Looks like the GF Revenge sites are done
 

"Laws last year contacted the FBI last year over IsAnyoneUp.com, which allegedly posted photos of her daughter, Kayla Laws, a 25-year-old aspiring actress, whose nude photos ended up on the site. Kayla Laws claims her computer was hacked."

How about don't take nude pictures of yourself to leave on your computer or show off to anyone :disgust.

they were retarded from the start anyway

you shouldnt carry a wallet because it might get stolen
girls should never ever drink alcohol because they might get roofied
you shouldnt leave your house because you might get it by a bus
etc forever

:disgust

Really?

Twenty-five years old, no problems posting for naked pictures, but when someone else sees them she curls up in a fetal position like a four year old child? It's a fucking photo of someone naked. It's not a photo of someone fucking a horse.

As they say at Walmart...Have a good'n!

while police are saying online material has no expectation of privacy?

which is it.

is it privacy, or no expectation of privacy?

furthermore, who is actually using real images?

So what does that mean for the guys uploading stolen content..oh oh

thats odd www.gfrevenge.com is still live and making sales

And she was an aspiring actress. I bet if she were offered a decent acting gig in a movie that required her to be naked she would have done it in a second.

hot gf revenge pic with that article.

There is a little bit of a difference here.

A more accurate statement might be:
You shouldn't carry a wallet that has your ATM card and a piece a paper with your ATM card Pin written down on it in it because it could get stolen.

If she was really worried about people seeing them she shouldn't have left them on a computer that is connected to the internet. She could have put them on a zip drive and they would have been safe from prying eyes.

^ You must have a funny idea of how the internet works.

If GF Revenge was real, then yeah perhaps it might affect them.

Canada is trying to introduce a law to protect against things like this. A young girl had photos or a video shared online (I think that is what the article said, not 100% sure, and not a lawyer), and they want to pass laws to protect against the sharing of sexual images without consent because, the girl who's photos were shared online, killed herself.

Isn't the problem not with the posting of these images, but (some sites) identifying the people in the photos, or posting their info along with the photos? Not sure what the defense is for the latter.

If you post private photos you don't own with the intent to cause embarrassment, harm or ridicule you need your ass fined jailed or both.

:2 cents:

Exactly, looks like it's targeted towards those kinda sites (like IsAnyoneUp.com was), not really against the normal ex-gf porn paysites.

My computer was hacked.. lol.. love that phrase.

:2 cents::thumbsup

Bingo. Those types of sites turn my stomach and I'm glad for this ruling.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc...evt4o1_400.jpg

So invasion of privacy is ok since she took nudes? makes sense.

God you are one fat fucking ignorant faggot

This case has nothing to do with revenge porn sites like gf revenge which are fake. It has to do with revenge porn sites like forums where people actually post real revenge porn, such as, 4chan.

TOUCHÉ!!!!

But you get 1 strike for posting something making sense on GFY :upsidedow

I wonder what this does to tubes? So now if someone uploads real revenge porn, they would do what?

would love to see some of these girls use the sites that their pics end up on - we all know some of the paysites here that have that kind of content scrapped from tubes.