![]() |
Apple awarded multi-touch patent -- this could be UGLY
http://www.redmondpie.com/apple-gran...now-uncertain/
Do you think they'll start suing the fuck out of everyone, and blocking competitors from making new devices with touch-screens? It's a safe bet. |
Apple sux etc
|
yeah I thought they will be granted that. Now we'll see what happens with the others using the same technology...
|
I wouldn't want to be Job's bitch......
|
oh fuck that is ridiculous - Apple didn't invent touch screen technology.
ok so i can go register a patent for a screen on a mobile device that is sensitive to the movement of my fingers without touching the screen at all and get it it i guess? or a patent on mobile device that is voice activated? i don't know who has the patent on touch screen technology - whoever did deserves a patent. before you get a fucking patent you should have to produce a working demo of it not just let idiots write down some idea in their head with some technical illustrations. |
patents suck and limit innovation.
|
That's all kinds of fucked up. HP had that technology in action long before Apple did.
It's bullshit like that patent that destroys the ability for any company to ever keep up with technological trends or it just means more money in apple's pockets. |
Quote:
|
I don't think they can patent multi-touch now, because anyone is using it already and it's nothing special anymore these days. At least i hope they aren't able to do so...
|
Peeps... if Apple invented it and awarded the patent, they own it. How can you talk like this yet be against Tube sites at the same time?
Apple could easily sell the use of their technology to other phone and tablet makers if they choose to. Technology licensing rewards the inventors and grows the company and allows continued innovation. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They might've come up with the idea first (maybe), but they sure as hell weren't the first to implement it. This is crap.
|
this makes me hate Apple and never will buy an Apple product, fuck them
|
Quote:
|
As much as I like Apple, that is kind of bs IMO. How can they patent that kind of technology, its almost like trying to patent the steering wheel
|
Quote:
I actually hope this happens. |
What the fuck! Fucking Apple.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's just like the Acacia lawsuits. They have a patent for "the delivery compressed video files via the Internet". Their patent is so fucking vague it sounds like they are trying to transport musical instruments through time and space to another location. |
Quote:
..there are plenty of patents for steering wheels |
Exactly. I wondered about this after other people started coming out with multi-touch. Apple indeed used it first.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you think innovators work for free ? |
Wow, this is big news. Nokia was set to release their N9 with MeeGo. Despite volume buttons it relies 100% on multi-touch.
http://www.phonenews.com/wp-content/...06/image36.png BTW, this Nokia phone looks super sleek, really caught my attention. |
Apple stole the mouse and windows desktop from Xerox - just saying
|
Quote:
|
Apple didnt invent touch screens.. my ancient HTC had touch screen before the iPhone was out
|
fyck ya apple, you didt create all you are just fucking money wanters
|
The Apple attorneys are hard at work today. Should be a nice cash flow for them if they just go the licensing route.
|
There is a big difference between "touch screens" and MULTI TOUCH.
Quote:
|
True :)
8char |
Now This is a Game Changer! Correct me if I'm wrong, but the multi-touch just refers to the ability to zoom by moving two fingers inwards and outwards to zoom, or 3 fingers for scrolling to the bottom of a page and moves like that correct? The others will just have to come up with a new and more innovative way to make their products unique and more user friendly.
|
Weird I remember ATM Machines having touch screens way back in 2000.
So Multi-TOuch is different LOL! Of course! of course.... |
Quote:
It's like the remote control sitting next to me. It's probably patented. But "remotes" aren't patented. The specific technology this specific remote might use could be though. Or "jet engines". No one has a patent on "jet engines", however every jet engine out there is patented. If I want a jet engine I have two options - I can buy someone else's or make up my own. |
This sucks. If apple is able to squeeze competitors with royalty payments. Then the fee will be passed onto the customers.
Its always the consumer that takes it in the ass. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Geez now I remember why I stopped posting here a few years back. because of people who look way too deep into other people's posts and come back with unrelated matters to prove a pointless view on something |
now that I think of it, HP wasn't using multi-touch before apple did.. it was infrared sensors in each corner of the screen that sensed when something got "in it's way" and interpolated the position to the computer. however, microsoft has been. Remember microsoft surface? There's proof of prior art there... unless apple had prior art in their labs long before MS started working on the surface platform.
|
Quote:
|
you guys make it sound like patenting stuff is something new... ALL major tech companies patent anytime some engineer dreams up some even remotely plausible technology....
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123