What idea is more delusional: the wall or the vetting?
 

This is a tough one to call...both are very very stupid but lets look at them and try to decide:

1) The wall

Pros - It is very amusing

Cons- It costs a fortune and you can climb over with a 30$ wallmart rope ladder...and re-use the ladder...


2) Vetting from countries that are muslim because terrorists

Pros - It is very amusing

Cons- No terrorist in the world will favor being vetted for 2 years over good old border hopping...why on earth would he apply to be vetted? why not buy a ticket to mexico or canada and walk over?


I honestly can not decide on which one is more stupid...If I was forced to vote I would say wall because its such a monumental waste of money but the idea that some terrorist would apply to be vetted is also delusional as fuck...


what do you think?

Both of them, of course.

Parts of the wall in Israel are a good model. You aren't getting over this easily....

http://www.sdiworld.org/sites/defaul...0Wall%20sm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/usPg3n3.jpg

20ft wallmart ladder 89$ wire cutter 2$ both items are multi use...or you just need an old blanket instead of the wire cutters....or 30$ rope ladder and 2$ wire cutter...

High tech borders

Excellent thread Crucifissio, as seen through the eyes of one world citizen forced to pierce the vail of multiple countries governmental bullshit to live a peaceful life on this planet that he deserves :thumbsup

The vetting is the worst of the two ideas. The wall will actually keep some people out, but I don't think the vetting is going to change much of anything, even if they can get it through the courts.

I guess we could just beat the living shit out those muslimes like you guys do...any tips?

To be fair, that wall is a lot higher than 20ft.

There is no problem with the courts and vetting, it is the ban that the courts are having a problem with.

The problem is that the Trump administration is putting the two of them together. Trump may have to come up with a vetting only bill or executive order if he wants to change how the vetting works.

Building a wall and extra vetting are positive moves. Cruci hates them because they keep out the riff-raff. Effecting him directly.

I think I'd enjoy a good poo... :2 cents:

The only delusion is pretending neither concept is attainable, IMO

OP

Just make a huge electric fence that blows your arms and legs off when you make contact with it. No1 will go near it or even try.

40 ft triple extension ladder is like 90$ on ebay...a rope with knots and a grappling hook is like 10$...billions on a wall that can be defeated with 10$ is a weak deterrent IMO

no I just find it amusing that immigrants are being blamed for the tanking economy when the paul markhams are to blame in reality...westerners do not want to employ westerners and do not want "made in the west" uncompetitive goods and services (paul markham-ing) they want cheap as fuck workers and cheap as fuck goods and services (paul markham-ing)...

desperate much? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh it happened in 2 countries one of them was bosnia where there is a majority muslim population...in reality serbia does not have to do shit, they actually go on hunger strike when the hungarians close the border towards the EU :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I shit you not, this immigrant guy sewed his lips shut when they would not let him out of serbia in to the EU :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

It doesn't matter if it works or not, if the x% who think it's a good idea are the x% who got him elected, he's already achieved what he wanted.

negative partisanship accounted for a considerable % of trump voters...keep in mind that the opposing candidate was basically herpes...not all trump voters are retarded, some are just pissed off...

True, but he said right at the start he was going to build a wall, so if it bothered them that much, they wouldn't have voted for him.