After 50 Years it's still great! SI Cover
 

Looks very hot :thumbsup

Nina Agdal:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Wow, I concur.

yummy yummy!

They look healthy.

No tits, just asses - and not nice ones, either.

FAIL.

I love this issue. So much.

Is the one on the right looking somewhere else?

Fucking stupid, the girls are looking at different cameras.

LOL. to upstage kate upton, they needed 3 models, topless, wearing thongs.

:)

First of all Kate Upton is very overrated. She is flaby and has a bad lower body. She is all tits. Nice tits of course but in 5 years she will hit the wall hard.

Secondly, this cover shot is way way way below acceptable. I would not even use it inside the magazine let alone the cover.

is that a proper cover or a mockup someone has made? It just doesn't seem very professional. the logo has been obliterated, the texts do not seem very focused and in contrast the cut-out around the girls is too sharp.

Seems its the real cover, but if so, its the lamest over.

http://swimdaily.si.com/2014/02/13/n...joy/?eref=sihp

It is "the" cover. meh. :P

Awesome! :thumbsup

:sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep

So fucking hot :thumbsup

I thought this was the cover. Not that it's generating any less negative feedback...

http://msn.foxsports.com/content/dam....medium.34.jpg

http://msn.foxsports.com/buzzer/stor...om:traffic_fan

i want to lick ass :)

1. Her forhead is way too big. Looks like an alien.
2. flat ass
4. eating disorder
5. dates creepy gender neutral people (Ken)
6. I would still hit it

With photoshop used as much as SI uses it, you could round up any 3 GFYers and do an acceptable cover.
You can't even see the actual girl there anymore. It's a nice drawing.

Oh fuck yea! :thumbsup

not a fan, not a match the golden days of Elle and co

A classic indeed!