GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   NJ passes law that require all political candidates to release income taxes for 5 years. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1309660)

crockett 02-23-2019 10:16 PM

NJ passes law that require all political candidates to release income taxes for 5 years.
 
This means if Trump or any of candidate fails to release their income tax filings for the previous 5 years they will not be included on the ballot.

https://www.wivb.com/news/nj-lawmake...rns/1804257829


Remember the many times Trump agreed to release his tax filings and still hasn't.. MAGA anyday now..

Acepimp 02-24-2019 01:23 AM

There is no requirement for candidates to release anything. These democRats are just butt-hurt that crooked H lost. I'm certain they have more important things to do. After all, they work for US, not for their personal agendas. Also it hasn't been passed. Fake news.

Paul Markham 02-24-2019 04:13 AM

Great law. The idea that people can be elected to any office without revealing where their sources of income, is abhorrent.

King Mark 02-24-2019 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22421488)
There is no requirement for candidates to release anything. These democRats are just butt-hurt that crooked H lost. I'm certain they have more important things to do. After all, they work for US, not for their personal agendas. Also it hasn't been passed. Fake news.

Yeah, sure

Wait till you find out republicans support the green new deal

directfiesta 02-24-2019 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22421488)
There is no requirement for candidates to release anything. These democRats are just butt-hurt that crooked H lost. I'm certain they have more important things to do. After all, they work for US, not for their personal agendas. Also it hasn't been passed. Fake news.

Just birth certificates....

ilnjscb 02-24-2019 06:03 AM

Just one house passed it, not the state of NJ

"The bill goes to the Democratic-led Assembly. If the measure is passes there, it would head to Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy."

It will pass, it looks like, but could easily be challenged in court

TheSquealer 02-24-2019 09:38 AM

Awesome, considering Democrats have more money by far in terms of net worth than Republicans. Maybe one day we'll know how leading Democrats like Nancy Pelosi has a net worth of ~$100,000,000.00 in spite of never having a paying job outside of government.

TheSquealer 02-24-2019 09:40 AM

https://i.redd.it/lrjmaycq9ji21.jpg

King Mark 02-24-2019 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22421632)
Awesome, considering Democrats have more money by far in terms of net worth than Republicans. Maybe one day we'll know how leading Democrats like Nancy Pelosi has a net worth of ~$100,000,000.00 in spite of never having a paying job outside of government.

Maybe when Mueller's done with trump...

tony286 02-24-2019 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22421632)
Awesome, considering Democrats have more money by far in terms of net worth than Republicans. Maybe one day we'll know how leading Democrats like Nancy Pelosi has a net worth of ~$100,000,000.00 in spite of never having a paying job outside of government.

Her husband is rich,he owns an investment firm.sorry to disappoint.

TheSquealer 02-24-2019 09:55 AM

oh, i'm not disappointed. Republicans respect hard work and achievement and Democrats run around screaming "pay your fair share" and "equality" etc etc etc etc and somehow seem to have as many or more millions as Republicans in government.

I'm 100% for every single one of them having to come clean 100% and go on record about how rich they are and how they got rich,.. so that we can all constantly remember that as they lecture non stop about equality and justice and what's fair and what isn't, who's "greedy" and who isn't etc.

https://i.redd.it/ebbu9gwo7di21.jpg

BaldBastard 02-24-2019 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22421632)
Awesome, considering Democrats have more money by far in terms of net worth than Republicans. Maybe one day we'll know how leading Democrats like Nancy Pelosi has a net worth of ~$100,000,000.00 in spite of never having a paying job outside of government.

So that would be like Republican.. Melina Trump? Just how she report a family net wealth of a billion+ .. when she's not worked in 20 years?

Maybe because she's not the money maker of the family?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22421648)
oh, i'm not disappointed. Republicans respect hard work and achievement and Democrats run around screaming "pay your fair share" and "equality" etc etc etc etc and somehow seem to have as many or more millions as Republicans in government.

I'm 100% for every single one of them having to come clean 100% and go on record about how rich they are and how they got rich,.. so that we can all constantly remember that as they lecture non stop about equality and justice and what's fair and what isn't, who's "greedy" and who isn't etc.

yet not one of these people shit in a golden toilet

Politics in all democracy's need a kick up the ass with regards to candidate background checks, just last year it was found here in Australia that numerous politicians on both sides held dual citizenships with other countries, which instantly voided there Political careers... no one had done the homework.

TheSquealer 02-24-2019 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 22421658)
So that would be like Republican.. Melina Trump? Just how she report a family net wealth of a billion+ .. when she's not worked in 20 years?

Maybe because she's not the money maker of the family?

yet not one of these people shit in a golden toilet

Was she running for political office? Or are you just struggling to learn how to read?

TheSquealer 02-24-2019 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 22421640)
Her husband is rich,he owns an investment firm.sorry to disappoint.

And i'm sure she has nothing to hide being that she demands others release their tax returns and refuses to release her own... then introduces a bill to force Presidential candidates to release their tax returns but not Congressional members or candidates of course.

Rochard 02-24-2019 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22421558)
Just one house passed it, not the state of NJ

"The bill goes to the Democratic-led Assembly. If the measure is passes there, it would head to Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy."

It will pass, it looks like, but could easily be challenged in court

On what grounds? Invasion of privacy? You can hardly claim invasion of privacy when every president in the past forty years has released their tax returns.

We need complete transparency from our politicians. Right now Kushner is applying for a billion dollar loan from the government to build apartment buildings. I'm sorry, but just the fact that he has the balls to apply for such a loan should put him in prison.

Do you know exactly what Kushner is doing? I call it "OPM" - other people's money. They borrow a billion dollars from the government, rolls the dice and hope to make money. If they make money, great. If not, they walk away without owing a dime. This is exactly what Mitt Romney did. His company would borrow money and buy a company in distress and "hope" to make money while charging huge management fees. Mitt Romney and his company made tons of money no matter what happened. Kushner is doing the same. Kushner will make money from this deal no matter what happens.

These people are evil, vile, and all criminals.

BaldBastard 02-24-2019 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22421660)
Was she running for political office? Or are you just struggling to learn how to read?

Its quiet amazing how retard your brain runs, Paul Pelosi's major investments and business moves are well documented, if anything I'd guess this Cali property investments are worth above the 200 mill they report.

The fact his wife's been in politics so long would mean that every opposition candidate for years would of been trolling for something.. anything, that got ya now moment. But nadda nothing..

Where as with your boy Trump....

ilnjscb 02-24-2019 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22421691)
On what grounds? Invasion of privacy? You can hardly claim invasion of privacy when every president in the past forty years has released their tax returns.

We need complete transparency from our politicians. Right now Kushner is applying for a billion dollar loan from the government to build apartment buildings. I'm sorry, but just the fact that he has the balls to apply for such a loan should put him in prison.

Do you know exactly what Kushner is doing? I call it "OPM" - other people's money. They borrow a billion dollars from the government, rolls the dice and hope to make money. If they make money, great. If not, they walk away without owing a dime. This is exactly what Mitt Romney did. His company would borrow money and buy a company in distress and "hope" to make money while charging huge management fees. Mitt Romney and his company made tons of money no matter what happened. Kushner is doing the same. Kushner will make money from this deal no matter what happens.

These people are evil, vile, and all criminals.

Have you ever been a plaintiff in a civil suit? You don't need "grounds". You simply find a party who can demonstrate harm from an action taken. The judge (in the US) is required to consider any efforts to dismiss the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Do you seriously imagine that the Trump campaign won't be able to file a lawsuit? If, then, the action is decided against him, he can appeal. An effort to change the way presidents are elected will with absolute certainty be heard. It will be fast tracked to the supreme court.

Rochard 02-24-2019 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22421857)
Have you ever been a plaintiff in a civil suit? You don't need "grounds". You simply find a party who can demonstrate harm from an action taken. The judge (in the US) is required to consider any efforts to dismiss the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Do you seriously imagine that the Trump campaign won't be able to file a lawsuit? If, then, the action is decided against him, he can appeal. An effort to change the way presidents are elected will with absolute certainty be heard. It will be fast tracked to the supreme court.

Not at all. I am sure that Trump's attorney's will try to fight it. They might even get a hearing. However, it's hard to argue that it's an invasion of privacy when it's been standard for every candidate to release their taxes.

Trump is fighting to keep his taxes hidden. Why?

kane 02-24-2019 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22421678)
And i'm sure she has nothing to hide being that she demands others release their tax returns and refuses to release her own... then introduces a bill to force Presidential candidates to release their tax returns but not Congressional members or candidates of course.

Pelosi is as shady as they come. Her husband supposedly made all this money investing. Somehow I have a feeling her political connections may have helped his success rate. All candidates for the House Senate or White House should have to release their taxes. It should just be one of the requirements for getting on the ballot.

TheSquealer 02-24-2019 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22421886)
Pelosi is as shady as they come. Her husband supposedly made all this money investing. Somehow I have a feeling her political connections may have helped his success rate. All candidates for the House Senate or White House should have to release their taxes. It should just be one of the requirements for getting on the ballot.

I agree that all those running for office and positions of influence like this should be required to disclose everything financial before and during,.. 100% and should be held to some reporting standard AFTER their term to prevent setting themselves up for later benefit.

kane 02-24-2019 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22421892)
I agree that all those running for office and positions of influence like this should be required to disclose everything financial before and during,.. 100% and should be held to some reporting standard AFTER their term to prevent setting themselves up for later benefit.

100% agree. We need to find people who want to be in office because they want to better the country not because they want to cash in.

crockett 02-24-2019 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22421488)
There is no requirement for candidates to release anything. These democRats are just butt-hurt that crooked H lost. I'm certain they have more important things to do. After all, they work for US, not for their personal agendas. Also it hasn't been passed. Fake news.

You seem butt hurt..

crockett 02-24-2019 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22421648)
oh, i'm not disappointed. Republicans respect hard work and achievement and Democrats run around screaming "pay your fair share" and "equality" etc etc etc etc and somehow seem to have as many or more millions as Republicans in government.

I'm 100% for every single one of them having to come clean 100% and go on record about how rich they are and how they got rich,.. so that we can all constantly remember that as they lecture non stop about equality and justice and what's fair and what isn't, who's "greedy" and who isn't etc.

https://i.redd.it/ebbu9gwo7di21.jpg

They do? Then why is it you guys hate Elon Musk so much?

Acepimp 02-24-2019 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22421901)
They do? Then why is it you guys hate Elon Musk so much?

Why Elon Musk is a fast talking hustler who preys upon scientifically illiterate bureaucrats to siphon billions of dollars from taxpayers

It is estimated that since their respective launches, Tesla, SolarCity, and SpaceX have together benefited from an estimated $4.9 billion in government welfare payments. This means that everyday working folks are having a portion of their hard-earned wages handed over to Musk so he can pump out more Model S electric sedans, for instance, which typically sell to buyers who, on average, boast household incomes of about $320,000.

---------------

^^ Crockette is in favor of tax breaks for rich people and their car purchases. :1orglaugh

TheSquealer 02-24-2019 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22421901)
They do? Then why is it you guys hate Elon Musk so much?

I don't think about Elon Musk... at all.

Maybe because he's spent Billions of tax payers money?

Robbie 02-24-2019 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22421886)
Pelosi is as shady as they come. Her husband supposedly made all this money investing. Somehow I have a feeling her political connections may have helped his success rate. All candidates for the House Senate or White House should have to release their taxes. It should just be one of the requirements for getting on the ballot.

But nobody ever did until Richard Nixon voluntarily did it. He wanted to prove he wasn't shady. lol

Then President Ford did NOT release his tax returns. He did release a "summary" in 1976

Mitt Romney did NOT release his tax returns as a candidate. Remember? Senator Harry Reid made the statement that he "heard" Romney had not paid his taxes. lol

It's all for political show.

So the next time you hear a "reporter" on the news say that Trump is the first President in "40 years" to not show his income taxes...that's because NOBODY did before Nixon did it in 1973.

It's a political stunt. Nothing more.

Acepimp 02-24-2019 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22421913)
It's a political stunt. Nothing more.

^^ Trump has been trolling the hysterical leftists this whole time. If he was doing something shady, the IRS would've filed charges years ago. He's just waiting for the right time (or for a law like this) to show that there's no problem, and then he will laugh in their face like always :1orglaugh

astronaut x 02-24-2019 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22421532)
Great law. The idea that people can be elected to any office without revealing where their sources of income, is abhorrent.

unless they act like they keeping out the illegals, eh paul?

kane 02-24-2019 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22421913)
But nobody ever did until Richard Nixon voluntarily did it. He wanted to prove he wasn't shady. lol

Then President Ford did NOT release his tax returns. He did release a "summary" in 1976

Mitt Romney did NOT release his tax returns as a candidate. Remember? Senator Harry Reid made the statement that he "heard" Romney had not paid his taxes. lol

It's all for political show.

So the next time you hear a "reporter" on the news say that Trump is the first President in "40 years" to not show his income taxes...that's because NOBODY did before Nixon did it in 1973.

It's a political stunt. Nothing more.

I never said Trump was the first one to not release his taxes. I'm well aware he is not the first. That said, in the modern age where corruption in the government seems rampant, I think we deserve to know where candidate's interests lie and tax returns can show just that.

Rochard 02-24-2019 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22421913)
But nobody ever did until Richard Nixon voluntarily did it. He wanted to prove he wasn't shady. lol

And he ended up resigning in disgrace anyhow so...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22421913)
Then President Ford did NOT release his tax returns. He did release a "summary" in 1976

If I remember my history correct here (Baddog might be able to fill in).... Ford did not run for President and win. He assumed the office when Nixon resigned, and then when he ran for President he lost.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22421913)
It's all for political show.

I disagree with this. It's not for political show; It's to prove that that the candidate has nothing to hide. It's called transparency. Without transparency we shouldn't elect them to office.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22421913)
It's all for political show.

So the next time you hear a "reporter" on the news say that Trump is the first President in "40 years" to not show his income taxes...that's because NOBODY did before Nixon did it in 1973.

But this is now expected of a candidate.

Trump said he would release his taxes. He hasn't. Why not? What does he have to hide?

Do we need to have an investigation?

Rochard 02-24-2019 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22421931)
I never said Trump was the first one to not release his taxes. I'm well aware he is not the first. That said, in the modern age where corruption in the government seems rampant, I think we deserve to know where candidate's interests lie and tax returns can show just that.

Trump was the first candidate elected president since Nixon who hasn't released his taxes. (Ford was not elected President.)

Paul Markham 02-25-2019 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astronaut x (Post 22421924)
unless they act like they keeping out the illegals, eh paul?

It should be a requirement of all politicians to reveal their source of income. Squabbling over who does or doesn't is harming democracy.

ilnjscb 02-25-2019 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22421857)
Have you ever been a plaintiff in a civil suit? You don't need "grounds". You simply find a party who can demonstrate harm from an action taken. The judge (in the US) is required to consider any efforts to dismiss the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Do you seriously imagine that the Trump campaign won't be able to file a lawsuit? If, then, the action is decided against him, he can appeal. An effort to change the way presidents are elected will with absolute certainty be heard. It will be fast tracked to the supreme court.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22421883)
Not at all. I am sure that Trump's attorney's will try to fight it. They might even get a hearing. However, it's hard to argue that it's an invasion of privacy when it's been standard for every candidate to release their taxes.

Trump is fighting to keep his taxes hidden. Why?

I would speculate (and that's all it is, speculation) that he engages in what I'll call "barely legal" tax accounting. If you won a state with 17,000 votes you might do the same thing. Regardless, I don't think it will do him much good. The election is the democrats to lose if they don't keep sucking up to the socialists.

Get it, barely legal cause its a porn board? Hey I have to take the laughs where I can get them. I'm here all week.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123