![]() |
Looks like in the immigration lawsuits AZ has a favorable judge
PHOENIX ? The judge who will decide whether Arizona's new immigration law is constitutional hasn't indicated whether she'll put the statute on hold before it takes effect next week and had some pointed questions Thursday for challengers at two court hearings.
U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton also went beyond dry legal analysis to point out some of the everyday realities of illegal immigration and how that applies to the new law. Without prodding from attorneys, the judge noted that the federal government erected signs in a wilderness area south of Phoenix that warn visitors about immigrant and drug smugglers passing through public lands. She said the stash houses where smugglers hide immigrants from Mexico before bringing them into the country's interior have become a fixture on the news in Arizona. "You can barely go a day without a location being found in Phoenix where there are numerous people being harbored," said Bolton, who didn't issue a ruling after the two hearings. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_immigr...izona_lawsuits |
Obviously the law must be struck down. We can't have 50 different state immigration laws. What if Colorado says, "we welcome immigrants with open arms".... that would directly conflict with AZ's law as well as federal law.
Shooting this law down is a no-brainer. :2 cents: |
Of course this law is constitutional. It's a simple law that says you need to check ID for anyone a police officer comes into contact with. If they cannot produce a valid US ID, there's something wrong.
If they happen to be French tourists on vacation, all they need to do is produce a valid passport and then check the database to see when they entered the country to make sure they are here legally. Very fucking simple. Just like when they check my car registration when they pull me over. |
Quote:
50 unique State immigration laws. That won't be confusing or anything. |
Quote:
The Hispanic that is legal would have a DL, they would be a in registered car, have insurance and a SSN/Tax ID of some kind, an address, work location... an actual history. |
Quote:
During a valid investigative stop (established under Terry v. Ohio), a police officer can require persons to identify themselves if they have ?reasonable suspicion? that this information is pertinent to an investigation they are conducting in the course of enforcing a clear and specific state law. Individuals who refuse to respond may be detained and arrested by the enforcement officers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The biggest two problems with the AZ law are:
1. They are usurping federal authority. Uncool in the eyes of the feds. 2. They are presuming all Hispanics to be guilty until proven innocent. And we don't work that way here in the good ol' US. |
Quote:
You're a fucking moron. LOL |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can do it too, see.... you're a fucking moron. LOL :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Immigration isn't a federal authority? Hispanics in AZ won't be arrested if they don't have ID and can't prove on the spot that they are citizens? 'Splain me how I'm "wrong on both counts" please. |
Quote:
2) Why does it have to be Hispanics? Anyone with an accent or that couldn't speak English, that happens to be doing something that warrants the police ask for information, and they can't or wont communicate the situation, would of course be subject to this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Right now in AZ, if you're Hispanic, can't speak English or refuse to communicate, and the police, sheriff or feds pull you over or have reason to ask for your id, and you can't provide it. The exact same thing happens now as will happen with the new law, however the end process will now be different for the illegal immigrant criminal.
|
well thursday is coming the judge said parts of the law will make it some parts are in question but illegals will be in jail friday. no beber cerveza :)
|
Quote:
The law does have protection written into it, the departments here are training officers, and making sure they don't target Hispanics, because the department and officer can be sued, and groups are waiting for the slip up. |
On a side note: Washoe County Jail (Reno, NV) now fingerprints everyone booked in to the jail and their prints are scanned against the ICE database. ICE even has an office at the jail.
Quote:
|
They should just make everyone swipe their ID cards at home, before the "system" allows your front door to be unlocked.
Simple convenience, only criminals should be concerned. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Who issues your passport? You should get your money back from whatever law school you went to. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Life could always get better :thumbsup |
The first Hispanic US citizen that gets "accidentally" deported or tased 12 times on the street for not having his ID with him, is going to be big front page headline news on every major mainstream news channel and website in the world.
The inevitable lawsuit that follows will be glorious. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
2) You claimed they would be stopping every single Hispanic person they see. Arizona is over 30% Hispanic, and those are the legals. No, I do not believe they will be stopping 3 out of 10 people for their paperwork. You keep forgetting that these same laws are in place elsewhere. You completely ignore that fact, again and again. I think you are just trolling these days for something to do. Are you really that bored? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123