Serious question - does anyone think this is appropriate "report" for serious/real news netwrok?
 

I am astonished how any half decent media would evenm publish a "report" like that. At most it is some blogger worthy.

Lets get aside if you are crookedteer or trumpeteer, try to think objectively.

How can any "serious" news agency even contemplate an idea of putting out a "report" like that?
This is more than a joke.

Ps: he very clearly said "big league" in most of the examples and somewhat clearly in the rest. So that is even more of a joke...

BIGLY lol lol
I liked the little hands jokes better :P

they can't come up with well thought out arguments against his policies, so they resort to primitive "ad hominem" attacks: hair, size of hands, way he may have mispronounced some phrases, etc...

and I thought liberals were supposed to be more sophisticated ones? :1orglaugh:error

what's next ? nukular ?

The blubber in his neck is interfering with his annunciation

Naw, that is how people talked cool in NYC in 1978

I stopped with CNN after I discovered their complete bias. I want a news agency that doesn't give a shit who is president, just reports it.

not really news that the liberal media has gone full retard.

& its beautiful to watch, like a nuclear mushroom cloud. scary, but beautiful.

:1orglaugh

CNN is really fucking pathetic. I never knew they were this retarded about a year ago... I havent watched CNN much but we oversees have had the impression they were a respectable, solid news outlet.

Now that I have watched them a bit more and how they report about the elections, Clinton and Trump, I can honestly say that I have never, ever seen such an amateur joke of a news network. Blew my mind that such a horribly biased network spreading propaganda only the extremely dumb fall for is so big.

Not a trumpeteer here, but that was ridiculous. CNN is Fox's transgender clone.

Trump started the name calling and intimidation -- WTF do you expect?
Watching Mr. Tough Guy squirm is a good time. Can't take his own shit back very well -- can he?

he started the name calling? i beg to differ. it started the afternoon after his campaign announcement, when everyone, including rush limbaugh, laughed at him. daily news put him in a clown suit, front cover.

barry stop drinking in the morning.

:1orglaugh

Have you missed the fact that since day 1 of his announcement that he would be running for president he is being crucified by all mainstream media? And still he won.

You'd be crawled up in a ball crying your eyes out if you'd endure only 1 day of the shit he's been putting up with for over a year, every single day.

Does not exist. "News" agency's bottom line is not the presentation of news but is the color green.

Him winning ain't saying much. Bush "won" too.

Bush won because he was meant to win. Because Bush works for the same people as Clinton.
Trump won even though Clinton was meant to win.
Total surprise for the arrogant establishment which has left the mainstream media they control in panic mode.

thats odd, since fox news is obliterating the other news channels in the ratings. you would think the other corporate media would jump on the conservabro ratings train to cash those big ad checks...

but they dont. they are institutionally liberal, unable to make news content that sells. unable to listen to their customers, who overwhelmingly disapprove of them in opinion polls about media honesty.

:2 cents:

You STILL do not understand American politics.

Let me explain another way to help you understand my foreign friend.

America is a Democratic Republic.

Democratic = voters

Republic = Electoral College

Democratic = 65 million votes win Clinton president

Republic = 306 votes win Trump president

Republic overrides Democratic = Trump win

Trump has never been supported by the majority of Americans because he's childish, petty, selfish, egotistical & erratic.

Only one can outlet can be number one.

even if true (which it isn't) who "started" is completely irrelevant... if anything, some poor word choice may have slipped out of his mouth, which was partly in jest and partly due to not fully considering the target audience, bunch of snowflakes who get offended by some remarks that got both twisted around and taken out of context...

what's news media's excuse? they are just joking, if so, why? isn't their job to report objective facts? was it their intention to base the story on some retarded ad hominem attack? or did they make a mistake because they don't think through their stories, and just report some childish half baked ideas?

what do you think of it yourself, was the whole "bigly" story a mistake? or is that quality journalism you would expect from a news network?

he won MAJORITIES in 30 fucking states, dumbdumb. hilary won majorities in 20 states.

thats why he's president, & your arrogant entitled woman loser candidate is sitting at home. with her meaningless 3 million vote padding from 1 nutter state.

:1orglaugh

It is clear you don't have a clue, or you are just a liar.

Jeanne Moos is more of a commentator for CNN. Her reports are fluffy fun based, or entertainment based, or cute pets, etc. Trumpers getting pissed at this "light" news are are too sensitive.

This guy makes Nixon look good.
He may be the first 'elected President' to quit his job in the first month ...

You foreigners are retarded. All up in the kool-aid and never took a sip to even have an idea of what the flavor might be. Is your country really that irrelevant? I couldn't imagine myself being so up in arms over some other place. Im blessed to be from the #1 country.

I'm sensing a heart attack, aneurysm or stroke in his future. Faked or real, hard to say.

That ladies voice tells me she is a chubby cunt.

That was my point.

CNN reporting about how not articulately enough someone pronounces some words...

This may be appropriate for some jokes blogger to put on his blog at most... And we have something like this on CNN? :helpme

I seriously would not have believed it was possible if someone told me so.

That is a vivid explanation of what CNN (or other "serious" news agencies) has became.

If you are talking about me I am not getting pissed, rather amused and am stating that this is at best blogger worthy material (and even then, not for known blogs, but for 100/day visit blogs at most :1orglaugh).

Might be even for 500/day blogs if he actually said bigly and not just less clear (although in some of the cases like that first one from debate was super clear) big league.

As for fluffy stuff - either you are a serious news channel or you are comedy central. Or just admit that you are a yellow news/entertainment channel. :)