The result of Obama's liberal policies on Gitmo
 

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,527868,00.html



Yes Obama, lets have them all released. Moron.

Fox News. Fair & Balanced [/sarcasm]

"al-Shihri, a Saudi national who was released from Guantanamo in November 2007 and sent to a Saudi Arabian "rehabilitation" program for jihadists."

help me out here. I thought obama was elected in 2008 and took office in 2009.

Definitely the response I was respecting. When faced with facts, liberals are quick with their "Lolz its fox news ergo its false" rhetoric. But I guess by your logic, everything CNN says is false too.

Um i read the article let me quote a piece of it
"al-Shihri, a Saudi national who was released from Guantanamo in November 2007 and sent to a Saudi Arabian "rehabilitation" program for jihadists."

now this thread title
The result of Obama's liberal policies on Gitmo

now educate me how the policies of a man who took office in 2009 had any effect on the guy who was released in 2007

Right. Obama's liberal policies= the releasing of most detainees in Gitmo. This kind of shit is what's going to happen if he follows through on his stance on Gitmo.

A result is the final consequence of a sequence of actions or events expressed qualitatively or quantitatively

The possible result of Obama's liberal policies on Gitmo. Would have been a better thread title But yeah I'll agree with you, there is that possibility some of the detainees will/may return or join a terrorist group

Maybe Obama will be smarter than the ultimate moron Bush and "release" them to countries that will actually keep them locked up... hmmm.. Isn't that the current plan? So hey.. I guess we have something else to blame Bush for... I just love how Fox takes something and instead of making news about what ACTUALLY HAPPENED they use it to talk about something that MIGHT happen... But then I guess they'd have to rag about their butt buddys Bush/Chenney etc. and that will never happen...

Bush war on terror have created more terrorist than it has stopped.

This thread = fail.

double post

This just proves that Obama is using the same failed policies as Bush. But whats new Obama is Bush's third term on steroids.

what is the recidivism rate of AMERICAN ex-cons released from prison? Far HIGHER than the prisoners released from Guantanamo. So using your logic every criminal should get a life sentence to prevent this.

The fact you take Faux news as real journalism is a joke. not liking Faux News does not make one democrat or a liberal. That like saying hating the Cubs makes your a Cardinals fan by default.

CNN does the exact same shit regarding republicans/conservatives. Gotta love the double standards though.

I take fox news as seriously as I take CNN.

Mysef I would have just released them into general population in an ordinary jail somewhere...

Kinda like goldfish in a tank of piranhas ....

Don't you think you've already made yourself look dumb enough in this thread?

no, but then again I'm assuming you're smart enough not to make baseless assertions.. My mistake:)

In case that confused you let me be blunt. Prove I've made myself look dumb. When you can't, you'll look like a mindless buffoon attempting to ride someone's(I don't know who) coattails.

It would really be something if the Gitmo detainees were all put on a large plane and that plane experienced a mechanical failure while crossing the Atlantic.

LMAO... epic fail

Oh please... While true, the level to which FOX news "skews" things is far beyond what CNN does.

Hope the terrorist remember it was the dems that let them go and only target republicans! :winkwink:







Yes. That was a joke. :P

Conservative Porn Webmaster... Now there is a fucking joke if I ever heard one. Real conservatives hate you more than they hate liberals.

added to sig for posterity

failed thread...

^That HAS to be a troll.

Wait. Conservative and webmaster can't go together? Do you even know the difference between the left and the right rofl?

:eek7:upsidedow

http://www.nsfwmotifake.com/demotiva...1231432214.jpg

ADG

YOU posted the thread with fox's article though?!

this thread is simply epic fail :2 cents:

So why not just keep them where they are at ...Gitmo..

Holy crap I lol'd.

People make their own choices... Bush or anyone else did not force them to become a terrorist...:2 cents:

Christ another fucking clueless idiot.

Ever since security at abortion clinics have tightened these assholes are coming out of the woodwork.

ROFL yea. Fuck personal responsibility. Lets blame socioeconomic factors.

Is this Bizarro-land GFY? I don't think I've ever seen a thread with the monitor tilted in this direction before.

Have you ever been diagnosed with a mental illness? You're obviously experiencing some sort of delusional episode.

LOL...:thumbsup

The active word is PORN... Supporting conservatives while earning a living in the adult industry is like a PETA member working as a butcher.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh: 1orglaugh

One quick way to tell who is a shit webmaster is to see who is critical of me.
Usually I have busted their ass in the past about something and they still haven't
gotten over it.

I always deliver code on time and never scam and some scammers are jealous of
that. Often they've failed on several jobs on the board.

Use the search function on the people who bad mouth me and you will see a
pattern. Most eventually got banned. So go figure.

http://econfirmpro.com was one of my first adult scripts and it was the very
first email confirmation script for automated TGP submissions.

Whois says econfirmpro.com Created: 2002-03-01

That's how long I've been delivering solid programming to deserving adult webmasters.

So if someone's talking shit about me then they probably suck hard.
Don't do business with them.

You're clearly an idiot.

1. Adult is relative. What if I'm promoting dating sponsors, with and get this, pg-13 ads? OMG!!!! Porn is another story.

2. I'm not earning a living in the adult industry, it's just money on the side.

3. Being a conservative and supporting porn or rather, not opposing it just means that I believe in the 1st amendment rights of this country and no matter how morally questionable porn is, it's a 1st amendment right. Go read a book.