New 911 computer analysis of Ball Footage on NBC
 

Richard D Hall of www.richplanet.net analyses the "Ball" and other 911 footage and comes to some very interesting conclusions, using computer modelling techniques along with analysis of the path.

1 of 3


2 of 3


3 of 3

bush and obama both work for the reptilian dark overlords

ball footage?

Thousands of witnesses watched the second plane hit first hand.

/thread

watch the video you will see the ball :Oh crap

Interesting ... Regardless of what footage I see, I will never believe a plane crashed into those buildings due to terrorism from Bin Laden.

BTW, I haven't talked to you since the BigCockContent days. ;)

How's things going?

The only "ball" is inside that guy's fucking head and it's a ball of dog shit:2 cents:

For fuck sakes... Add another fucking idiot to the pile. Fake planes? Composite images? Camera drift? Yet another complete and utter moron with too much time on his hands.

glad to hear you dont buy the bin laden crap :thumbsup


things are fine thx :)

very interesting footage, first time i've heard or seen the "ball" but its obviously in the footage and also that extra piece of "equipment" attached to the underside of the plane is really strange. its there but i never noticed it before.

The best part is where he says the govt would not use passenger planes as it would be too hard to cover up.... yet, he neglects to explain where the planes are, since these planes would now be missing along with all their passengers!

The "extra piece of equipment" is not an extra piece of equipment. It is the shadow from the right engine.

richard d. hall summarized-

http://www.richplanet.net/i/bookcover2.jpg

and yet you have experienced air force personnel on the video saying absolutely there is an extra "piece of equipment" attached to the plane. hmmmm...who to believe:winkwink:

I don't buy into the story of "12 arabs with box cutters evaded the world's military super-power, including their military headquarters (Pentagon)" either. The Pentagon is probably one of the most guarded buildings in the entire world. Do people really believe a non-authorized, non-military airplane can get anywhere close to it? Then NORAD scrambles planes hundreds of times a year, but dag-nammit, just forgot to that day. Not to mention, a dozen or more people making cell phone calls from 36,000 feet in the air is scientifically impossible.

It's simply too unrealistic to believe. Plus the response (none except denial) from the Bush administration when questions were raised somewhat confirms that.

Let me get this straight. You're willing to believe that the LIVE footage from 9/11 was manipulated, the thousands of witnesses on the ground were fooled and the deaths of all the passengers were made up in an elaborate hoax, but you're not the least bit skeptical about the "facts" presented to you in a YouTube video?

Interesting...

It's obvious, isn't it? You're supposed to believe the random anonymous guy on the adult webmaster board, of course! :winkwink:

Richard is a very clever guy. and thats bush on the book cover :winkwink:

i'm sure he is quite clever, his expose uncovering the truth behind crop circles is more than adroit.

:thumbsup

where did i say any of that? i said there are air force personnel saying there was something attached to the plane.

now go back to school and learn how to read.

Of course, wtc was hit by a flying anti-gravity ball. It all makes sense now.

gravity is a construct invented by the government to keep the working class down.

2c

You didn't have to say it. One can infer your conclusion based on your original statement.

I just find it fascinating that you're so quick to accept all that, but the thought of dressing a guy up in uniform and putting captions under his name that say "Air Force Personnel" to make it seem credible doesn't even cross your mind. Richard D. Hall probably gets paid by the CIA just to stir shit up and keep people like you confused.

Maybe we should find out Brad Pitt's take on it. I hear he has a lot of pull. :1orglaugh

So what happened to the hijackers then? what about flight 93? Where they fighting non-existant hi-jackers? Oh wait Bush had the CIA spike the drinks on the plane with LSD so the pasengers would think the real flight crew were hi-jackers and thus they would delibertly crash the plane.

"it wasn't a fake pod added to the plane, it was a fake plane added to the pod."

"people who saw the plane were planted."

No, but one can definitely infer from your statements that you need to learn english comprehension.:1orglaugh

Look, really it won't be that hard to go back to 5th grade where you left off...just like riding a bike.

You gotta be trolling with this shit cause seriously lol if you believe any of this shit you need serious help.

how utterly pathetic.

False Flag terrorism aka Operation Northwoods

The sheep are still asleep.


Saddam = 33rd degree freemason died in 1999 of cancer aka illuminati agent

Irans leader = illuminati agent

the ball footage and theory sounds a bit far fetched to me... what does spark a question is the backdrop chopping from the NBC footage.

funny how youre supposed to be looking up at the building yet you see its roof.

that part is questionable...

This is never going to stop is it?

Some new freak is going to have their conspiracy theory about this again and again and again.

Let it go - build a bridge, do whatever you need to get the hell over it.

logic tells me that footage had to come from a helicopter, which is odd because i thought they had grounded all aircraft by that point, maybe not though

Actually professor, that has nothing to do with English (that's a proper noun, by the way) comprehension. You're referring to a false supposition, which is a matter of linguistic interpretation. But, by all means, keep trying to insult my level of education, because anyone with a modicum of higher education knows that only an uneducated fool relies on such childish ad hominem, instead of providing a real rebuttal.

I accept your apology. :winkwink:

It was just an accident? Coincidental that two planes hit the WTC within minutes of each other? Guess it is possible.

Come on... if there was any truth to that the people putting these videos up would have been dead before the clips were done converting.

That was awesome!

There is no such thing as truth.

I believe nothing.

Now, please enjoy the worst music video ever...



https://youtube.com/watch?v=YPnGPIMUnus

Yup, and it is a military cover up. That is why they attacked the Pentagon too - their own HQ! </sarcasm>