85% of all .xxx domain registrations are defensive says TheDomains
 

http://www.thedomains.com/2013/07/08...0-xxx-domains/

The International Foundation for Online Responsibility ? (IFFOR)? isa not-for-profit organization which was set up as part of ICM application to operate the .XXX registry has now published on its site, its tax returns for 2011 and 2012.

In 2012 IFFOR had income of $267,740.

This income is derived entirely from the $10 per resolving domain commitment that ICM Registry has made to fund IFFOR.

The increase of $58,880 in 2012 is due to an increase in the number of resolving dot-xxx domain names.

In 2011 IFFOR had an income of $208,860.

This income is derived entirely from the $10 per resolving domain commitment that ICM Registry has made to fund IFFOR.

Back in February we posted about IFFOR?s 2011 return and the fact that it only took in some $208,000 all paid by ICM Registry at $10 per domain for RESOLVING .XXX domain names meaning that .XXX only had some 20,800 resolving domain names which led us to ask Are 90% of all .XXX registrations defensive?

We based our 90% figure on the statement of Stuart Lawley the CEO of ICM Registry made to the effect there were 250,000 .XXX domain names under management at ICM and IFFOR?s payment on their 2011 tax return that represented only 20,800 domains.

At the time we got some push back with some saying our numbers were way off and we couldn?t make the conclusion from one year?s tax return.

But now that we have two tax returns of IFFOR published it becomes pretty clear that somewhere between 20,700 and 26,700 .XXX domain names resolved for IFFOR tax years.

Under the 2012 numbers there are some 26,700 resolving .XXX domain names.

We know that ICM reach a high of about 140,000 registered .XXX domain names in the December 2012 report ICM filed with ICANN.

However that 140,000 figure did not include any of the approximate 80,000 ten year blocks ICM sold to trademark and other rights holders.

So out of the 220,000 domain names registered, including the 10 year blocks only 26,700 or so resolved and were paid by ICM to IFFOR.

We do know by its terms none of the 10 year block domain names do not resolve.

With 190,000 non-resolving domain names, it still seem like an incredibly high percentage of defensive registration and certainly based on the 2012 numbers 85% of all registered .XXX domains Do not Resolve which is a huge percentage as well.

To be clear ICM collects $10 on each .XXX domain name registration for IFFOR. however is responsible to pay IFFOR on the number of resolving domain names. Thereby ICM collected $10 for each of the 140,000 domain registrations (not on the 10 year blocks) and is only paying IFFOR $10 on each of the 26,700 resolving domains, which all means to say there seems to be over 100,000 domain names ICM is collecting the $10 IFFOR fee for that are staying in ICM coffers adding another $1.oM + to added revenue of ICM.

Here are some other info from IFFOR two years of tax returns.

Salaries

In 2011, IFFOR had salaries of $138,808. including the salary for IFFOR?s Executive Director (and 8,808 in payroll taxes). An additional $60,833 is listed under Board of Directors stipend.

In 2012, IFFOR had salaries of $318,712. This covers a full year of salary for IFFOR?s Executive Director Kieren McCarthy at $195,000; its chairman at $70,000; its vice-chair at $35,000; and its secretary (and third member of the Board) at $8,750. The difference of $9,962 is due to payroll taxes.

Other expenses

In 2011 there were additional expenses of $403,985.

The most significant were:

$100,725 on Travel. IFFOR representatives attended numerous meetings and conferences over the course of the year, including ICANN meetings and a face-to-face meeting of the Policy Council in Washington DC.
$75,586 on Other Fees. These were costs related to the creation of IFFOR as an entity and initial administration costs.
$37,500 on stipend to the nine-person IFFOR Policy Council.
$37,047 on Legal Fees. These were costs related to the creation of IFFOR as a non-profit organization and review of various contracts.
$36,704 on Conferences. IFFOR held a face-to-face meeting of its Policy Council in Washington DC.
$20,866 paid to MetaCert for its automated labeling system for content held on dot-xxx websites (an IFFOR policy).
$16,489 on insurance, including Directors Insurance and travel insurance.



In 2012 There were additional expenses of $309,285. Most significant of these expenses was $100,000 paid to the nine-person Policy Council.

The most significant were:

$85,807 on contract labor. This included IFFOR?s Ombudsman, IFFOR?s Manager of Public Participation and the organization that carries out IFFOR?s auditing work.

$28,233 on legal services. These were mostly in relation to the establishment of IFFOR as a non-profit organization and the drawing up and review of various contracts.

$26,774 paid to MetaCert for its automated labeling system for content held on dot-xxx websites (an IFFOR policy).

$19,593 on travel. IFFOR representatives attended numerous conferences over the course of the year, including three ICANN meetings.

$14,253 on insurance, including Directors Insurance and travel insurance.

$10,000 on IFFOR?s Grant Program, which was split equally between two companies (see here for more details http://iffor.org/news/grant-recipients)

pure fucking blackmail

This shit doesn't run on water :upsidedow

http://www.dnjournal.com/images/lowd.../speedboat.jpg

keep on digging that hole.

only 20k resolving domains? pretty sad stats for dotxxx.

I don't have even a single one. Well, I was about to get a few when they were lunching it to be honest. But then it showed up that all were pre taken by .xxx themselves, so yeah, spending $200 for nothing that is top keyword would be a bit silly unless... brand protection... but then again $200 to just get another worthless extension? No, thanks.

Correct.

I posted this on XBIZ a few months back when I tried to register a domain for a new project, and was met with a bunch of unnecessary bullshit from these guys. They then told me that many people registering these domains are simply to protect their trademark or brand so they did not need DNS.

This was a straight up money grab. No more, no less.

:disgust

well , actually, it looks like it does, and pretty fast as well :Graucho

bunch more drops will happen this winter.
Not worth the $100 renewal.

Considering how much reg fees are for them, there's lucky to be 500-1000 .xxx domains worth registering (yes, some of those are really nice 1-words that are likely highly profitable), I'd say they're lucky to still have that many.