GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   News BREAKING! Vote Padding Found in Wisconsin, Trumps "lead" shrinks by 18% (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1231126)

Bladewire 11-26-2016 02:47 PM

BREAKING! Vote Padding Found in Wisconsin, Trumps "lead" shrinks by 18%
 
Fascinating that Only Trumps numbers shrink by 18% isn't it?

"If this pattern remains consistent across the state, it's feasible ? though unclear how likely ? that Clinton could end up on top in the state."

----------

Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts

Ahead of recount, Wisconsin has already wiped out 5,000 imaginary Donald Trump votes

Earlier today we reported that three precincts in the Wisconsin county of Outagamie had revised their vote totals downward for Donald Trump by more than a thousand votes combined, with local officials insisting to their local ABC News affiliate that it was a mere arithmetic error. But as more revisions come in throughout the state, a total of nearly five thousand Trump votes in Wisconsin have now been taken off the official board because they apparently never existed to begin with.

At the end of election night the New York Times reported that Donald Trump had won the state of Wisconsin with a total of 1,409,467 votes, giving him a winning margin of 27,257 votes over Hillary Clinton?s total of 1,382,210. These numbers were based on what the individual counties and precincts were reporting that night. But now seventeen days later, based on various Wisconsin precincts revising their own totals, Dave Wasserman of the respected Cook Political Report has updated the totals. Donald Trump now has 1,404,536 total votes in Wisconsin, while Hillary Clinton now has 1,382,011 total votes.

Two things immediately jump out, as first spotted by music critic Dave Greenwald. The first is that, even ahead of the forthcoming recount in Wisconsin, Donald Trump?s lead has already shrunk to just 22,525 votes. That means 18% of his ?lead? has already vanished, based on precincts catching some of their own incorrect numbers, and internet gawkers catching others. But the second thing that jumps out is that the revisions have served to erase thousands of votes from Trump, while affirming that Clinton?s vote total was essentially correct to begin with.

Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts

Ahead of recount, Wisconsin has already wiped out 5,000 imaginary Donald Trump votes - Palmer Report

Report: Trump's Margin In Wisconsin Shrinks By Thousands Of Votes Ahead Of Recount

Bladewire 11-26-2016 03:17 PM

"An election fraud complaint has been filed with the Wisconsin Elections Commission after it was uncovered that more people voted in the presidential race than the total number of votes in 4 precincts in Wisconsin."

Barry-xlovecam 11-26-2016 03:35 PM

OH NOES!

https://s17.postimg.org/n8ihnnyfj/pouting_trump.jpg

Never ending drama ...

AMDWarrior 11-26-2016 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21333550)
Fascinating that Only Trumps numbers shrink by 18% isn't it?

"If this pattern remains consistent across the state, it's feasible ? though unclear how likely ? that Clinton could end up on top in the state."

----------

Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts

Ahead of recount, Wisconsin has already wiped out 5,000 imaginary Donald Trump votes

Earlier today we reported that three precincts in the Wisconsin county of Outagamie had revised their vote totals downward for Donald Trump by more than a thousand votes combined, with local officials insisting to their local ABC News affiliate that it was a mere arithmetic error. But as more revisions come in throughout the state, a total of nearly five thousand Trump votes in Wisconsin have now been taken off the official board because they apparently never existed to begin with.

At the end of election night the New York Times reported that Donald Trump had won the state of Wisconsin with a total of 1,409,467 votes, giving him a winning margin of 27,257 votes over Hillary Clinton?s total of 1,382,210. These numbers were based on what the individual counties and precincts were reporting that night. But now seventeen days later, based on various Wisconsin precincts revising their own totals, Dave Wasserman of the respected Cook Political Report has updated the totals. Donald Trump now has 1,404,536 total votes in Wisconsin, while Hillary Clinton now has 1,382,011 total votes.

Two things immediately jump out, as first spotted by music critic Dave Greenwald. The first is that, even ahead of the forthcoming recount in Wisconsin, Donald Trump?s lead has already shrunk to just 22,525 votes. That means 18% of his ?lead? has already vanished, based on precincts catching some of their own incorrect numbers, and internet gawkers catching others. But the second thing that jumps out is that the revisions have served to erase thousands of votes from Trump, while affirming that Clinton?s vote total was essentially correct to begin with.

Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts

Ahead of recount, Wisconsin has already wiped out 5,000 imaginary Donald Trump votes - Palmer Report

Report: Trump's Margin In Wisconsin Shrinks By Thousands Of Votes Ahead Of Recount



LOL give it up pussy.. your little criminal bitch is done.

Bladewire 11-26-2016 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AMDWarrior (Post 21333631)
LOL give it up pussy.. your little criminal bitch is done.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :321GFY

mineistaken 11-26-2016 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21333550)
Fascinating that Only Trumps numbers shrink by 18% isn't it?

trump numbers shrink by 18% or lead shrink by 18%?
Twisting again?

EddyTheDog 11-26-2016 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333664)
trump numbers shrink by 18% or lead shrink by 18%?
Twisting again?

Is it a good thing either way?..

mineistaken 11-26-2016 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21333667)
Is it a good thing either way?..

3 points lead shrinking by 18% would make it 2.4 points lead.

kane 11-26-2016 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333670)
3 points lead shrinking by 18% would make it 2.4 points lead.

Does the amount really matter? If we are finding flaws (or fraud) in the voting system shouldn't it be brought to light even if it is small?

mineistaken 11-26-2016 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21333676)
Does the amount really matter? If we are finding flaws (or fraud) in the voting system shouldn't it be brought to light even if it is small?

Of course. Lets not make it sound as if it is guaranteed fraud by Trump camp though. :1orglaugh
I am sure if yiu recounted all states you would find lead shrinking to both sides.

EddyTheDog 11-26-2016 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333670)
3 points lead shrinking by 18% would make it 2.4 points lead.

That's still 1000's of votes - You have to ask why - This is not a poll - There should be zero margin of error...

Forget this election - It's over - However, the next election you could forgive people for asking 'Why bother?'....

Bladewire 11-26-2016 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333682)
Of course. Lets not make it sound as if it is guaranteed fraud by Trump camp though.

Right because Trumplestiltskin was just forced to personally pay off a $25,000,000 federal class action fraud case against him brought by hundreds of ripped off citizen. Trump has been caught doing fraudulent activities many times in the past and had to payout big $$$, but the Russian Mineistaken doesn't want us to use Trumplestiltskins past behavior as a predictor of his future behavior.

kane 11-26-2016 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333682)
Of course. Lets not make it sound as if it is guaranteed fraud by Trump camp though. :1orglaugh
I am sure if yiu recounted all states you would find lead shrinking to both sides.

I'm reserving judgment until the investigation is finished. It just sounded like you were dismissing it because it ultimately isn't that many votes or that big of a percentage of the votes. Of course, I could have mistook what you read.

In the end, if there appears to be fraud from either party it should be delt with accordingly.

Rochard 11-26-2016 05:02 PM

If any of this was true, it would be front page on all of the major news sites - not on crappy biased site I've never heard of.

MiamiBoyz 11-26-2016 05:23 PM

http://67.media.tumblr.com/73a3aead0...epc3o1_400.gif

Bladewire 11-26-2016 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz (Post 21333808)

Glad to see you're getting out of the house :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Barry-xlovecam 11-26-2016 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21333772)
If any of this was true, it would be front page on all of the major news sites - not on crappy biased site I've never heard of.

If it's cooked news this is Internet drama at its finest :OP

Bladewire 11-26-2016 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21333772)
If any of this was true, it would be front page on all of the major news sites - not on crappy biased site I've never heard of.

They're saving it for maximum impact Monday.

BTW the media has anointed Trump. Do you think they want to pause/reverse and take back all the ass kissing/fence mending they've done the last couple weeks? Nope.

You can see by hosts & comentators reactions they're fighting Stein and trying to drag Clinton into it to demonize her & invalidate the recount process.

Grapesoda 11-26-2016 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21333667)
Is it a good thing either way?..

none of any of this happened. check the real news

Bladewire 11-26-2016 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 21334045)
none of any of this happened. check the real news

The Wisconsin local news & national news, and fraud report, happened, as linked. Sucks for Trumplestiltskin.

Rochard 11-27-2016 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21333835)
They're saving it for maximum impact Monday.

BTW the media has anointed Trump. Do you think they want to pause/reverse and take back all the ass kissing/fence mending they've done the last couple weeks? Nope.

You can see by hosts & comentators reactions they're fighting Stein and trying to drag Clinton into it to demonize her & invalidate the recount process.

I hate Trump with a passion, but I also believe in being both realistic and honest.

If you are repeating nonsense from heavily biased websites, all you really doing is spreading fake news. I want to believe this as much as the next person, but the media isn't going to sit on this until Monday for "maximum impact". The media doesn't want to sit on news but instead each outlet wants to be the first to report it.

We'll see next week if there is any truth to this.

Bladewire 11-27-2016 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21334231)
the media isn't going to sit on this until Monday for "maximum impact". The media doesn't want to sit on news but instead each outlet wants to be the first to report it.

Right, the media never sits on a story for maximum impact, especially on Thanksgiving/black Friday weekend when everyone is focussed on family/traveling & shopping.

I lived with, & was in a relationship with, a TV newscaster for 2 1/2 years and know a little about stories having legs when to drop etc.

When I post news here before it drops, with links, it's because I know where to look ,and how, for direct source.

Anyway, the last thing the media wants to do is backtrack after kissing Trumps ass the last 2 weeks so we'll see, they're already trying to drag Clinton unti it and demonize her, again.

EddyTheDog 11-27-2016 03:25 AM

Trump dismisses Wisconsin recount drive as 'scam' - BBC News

Barry-xlovecam 11-27-2016 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21334300)

There you go, a blanket denial by the scammer-in-chief. Someone with first hand knowledge :1orglaugh

The inmates are running amok in the asylum.

Bladewire 11-27-2016 10:09 AM

WBAY - Discrepancies in unofficial Outagamie County election results explained - November 22, 2016

Stories like this break at the local affiliate and the national news decides whether to, and when, to push it national.

CaptainHowdy 11-27-2016 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz (Post 21333808)

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh ...

TheSquealer 11-27-2016 12:28 PM

So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons..... but of course, that means that you'll lose a lot of votes by simply doing the right thing.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

xKingx 11-27-2016 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335023)
So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Bladewire 11-27-2016 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335023)
So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons..... but of course, that means that you'll lose a lot of votes by simply doing the right thing.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

I agree with voters having ID's to vote seems common sense to me. I've always said that.

This whole election was based on hacks of various voter databases, DNC servers and Clinton campaign members, etc.

Trump was yelling that the election is rigged and he won't accept results if he lost BEFORE anyone even voted.

2 weeks after results scientists & processors approached The Green party with data suggesting anomalies. The Green party put forth the recount initiative, Hillary Clinton did not.

Trump is trying to put the grassroots recount on Clinton and she had nothing to do with it.

Typical Trump lying his ass off and misrepresenting while tweeting like a maniac this morning blaming Clinton. Disgusting.

NewNick 11-27-2016 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335023)
So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons..... but of course, that means that you'll lose a lot of votes by simply doing the right thing.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

The worst losers ???

Dont forget your boy Trumpy stated that he would only accept the legitamacy of the vote if he won FFS !!!

He stated over and over again that everyone was being mean to him, rigging the vote, and stealing the election. He was more than happy to say in advance that he would not take defeat graciously, and y'all screamed the house down cos Trumpy can do no wrong.

Dont you think your flash new Emperor kind of set the tone here ???

jsmih 11-27-2016 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335023)
So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons..... but of course, that means that you'll lose a lot of votes by simply doing the right thing.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

Solution depends on what type of fraud, if any, is found. IDs may work for real people voting who are not eligible, but wouldn't do anything to solve malicious voting machine software.

xKingx 11-27-2016 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsmih (Post 21335053)
Solution depends on what type of fraud, if any, is found. IDs may work for real people voting who are not eligible, but wouldn't do anything to solve malicious voting machine software.

True IDs won't work for hacking, but you can damn be sure Hillary wouldn't of won the popular vote without all the illegals voting for her :winkwink:

Bladewire 11-27-2016 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xKingx (Post 21335074)
True IDs won't work for hacking, but you can damn be sure Hillary wouldn't of won the popular vote without all the illegals voting for her :winkwink:

Trump "won" you don't have to perpetuate that lie anymore

DBS.US 11-27-2016 01:01 PM

Trump said it was fixed, live with it:2 cents:

imabro 11-27-2016 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21334246)
Right, the media never sits on a story for maximum impact, especially on Thanksgiving/black Friday weekend when everyone is focussed on family/traveling & shopping.

I lived with, & was in a relationship with, a TV newscaster for 2 1/2 years and know a little about stories having legs when to drop etc.

When I post news here before it drops, with links, it's because I know where to look ,and how, for direct source.

Anyway, the last thing the media wants to do is backtrack after kissing Trumps ass the last 2 weeks so we'll see, they're already trying to drag Clinton unti it and demonize her, again.

Which explains why you called Trump winning ... oh, wait.

imabro 11-27-2016 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335038)
I agree with voters having ID's to vote seems common sense to me. I've always said that.

This whole election was based on hacks of various voter databases, DNC servers and Clinton campaign members, etc.

Trump was yelling that the election is rigged and he won't accept results if he lost BEFORE anyone even voted.

2 weeks after results scientists & processors approached The Green party with data suggesting anomalies. The Green party put forth the recount initiative, Hillary Clinton did not.

Trump is trying to put the grassroots recount on Clinton and she had nothing to do with it.

Typical Trump lying his ass off and misrepresenting while tweeting like a maniac this morning blaming Clinton. Disgusting.

You love to twist the facts.

noshit 11-27-2016 01:44 PM

I wonder if Jill Stein will coincidentally be purchasing a brand new Audi and a mansion on the beach, like Bernie Sanders

.

rogueteens 11-27-2016 01:52 PM

doesn't America find voting fraud in every election? We have it here too but it only happens in "Asian" areas so that's allowed.

Bladewire 11-27-2016 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imabro (Post 21335122)
Which explains why you called Trump winning ... oh, wait.

You're an idiot fake nick coward

Bladewire 11-27-2016 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imabro (Post 21335128)
You love to twist the facts.

You're an idiot

TheSquealer 11-27-2016 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21335050)
The worst losers ???

Dont forget your boy Trumpy stated that he would only accept the legitamacy of the vote if he won FFS !!!

He stated over and over again that everyone was being mean to him, rigging the vote, and stealing the election. He was more than happy to say in advance that he would not take defeat graciously, and y'all screamed the house down cos Trumpy can do no wrong.

Dont you think your flash new Emperor kind of set the tone here ???

Uhm... no.

Trump responded time and time again to that career criminal cunts (you know, the bitch that vandalized and robbed both the White House and State Department on her way out) repeated question of "will you accept the outcome of the election" because you delusional weirdos assumed the victory in spite of never having been right about absolutely anything at all with respect to his running, being nominated and then winning the election.

All the same fucking pussy crybabies that were calling anyone protesting Obama's win "racist" are doing the same infantile shit again.

You lost.

It's over.

The left hasn't been right about a single fucking thing with regards to his candidacy or victory... so stop acting out and focus on trying to get a candidate nominated that isn't a hardened criminal, pathological liar and thief who isn't even trusted by her own party.

TheSquealer 11-27-2016 03:42 PM

This is what American politics has come to... 2 thoroughly unfit candidates running head to head for President of the United States and you jack offs don't have the wisdom to step back and examine the much bigger problem of how something like that could even happen.

Bladewire 11-27-2016 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335296)
This is what American politics has come to... 2 thoroughly unfit candidates running head to head for President of the United States and you jack offs don't have the wisdom to step back and examine the much bigger problem of how something like that could even happen.

Clinton is vastly more experienced and less corrupt than Trump. Keep it honest.

We all know it was "Clinton's turn" and that's the flaw in the Democratic side. Bernie could have won but we held him back, that what went wrong.

Now on the Republican side, what the fuck went wrong there? No experience, corrupt, "grab the pussy" etc. Republicans were offered, and ate up, the bottom of the barrel to watch him destroy America with his greed & corruption, how patriotic :2 cents:

TheSquealer 11-27-2016 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335311)
Clinton is vastly more experienced and less corrupt than Trump. Keep it honest.

More experienced? Obama was a 2 year absentee Senator who never voted and he did two Presidential terms. Were you arguing about his "lack of experience"?

Didn't think so.

....

Less corrupt?

Thats hardly "honest"

Almost no Democrats trust her. Thats hardly the signature of someone who is the beacon of honestly.

Educate yourself and take your blinders off. She is quite literally a career criminal. At least Bill was likable. She's not even likable.

From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Primer on Bill and Hillary Clinton Scandals - The Atlantic

25 and counting: Hillary’s huge scandal list explodes

What went wrong with the election is obvious. People are getting increasingly pissed at Washington elitism, corruption and a government that doesn't represent them. They are pissed that the economy is having the slowest recovery since world war 2 while being told everything is perfect. They are pissed their health care was taken away and that made vastly more expensive with their options being limited. They are pissed there are 20-30 Million illegal immigrants in this country which has a stagnant economy and flat income growth for decades. They are pissed that for many decades we've entered into idiotic trade agreements which were always one sided or where the other side ignored anything that placed restraints on them and only complied with the beneficial parts. They are pissed that one side for 8 years just says "its all the other sides fault" as if that's going to change anything or fix anything.

Doesn't shock me that you still don't get that.

These are among the many reasons Trump is your President.

Spending the next 4 years writing 10 posts for every Trump fart in a perpetual ********** state of emotional meltdown isn't going to fix any root problems which put Trump in office.

And by the way, when you're so biased that the only way you can make sense of the world is to believe that 1/2 the voting public (i.e. anyone that doesn't share your views) is "stupid", "crazy", "greedy", 'brainwashed" then you are also just as big a part of the problem. Name calling and simplistic adolescent reductions of complex issues and problems doesn't bring anyone closer to solutions, understanding or a better world.

Bladewire 11-27-2016 04:15 PM

^^ triggered ^^

I said let's be honest and you reply with 100% right wing propaganda. Nowhere to go from there.

Trump lost the vote by millions. Trump has no mandate by the will of the people going into office being annointed by 538 elites on Dec. 19th. This action is against the will of the majority of Americans.

TheSquealer 11-27-2016 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335356)
^^ triggered

'
Translation: I lose. I can't argue the facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335356)
I said let's be honest and you reply with 100% right wing propaganda. Nowhere to go from there.

Translation: I lose. I can't argue the facts so i'll attack the source and call it good.


PS: You forgot to further the misdirection and call me by the standard insults of racist and brainwashed by FoxNews as per the all too common, left wing response to anyone presenting undeniable. documented facts.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335356)
Trump lost the vote by millions. Trump has no mandate by the will of the people going into office being annointed by 538 elites on Dec. 19th. This action is against the will of the majority of Americans.

Translation: I have no idea that we are not a democracy and have no idea how the electoral college works and how US Presidential elections are decided.... and further, I have no idea whatsoever that our electoral system and its existence IS THE WILL of the people until its changed by the people.



The party of tolerance sure does hate a lot when things don't go their way.....

xKingx 11-27-2016 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335347)
More experienced? Obama was a 2 year absentee Senator who never voted and he did two Presidential terms. Were you arguing about his "lack of experience"?

Didn't think so.

....

Less corrupt?

Thats hardly "honest"

Almost no Democrats trust her. Thats hardly the signature of someone who is the beacon of honestly.

Educate yourself and take your blinders off. She is quite literally a career criminal. At least Bill was likable. She's not even likable.

From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Primer on Bill and Hillary Clinton Scandals - The Atlantic

25 and counting: Hillary?s huge scandal list explodes

What went wrong with the election is obvious. People are getting increasingly pissed at Washington elitism, corruption and a government that doesn't represent them. They are pissed that the economy is having the slowest recovery since world war 2 while being told everything is perfect. They are pissed their health care was taken away and that made vastly more expensive with their options being limited. They are pissed there are 20-30 Million illegal immigrants in this country which has a stagnant economy and flat income growth for decades. They are pissed that for many decades we've entered into idiotic trade agreements which were always one sided or where the other side ignored anything that placed restraints on them and only complied with the beneficial parts. They are pissed that one side for 8 years just says "its all the other sides fault" as if that's going to change anything or fix anything.

Doesn't shock me that you still don't get that.

These are among the many reasons Trump is your President.

Spending the next 4 years writing 10 posts for every Trump fart in a perpetual ********** state of emotional meltdown isn't going to fix any root problems which put Trump in office.

And by the way, when you're so biased that the only way you can make sense of the world is to believe that 1/2 the voting public (i.e. anyone that doesn't share your views) is "stupid", "crazy", "greedy", 'brainwashed" then you are also just as big a part of the problem. Name calling and simplistic adolescent reductions of complex issues and problems doesn't bring anyone closer to solutions, understanding or a better world.


:bowdown:bowdown:bowdown:bowdown

Barry-xlovecam 11-27-2016 04:53 PM

Bump the Trump 2016

Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero ["Seize the day, put very little trust in tomorrow"]

How do you like having your own shit thrown back in your face:2 cents:

https://s16.postimg.org/hh7d4g9ed/tenor.gif

Bladewire 11-27-2016 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335374)
'
Translation: I lose. I can't argue the facts.



Translation: I lose. I can't argue the facts so i'll attack the source and call it good.


PS: You forgot to further the misdirection and call me by the standard insults of racist and brainwashed by FoxNews as per the all too common, left wing response to anyone presenting undeniable. documented facts.




Translation: I have no idea that we are not a democracy and have no idea how the electoral college works and how US Presidential elections are decided.... and further, I have no idea whatsoever that our electoral system and its existence IS THE WILL of the people until its changed by the people.



The party of tolerance sure does hate a lot when things don't go their way.....

So you're an elitist and believe 538 elites should anoint a candidate against the will of the Americon people.

You morally compromise the good of all Americans for the good of the minority that think like you. That's not patriotic is it? Would you die for your country? Or just those that think like you?

TheSquealer 11-27-2016 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335449)
So you're an elitist and believe 538 elites should anoint a candidate against the will of the Americon people.

You morally compromise the good of all Americans for the good of the minority that think like you. That's not patriotic is it?

Like anyone else on the losing side of an argument, you have to start making fake arguments to argue. Since you attempted to characterize me as something i'm not, i'll happily add some clarity for you out of charity and sympathy to your very weak position.

The answer... no. I'm not an "elitist" whatever the hell that is. I'm just not a self entitled, fully detached from reality, whiny brat, who grew up with safe spaces, micro aggression and participation trophies who is left confounded when he isn't suddenly getting what he wants no matter how hard he kicks and screams and who doesn't seem to understand that our way of electing a President is established in the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and has nothing at all to do with the will of the majority of the people (a point which forgets those who neither voted for hillary or trump or can't vote/didn't vote)

Understanding the process and our system of government and accepting the outcomes hardly makes one "unpatriotic". One could however, argue that denying the results of a legal election, already conceded by the defeated party, simply because you don't agree with them or like them, does.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123