Rachel Maddow on Donald Trump
 

Full text and links at Innocent people don't usually act the way Trump is acting | MSNBC

Is she wrong?

(Hint: No!)

Couldn't agree more.

http://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/39699...d-him-jail.jpg

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/A5sbegfCz7o/hqdefault.jpg

(David Irving and Ernst Zundel. Look 'em up, but don't read the Wikipedia entries because they just bang on about "Holocaust denial".)

Yes she is. Why are you so obessed with the United States President? You should just worry about Canada, and your sorry ass bitch boy Trudeau.

No one is politics is innocent - any moron knows that - what is the big surprise?

http://68.media.tumblr.com/35bcb32b5...1xxko1_500.gif

Rachael Maddow is a very bad conspiracy theorist. Nothing she says is backed up with any kind of evidence that would make the theory seem to be within the realm of possibilities.

The dumbest thing she said earlier this year was Trump and Putin have a deal where Trump will out American spies in Russia so that they can be executed.

Riveting

Everything she said was 100% true:

Innocent people don?t try to end ongoing investigations.

Innocent people don?t try to divert blame.

Innocent people don?t take lash out at witnesses and/or try to block their testimony.

Innocent people don?t lie.

Innocent people don?t show signs of panic.

Innocent people don?t try to manipulate allies into making their problems go away.

Innocent people don?t try to suppress questions.

it is most amusing to see red hats squirm and try to defend trump :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

How?


Already asked and answered a bunch of times.

What is their to worry about?


Like what? (Links please!)

Everything she says is backed up.

Video please.

He's an anonymous fake ghost nic.

He makes stuff up. He's a one way door. Don't go through the effort to post proof of anything, he ignores it. He's just here to spew, not actually debate or understand.

maddows dramatics are quite annoying at times and she tends to build up things a bit more than she should, like the single year tax return without details laid out, but the actual journalism involved is pretty impressive.

supporters wont like her by default because she is investigating into their guy, but the stories are accurate although she does tend speculate with them.

One thing you should know about Rachel Maddow (from a 6 year viewer)...she may get a little into the weeds with speculation sometimes, but she can connect dots with journalism like no one else on TV.

there's also a major effort on her part to get things correct. I've seen her make retractions many times when she thinks something was reported incorrectly.

I agree 100%

She is kickass on interviews and explaining things clearly, but those long segments when she's explaining stuff alone ugh.

I often have to turn the channel or fast forward to the meat & bones.

You mean = Matt 26z is JoshuaG/Dynamo/Johnnyclips? Hmmm...

Very true. When she tells a story it always includes headlines, names of people, documentation, photos, etc. I know lots of righties don't like her, but I think she's very good.


Yup. And also after explaining a story and starting an interview, she always asks if she explained everything correctly, or if she got anything wrong. Impressive.


Dude:
The whole world was stunned when Trump won. As for calling her "smirk", stupid, that makes no sense. She's pretty smart.