Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Glen
(Post 18563442)
yeah because so many people have gotten cancer from plane scanners..
|
It's difficult to track exactly where a cancer came from. Shoe shops used to measure feat with X-Rays, everyone was told it was perfectly safe. Once upon a time we were told that cigarettes were good for us. Monsanto funds research to tell us that GMO's are perfectly safe, but there's already more than enough evidence to suggest the complete opposite. Already there are studies suggesting that Body Scanner T-Rays are damaging DNA
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24331/ whilst in the article at the top of the thread, even the EU has come to the conclusion that the Body Scanners will increase the Cancer rate.
People are making a lot of money out of these scanners:- George Soros, Michael Chertoff, and a number of lobbyists, just to name a few
http://thenewamerican.com/economy/co...-body-scanners We have to understand that this is corruption, we cannot trust these people with our health.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Glen
(Post 18563442)
it's like nobody can cash in their frequent flyer miles because they are all dying quick deaths...
|
Though Cancer isn't generally a quick death :2 cents:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Glen
(Post 18563442)
No money in killing your own people...
|
There's a huge difference between someone dying instantly, without the need to pay for treatments and potentially leaving an inheritance for a relative, meaning the relative has less need to submit to employment. This is not good for the TPTB, they do not want e.g. $200,000 transferred to relatives when we die. They want them to have to continue submitting to employment and to be paying taxes.
When it comes to Cancer treatments, here are a few figures:-
- In 2006 the average cost of a
1 month Cancer prescription was over
$1,600, it's higher now
http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/Find...ncer-treatment
- Avastin/Bevacizumab (Prolongs life but does not cure Cancer) -
$100,000 per year in the US
Despite these high prices, it doesn't actually cost that much to make these products, in fact Big Pharma spends twice as much on Promotion as it does on Research and Development (13.4%)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0105140107.htm
They also spend a higher percentage on the lobbyists who they send to get laws changes e.g. vaccines to attend school etc (injecting kids with more disease)
Let's not forget to add, that by giving us Cancer and continuing the myth of "We do not understand it, we need your help" they make even more money from all of the fundraising. For example, let's say a frequent flyer goes down with a Cancer, then the friends/relatives will often start raising money for Cancer Research, but where does that money really go, as we know that the Pharms spend such a small percentage on research, they are not interested in curing us, but making us into repeat customers i.e. keeping us sick.
So at face value, Big Pharma is making a lot of money out of Cancer, whereas if we look deeper into the reality of what's going on here. It's far more complex; it's about attaching us to the the main currencies, so as we have to take refuge in money and the rest of the system that comes with it. That way they control us; we work for them. Whereas if we could easily live outside of the system, feeding ourselves, being healthy etc, then we're only working for ourselves. So by injecting us with disease (i.e. vaccines) and finding other ways to increase our chances of illness, they are giving us all the more reason to be in the system, with fear of being outside of it, they want us to feel that the system will protect us; that way will will work for the system.
Back to what I mentioned earlier about them not wanting us to leave an inheritance, this is where the so-called "Old Person's Flu Jab" comes in. TPTB do not want people dying in their own homes, so if they have avoided other disease, then they want to push them towards an old people's home, which will quickly start draining their resources back into the system, so as relatives will have less benefit from any inheritance. We've been told a Fairy Tale, the old people's injection is actually one that slowly starts to push them towards Alzheimer's disease.
-------
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/flu11.html
"According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD (
http://members.aol.com/nitrf), the world's leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals), if an individual has had five consecutive flu shots between 1970 and 1980 (the years studied) his/her chances of getting Alzheimer's Disease is ten times higher than if they had one, two or no shots. I asked Dr. Fudenberg why this was so and he said it was due to the mercury and aluminum that is in every flu shot (and most childhood shots).
-------
Some people will find this hard to accept as it doesn't fit in with their perception of the world, they would first need to have a mental breakdown and start rebuilding their Paradigm :2 cents:
