Okay, who has the Cameron Diaz porn photos?
 

LOS ANGELES ? A photographer accused of trying to extort $3.3 million from Cameron Diaz (search) for pictures taken before she became famous must stay jailed or pay a high bail amount.

Superior Court Judge Ann Jones on Wednesday said John Rutter (search) of Los Angeles must remain jailed in place of $250,000 bail.

In a related matter, Diaz has sued Rutter in civil court to keep the photographs from being published. That case begins Friday in Santa Monica Superior Court before Judge Alan B. Haber.

Rutter, 41, faces felony counts of attempted extortion, attempted grand theft, perjury and forgery. Last month, Rutter was denied release on his own recognizance and a court commissioner ordered him to stay away from the 31-year-old actress.

The photographs taken around 1992 are being held in a safe deposit box. Diaz's lawyers have declined to describe the photos and are asking for an injunction to keep them from being made public.

Rutter has said he contacted Diaz's attorneys on June 23 to offer them first right of refusal for the photos before trying to sell them to media outlets. Soon afterward, he said, authorities raided his apartment and seized the photos. He was arrested Aug. 12.

A publicist for Diaz has said the actress didn't sign a photo release at the private modeling session, and a release that Rutter produced is a forgery.

Rutter's mother, Mary Rutter, said after the hearing that her son was "not trying to hurt Cameron Diaz. Somehow, we have to see justice done."

Diaz, co-star of the "Charlie's Angels" (search) movies, "Gangs of New York" and "There's Something About Mary," is listed in the 2004 Guinness Book of World Records as Hollywood's highest paid actress with earnings of $42.2 million in 2001.

ehhh...nothing to write home about...

http://coolios.flabber.nl/img/cdiaz.jpg

Has she ever gone topless in a movie? If so, I REALLY don't see what the big deal is.

Now if she was showing pink, like Demi Moore did in Oui . . .

I don't nkow what the fuck she has to worry about . Only fucking tits . How many mens have seen her tits ?

yes but did you see how perky those tits are???

wow!!!!

Got those pix? :thumbsup

she's sooo fugly :helpme

I always used to like her in movies. I like girls with big mouths.

But I think that having the guy jailed for having taken topless photos of her and contemplating publishing them in this part of the world is just wrong. I will probably boycott any movie she is ever in in the future.

Harsh!

That's really gonna hurt her income.

i think she will have to sell his ferrari :P

She looks better with her clothes on.

BIGGER PICS?

Load photoshop > zoom 200%.

He should of just sold them to the media ,see what happens when you try to be nice .lol

very old pics, i seen those years ago

My thoughts exactly

Just me doing it won't make a lick of difference, but when stars do things which make them less attractive, they are less able to open a movie, and overall will command smaller salaries. As I first heard this story from a fashion photog friend of mine, I know that it is not just adult internet people on gfy who think what Diaz did in this instance is very unattractive.

Agreed.

Is she the highest paid actress in Hollywood now? Thought I heard that somewhere.

I could see trying to halt the release of the pics, but I don't know about the guying being held and being charged with extortion. It would be nice to know all the real circumstances. The biggest question really lies in who has legal ownership of the pics in question. And in the past as we've seen nude pics haven't hurt many actresses careers in fact many it may caused them to be even bigger stars.

Assuming the release is a forgery (ummm sure).

The photographer owns the copyright i.e. the pictures.

The model owns the likeness rights i.e. the right to make money off of them.

Under any standard release the model gives over that right to the photographer (right to profit and other things).

She obviously was present at the shoot. Now fun question is once you reach celebrity status you ussually give up certain rights pertaining to your likeness being used. I.E. tabloids, razzi, etc. So is a release needed?

I can answer the question. Her lawyers are Lavely and Singer who use getsapo techniques when dealing with people. They threatened to raid my house because I had the fake Ben Affleck XX video on my site.

Oui March 1982

i can't find any of the inside pics.

anyone have them?

Bandwidth Limit Exceeded? :BangBang:

We have them.

Get a fucking bigger server