![]() |
Fact : Riot photos are nothing but cheap porn
|
|
and by the way... leave it to a fucking idiot like you to jerk off to a city being destroyed.
|
What's going on in this picture? Are they hitting him with milk to reduce the pain on pepper spray? That's my guess?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pathetic. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Yeah... you uhm... you got me. Actually, i just don't like you either. |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Are you saying that I'm just as concerned about a riot as you are about police murdering people? Me no understand. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
1) I have not heard any facts regarding the guy with the massive criminal record's death. So, you have no idea what happened to him other than "a spinal injury" 2) It's not ok in a civilized society to rob and steal and burn as a legitimate form of "protest". Only an useless fucking animal would think like that or think it is an appropriate response. |
Quote:
:helpme |
Quote:
|
Fuck, I was hoping all of the pics would have been compiled and posted into this thread. I don't want to have to click out to another site.
Thread fail. http://img0.joyreactor.cc/pics/comme...me-682496.jpeg |
Quote:
|
|
I want to loot some toilet paper and doritos! What fun! Yayyyyyyy. Cops killed someone block partayyyyy time.
|
Quote:
duhhhhhh |
Quote:
|
This thread title states a provocative message about whether the riot pictures appeal to the same kind of instincts that attract people to porn - and whether people hunger for depictions of violence in the same or maybe a related way. The idea's been around for awhile. Some time during the mid to late 60's, Playboy ran an article with the word "Gut Smut" in the title, maybe 1968 or so. It was mainly about a profusion of articles in the popular press at that time that recounted grisly details about injuries and surgeries, and maybe accompanying images. If I remember this article and its thesis from my junior high years - even then, once and awhile I got away from the pictures and read some of the articles - I think it set out the idea that porn was just a subset of a general human interest in extreme and intense images and that we have a force within us that always steers us toward the shocking/brutal/dramatic/unusual, that generally, most people (or men anyway, it's hard to remember after the many years) actually crave these things. He may have called it a bloodlust. If I remember, the author thought that people really watch football at least on some level waiting for someone to get hurt badly, that expressway traffic always slows down to cause "gaper's block" just because there might be some blood and guts to be seen, that videos/pictures of executions, murders, torture and death will always find an eager audience - and that pre-Internet author, if I remember, thought that attraction to hardcore porn was brain-wired into us through the same mental "circuits" that control how we behave and attract us to shocking and violent images in general.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm scared now. :Oh crap |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But it makes you think about why that picture is so interesting - it is a powerful image. And it reminded me of this video that goes in the same direction as that image: https://www.facebook.com/UnusualHorr...type=2&theater |
there's no sex in your violence, everything zen.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123