How disappointing is Playboy
 

So like everyone else in the nation I've seen the Lindsey Lohan pictures:

How horrible is the set, the photography, the hair and makeup, I know the magazine has declined but it's really a shame the quality has too. Just let her be cute and stand next to some California pool on the hills. Why take someone you know is going to sell and generate interest and make her look completely different, Halloween has passed. My $1 yearly subscription isn't even worth it anymore.

This issues looks to be 95% ad space.

agree :)

Wow porn.com got the thread here deleted.

WTF

Some pics in their mags are good but holy hell did they make Lohan look like shit.

Well in all fairness it's their material being leaked, and much like a torrent or theft I side with them on this. But there's not much you can do, every site in the world has all her pictures up. That being said Playboy fucked this is up and it's easy to see they have bigger problems then pictures being shared.

There better be one HELL of a Ron Howard interview in those pages.

This thread is useless without pix

:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

Thread without pics :(

This thread is a let down :pimp

Noted

http://s7.postimage.org/435v5x5h7/0495607030.jpg

http://s12.postimage.org/dsvvc1hfh/0495607033.jpg

http://s8.postimage.org/pi1a9phol/0492836130.jpg

http://s10.postimage.org/xkalv8t49/t...uagno1_500.jpg

hot pics :thumbsup

:thumbsup:thumbsup

I thought that also :thumbsup

She should have stayed a Ginger.

Does Lohan have fake tits now?

actually, should of stayed home:winkwink:

http://www.pheermedia.com/pics/poolbitch.jpg

Maybe this will interest you:
http://www.underwaterphotoshop.com/

Wow awesome Pheer!

To me the big issue with the pics is that her make-up is so bad that she looks more like a blowup doll. She doesn't even look like herself in the pics. If you showed me the pics and I didn't know who it was I would have never known it was Lindsay Lohan.

Agreed, it looks like she has a ton of makeup on or it's been airbrushed.

i personally dont blame the makeup, or playboy. you can't polish a turd.

Sure is, nice job.

IMO: crappy pics, missed opportunity (for Playboy)

If I had paid for it, I would have felt ripped off after seeing those pictures.

I liked the pics :)

nikki stop ruining our hater party :D

This is completely false. If you saw some of the models that you thought were hot in real life. You would probably think different.

There reason Playboy sucks is because it doesn't understand thier audience. Playboy has lost all credibility with men aged 18 - 40. They obviously don't get that the world has changed and seeing Lindsay Lohan in a retro scene showing her tits is a total waste of time and no one really cares. She was making out with her mom naked in a pool in the movie Machete!!!

All Playboy can do now is try to sell T shirts and apparel to women who like the bunny logo, but I have bought this shit for my GF and it lasted about two weeks.

And finally after all of the nip slips out in public and flashing her tits in every movie she does, WHY THE FUCK WOULD ANYONE BUY THIS WHEN SHE DOESN'T SHOW HER PUSSY!! Demi Moore and Drew Barrymore did it in Playboy! That would be the only thing worth the million they paid for this shit.

It couldn't have been more obvious in that movie that they used a body double in that scene.

Agree here. And not even sure why the hell they even try to sell the print magazine anymore. They should focus more on trying to sell internet subscriptions in my opinion. The internet has changed the way things operate. and this leak of pictures proves it more so now then before I think for Playboy at least.

Agreed. It's a shame really... Who came up with the idea for this spread and who approved it? There are GFY members shooting porn on $500 cameras that will interest more people.

Link to the pics? I haven't seen them yet.

they should have went with a more natural look, less makeup. look at the type of softcore women young men like over at foobies. met-art, x-art, hegre.

Thanks...honestly she looks pretty good to me. Definitely crazy hair and makeup but at least they are straight up clear, nude shots.

While I agree with you that Lindsay is nowhere as good looking as she was about 5 years ago, the makeup and air brushing make her unrecognizable. If you are going to pay a celeb a million dollars to be in your magazine you want her fans and people who want to see her naked to know it is her. There was a pic on TMZ last night of her behind the scenes of the shoot and you can actually tell it is Lindsay Lohan, but the finished pics look nothing like her and could be anyone.

I am starting to wonder if Playboy released these on purpose. Supposedly she had to redo the shoot because the first set sucked. It would be brilliant marketing if these were the shitty set and the leaked them to get publicity up then the version in the magazine were the good ones.

This picture of a clothed 20-year old Lindsay Lohan from Halloween 2006 is more appealing than the shitty nudes from Playboy.

http://i536.photobucket.com/albums/f...teau_Marmo.jpg

Very disappointing actually.

One can argue the creativity of an homage or the validity of Marilyn Monroe pics Playboy re-published in its first issue being iconic of Playboy, but what is wrong with the images? They look like nice pictures of a pretty girl. Maybe not the most special nice pics of the most pretty girl ever. I like a little bigger ass and hips and obviously Photoshop can offer that. But it the shoot looks like overall nice work. Are people just bent about how much she reportedly got paid to do what seems sort of minimal or what?

They are just creating a buzz. That s all.

for me. the images are so shopped, they should be called cartoons. my guess is her freckles needed major surgery, hence the garish whitewashing of her skin.

im also peeved because she had a number of hot years she coulda done this before she looked like a drug addict.

Quoted for truth.

That is why I don't put my hopes on a smut magazine ...

Nice :thumbsup

amazing bitches!! :thumbsup

If it were just a regular Playboy spread I would agree with you. They Photoshop everything so that is to be expected. The problem is that with the combination of her makeup and the shopping it doesn't even look like Lindsay Lohan. It could be any girl for all we know. If they want to sell a magazine featuring a layout of a famous celeb, the pictures should at least look like that celeb. just my :2 cents: