Identify these Porn Stars?
 

Can anyone identify these beautiful girls? :helpme

01;
http://whiteboxvault.com/IDENTIFY/01.jpg

02;
http://whiteboxvault.com/IDENTIFY/02.jpg

03;
http://whiteboxvault.com/IDENTIFY/03.jpg

04;
http://whiteboxvault.com/IDENTIFY/04.jpg

those are not porn stars just house cleaners :winkwink:

4. Black Angelika

#1 and #4 :thumbsup

muchas gracias senor! :thumbsup

1. maybe http://www.freeones.com/html/p_links/Piper_Fawn/

Yessir, I do think you are correct, Danke schön :thumbsup

02. is Jenny Laird

Grazie tanto! You guys sure know your porn stars! :thumbsup

Angelicka Black is hot!

03 scoliosis

Got no names for them but I will take girl number 2..

She's all yours if you can identify number 03 :winkwink:

Yep :thumbsup

Now doing 3 years for drug dealing :)

#1 is super hot

This thread needs more LOVE POWER

:1orglaugh

Fucking HAWT !!!!!!! :thumbsup

1st and 4th girls are beautiful :thumbsup

Too funny! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The #1 is easy...

she was Piper Fawn first, then Faith Lightspeed, then Gabielle Lupin and now Ariel's Blog

Skank, Slut, Ho, and Hooker?

Not necessarily in that order.

She has derp nipples.
http://files.sharenator.com/tumblr_l...134550-580.jpg

They are not pornstars unless they have a cock in thier mouth or AT LEAST eating pussy.

SOLO GIRLS ARE NOT PORNSTARS !!

i got every reference except ariel's blog

???

By that definition, #1 and 4 qualify at least. #2 doesn't, don't know about #3 :)

If the average person viewing porn does not recognize the person by name alone
then the person is not a porn star.

The porn industry has only had a handful of "stars" ever.

We don't even bother to put credits on the film like "Staring So-and-So".

So how can anyone claim to be using porn stars when they don't even put the
person's name on the video?

A porn actor will be known to every content producer in the world and be considered
by producers to be a porn star, yet the porn consumers don't even know the
performers name even after seeing them in 10 films.

And people wonder why conversions are tough.
We should try letting the consumers know something about who/what we are selling.

When's the last time a sponsor released a decent porn star interview clip to
try and build a brand for the star?

We keep waiting for stardom to happen magically while not realizing that stardom
is controlled by the media. The media creates the star, that's why we have Paris Hilton
and Kim Kardashian. But the media is mainstream and therefore does not attempt
to create "porn stars". The industry has to create the star by pumping the stars
brand. The solo site is the closest thing this industry has to trying to create a
star. And the only reason it can create a star is because the site is named after
the performer. Name recognition is what creates a star.

We don't even put the fucking names on the videos.

We're fucking dumb.

:1orglaugh

Add to above :

The old school porn video shop did create porn stars.
All the big names in porn that I ever heard of got their status by making
films before the internet exploded.

The reason the old school porn shop created stars is simple:

They had a box and put the performers name on it next to the performers picture.

It's a magic concept.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

#3 is Gitta Szoke I think, at least her lips look the same, I have her profile here :
http://www.smutmodels.com/gitta-szoke/81

Agree with Matuloo that #3 resembles Gitta Szoke.

However, I think she also resembles Alyssa Lovelace:
http://www.allalyssalovelace.com/

nice hotties....

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

LOL WELL SAID.
My thoughts also theres full nudity in mainstream movies but those girls arent pornstars.

No question, I'd recognize those nipples anywhere! :thumbsup Thanks much!

What does the average person call them or refer to them as otherwise?

Until I came to GFY, I had never heard the term Solo Girl.