SEO question (check)
 

Hi: I would appreciate check from people with SEO experience. Are these pages optimized well?

thanks

keyword : teen dominatrix . LINK

keyword : american femdom. LINK

keyword: MILF humiliation . LINK

keyword: pegging video . LINK

Yes, they look good to me. I see that you use Yoast SEO plugin, they have a ''Score'' function. Green light = good seo, do you have green lights?

First link for start! No meta tag a keywords! To much a general keywords on the page (62% is too much!)

They all have green light. Usually, only thing I can't solve is to avoid message : " The focus keyword doesn't appear in the first paragraph of the copy. Make sure the topic is clear immediately."

But that happens when I have banner at the top of the post.

What bothers me is are those pages overoptimized. Also, it is pretty simple to do it and that bothers me too :)

Were you checking manually or with some tool?

I used a tool but you will can found youself to much a keywords on the page

please ignore that comment/guy, meta keyword tag has not been relevant in seo for years. and 62% general keywords..... you use your keyword 4 times over the page thats fine (there is no exact metric for this) (you use 'femdom a lot on the page, mainly the sidebar, i guess he means that with 62%, this is no issue for this page though since your not trying to rank on femdom)


First link: Title starts with keyword, this is good.
Url is also good
you have a double h1, (1 has an image: http://www.femdomdestiny.com/wp-cont...dom-logo-1.png, you should remove the h1 there)
(you have the double h1 on every page)

Is the text unique? (hand written or copied from a other site?)
+ make sure your internal link structure is well done (this will help a lot)

link2.
Ideally you want more text on this page, a 'sweetspot' is usually around 300 words (again, no exact number) the 150 on this page is on the low side though


General issue:
Your non www does not redirect to www. Its not really an seo issue since you use canonical, but still recommended to fix this

thank you. Texts are hand written. That is the slowest part. Yeah, I've somehow missed 300 on that page but I always try to go slightly over it.

What do you think will longer text help or it is just a waste of time?

Not sure what your point is with this + this video is from 2009

Meta keywords are not a ranking factor in any way, its as simple as that

edit:
https://youtu.be/RBTBEfd7z_Y?t=34
video from mat 3 years after your video.

It is believed it helps a little, but the amount it helps is really really small (if at all)
so i would say waste of time, try to get that 300 word count (like 250 won't kill you, but the 150 you had on that second link was just a bit low)

i asumed it were manual texts (copyscape didnt find any duplicate :P)
So the on page looks good (apart from the double h1)

I didnt check your internal link structure because that would take to much time for a quick forum question :P
But make sure you use your keyword in the link it helps (don't spam links to it, keep stuff relevant)

Thank you once again.
I am trying to improve site but still I don't know much about link structure that is good for SEO? Any relevant (and already prooved) tutorial or link about this?

Looks pretty good! :)

That link just confirms that Google ignores the keyword meta tag.

One we usually work with is a simple pyramid.

so an example
homepage links to 10 categories.
the 10 categories link to a bunch of posts each in respective categories.
Those posts link back to their category and homepage (homepage link is usually automatic due to navigation menu)
If possibly on the posts also link to other categories (like also see.....)

For the internal links, use proper anchor texts, not stuff like: click here

This is a really simplified version, but it should work.
In general, more internal links tells google that a page is more important.


It really depends on the site whats possible and works.