GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Study: Holding a Gun Influences You to Think Others are Armed (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1096333)

GrantMercury 01-14-2013 04:28 PM

Study: Holding a Gun Influences You to Think Others are Armed
 
Ever wonder why gun nuts always seem paranoid?

Study: Holding a Gun Influences You to Think Others are Armed

Quote:

If you?ve been following the news about Trayvon Martin, the unarmed teen who was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch volunteer claiming he acted in self defense, you may be wondering why the man thought the teen was armed. The 17-year old evidently had nothing in his hands except a bag of skittles and a can of ice tea. He never brandished a weapon of any sort, gun or otherwise.

Researchers at the University of Notre Dame may have uncovered the answer: their research suggests that holding a gun influences you to think others have a gun, too.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddis...ers-are-armed/

StickyGreen 01-14-2013 04:31 PM

Bullshit...

xNetworx 01-14-2013 04:33 PM

Should I imagine they want to buy me lunch instead?

Smut 01-14-2013 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19424986)
Ever wonder why gun nuts always seem paranoid?

Study: Holding a Gun Influences You to Think Others are Armed



http://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddis...ers-are-armed/

http://stickerheads.com/images/scale45345.jpg

GrantMercury 01-14-2013 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 19424991)
Bullshit...

Right. What do those dummys at Notre Dame know?

We don't need no dumb "studies."

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__...hinessdict.jpg

Smut 01-14-2013 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19425002)
Right. What do those dummys at Notre Dame know?

We don't need no dumb "studies."

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__...hinessdict.jpg

They don't know anything. This information is based on 5 experiments with vague details only published in the ~Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance~.

So you aren't qualified to quote the experiment or call anyone dumb.

Killswitch 01-14-2013 05:04 PM

http://i.imgur.com/AcuVo.jpg

GrantMercury 01-14-2013 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut (Post 19425000)

Stupid? Maybe. But the researchers at one of the finest schools on Earth aren't.

Take it up with them. :thefinger

Smut 01-14-2013 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19425115)
Stupid? Maybe. But the researchers at one of the finest schools on Earth aren't.

Take it up with them. :thefinger

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=19425041&postcount=6

L-Pink 01-14-2013 05:44 PM

ANOTHER anti-gun thread? What the hell is wrong with you? Get a fucking hobby, adopt a dog, leave the basement for some fresh air.

.

GrantMercury 01-14-2013 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut (Post 19425041)
They don't know anything. This information is based on 5 experiments with vague details only published in the ~Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance~.

So you aren't qualified to quote the experiment or call anyone dumb.

They don't know anything? Who does?

Deej 01-14-2013 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 19425122)
ANOTHER anti-gun thread? What the hell is wrong with you? Get a fucking hobby, adopt a dog, leave the basement for some fresh air.

.

really... Ive honestly been wondering why there are so many gun threads... We have nothing to do with guns. I can understand a thread or two.. but not ten a day for a month...

GrantMercury 01-14-2013 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 19425122)
ANOTHER anti-gun thread? What the hell is wrong with you? Get a fucking hobby, adopt a dog, leave the basement for some fresh air.

.

It's an important topic. If you don't like them, there are 98,274,552,238,813 other threads on GFY.

GrantMercury 01-14-2013 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 19425135)
really... Ive honestly been wondering why there are so many gun threads... We have nothing to do with guns. I can understand a thread or two.. but not ten a day for a month...

It's an important topic.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 01-14-2013 05:54 PM

http://i1223.photobucket.com/albums/...alm--44919.gif

This thread needs more syrup...

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_le...aaw6o1_500.gif

:food-smil02

ADG

L-Pink 01-14-2013 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19425136)
It's an important topic. If you don't like them, there are 98,274,552,238,813 other threads on GFY.

Did some bad man molest you with the barrel of his .45? Now you seek anti-gun attention as a way of lashing out when what you really want is to feel the cold hard steel go up your ass again?

Am I close? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh


.

StickyGreen 01-14-2013 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 19425135)
really... Ive honestly been wondering why there are so many gun threads

It's because the media literally controls what these zombies think about...

Smut 01-14-2013 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19425131)
They don't know anything? Who does?

Just shut your cock hole retard. Go read the article you posted. Go read the source article it was taken from. Go read the lame research attached to it. I'm not going to spoon feed you information. If you want to be informed, do your own fucking research like I did, otherwise, eat my asshole.

Rochard 01-14-2013 08:51 PM

I can see this as being true. If you live in fear of everyone else, you start seeing things.

If thought I was threatened by someone, I would leave. I don't want to get into a fist fight over some stupid shit, nor do I want to be involved in a shooting.

kyro 01-14-2013 09:24 PM

i agree, i always wonder who is packing heat.

GrantMercury 01-14-2013 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 19425147)
Did some bad man molest you with the barrel of his .45? Now you seek anti-gun attention as a way of lashing out when what you really want is to feel the cold hard steel go up your ass again?

Am I close? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh


.

Actually, I was disturbed by the cold blooded murder of 20 children by a lone gunman.

But thanks for that glimpse into your psyche. :Hollering

GrantMercury 01-14-2013 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 19425159)
It's because the media literally controls what these zombies think about...

Yeah. You see the "big picture." Not like us lemmings. You get the "straight dope." You see through the haze of media smoke while the rest of us stumble about in a state of confusion.

dynastoned 01-14-2013 10:51 PM

i can't believe some of you guys are still arguing over this shit as if you haven't beaten this topic to death yet... move the fuck on already.

GrantMercury 01-14-2013 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut (Post 19425246)
Just shut your cock hole retard. Go read the article you posted. Go read the source article it was taken from. Go read the lame research attached to it. I'm not going to spoon feed you information. If you want to be informed, do your own fucking research like I did, otherwise, eat my asshole.

I read it, dicklick. I read everything I post. I figure it's only polite to do so, if I expect others to spend time on it. It's an interesting study that came out of a outstanding school.

The Ph.D. who conducted the study has an impressive curriculum vitae. http://psychology.nd.edu/assets/8034...kmole_vita.pdf

Smut 01-14-2013 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19425628)
I read it, dicklick. I read everything I post. I figure it's only polite to do so, if I expect others to spend time on it. It's an interesting study that came out of a outstanding school.

The Ph.D. who conducted the study has an impressive curriculum vitae. http://psychology.nd.edu/assets/8034...kmole_vita.pdf

I call bullshit. Give details about the study you read. How many people were in the study? Was this double-blind? How many in the control group? What were the backgrounds of the people? What were the nationalities?

Let's hear what you know about this study.

L-Pink 01-15-2013 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19425582)
Actually, I was disturbed by the cold blooded murder of 20 children by a lone gunman.

But thanks for that glimpse into your psyche. :Hollering

Everyone has an opinion you seem to have an agenda. And using murdered children as a crutch for getting attention and a reason for your dumb-ass posts is pitiful.

.

StickyGreen 01-15-2013 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19425582)
Actually, I was disturbed by the cold blooded murder of 20 children by a lone gunman.

Who wouldn't be disturbed by that? Bad things happen sometimes in this world, it's far from perfect, and it can't be perfect without taking away people's freedom.

mechanicvirus 01-15-2013 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut (Post 19425041)
They don't know anything. This information is based on 5 experiments with vague details only published in the ~Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance~.

So you aren't qualified to quote the experiment or call anyone dumb.

Are you a professor or qualified? Please leave this thread. I will pay anyone $1000 to make sure Smut never posts again. Anyone have rent due?

Smut 01-15-2013 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechanicvirus (Post 19425878)
Are you a professor or qualified? Please leave this thread. I will pay anyone $1000 to make sure Smut never posts again. Anyone have rent due?

Yes, I am qualified. Please leave this thread before you hurt yourself.

kyro 01-15-2013 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechanicvirus (Post 19425878)
Are you a professor or qualified? Please leave this thread. I will pay anyone $1000 to make sure Smut never posts again. Anyone have rent due?

i'll take you up on that offer, wire money first :2 cents:

kyro 01-15-2013 02:30 PM

I like what this person has to say

I am really tired of the NRA. The second amendment might give people the right to bear arms, but I don't think it was a guarantee outside of a regulated militia. It doesn't say any thing about not taxing it.

I would like to see ammunition taxed at a rate that would recover the cost of swat teams, the increased security made necessary in public places by gun violence, victim compensation, emergency room costs for victims etc. The tax would likely have to be far in excess of the 50% being proposed to cover the costs. We pay all sorts of other user taxes (gas tax for instance), it is only fair to pass the cost of gun ownership to the user instead of the general public. I think it should be applied nationally against gun powder on a per grain of weight basis, to create a fund that reimburses the states for the above cost. I know this is a tall order, so I really appreciate the effort to get it started. Hopefully the national government will finally get it's act together, but I am not holding my breath

GrantMercury 01-15-2013 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 19425802)
Who wouldn't be disturbed by that? Bad things happen sometimes in this world, it's far from perfect, and it can't be perfect without taking away people's freedom.

Well, that's one way to look at it. A lazy way, but a way nonetheless.

And do you really think "taking away people's freedom" would make this a perfect world?

GrantMercury 01-15-2013 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 19425792)
Everyone has an opinion you seem to have an agenda. And using murdered children as a crutch for getting attention and a reason for your dumb-ass posts is pitiful.

.

"An agenda" :1orglaugh

Well, if you call wanting sane, common-sense legislation an "agenda," then I guess you're right.

And I'm supposed to ignore the fact 20 children were obliterated by a lone gunman wielding weapons of war? Is that your plan? :321GFY

GrantMercury 01-15-2013 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut (Post 19425643)
I call bullshit. Give details about the study you read. How many people were in the study? Was this double-blind? How many in the control group? What were the backgrounds of the people? What were the nationalities?

Let's hear what you know about this study.


I read the article that I posted. That's all I meant. I'm not privy to the research papers.
http://newsinfo.nd.edu/news/29684-ho...esearch-shows/

The actual study will be published here: http://www.apa.org/about/index.aspx

L-Pink 01-15-2013 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19426674)
"An agenda" :1orglaugh

Well, if you call wanting sane, common-sense legislation an "agenda," then I guess you're right.

And I'm supposed to ignore the fact 20 children were obliterated by a lone gunman wielding weapons of war? Is that your plan? :321GFY

Fuck you, all you care about is getting attention with thread after thread rehashing the same old shit.

.

GrantMercury 01-15-2013 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 19426757)
Fuck you, all you care about is getting attention with thread after thread rehashing the same old shit.

.

Fuck you. It's an important issue and should be the subject of rigorous debate. If you aren't interested in the subject, read another thread. :moon

GrantMercury 01-15-2013 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kyro (Post 19426651)
I like what this person has to say

I am really tired of the NRA. The second amendment might give people the right to bear arms, but I don't think it was a guarantee outside of a regulated militia. It doesn't say any thing about not taxing it.

I would like to see ammunition taxed at a rate that would recover the cost of swat teams, the increased security made necessary in public places by gun violence, victim compensation, emergency room costs for victims etc. The tax would likely have to be far in excess of the 50% being proposed to cover the costs. We pay all sorts of other user taxes (gas tax for instance), it is only fair to pass the cost of gun ownership to the user instead of the general public. I think it should be applied nationally against gun powder on a per grain of weight basis, to create a fund that reimburses the states for the above cost. I know this is a tall order, so I really appreciate the effort to get it started. Hopefully the national government will finally get it's act together, but I am not holding my breath

Some good ideas in there. I imagine they would to appeal to any "fiscal conservative" or libertarian who understands the cost of gun violence in taxpayer dollars.
Quote:

In this report we share the findings of the Center for American Progress?s survey of the monetary costs incurred as a result of the murderous rampage at Virginia Tech five years ago. This paper assesses this cost at $48.2 million for the taxpayers of the United States and the commonwealth of Virginia, and for Virginia Tech, a public university. This report also demonstrates how the loopholes in the background-check system failed to protect American citizens from an armed and dangerous Seung-Hui Cho, costing innocent lives?many of them young ones. This was compounded by the legal use of high capacity magazines which transform often traditional firearms into killing machines.
http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/1134

L-Pink 01-15-2013 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantMercury (Post 19426798)
Fuck you. It's an important issue and should be the subject of rigorous debate. If you aren't interested in the subject, read another thread. :moon

bla bla gun gun bla bla gun bla bla same old shit in every thread you start.

John-ACWM 01-16-2013 09:46 AM

:1orglaugh brilliance from Notre Dame.

bronco67 01-16-2013 10:48 AM

....it also adds 3 very much needed inches to the holder's dick.

GrantMercury 01-16-2013 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 19428173)
....it also adds 3 very much needed inches to the holder's dick.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://www.igotnewsforyou.com/images...mall_penis.jpg

GrantMercury 01-16-2013 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 19426936)
bla bla gun gun bla bla gun bla bla same old shit in every thread you start.

Go read something else then, retard. :thefinger


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc