GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Congrats to North Korea (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1184330)

Rochard 02-06-2016 08:55 PM

Congrats to North Korea
 
Seems North Korea claims it launched a long range missile today. The pictures were very cute, reminded me of the Apollo missions in the 1960s.

Congrats to North Korea for having 1960s technology.

SBJ 02-06-2016 09:00 PM

congrats to the winners :thumbsup

muthisdev 02-07-2016 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723134)
Seems North Korea claims it launched a long range missile today. The pictures were very cute, reminded me of the Apollo missions in the 1960s.

Congrats to North Korea for having 1960s technology.

Difference being: North Korea's missles can't make it to the moon.
More like 50s tech.

Sarn 02-07-2016 05:22 AM

now they have a full-fledged nuclear weapons delivery vehicles.
and of nuclear weapons

KCNA

directfiesta 02-07-2016 06:03 AM

was a '' satellite '' ....

Grapesoda 02-07-2016 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723134)
Seems North Korea claims it launched a long range missile today. The pictures were very cute, reminded me of the Apollo missions in the 1960s.

Congrats to North Korea for having 1960s technology.

we managed to fuck japan with vacuum tubes, nk can probably fuck us with transistors :2 cents:

just a punk 02-07-2016 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723134)
Seems North Korea claims it launched a long range missile today. The pictures were very cute, reminded me of the Apollo missions in the 1960s.

Congrats to North Korea for having 1960s technology.

To be fair, many of so-called developed countries had no such a technology even now. Also even the USA have lost the Apollo techs long time ago (when it's creator Wernher Von Braun has died). When exactly the US astronaut has been sent to the orbit by the US-made rocket and got back alive?

yuu.design 02-07-2016 06:24 AM

hahhaha, mean guy :P

Sarn 02-07-2016 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 20723280)
was a '' satellite '' ....

are you sure?

just a punk 02-07-2016 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 20723280)
was a '' satellite '' ....

What's the difference? A a nuclear warhead is also a satellite. This video shows launch of a commercial satellite by a military mobile ICBM launch system:


just a punk 02-07-2016 07:21 AM


Barry-xlovecam 02-07-2016 07:40 AM

We can wait until they try to nuke Japan I guess ...

just a punk 02-07-2016 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 20723323)
We can wait until they try to nuke Japan I guess ...

The question is: what for? What profit NK will gain of nuking Japan?

Black All Through 02-07-2016 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muthisdev (Post 20723220)
Difference being: North Korea's missles can't make it to the moon.
More like 50s tech.

:2 cents::thumbsup

Sarn 02-07-2016 08:18 AM


adultchatpay 02-07-2016 08:39 AM

There goes the missle that could feed millions of North Koreans.

Rochard 02-07-2016 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20723283)
To be fair, many of so-called developed countries had no such a technology even now. Also even the USA have lost the Apollo techs long time ago (when it's creator Wernher Von Braun has died). When exactly the US astronaut has been sent to the orbit by the US-made rocket and got back alive?

Seems we are planning on going back to the moon in the next few years...

NASA to Unveil Plans to Send 4 Astronauts to Moon in 2018
NASA's Orion Crew Module Arrives in Florida to Prep for 2018 Flight

Rob 02-07-2016 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 20723323)
We can wait until they try to nuke Japan I guess ...

They would Nuke South Korea before they went after Japan.

Sarn 02-07-2016 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723375)

how's this device with the people landed on the moon and fly away back
http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/wp-...drin-photo.jpg

if on the erth after all the tests you can return only once a rocket, other attempts have failed, and it was without people

just a punk 02-07-2016 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723375)

I've seen many similar announces within last few years from the USA, Russia and even China, but I don't think it will happen in 2018, 2025 or 2030. First of all, the States have no rocket technologies for a new Moon mission. Forget about the Apollo project, because the technology was completely lost. Even the latest Mars mission (Curiosity) would be possible because of this: RD-180.

just a punk 02-07-2016 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 20723403)
how's this device with the people landed on the moon and fly away back
http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/wp-...drin-photo.jpg

I know good English, bad English, terrible English and Sarn English. Type in Russian please, so at least about 1/3 of GFY members (including me of course) will be able to read your posts. A 1/3 is better than nobody.

Sarn 02-07-2016 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20723413)
I know good English, bad English, terrible English and Sarn English. Type in Russian please, so at least about 1/3 of GFY members (including me of course) will be able to read your posts. A 1/3 is better than nobody.

device = the lunar module, it works on the same principle as the missiles develops in spacex.
landing from Apollo station and return back
Apollo Lunar Module - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PS:educational so bad :1orglaugh
PSS:
-burrito
-FFff..FUck:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

just a punk 02-07-2016 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 20723433)
device = the lunar module, it works on the same principle as the missiles develops in spacex.
landing from Apollo station and return back
Apollo Lunar Module - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So? What's wrong with the lunar module? Dude, it has nothing to do with SpaceX rockets or any others. Go back to school and learn physics already. There is no atmosphere on the Moon, so the lunar module don't need to have a streamlined body, it won't be affected by a windage, it doesn't need to be pressurized and so on. Also the Moon gravitation is only 16% of the Earth's one, so an average human can easily do 6 meter high jumps there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 20723433)
PS:educational so bad :1orglaugh

Yep, your education sux so bad. I bet your teacher of physics was even worse than the English one.

Barry-xlovecam 02-07-2016 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob (Post 20723378)
They would Nuke South Korea before they went after Japan.

Too close, they might be downwind in the weather changes.

SAMANTAmax 02-07-2016 11:21 AM

They are 5steps ahead of every nation

dyna mo 02-07-2016 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20723405)
I've seen many similar announces within last few years from the USA, Russia and even China, but I don't think it will happen in 2018, 2025 or 2030. First of all, the States have no rocket technologies for a new Moon mission. Forget about the Apollo project, because the technology was completely lost. Even the latest Mars mission (Curiosity) would be possible because of this: RD-180.


Nitwit, NASA just finished final tests of the rs-25 made in the USA rocket engines for mars. Or the fucking moon, whichever one we fucking want to go to while rosskiez try and figure out how to buy gasoline.

Sarn 02-07-2016 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20723440)
So? What's wrong with the lunar module? Dude, it has nothing to do with SpaceX rockets or any others. Go back to school and learn physics already. There is no atmosphere on the Moon, so the lunar module don't need to have a streamlined body, it won't be affected by a windage, it doesn't need to be pressurized and so on. Also the Moon gravitation is only 16% of the Earth's one, so an average human can easily do 6 meter high jumps there.
Yep, your education sux so bad. I bet your teacher of physics was even worse than the English one.

everyone understands that this is not the same. lunar module not SpaceX rockets.
everyone understands that the parameters are different from the earth and the moon.
but the development of such a module for another planet with unknown parameters(atmosphere, gravitation etc...) on the distance which 384 400 km - is much more difficult than in the calculation of which is being developed here on earth.
for earth the task much easier, if you have these settlements. and they must to be if you really be fly to the moon.

SekobA 02-07-2016 12:52 PM

I remember they won the world cup soccer

just a punk 02-07-2016 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 20723498)
but the development of such a module for another planet with unknown parameters(atmosphere, gravitation etc...) on the distance which 384 400 km - is much more difficult than in the calculation of which is being developed here on earth.
for earth the task much easier, if you have these settlements. and they must to be if you really be fly to the moon.

Jeez. Moon is not a planet. The Moon manures are very easy (a Newtonian physics was taught to every Soviet 7th grader) and they are not even comparable with the Earth ones. I've made my first scientific lunar landing simulator when I was 12 year old. In fact, it was pretty simple suing standard formulas.

baddog 02-07-2016 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muthisdev (Post 20723220)
Difference being: North Korea's missles can't make it to the moon.
More like 50s tech.

The difference really being, they're not trying to go to the moon. All they need to do is make it to LA.

Rochard 02-07-2016 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20723405)
First of all, the States have no rocket technologies for a new Moon mission. =

The United States is the only country who has ever landed a man on the moon. What makes you think we do not have the technology to do it again?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20723405)
Forget about the Apollo project, because the technology was completely lost.

We lost that technology? Did we not write things down? I'm pretty sure we most likely still have the parts laying around some where.

MaDalton 02-07-2016 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 20723555)
The difference really being, they're not trying to go to the moon. All they need to do is make it to LA.

considering LA traffic you have plenty of time for counter measures :glugglug

just a punk 02-07-2016 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723556)
The United States is the only country who has ever landed a man on the moon.

No, that was done by German Nazis, bot by you. The USA were involved as founders and cannon fodder (for example, the evil Soviets had used dogs for the similar purpose).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723556)
What makes you think we do not have the technology to do it again?

A simple fact: the States are not able to build it again after Von Braun's death. If you think they can, please post the proof.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723556)
We lost that technology? Did we not write things down? I'm pretty sure we most likely still have the parts laying around some where.

Man, that's not as simple as you think. Nobody can just read a book to repeat the German Moon program (actually I have a doubt that "book" does still exist). The technology was completely lost together with a death of its creator. That's why you have to buy Russian space engines for your super-puper high-tech rockets in 21th century. Why don't you use the Apollo tech? I'll tell it to you: it was completely lost.

Sednub997 02-07-2016 02:35 PM

They lended on the sun

xXXtesy10 02-07-2016 03:07 PM


Sarn 02-07-2016 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20723527)
Jeez. Moon is not a planet. The Moon manures are very easy (a Newtonian physics was taught to every Soviet 7th grader) and they are not even comparable with the Earth ones. I've made my first scientific lunar landing simulator when I was 12 year old. In fact, it was pretty simple suing standard formulas.

planet-satellite, satellite - it Moon! all know this :321GFY
in Soviet schools not taught to think - only to teach written postulates of the Communist leaders.
http://medialeaks.ru/wp-content/uplo...74609_kim3.jpg
that's what those guys with a notebook wrote - that this delirium taught in Soviet schools.
your simulator - shit has no relation to reality.
I repeat once again for idiots - landing on the moon is much harder and more expensive.

Rochard 02-07-2016 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20723559)
A simple fact: the States are not able to build it again after Von Braun's death. If you think they can, please post the proof.

You mean, other than the space shuttle?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20723559)
Man, that's not as simple as you think. Nobody can just read a book to repeat the German Moon program (actually I have a doubt that "book" does still exist). The technology was completely lost together with a death of its creator. That's why you have to buy Russian space engines for your super-puper high-tech rockets in 21th century. Why don't you use the Apollo tech? I'll tell it to you: it was completely lost.

There was no "German moon program". I know all about Von Braun's and what a handful of Germans did, but this was only a portion of the technology. I just finished reading "Apollo" by Bly Cox and Charles Murray, and also "Failure is not an option" by Gene Kranz - This was an American effort by thousands if not tens of thousands of American engineers...

I know you thin Russia is so great... For me... If Russia was to put boots on the moon tonight I was stay up all night watching it on TV because I would be so excited. I don't care who does it - The US, China Russia, - I just want mankind to move forward and I would be excited no matter who did it.

just a punk 02-07-2016 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723604)
You mean, other than the space shuttle?

Space shuttles? The USA made 6 space shuttles. Two of them (1/3) have exploded and killed off all their crews. It doesn't sound good enough even for a 3rd-world technology, isn't it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723604)
There was no "German moon program". I know all about Von Braun's and what a handful of Germans did, but this was only a portion of the technology. I just finished reading "Apollo" by Bly Cox and Charles Murray, and also "Failure is not an option" by Gene Kranz - This was an American effort by thousands if not tens of thousands of American engineers...

There was a German Moon program. Von Braun and his Nazi guys did it. Now he's dead and there is no Moon for the States anymore. Your modern super-puper rockets explode in 50% of cases. Admit it already.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723604)
I know you thin Russia is so great...

I didn't say that. I've just mentioned a well-known fact: the USA have no reliable rocket technologies and they have to use the Russian ones.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20723604)
For me... If Russia was to put boots on the moon tonight I was stay up all night watching it on TV because I would be so excited. I don't care who does it

A first creature in space was a dog. Not some American guy, and not a Russian one. It was a dog. Does it mean that dogs won the space race? The same can be applied to Americans. Von Braun and his Nazi crew just used Americans to see if they will survive on the Moon or not. It's just like Soviets were using dogs in their experiments. Dogs were always first and humans were second.

LovinNothin 02-08-2016 06:16 AM

Doesn't matter how slow they are progressing, the fact is, they are progressing and it's just a matter of time before they do something really stupid.

Sarn 02-08-2016 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LovinNothin (Post 20723895)
Doesn't matter how slow they are progressing, the fact is, they are progressing and it's just a matter of time before they do something really stupid.

I do not believe that it is their research and development.
it is very hard work.

malcolme polo 02-08-2016 09:01 AM

Going to watch The Interview again

Horatio Caine 02-08-2016 11:48 AM

http://www.chino.k12.ca.us/cms/lib8/...n/1935/ESL.jpg

http://cdn.rsvlts.com/wp-content/upl...VX-630x350.jpg

https://41.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l...rp0o1_1280.jpg

JFK 02-08-2016 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultchatpay (Post 20723358)
There goes the missle that could feed millions of North Koreans.

The "Dear Leader" is well fed, that's all that matters :2 cents::thumbsup

Piper Blush 02-08-2016 01:11 PM

Great for them, they now have one satellite alone in space! It won't be long for that this satellite to 'accidentally' stop functioning.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123