Minix is the most installed OS in the world because INTEL is spying on you LOL
 

https://www.techpowerup.com/238514/i...-runs-on-minix


With the transition to multi-core processors, and multi-core processors with integrated core-logic (chipset), the need arose for a low-level SoC embedded into the processor with just enough compute power to make sure all the components you pay for start-up and function as advertised. Enter the Intel ME (management engine). This is a full-fledged computer within your Intel processor, which isn't exposed to you. It runs on its very own tiny x86 CPU core that isn't exposed, and its software is driven on an infinitesimally small ROM and RAM. Since you can't have software without some sort of operating-system, Intel chose MINIX for the job.

Google wants to remove MINIX from its internal servers
According to Google, which is actively working to remove Intel?s Management Engine (MINIX) from their internal servers (for obvious security reasons), the following features exist within Ring -3:
-Full networking stack
-File systems
-Many drivers (including USB, networking, etc.)
-A web server
That?s right. A web server. Your CPU has a secret web server that you are not allowed to access, and, apparently, Intel does not want you to know about.



:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yeah, scary shit. If Intel's management software can send out-of-band commands to trigger something in the management chip, then so can someone 'else'

You have one of those potentially insecure IoT devices sitting right in your CPU.

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/0...vulnerability/

This gets pretty technical but does mention ways to remove or bypass a lot of the hidden out-of-band management stuff.

Or possibly brick your CPU.

https://schd.ws/hosted_files/osseu17...th%20Linux.pdf

technically not different than what the BIOS/UEFI chipset already does, and exploits exists to all of those already

Might be "breaking news" to you, but that just show how uninformed you aer

^^ Truth

step #1... NEVER ever click a link to a PDF :1orglaugh

That's usually only a problem if you use Adobe products. I haven't had Reader installed on my computer for years.

Think you forget those that was hit by the Nitro PDF Exploit on linux. Same reason there are several banners on Pornhub that make the PDF reader load.
I would never visit those kind of site from anything than my locked down Linux.

Big Brother is watching you definition. A warning that appears on posters throughout Oceania, the fictional dictatorship described by George Orwell in his book Nineteen Eighty-Four. Note : The term Big Brother is used to refer to any ruler or government that invades the privacy of its citizens.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ig-Brother.jpg

Intel is secretly mining Bitcoins worldwide.

Putin = big brother
In your country
And you accept
Like sheep

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

that made me lmao! thanks! :thumbsup

who cares, every body spies

things in life you can not choose:

-where you will be born
-your sex
-your skin color
-the president of russia

https://i.imgur.com/GdekIEM.jpg

Not only Putin, people elect him like Trump and you accept it too.

:1orglaugh true

Pooty is the end boss...Hillary vs Trump is worse than dictatorship LOL

Trump it is punishment for liberals like obama from Putin))

^^^obama was pootys bitch...pooty is the end boss...nobody is above pooty...

we are little trolling :1orglaugh:1orglaugh


Did a Russian Missile Really Hit an Israeli F-35?

Israel says one of its F-35s was damaged?after colliding with a bird.
?The incident allegedly took place ?two weeks ago? but was publicly reported only on October 16,? Southfront noted. ?However, Israeli sources were not able to show a photo of the F-35 warplane after the ?bird collision.??
Did a Russian Missile Really Hit an Israeli F-35? | The National Interest Blog

Did American Missile Defense Fail in Saudi Arabia?

Some U.S. officials said there was no evidence the Saudis had hit the missile. Instead, the debris may have broken up under the pressures of flight. What the Saudis presented as evidence of their successful interception may have simply been the missile ejecting its tube as intended.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...?smid=tw-share

this does not work too