SEO strategy: smaller/deeper pages vs front page
 

If you only have the time/resources to pick one, which would you pick:

A FEW Deep/internal Links from HEAVY HITTER (high Page rank, etc) "authority" sites (maybe an older article where your new link is placed)

VERSUS

MANY Front page link from smaller/newer sites with lower Page rank

Which would you pick and why?

i pick duck

http://www.freefoto.com/images/01/08...--Duck_web.jpg

Go with potato.

http://www.solcomhouse.com/images/potato-recipes.jpg

Go LOL says funny cat!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...yping_Cat1.gif

first choice for sure.

But wouldn't that look suspicious?

Indeed, duck is the way to go :thumbsup

wouldnt it look more suspect the other way?

duuuuuuuuuuuurrrrr, both.


duck and potato go hand in hand...

The duck potato :D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittaria_latifolia

Less suspicious if the small site links are spaced out more. Also, setting them up to link to deep links/subpages would look more "natural" :) What do you think?

thats true, this's the reason why some directories also started to use that method.

but SE's becoming even smarter day by day, so it dependss how do You go with it.

i'm a Platipus

Woof Woof!

http://peregrinacultural.files.wordp...l-platipus.jpg

go banana

I go bananas over you!

probably first one, i still think BIG PR can trigger magic

nice SEO Advance :D

You pick the one that is more relevant to your site content wise. Authority sites are liking being given a carte blanche though, get those ;)
WG

Whatever you do, do NOT pick baby

http://www.anilos-mature.com/Bushed.jpg

Baby is bad!

I am wet

Don't you know platypuses have a DUCK bill? :winkwink:

That's why I'm so Happy BING came around. It's like looking at a Google Time Machine circa 2000. 100 Million Dollar Microsoft Ad Budget + Easier to Chump Search algo = Lots of happy webmasters