What is worse selling crack or spreading computer viruses?
 

In the other thread some people have argued that spam is often harmless and sometimes even informative. Meanwhile, others point out that malware is oftentimes spread via spam.

So, let's cut to the chase here folks.

Forget spam in general.

What is worse selling crack or deliberately spreading computer viruses?

Whats wrong with crack sellers if people want to buy it? I have never asked anyone for a computor virus.


Shouldnt the question be more... Whats worse, a computor virus or a person starting problems where ever.

If it a massive large-scale spamming operation that sends out emails that give people viruses and infect their computer with advertisements to sell crack, than it would be worse that just regularly selling crack.

P.S.

Don't sell crack! Crack is bad for your health.

Message from the government of Canada.

which agency did your sig banner? it's really funny.

I'll just say that crack is bad!!!

In moderation, crack has never killed a brain like a virus kills a system, the pocket, and, the stress from it probably kills more brain cells than the crack in a one off instant :2 cents:

Well said :thumbsup

:1orglaugh

I'd say viruses take the cake. In the wrong system the right virus can cause great damage. I know it's a Hollywood scenario, quite impossible for a spam virus and needs at least a brilliant hacker but say a virus spreads in a flight control tower's computers and shit hits the fan. Or in a criminal lawsuit database and stars deleting cases.

Well bottom line is selling crack doesn't have fuckers shoving it in my face to buy the shit but I just recovered my system from some wicked virus and it cost me quite a lot of $ and time recovering it, not to mention all the shit I had on it.

That's destruction of property!

I'd shove all the virus-making geek-ass programmers in a freezing computer-less jail and elegantly throw away the fucking key in a remote direction.

Crack dealers want your shit - they are opt in.