being provoked with the vaccines is comparable to that which you would see in a woman who cut herself a little while shaving her armpit and then applied deodorant - a small bit of redness and swelling.

There are some more advanced adjuvants, such as certain enzymes found in specific viruses, but those are equally safe, and have been tested extremely well before being allowed on the market.

Basically, if on some given day you cut yourself shaving, apply deodorant and aftershave to your body, eat a few meals, come near one or two sneezing people and take some vitamin pills, you're exposing yourself to the same type of "risks" that taking a vaccine exposes you to - larger ones, actually, because the sneezing people have a realistic chance of infecting you with something.

Also, keep in mind that with large groups of people, it's inevitable that some things happen - with or without vaccination. Vaccinate a million people, and you will inevitably see a number of them suffer from unexplained or rare diseases in the months that follow. Just because with any given group of such a size, there will be a few people developing unexplained or rare diseases in the timespan of a few months no matter what you do.

Hell, among some ethnic groups sudden death during sleep occurs about 40 times per 100k young, healthy population per year (google "sudden unexplained death syndrome"). In a group of a million, that's 33 deaths per month, or slightly over 1 per day - which gives a rather large chance that someone would suddenly die the day after a vaccination if 1 million were vaccinated, despite the vaccination having absolutely nothing to do with it. And that's just one syndrome :2 cents:

baddog 10-16-2009 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16437906)
It's not actually a "drug created on the fly".

Since H1N1 has only been known of for a few months I don't know how you can suggest otherwise. :2 cents:

After Shock Media 10-16-2009 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 16437636)
did they even bother testing the vaccine? when health care workers don't want to take it, that sends a message.
Local news in boston discussed a 24 year old girl that took a seasonal flu shot august 23rd...she can't talk anymore.
i have no confidence in a drug created on the fly...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elli (Post 16437767)
Exactly. Where are the years of testing? or are we just treating the general population as guinea pigs and in 15 years we'll say "well, we shouldn't have, but we were under tremendous pressure to do SOMETHING."

Depends are we talking about the regular flu vaccine or H1N1 vaccine, which by the way is next to impossible to get even if you want it.

The standard flu shot is safe to say has had time to be studied. Works pretty damn much the same way as polio vaccine, small pox vaccine, and even chicken pox and measles vaccines.

Then again parents are trying to prevent the polio, and small pox ones now too. Pretty much on 100% junk science and surprise, surprise we are seeing those pop back up on the map. Terrific reason why celebrities should watch what fucking things they get behind and start yapping their mouths about on a national stage. All for freedom of speech - issue with spreading false/BS info that can cause other people harm. Slippery slope, so naturally I defend their ability to say that shit. General people need to at least get an idea of how smart or educated someone is. Just because they can look good on some show or movie and remember lines - does not make them equally or often more qualified to spread info on such matters over actual scientists.

Hell I can probably just bring up MSG right now and watch as the majority of anti vaccine people will also jump on the anti MSG issue too - despite all evidence and even blind studies by those who supposedly have such issues.

Libertine 10-17-2009 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 16437926)
Since H1N1 has only been known of for a few months I don't know how you can suggest otherwise. :2 cents:

The two sentences below the one you quoted explain the statement.

Describing flu vaccines as "drugs created on the fly" implies that there's something new or untested about them. But that isn't the case. Flu vaccines are made with existing adjuvants, based on an existing principle, using existing techniques.

It's a bit like putting new tire chains on your car when there's heavy snowfall. You didn't just create a new type of vehicle on the fly, you merely adapted an existing vehicle to new conditions.

It would be different if they used a new class of adjuvants, or used specific characteristic molecular structures of a virus that hadn't been used for that purpose before.

Relentless 10-17-2009 08:07 AM

He didn't rule that they can't get the vaccine..

He ruled that the government and their employer can't FORCE them to have a virus (even a dead one) injected into their body.

BIG DIFFERENCE.


Think it through. If an employer is allowed to make an injection mandatory, what comes next? Maybe they require employees to take antibuse so they can't drink alcohol, or they require them to be on a particular medication for any other reason.

The decision is about maintaining a person's right to control what does or does no go into their body. Simple and correct decision.

uno 10-17-2009 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 16437979)
Depends are we talking about the regular flu vaccine or H1N1 vaccine, which by the way is next to impossible to get even if you want it.

The standard flu shot is safe to say has had time to be studied. Works pretty damn much the same way as polio vaccine, small pox vaccine, and even chicken pox and measles vaccines.

Then again parents are trying to prevent the polio, and small pox ones now too. Pretty much on 100% junk science and surprise, surprise we are seeing those pop back up on the map. Terrific reason why celebrities should watch what fucking things they get behind and start yapping their mouths about on a national stage. All for freedom of speech - issue with spreading false/BS info that can cause other people harm. Slippery slope, so naturally I defend their ability to say that shit. General people need to at least get an idea of how smart or educated someone is. Just because they can look good on some show or movie and remember lines - does not make them equally or often more qualified to spread info on such matters over actual scientists.

Hell I can probably just bring up MSG right now and watch as the majority of anti vaccine people will also jump on the anti MSG issue too - despite all evidence and even blind studies by those who supposedly have such issues.

Watching Bill Maher last week I had the same feeling. He's totally against flu vaccines. He had Bill Frist on who was talking about the importance of vaccines. Maher pretty much refused to listen to the science and common sense of it, much as he does with food and other drugs. This flu vaccine paranoia is just crazy.

Babaganoosh 10-17-2009 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 16437926)
Since H1N1 has only been known of for a few months I don't know how you can suggest otherwise. :2 cents:

A doctor from the CDC was on NPR the other day and said the H1N1 vaccine was created in exactly the same way as the standard flu vaccine that was available in World War 2. The H1N1 vaccine was simple to create. The only difference is the dead or inactive virus the serum contains.

Fletch XXX 10-17-2009 08:09 AM

Bill Frist family owns hostpitals and is heavily involved in medicine/hosppital business, i woudnt believe anything he has to say regarding medicine since he makes living from it. LOL conflict of interest if there was ever one.

uno 10-17-2009 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 16438878)
Bill Frist family owns hostpitals and is heavily involved in medicine/hosppital business, i woudnt believe anything he has to say regarding medicine since he makes living from it. LOL conflict of interest if there was ever one.

He was still talking common sense regardless of how many kittens he killed.

Babaganoosh 10-17-2009 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 16438878)
Bill Frist family owns hostpitals and is heavily involved in medicine/hosppital business, i woudnt believe anything he has to say regarding medicine since he makes living from it. LOL conflict of interest if there was ever one.

Doctors all make a living from medicine you fucking tool.

Libertine 10-17-2009 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 16438872)
He didn't rule that they can't get the vaccine..

He ruled that the government and their employer can't FORCE them to have a virus (even a dead one) injected into their body.

BIG DIFFERENCE.

Think it through. If an employer is allowed to make an injection mandatory, what comes next? Maybe they require employees to take antibuse so they can't drink alcohol, or they require them to be on a particular medication for any other reason.

The decision is about maintaining a person's right to control what does or does no go into their body. Simple and correct decision.

Think it through. Medical workers come into contact with patients who have weakened immune systems all the time. An outbreak of the flu in a hospital can easily kill a bunch of patients. If you work in a hospital, preventing your patients from dying should be your primary goal.

stickyfingerz 10-17-2009 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16438907)
Think it through. Medical workers come into contact with patients who have weakened immune systems all the time. An outbreak of the flu in a hospital can easily kill a bunch of patients. If you work in a hospital, preventing your patients from dying should be your primary goal.

Maybe they should force every patient to have the vaccine when they come through the door then? After all when they enter the hospital they could be infecting other patients. In order to have the right to be treated at a hospital it should be a mandatory vaccine injection. What do you think comrade?

Libertine 10-17-2009 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16438931)
Maybe they should force every patient to have the vaccine when they come through the door then? After all when they enter the hospital they could be infecting other patients. In order to have the right to be treated at a hospital it should be a mandatory vaccine injection. What do you think comrade?

Patients don't have much of a choice about needing to be taken into the hospital, and don't come into contact with lots of other patients. Medical workers, on the other hand, are free to choose jobs, and come into contact with tons of patients.

If you're going to risk killing leukemia kid, aids guy and scid chick, you probably should go looking for a different job :2 cents:

Aside from that, here's a little something to keep in mind: just about every med student gets mandatory vaccinations (hep B). As it happens, most med students have at least one parent who's a physician. So do you honestly believe that the medical community is trying to kill off its own children with dangerous, untested vaccines?

BlackCrayon 10-17-2009 09:10 AM

according to a recent study 1 in 4 people said if they or a family member had h1n1 they would still go into work...

stickyfingerz 10-17-2009 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16438939)
Patients don't have much of a choice about needing to be taken into the hospital, and don't come into contact with lots of other patients. Medical workers, on the other hand, are free to choose jobs, and come into contact with tons of patients.

If you're going to risk killing leukemia kid, aids guy and scid chick, you probably should go looking for a different job :2 cents:

Aside from that, here's a little something to keep in mind: just about every med student gets mandatory vaccinations (hep B). As it happens, most med students have at least one parent who's a physician. So do you honestly believe that the medical community is trying to kill off its own children with dangerous, untested vaccines?

Right so when flu patient A. is in the waiting room with weak immune patient B. then what? Do you think they quarantine every patient from one another? Do you think each medical professional changes clothes and showers from going from patient A. to patient B. ? lolz Its the flu its spread through the air, through contact etc. A medical professional does not have to actually have the virus in order to pass it from one patient to another.

Libertine 10-17-2009 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16438966)
Right so when flu patient A. is in the waiting room with weak immune patient B. then what? Do you think they quarantine every patient from one another? Do you think each medical professional changes clothes and showers from going from patient A. to patient B. ? lolz Its the flu its spread through the air, through contact etc. A medical professional does not have to actually have the virus in order to pass it from one patient to another.

Jesus. You didn't even pass high school biology, did you?

The lifespan of viruses outside of living bodies is rather limited. Moreover, without cells to infect, the virus won't replicate.

By contrast, during an infection the body serves as a virus-replicating factory of sorts, copying the virus over and over again. Coughs and sneezes send droplets of mucus containing the virus flying around the room, providing a constant source of potential infections.

An infected person has a chance of transmitting the virus that is literally thousands of times higher than the chance of simply carrying the virus from an infected patient to an uninfected one.

Relentless 10-17-2009 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16438907)
Think it through. Medical workers come into contact with patients who have weakened immune systems all the time. An outbreak of the flu in a hospital can easily kill a bunch of patients. If you work in a hospital, preventing your patients from dying should be your primary goal.

In that case, anyone with a sniffle should be sent home immediately but they are not...

Every medical care worker should be HIV tested and fired if they have AIDS but they are not....

Every medical worker should be forced to get a full medical exam once per week but they are not....

Your logic is flawed. Sick people work in hospitals every day. Sick people provide excellent medical care in some cases, and healthy people provide horrible medical care in other cases. Why don't we require ambulance drivers and EMTs to get injected? How about Taxi Cab drivers - They come in contact with more people every day than any hospital staffer... are are far less sanitary.

Why don't we require airline flight attendants to get injected? They are on a fucking plane with you for 6+ hours breathing RECIRCULATED AIR that you are all sharing and they are traveling all over the country/world each week where diseases are much more likely to be passed around.

Think... :2 cents:

digifan 10-17-2009 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 16436207)
It has nothing to do with them. It has everything to do with they are dealing with people that are high risk.

Why not have claustrophobic nurses not wear masks or quarantine wardrobes. How about we allow people who faint at the sight of blood to work surgery or collecting blood.
May as well not require them to stay home if they are sick, they need the money after all.

I agree.. :thumbsup

Libertine 10-17-2009 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 16439034)
In that case, anyone with a sniffle should be sent home immediately but they are not...

At my faculty and the hospital, people are strongly urged to stay at home if they suspect there's a chance they might have the flu.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 16439034)
Every medical care worker should be HIV tested and fired if they have AIDS but they are not....

Tests for HIV, Hep B, etc are mandatory. If you test positive, you're banned from a wide range of jobs because of the risk of infecting patients. Likewise if Hep B vaccination doesn't provide sufficient immunization. Unsatisfactory titer? You'll never be a surgeon.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 16439034)
Every medical worker should be forced to get a full medical exam once per week but they are not....

The costs of that would be prohibitive, and possible gains would be small. Regular checkups, however, actually are required.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 16439034)
Your logic is flawed. Sick people work in hospitals every day. Sick people provide excellent medical care in some cases, and healthy people provide horrible medical care in other cases. Why don't we require ambulance drivers and EMTs to get injected? How about Taxi Cab drivers - They come in contact with more people every day than any hospital staffer... are are far less sanitary.

Your knowledge is lacking.

Minimizing the amount of infections among hospital workers minimizes risk of outbreaks. Providing excellent care doesn't matter if you infect a kid who has leukemia with the flu, since the infection has a good chance of killing the kid.

As for cab drivers - they don't typically spend their days among immunocompromised patients, nor do they perform medical procedures which bring them into close physical contact with their clients.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 16439034)
Why don't we require airline flight attendants to get injected? They are on a fucking plane with you for 6+ hours breathing RECIRCULATED AIR that you are all sharing and they are traveling all over the country/world each week where diseases are much more likely to be passed around.

Think... :2 cents:

How many airplane passengers are undergoing chemo? How many aiplane passengers have large open wounds from surgery they just had? How many flight attendants change bandages on their passengers' bodies? How many flight attendants inspect their passengers' various orifices? Etc.

stickyfingerz 10-17-2009 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16438999)
Jesus. You didn't even pass high school biology, did you?

The lifespan of viruses outside of living bodies is rather limited. Moreover, without cells to infect, the virus won't replicate.

By contrast, during an infection the body serves as a virus-replicating factory of sorts, copying the virus over and over again. Coughs and sneezes send droplets of mucus containing the virus flying around the room, providing a constant source of potential infections.

An infected person has a chance of transmitting the virus that is literally thousands of times higher than the chance of simply carrying the virus from an infected patient to an uninfected one.

Yes you only catch the flu by being sneezed, coughed, or breathed on..... :uhoh Can't touch it by say picking up a pen to fill out a form in an ER or doctors office after someone with the virus. Dies instantly right... :uhoh

I mean a person could never catch it by say touching a door handle on an exam room touched by someone infected then touching a patient right? After all hospitals and doctors offices are 100% sanitized at all times lol..

But shit if it is spread almost 100% by breathing, coughing, or sneezing hospital workers wearing masks should stop that then right?

Libertine 10-17-2009 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16439086)
Yes you only catch the flu by being sneezed, coughed, or breathed on..... :uhoh Can't touch it by say picking up a pen to fill out a form in an ER or doctors office after someone with the virus. Dies instantly right... :uhoh

I mean a person could never catch it by say touching a door handle on an exam room touched by someone infected then touching a patient right? After all hospitals and doctors offices are 100% sanitized at all times lol..

But shit if it is spread almost 100% by breathing, coughing, or sneezing hospital workers wearing masks should stop that then right?

How exactly do you think the virus gets to hands, objects, etc?

stickyfingerz 10-17-2009 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16439094)
How exactly do you think the virus gets to hands, objects, etc?

Oh ya thats right, the virus can only be spread from one person to the next. Not from one infected person, to a non infected person or object to someone else.. nah.. Thats why the cdc says don't bother washing common surfaces or your hands to stop the spread..

Libertine 10-17-2009 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16439105)
Oh ya thats right, the virus can only be spread from one person to the next. Not from one infected person, to a non infected person or object to someone else.. nah.. Thats why the cdc says don't bother washing common surfaces or your hands to stop the spread..

Again: how exactly do you think the virus gets to hands, objects, etc?

stickyfingerz 10-17-2009 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16439108)
Again: how exactly do you think the virus gets to hands, objects, etc?

Oh are you saying that people who have the swine flu don't goto the doctors office, ER, or hospital? lol That makes sense. The only way the virus could end up at the hospital would be via the people that work there.....

Relentless 10-17-2009 11:15 AM

Libertine... what country are you in?

In the US no run of the mill medical care worker has mandatory HIV testing. Urging people with the sniffles to stay home is NOT the same as telling them they are fired if they do not. The idea that the government or an employer should be allowed to REQUIRE you to be injected with anything is simply 'batshit-crazy.' :2 cents:

Libertine 10-17-2009 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16439120)
Oh are you saying that people who have the swine flu don't goto the doctors office, ER, or hospital? lol That makes sense. The only way the virus could end up at the hospital would be via the people that work there.....

Are you illiterate? I'm asking a very simple, basic question.

Again: how exactly do you think the virus gets to hands, objects, etc?

Try answering it.

woj 10-17-2009 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 16439147)
Libertine... what country are you in?

In the US no run of the mill medical care worker has mandatory HIV testing. Urging people with the sniffles to stay home is NOT the same as telling them they are fired if they do not. The idea that the government or an employer should be allowed to REQUIRE you to be injected with anything is simply 'batshit-crazy.' :2 cents:

I'm pretty sure kids are required to have certain vaccinations already... do you think that is batshit-crazy too? If not, why would it be so crazy to have those working in the medical industry to have certain vaccinations/tests done as well?

stickyfingerz 10-17-2009 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16439149)
Are you illiterate? I'm asking a very simple, basic question.

Again: how exactly do you think the virus gets to hands, objects, etc?

Try answering it.

If you can't find the answer in my last response I can't help you. lol


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123