GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   How much is your reputation worth to you? IFFOR now looking for .XXX lords.... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1025533)

Connor 06-06-2011 03:19 PM

How much is your reputation worth to you? IFFOR now looking for .XXX lords....
 
I hear you don't have to sign in blood... that's promising. ;)

http://www.ynot.com/content/116895-i...andidates.html

Rochard 06-06-2011 03:27 PM

Quote:

In return for their devotion to and effort on behalf of IFFOR, each policy council member will receive a stipend of U.S. $15,000 annually.
So if you sell your soul to the devil it's only worth $15k? LOL. Pass.

MaDalton 06-06-2011 03:29 PM

5 Million Euro and you never hear of me again ;)

alias 06-06-2011 03:30 PM

Do they include the crack, or was that phased out after the Chris 8.0 fiasco?

96ukssob 06-06-2011 03:33 PM

i wonder how many people are going to take that $15k... :2 cents:

Brujah 06-06-2011 03:33 PM

I nominate baddog.

MaDalton 06-06-2011 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossku69 (Post 18198346)
i wonder how many people are going to take that $15k... :2 cents:

in many countries thats more than most regular jobs pay, so i am sure Rajid and Hung Lo will apply...

DWB 06-06-2011 03:36 PM

I'd do it just to learn the plan and let all of you know what's coming.

They would fire me in like 6 days. I'd beat Lebrun's record.

jk, I wouldn't do it. But I'd sucker punch Lawley in the face if I saw him in Thailand.

will76 06-06-2011 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor (Post 18198304)
I hear you don't have to sign in blood... that's promising. ;)

http://www.ynot.com/content/116895-i...andidates.html

If I have a cocaine addiction would that prevent me from being selected?

TheDoc 06-06-2011 04:17 PM

Cool, just signed up..

the Shemp 06-06-2011 04:21 PM

this sounds like a lot of work for 1250.00 a month...is lunch provided...?

JFK 06-06-2011 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 18198415)
If I have a cocaine addiction would that prevent me from being selected?

dont tell em :thumbsup

alias 06-06-2011 05:00 PM

http://alientrollscience.com/metric.jpeg

V_RocKs 06-06-2011 05:03 PM

It is strange that your soul is only worth $15K, but you can part out your body for a million....

will76 06-06-2011 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Shemp (Post 18198427)
this sounds like a lot of work for 1250.00 a month...is lunch provided...?

apparently there is no complimentary coke lines for dessert.

baddog 06-06-2011 08:53 PM

I would think it would be in our best interest to stack the advisory committee with people that are on our side. Don't you?

shade001 06-06-2011 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18198897)
I would think it would be in our best interest to stack the advisory committee with people that are on our side. Don't you?

I'm pretty sure that won't be allowed to happen.........even if it did take them two weeks to figure out they had hired a coke fiend.

ThatOtherGuy - BANNED FOR LIFE 06-06-2011 09:05 PM

15K a year? LOL thats a fucking joke.

L-Pink 06-06-2011 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias (Post 18198486)

That is so funny and true :1orglaugh

L-Pink 06-06-2011 09:10 PM

$15,000 ... can i get paid in 8balls?

baddog 06-06-2011 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shade001 (Post 18198904)
I'm pretty sure that won't be allowed to happen.........

Great attitude. :thumbsup

u-Bob 06-07-2011 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18199041)
Great attitude. :thumbsup

If history has taught us one thing it is that the ICM will twist the facts and use things like defensive preregistrations or IFFOR applications as a sign of support.

You don't work with the enemy hoping that you'll somehow be able to influence them a tiny bit, you fight them till the bitter end.

Markul 06-07-2011 03:28 AM

lol somehow I read that title as IFOR and was like wtf? :1orglaugh

Nicky 06-07-2011 03:32 AM

15k per year :error

spazlabz 06-07-2011 06:45 AM

I dont think it is the money that is really what should be considered, although it is extremely small all things considering. The only reason I would ever consider taking a position like that is if it was actually a position that would make a difference, someone who could actually help reel in IFFOR if and when it begins to over step.

It is my own personal opinion that they have an agenda beyond making XXX the standard for our industry and that no token webmaster advisers will make even one tiny bit of a difference

Due 06-07-2011 06:57 AM

How much will it bring in extra through "tips ? ?

Due 06-07-2011 07:04 AM

PS anyone that hate xxx should apply for this. This would be your change to make a difference in how the future of xxx will be governed and what standards that is going to apply

Jman 06-07-2011 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18198897)
I would think it would be in our best interest to stack the advisory committee with people that are on our side. Don't you?

Is that your way of saying you are considering this???

baddog 06-07-2011 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due (Post 18199619)
PS anyone that hate xxx should apply for this. This would be your change to make a difference in how the future of xxx will be governed and what standards that is going to apply

Absolutely.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crak_JMan (Post 18199629)
Is that your way of saying you are considering this???

You are, without a doubt, an idiot. :2 cents:

Jman 06-07-2011 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18199673)
Absolutely.



You are, without a doubt, an idiot. :2 cents:

And this is coming from you :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Honestly won't make me lose any sleep old man :upsidedow

Got Baddog???? LOLOL

czarina 06-07-2011 07:39 AM

hey hey no way (those of you who watch Jake and the Neverland Pirates know....)

Tasty1 06-07-2011 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crak_JMan (Post 18199629)
Is that your way of saying you are considering this???

:2 cents:

Jman 06-07-2011 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bjorn_Tasty1 (Post 18199696)
:2 cents:

Watch out he'll call you an idiot for calling him out. He's a real Baddog :1orglaugh

Tasty1 06-07-2011 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crak_JMan (Post 18199781)
Watch out he'll call you an idiot for calling him out. He's a real Baddog :1orglaugh

I am more open, i said i sent a resume. But you never know if i am serious.

But i know about politics. This is what the main strategy local politics use here.

- They put several stakeholders with different interest together
- The say they had been adepted by the industry and have a commision to think things over
- All input will be mixed.
- The result is some rules nobody can agree upon, but you have to because there are different interest and you have to give a little, take a little.
- The rules will be presented as negotiated rules, made by the industry, marketeers, webmasters, mainstream companies, child protection, etcetra.
- And than they will try to make it mandotary because these are the rules 'the people' wants.

As a member of the policy council you have explain to the group you represent why you agreed with those rules that most people don't want.

And at the end people adapt, just like the tubes are adapted and people want to be in the policy council next time they need a new candidate.

baddog 06-07-2011 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bjorn_Tasty1 (Post 18199846)
I am more open, i said i sent a resume. But you never know if i am serious.

But i know about politics. This is what the main strategy local politics use here.

- They put several stakeholders with different interest together
- The say they had been adepted by the industry and have a commision to think things over
- All input will be mixed.
- The result is some rules nobody can agree upon, but you have to because there are different interest and you have to give a little, take a little.
- The rules will be presented as negotiated rules, made by the industry, marketeers, webmasters, mainstream companies, child protection, etcetra.
- And than they will try to make it mandotary because these are the rules 'the people' wants.

As a member of the policy council you have explain to the group you represent why you agreed with those rules that most people don't want.

And at the end people adapt, just like the tubes are adapted and people want to be in the policy council next time they need a new candidate.

Logic has no place here. :)

ottopottomouse 06-07-2011 09:41 AM

Quote:

In return for their devotion to and effort on behalf of IFFOR, each policy council member will receive a stipend of U.S. $15,000 annually.

?We want to make sure people who are on the council are compensated for their time, because we value that,? Irvine said. ?By paying a stipend, expense associated with lost work hours becomes a non-issue.?

However, she added, ?People do not have to accept [the stipend].?
If you're devoted enough they will let you do it for free :1orglaugh

shade001 06-07-2011 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18199041)
Great attitude. :thumbsup

I guess everything is going to be okay, Joan will look out for us. Right?

Connor 06-07-2011 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18198897)
I would think it would be in our best interest to stack the advisory committee with people that are on our side. Don't you?

Not saying it's your intent but... that sounds like an excuse someone would make to take the money. ;)

baddog 06-07-2011 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor (Post 18200972)
Not saying it's your intent but... that sounds like an excuse someone would make to take the money. ;)

And it is your position that we should have a bunch of right wing tea party representatives on the council?

Redrob 06-07-2011 04:24 PM

<---- Is probably on the Shit List at IFFOR.:1orglaugh

Tasty1 06-07-2011 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18200977)
And it is your position that we should have a bunch of right wing tea party representatives on the council?

Yes, that would be good. Than the adult industry never would addapt it.
Or more CHRIS 6.0's could accomplish the same ;)

u-Bob 06-07-2011 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18199913)
Logic has no place here. :)

so you see the logic of what he is saying, yet you insist on going along with the iffor scam?

Putting someone from the industry on the board will in no way make things better for this industry. On the contrary! Lawley (you know, the guy that lied to your face) wants us to put someone on that board!

C H R I S 06-07-2011 05:29 PM

I personally am on the fence on the whole .XXX issue. Having spent time on the inside I know things that would make peoples heads spin.....

I think change is scary for people - especiall people in this industry. But change happens whether you like it or not. I suggest people be more open minded and look at the state of the industry and how this might potentially help and not hurt their business' bottom line. Im just saying, my opinion really means nothing in the larger picture and I only have 15 years in this industry.....

Cheers!

topnotch, standup guy 06-07-2011 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18200977)
And it is your position that we should have a bunch of right wing tea party representatives on the council?

It doesn't matter who's on the council, Lawley and his butt buddies have already mapped out what the policies are gonna be.

But wait, that's not the worst of it...

The real tea party types (the ones in congress) will then get their say on XXX policy once Lawley starts lobbying them to make XXX mandatory :(

.

C H R I S 06-07-2011 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topnotch, standup guy (Post 18201105)
It doesn't matter who's on the council, Lawley and his butt buddies have already mapped out what the policies are gonna be.

But wait, that's not the worst of it...

The real tea party types (the ones in congress) will then get their say on XXX policy once Lawley starts lobbying them to make XXX mandatory :(

.

.XXX will never be mandatory. Period.

JFK 06-07-2011 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C H R I S 3.0 Beta (Post 18201148)
.XXX will never be mandatory. Period.

sound pretty serious there:winkwink:

alias 06-07-2011 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C H R I S 3.0 Beta (Post 18201148)
.XXX will never be mandatory. Period.

So it's a giant avs?

baddog 06-07-2011 07:16 PM

I wish I owned a crystal ball like the rest of you.

Chris 06-07-2011 07:55 PM

The way they spun it - they claim that if someone is against .xxx or worried about the regulations behind it that a spot on IFFOR would be perfect so they have some sort of vote into as what goes on

topnotch, standup guy 06-07-2011 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18201281)
I wish I owned a crystal ball like the rest of you.

You don't need a crystal ball or a weatherman to know which way the wind blows re: this issue.
.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123