Study finds ?adjustments? were made to surface temp readings to FAKE ?record-setting? warming
 

Yet another peer-reviewed study has proven that so-called ?global warming? is nothing but a fabricated hoax, and yet American institutions of primary and secondary education continue to push the lie that modern human activity is destroying Earth.

As reported by The Daily Caller, the new study, which was published by a pair of scientists and a veteran statistician, found that there were adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by other scientists in the past few years which ?are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.?

As such, ?it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST [global average surface temperature] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever ? despite current claims of record-setting warming,? the study, published last month, noted.

The study was authored by Dr. James P. Wallace III, Dr. Joseph S. D?Aleo, and Dr. Craig D. Idso. Their results were supported by seven additional scientists and researchers.

?The objective of this research was to test the hypothesis that Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data, produced by NOAA, NASA, and HADLEY, are sufficiently credible estimates of global average temperatures such that they can be relied upon for climate modeling and policy analysis purposes,? says the study?s abstract.

?In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified,? the abstract continues. ?It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.?

The trio concluded: ?The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality.?

The Daily Caller noted that climatologists very often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers in order to account for ?biases? in data. And while the study does not question those adjustments, per se, it does note that the adjustments are nearly always upward, as in, warmer.

Continued Climate change baloney: Study finds â??adjustmentsâ?� were made to surface temp readings to FAKE â??record-settingâ?� warming â?? NaturalNews.com

Looking at the front page of your "credible source" and I see a top article whining about "liberals" and then 3 other articles calling other media outlets "fake news"..

Seriously, its no wonder you are so bat shit crazy, just look at what you think is credible journalism..

But of course you are just a foreign national who wants to see America fail..Im just going to go down the list and hit ignore on each of you bat shit crazy foreign fucks. You are not worth my effort or time. Id rather use it to try to talk reason into people who can actually vote..

You don't seem to understand that Natural News is not the original source, I just use it to anger people like yourself

https://thsresearch.files.wordpress....ort-062717.pdf

One study to debunk thoussnds of studies, like a conspiracy to debunk facts.

The Conspiracy theorist tells normal people they "don't understand" :1orglaugh

The guy who thinks chemtrails are poison and we never went to the moon also thinks thousands of scientists worldwide are part of a vast conspiracy, for decades, to fake global warming. He also thinks they're in Antarctica with hot hair dryers to break ice off the Arctic shelf :1orglaugh

I bet you think this conspiracy is real too