GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Tubes R Not the Death of the Industry (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=967487)

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 09:34 AM

Tubes R Not the Death of the Industry
 
I stumbled across this gem, and unfortunately can't link to it. But I think the original author (deemented) makes some good points that frankly are missed in tube hater threads.

Quote:

In the previous millennium, when my very first vid came out, it had an anti piracy message in the middle of the vid between scenes. The fact that there was a message took up 2 sentences of my 2 paragraph AVN review and they took off 1/2 of a star from the rating, because the vid had that message.

I wrote AVN to complain that a company that views them self to be the voice of the adult industry should think about what they are saying by their actions-they should be supporting my anti piracy message. They told me-"rules are rules."

When DVDs first started to become big, you couldn't dupe them on a computer. You had to pay $2,000 for the glass master, another grand for the authoring and then about $2 a unit for the case, cover and disc. The number 1 duper of adult DVDs-because he was the cheapest-was also the #1 seller of pirated DVDs. Absolute fact.

There were numerous law suits and criminal investigations and trials against him. Yet 80% of the industry used him cause he was top quality and bottom price. He would double the order and send half out his back door. As far as I know he never went to jail, he never shut his door, he never changed his business practices and he's still one of the adult industry's #1 dupers.

The list of bullshit about theft in the adult industry ranges from serious Mafia control of distribution, to John Stagliano starting Evil Angel because he felt he was being stolen from, to "tube sites" allowing up loaders to put up anything they want. The list is much longer than John Holmes famous member and like that famous member-it will always grow.

Dealing with losses from theft/piracy will always be a serious part of the industry. It's an unsolvable problem.

Theft is NOT what has caused the industry jobs. The industry itself did that. The industry started and continues the downward spiral of price vs. quality. Quantity vs. quality.

The manufacturer's price for a video ranged from $10-15 with $12 being the industry average. I would see my product which I was paid $12 for, priced from $20 in a New York store up to $60 in a mid west store. After 6-8 months or so, your production would make a second run and sell the same tape for $2-3. Those would be $10-20 in a store. Adult materials had the highest gross profit margins of most any retail item.

Most adult bookstores are chains of various sizes. Most adult wholesale distributors were bookstore chains wanting to get the manufacturer price. Some manufacturers were also distributors and store chain owners.

The net started a manufacturer-direct-to-retail end user chain. Allowing manufacturers to rake in the retail big bucks. You didn't need to invest in DVDs and stock them, lay out big bucks for inventory and wait 90 days for distributors to pay you. A manufacturer at any given time had a minimum of $300,000 in collectibles on the street. A big company had 5 times that much.

Cheap video cameras caused cheap production at the cost of quality. Cheap distribution channels caused further pricing wars and it goes on and on-price vs quality. The huge appetite for porn that the net created, was filled more and more by shit that is cheap. Eventually, shit became the new standard of quality!

Tube sites are not the downfall of the adult industry. Making cheaper shit is! When all you can say about your product as its major competitive advantage is: "it's cheaper" that says it all-a bunch of whores trying to under cut each other with lower pricing, cutting through the distribution chains by manufacturer direct retail...the bottom line-jobs get lost.

American cars couldn't sell at one time cause they were shit. Hagadaz Ice Cream became famous because all other ice creams were in a price war-producing cheaper and cheaper shit! Industry by industry, in the history of business, sell on price and not quality-jobs get lost.

The adult industry is far from being as bad off as the American auto industry was when Chrysler was bailed out but the revitalization of the adult industry needs to come from reinventing itself and returning VALUE in the product, rather than the current business model of: most people will get it for free so don't invest in it. SELL SHIT!

It is the industry, not the consumer that ruined the value of its product. People pay you what you prove your product is worth! It was the industry not the consumer that made "FREE" the right price to pay for porn. It's the industry and not the consumer that needs to repair its mistakes and reinvent itself. There is no real reason the industry gives the consumer to pay for it's product. In business the number 1-10 top rules of business:

the customer
the customer
the customer
the customer
the customer
the customer
the customer
the customer
the customer
THE CUSTOMER!

YO-ADULT INDUSTRY-WAKE UP!!!


Want to stop losing jobs-go back to the basics of all business and follow those 10 rules. Want to get paid for your work-put the value back in your product! Stop your fucking whining and do the work!

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 09:35 AM

Additionally...

Quote:

Ecco 101: Business is very Darwinian-the strongest/best survive. Competition breeds better-not just cheaper-what do we think of ourselves as an industry when everything is only cheaper...

"it's fundamental supply/demand...."

Is it? Who is still thriving in the adult industry? The companies that maintained their high standards of quality. Their quality allows them to demand a price point that allows for a profit. They never made "shit" so that it could be sold cheaply.


Windows-a classic example of a shit product-reinvents itself every 2 years or so. It doesn't lower it's price, in theory it's constantly proving its value by making improvements worth paying for.

Publishing was getting killed by the net-huge publishing money maker-download books from the net. Yet there are tons of free books and for sure you can spend your life reading for free on the net. Publishing is still very much in the black.

Ebay-a such a huge retail portal-do they even need to do auctions anymore?

Google-constantly reinventing itself-and it's really suffering from all the pirated materials and free stuff (yes you can argue its the pirate not the victim)

The list goes on and on-the industries that cheapen themselves don't survive...is it "outside" forces?

Adult sites-"$1 trials" that get re-billed as 30 day memberships to the vast majority of "suckers" who don't understand they need to cancel or get a painful surprise. Excellent business model for building client trust. Or is it the free porn that captures your computer or the Thumb Posts that never lead anywhere that is in the customer's best interest? In the long run, do these cheap whore tricks make long term, loyal customers? Ever have Amazon.com not allow you to close a page?

Sorry-there is no oversupply of any "value added" product in the adult industry. Companies like Vivid, Wicked, VCA, Evil Angel prove daily that people WILL pay what you prove your product is worth!

plyndrty 05-08-2010 09:52 AM

You get what you pay for...

KillerK 05-08-2010 09:58 AM

This guy, whoever it is ... IS A FUCKING IDIOT.

If people took his DVDs and copied them and handed them out for free outside the porn shop to people as they entered. Let's see how many sales they would do.

Paul Markham 05-08-2010 10:04 AM

When I first came to do business on the Net one of the things that shocked me was the price people were prepared to pay for the product the customer was buying. I had big businesses offer me jobs or custom work at prices that were a joke.

Even today some of the top sites, with the so called top content, either don't value or can't afford to pay a good price for content. There are great shooters around now going into different businesses, why? Because the Adult Net won't pay them enough.

How many top shooters supplying top sites can say they earned $3,000 from a single solo girl set they still own? Without a video. And $3,000 is not an exaggeration or a one off.

But how many can say they turned over $1500 shooting 5 sets and videos in a day, for something they no longer own?

You get what you pay for in all markets.

Caligari 05-08-2010 10:12 AM

That's a moronic series of statements:2 cents:

A)There are many high quality studios producing adult videos NOW. Let me list a few.
Girlfriends Films
Evil Angel
Burning Angel
New Sensations
Evasive Angles
Abby Winters
3rd Degree
Anabolic
....i could go on, but the point is this guy doesn't know what the hell he is talking about, and in any case, theft is theft.

And furthermore, noting the title of your thread, are you saying that because a video is deemed "shit" by some people that this is a reason for it to be pirated??

Martin 05-08-2010 10:17 AM

They're not the death but they ant helping!

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17121695)
When I first came to do business on the Net one of the things that shocked me was the price people were prepared to pay for the product the customer was buying. I had big businesses offer me jobs or custom work at prices that were a joke.

Even today some of the top sites, with the so called top content, either don't value or can't afford to pay a good price for content. There are great shooters around now going into different businesses, why? Because the Adult Net won't pay them enough.

I always enjoy some Markham.
:)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligari (Post 17121710)
And furthermore, noting the title of your thread, are you saying that because a video is deemed "shit" by some people that this is a reason for it to be pirated??

No. My thread title was taken from the points, and paraphrased remarks, he had made in the discussion. Mainly that you need to focus on the customer, adding value to your product, and stop fighting technology you have no chance of winning against historically.

I did not voice my point of view. The O.P. is quoted verbatim.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin (Post 17121722)
They're not the death but they ant helping!

There are legal tube sites out there with licensed content.

spazlabz 05-08-2010 10:27 AM

The writer of this article is coming from a very specific limited point of view. I am sure he has valid points and I would not want to be in the DVD production side of the industry right now. We, as the online part of the industry, produce a consumable and while quality is a great way to separate yourself from the horde of cheap porn, quantity plays a much bigger role.

That is assuming equality in the value of your talent

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spazlabz (Post 17121764)
The writer of this article is coming from a very specific limited point of view. I am sure he has valid points and I would not want to be in the DVD production side of the industry right now. We, as the online part of the industry, produce a consumable and while quality is a great way to separate yourself from the horde of cheap porn, quantity plays a much bigger role.

That is assuming equality in the value of your talent

Agreed.

Just as Paul always talks about the old days, and magazine side of the business. He has some points of view that a lot of the online guys laugh at. It really comes down to your experience, and segment of the industry, that shapes your point of view.

SmokeyTheBear 05-08-2010 10:36 AM

Cant knock his opinion but some of the comparisons are fairly silly . like hagendaz ice cream, we arent selling ice cream , and there isn't guys giving away free hagendaz outside our sites.

The music industry is a much closer comparison in my opinion. Radio stations give away music for free yet people still buy music. The adult industry has value in their product the tube sites have found a way to capitalize offf the copyright materials within, all we gotta do is reverse that information gap. Have a better product, present it better and faster and people will use it. oh and sue sue sue...

Paul Markham 05-08-2010 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17121804)
Agreed.

Just as Paul always talks about the old days, and magazine side of the business. He has some points of view that a lot of the online guys laugh at. It really comes down to your experience, and segment of the industry, that shapes your point of view.

What I was talking about was not such a long time ago. When I first came to this side of the porn business was 10 years ago. And that was when I was earning $3,000 a set I still own and was being offered $1,500 for 5 scenes I would not own.

And even today there are great shooters turning there back on the Adult Net because it refuses to pay a decent price. So nothing there about the "old days". :)

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 17121824)
The music industry is a much closer comparison in my opinion. Radio stations give away music for free yet people still buy music.

"Free" is subjective to the end users perception.

On radio and TV. You have to suffer through the commercials that finance the "free" to the end user. Where some people do not mind commercials, some can't stand them. Hence TiVO and subscription types of radio.

As for your other point in regards to adult. People who were not around in the 90's when the online adult porn industry started are quick to forget the history lesson repeating it's self a decade later.

Now that most higher end, well known, traffic tube sites are making a mint, they are now licensing their content. They can now afford to do it, and the content producers are providing them the material. This is a buyer's market.

While not all are legal out there, many more are moving in that direction.

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17121838)
And even today there are great shooters turning there back on the Adult Net because it refuses to pay a decent price. So nothing there about the "old days". :)

I love me some Markham.
:)

NaughtyRob 05-08-2010 10:59 AM

The most important thing that he said was basically: "Stop trying to fuck over the surfer for a quick buck and give them value", let them cancel when they want, no tricks and they may stay. Sure we will all have less members then before but we need to build trust. Our industry on the web has pretty much fucked over the trust of the consumer.

SmokeyTheBear 05-08-2010 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17121842)
"Free" is subjective to the end users perception.

On radio and TV. You have to suffer through the commercials that finance the "free" to the end user. Where some people do not mind commercials, some can't stand them. Hence TiVO and subscription types of radio.

isnt that kinda the same as saying tubes arent giving it away free either , its ad supported some can't stand them and pay for memberships :)

but i was kind of pointing more to the fact the labels not only support radio but compete to get their music played first
Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17121842)
As for your other point in regards to adult. People who were not around in the 90's when the online adult porn industry started are quick to forget the history lesson repeating it's self a decade later.

not sure who you are referring to , but for the record i had PAY porn sites BEFORE there was an internet, thats not a joke. as far as porn and computing go, it would be unlikely to find many people with an older track record

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17121842)
Now that most higher end, well known, traffic tube sites are making a mint, they are now licensing their content. They can now afford to do it, and the content producers are providing them the material. This is a buyer's market.

While not all are legal out there, many more are moving in that direction.

the tube model is a good model , the bad tubes will move closer to the legal tubes and vice versa

FreeHugeMovies 05-08-2010 11:33 AM

Tubes are killing the industry. How can you say giving away a 50 min video ISN'T hurting?

DBS.US 05-08-2010 11:42 AM

The number 1 duper of adult DVDs-because he was the cheapest-was also the #1 seller of pirated DVDs. Absolute fact.

And nobody did shit about it.:2 cents:

seeandsee 05-08-2010 11:46 AM

legal tubes are good but those dirty are killers

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FreeHugeMovies (Post 17121964)
Tubes are killing the industry. How can you say giving away a 50 min video ISN'T hurting?

Not all tube sites do that.

That is like saying that all legal pornographers are also all kiddie pornographers.

You can't have it both ways.

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US (Post 17121985)
And nobody did shit about it.:2 cents:

I am sure there was plenty of talk, forum posts, trade mag articles and saber rattling.

Bman 05-08-2010 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17121838)
What I was talking about was not such a long time ago. When I first came to this side of the porn business was 10 years ago. And that was when I was earning $3,000 a set I still own and was being offered $1,500 for 5 scenes I would not own.

And even today there are great shooters turning there back on the Adult Net because it refuses to pay a decent price. So nothing there about the "old days". :)


Sounds about right.

dyna mo 05-08-2010 12:47 PM

it's not an either or or situation. a lot has come together to create the current climate, illegal tubes are part of that.

he's also wrong with his
Quote:

Ecco 101: Business is very Darwinian-the strongest/best survive.
thought.

this is simply not true. there are many MANY adult companies that succeed in spite of themselves. same with mainstream. i see it all the time.

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17122129)
it's not an either or or situation. a lot has come together to create the current climate, illegal tubes are part of that.

Agreed.

However, it's not the only turd in the punch bowl. In the past 2-3 years, you can think of a lot of other things from cross sales, pay sites that never update, and other credit card practices that also have contributed to the decline.

The O.P. also does not take into account the evolution of the web, and there is a lot more to do on it now then there was 10 years ago. Most people have a limited amount of online time, and doing those hours, they have many things trying to get their attention.

dyna mo 05-08-2010 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17122135)
Agreed.

However, it's not the only turd in the punch bowl. In the past 2-3 years, you can think of a lot of other things from cross sales, pay sites that never update, and other credit card practices that also have contributed to the decline.

The O.P. also does not take into account the evolution of the web, and there is a lot more to do on it now then there was 10 years ago. Most people have a limited amount of online time, and doing those hours, they have many things trying to get their attention.

yessa.

i believe i have seen a graph charting traffic to adult sites falling proportionately to traffic increasing to social network sites during the same time period

bronco67 05-08-2010 12:53 PM

he's so correct about people wanting to pay for a quality product. But he fails to mention that people will also steal a quality product if there's an easy avenue to do it -- and there's still tons of quality porn. It's just his opinion that porn is shit, and he's totally wrong.

...and he doesn't know the difference between the the word "caused" and "cost". That bothers me.

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 17122141)
he's so correct about people wanting to pay for a quality product. But he fails to mention that people will also steal a quality product if there's an easy avenue to do it -- and there's still tons of quality porn.

I think his bigger point is that theft is inevitable. Just like in other industries.

If you stop producing content because you are worried about theft. You will be out of business in a short period of time. You are always going to have to try and feed the monster.

There are options available to programs and producers via DRM, streaming only, among other things. But people refuse to use them saying it would piss off a consumer. You could go the gideongallery method and give EVERYTHING away from free and try and find another way to monetize it. If such a way exists.

SomeCreep 05-08-2010 01:01 PM

There's a lot of caca in this thread. I don't know where to start, except to say there is a lot of caca.

dyna mo 05-08-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SomeCreep (Post 17122154)
There's a lot of caca in this thread. I don't know where to start, except to say there is a lot of caca.

the gfy preferred way to state this (and it's easier) is

*pigshit*

that way you can simply & quickly do you drive-by everyone is wrong but me comment and move on, not wasting your precious time.

Trend 05-08-2010 01:15 PM

Another vote for *pigshit*

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17122137)
yessa.

i believe i have seen a graph charting traffic to adult sites falling proportionately to traffic increasing to social network sites during the same time period

Yep. :thumbsup

GatorB 05-08-2010 01:28 PM

One problem with that authors theory. If you went back to making expensive high quality porn it still would get distributed over the net via tubes/torrents. Now you just spent A LOT of more more to still not make very much.

The fact is quality doesn't mean expensive "professional" looking sets/costumes/make-up scripts with actual plot slick looking boxcovers with big promotion budgets anymore. Maybe back in the old days when guys actually watched porn on the couch or bed with a tape in the VCR and some beer and bottle of Jergins watching porn was an all night activity. Guys mostly watch porn on their computer and more and more often on their phones. Guys want to get off quickly and move on with their day.

Paul Markham 05-08-2010 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GetNaughty (Post 17121881)
The most important thing that he said was basically: "Stop trying to fuck over the surfer for a quick buck and give them value", let them cancel when they want, no tricks and they may stay. Sure we will all have less members then before but we need to build trust. Our industry on the web has pretty much fucked over the trust of the consumer.

We won't have less members, we will have more. Just because he left your site does not mean he will stop buying porn. He will buy from another site and a member from another site will be signing up on your site. Fuck him over and he drops out the loop.

Paul Markham 05-08-2010 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17122210)
Guys want to get off quickly and move on with their day.

So is trying to sell them a month membership the answer?

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17122210)
One problem with that authors theory. If you went back to making expensive high quality porn it still would get distributed over the net via tubes/torrents. Now you just spent A LOT of more more to still not make very much.

The fact is quality doesn't mean expensive "professional" looking sets/costumes/make-up scripts with actual plot slick looking boxcovers with big promotion budgets anymore. Maybe back in the old days when guys actually watched porn on the couch or bed with a tape in the VCR and some beer and bottle of Jergins watching porn was an all night activity. Guys mostly watch porn on their computer and more and more often on their phones. Guys want to get off quickly and move on with their day.

Agreed.

Specifically in regards to content production, it's similar to the 80's when the VCR come in and forced the big budget porn productions to cut down on costs. You are seeing more of that now. The internet is cutting out some of the higher end studios because they simply can't compete and get ROI.

shunga 05-08-2010 02:08 PM

Two basic truths are:

1) people will always prefer to get something for free
2) it's a lot easier to find free porn now than it was ten years ago

Which means exclusive is a lot more important, and protecting your content is hugely important.

dyna mo 05-08-2010 02:11 PM

in our business, a good way to think of quality is to think of it as niche. if you provide niche content that you are familiar with and enjoy creating, that is quality content and people will buy it.

Barefootsies 05-08-2010 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17122298)
in our business, a good way to think of quality is to think of it as niche. if you provide niche content that you are familiar with and enjoy creating, that is quality content and people will buy it.

Well said.

My content is not the best by any means. The girls are not super hotties, they are not naked, the lighting is not studios JimGunn style type of professional quality. That said, my stuff still sells and retains like a mofo as the stats is sig show.

Why?

Because the passion for what I shoot comes through. I also get feedback from members, their ideas and scripts, so that further leads to success when you are shooting with direct input from members and patrons.

Niche porn will always sell and always convert. It is not profitable for big studios to produce, and mom and pops of small production companies will always have a place to feel the niche people. They are going to PAY FOR what they want. If you do not have a fetish, you simply will never understand how you must feed that need.

nation-x 05-08-2010 03:29 PM

I will agree with the intent of your statement that tubes in general are not killing the industry... people giving away full length movies and pirated movies ARE and HAVE effected sales overall. Noone who is credible has claimed that they are the ONLY reason for revenue decline... there are many reasons including higher social network activity, the economy, etc etc. To claim that tubes that carry high quality full length movies for free (even with advertising) haven't negatively effected our business is just intellectually dishonest and the logic used in trying to justify their existence is fundamentally flawed at it's base.

GatorB 05-08-2010 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17122259)
So is trying to sell them a month membership the answer?

No did I say that? My point was the author infers that if you make these super HQ porn movies with high production values people will pay. That's simply not the case.

DamianJ 05-09-2010 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17121838)
What I was talking about was not such a long time ago. When I first came to this side of the porn business was 10 years ago. And that was when I was earning $3,000 a set I still own and was being offered $1,500 for 5 scenes I would not own.

It amuses me no end you do not think 10 years ago is a long time in terms of the internet. That's sweet.

Paul Markham 05-09-2010 04:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 17123229)
It amuses me no end you do not think 10 years ago is a long time in terms of the internet. That's sweet.

It amuses me no end that you know so little about the market you work in. Try marketing a product you understand.

The figures I posted were true until a few years ago. But that was when the decline set in, when sites thought all they needed to do was fill their site with content shot on the cheap. Sites producing a quality product are keeping members a lot better than sites churning out content that is not quality.

Yes you still have to protect it from the pirates, but you have something worth protecting.

Paul Markham 05-09-2010 04:30 AM

The author of the articles offered a solution and I see no one here offering a solution that will work. Lots of crying about what we already know and some self promoting but no solutions.

The Adult Net went largely exclusive and it was not the solution, sales still fell.

The future for the industry is not to all go niche, it works for Mom & Pop sites and not for the big sites.

A lot of customers have rejected what we are selling.

So what's the answer?

DamianJ 05-09-2010 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17123238)
It amuses me no end that you know so little about the market you work in. Try marketing a product you understand.

Yeah, I haven't got a clue. That is why I was asked to contribute to the GFY educational series and you spam rehashed cut and paste out of date waffle here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17123238)
The figures I posted were true until a few years ago.

I don't give two hoots about the figures Paul. I was laughing at you suggesting 10 years ago 'online' isn't a long time. It is Paul. Very long.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17123238)
Yes you still have to protect it from the pirates

You can't protect anything from filesharers, Paul. Haven't you realised that yet? Stop wasting your time with that pointless persuit and start another thread spamming your pictures pretending you need 1000 for glasses. That was a winner.

LoveSandra 05-09-2010 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerK (Post 17121685)
This guy, whoever it is ... IS A FUCKING IDIOT.

If people took his DVDs and copied them and handed them out for free outside the porn shop to people as they entered. Let's see how many sales they would do.

i second that

Barefootsies 05-09-2010 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17123252)
So what's the answer?

I do not think anyone has a definitive answer.
:disgust

Barefootsies 05-09-2010 09:25 AM

Additional remarks from O.P.

Quote:

DVDs (just the DVD duping part) cost near $5 a unit at the beginning of the decade-disc, duping cost with master, authoring, printed insert and plastic cover. Now they are around $1. $4 difference in the manufacturing price equals $8 to $20 lower retail price. The Adult bookstore-previously the number 1 retail point of sale for adult-I can't find the figures but I'm certain their significance in the supply chain has diminished in the United States to the point that if they closed up shop tomorrow, their sales would immediately be made up through other sources to the point they wouldn't be missed.

Has the industry adjusted like other industries do when the supply chain changes?

Rentals-this was a huge income source-the video rental of adult materials. Do the kiosk machines pay ASCAP fees? Do people rent any more? Pay per view was supposed to replace the rental model part of the business. Has it? What has the industry done to adjust for the change in this huge industry income source.

Many people talk about how the adult industry is the big innovator on the net-creating all the new outlets for revenue streams-WHAT HAPPENED? Did main stream retailing steal all the innovation?

As a businessman I studied numerous companies that were "In Search of Excellence"-they find innovative ways to add value to their products-again people pay what you show them your product is worth. What value added innovations has the adult industry used to maintain the price point of its product? Free 30 second clips? Stealing people's bandwidth with exit traffic consoles?

Met Art became a giant on the net because they put up any shit that is submitted because they can buy it for "cheap"

Twisties lowered their standards and started to buy crap because they had to lower their membership price to get members?

"The value of the product has fallen in the market"

Not for quality. Not for the small percentage of companies that continue to search for excellence. Not for sites that treat their clients like clients instead of Johns. Not for adult companies that behave like businessmen instead of tainted hookers.

I've gotten into fistfights when I threw pirated copies of my production on the floor in adult bookstores and started stomping on them. I do know very well what it is to be stolen from. Tube sites and pirates aren't the adult industry's big problem-the adult industry's whore mentality is its own worse enemy. The businessmen in the industry make money and will continue to make money. Excellent companies always do.

GatorB 05-09-2010 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17123252)
The author of the articles offered a solution and I see no one here offering a solution that will work. Lots of crying about what we already know and some self promoting but no solutions.

The Adult Net went largely exclusive and it was not the solution, sales still fell.

The future for the industry is not to all go niche, it works for Mom & Pop sites and not for the big sites.

A lot of customers have rejected what we are selling.

So what's the answer?

What solution did he propose? I guess I missed that.

Ok here's an anology. All these porn companaies are like blackmsiths 100 years ago. They did fine for along time when everyone used horses to get around, but then 100 years ago people started buying cars. Instead of accepting that and perhaps start selling tires the industry is acting like blacksmiths who try to get people to stop buying cars and go back to horses. Well that wasn't going to happen. And stopping tubes and torrents and free porn in general isn't going to happen either. If it was that easy it would have been done years ago. Now you can be a balcksmith that tries to still sell horseshoes and eventually go out of business or you can start selling tires.

The porn industy is just like the music and mainstream movie/TV industry and has it head in the sand and refuses to adapt because that means accepting the fact your product isn't worth as much as it used to be. For example eventually the music industry will have to realize that the money in music isn't from selling songs or albums. The songs will be used to promote the concert tour of the artist and thus be given out for free. I will be shocked if in 20 years music is actually still being sold.

closer 05-09-2010 07:31 PM

Let me ask you this question: do you still surf the web the same way you did 5 years ago?

What sites do you still visit? And why?

That's all the answer you need in my humble opinion.

Barefootsies 05-09-2010 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17124360)
What solution did he propose? I guess I missed that.

Ok here's an anology. All these porn companaies are like blackmsiths 100 years ago. They did fine for along time when everyone used horses to get around, but then 100 years ago people started buying cars. Instead of accepting that and perhaps start selling tires the industry is acting like blacksmiths who try to get people to stop buying cars and go back to horses. Well that wasn't going to happen. And stopping tubes and torrents and free porn in general isn't going to happen either. If it was that easy it would have been done years ago. Now you can be a balcksmith that tries to still sell horseshoes and eventually go out of business or you can start selling tires.

The porn industy is just like the music and mainstream movie/TV industry and has it head in the sand and refuses to adapt because that means accepting the fact your product isn't worth as much as it used to be. For example eventually the music industry will have to realize that the money in music isn't from selling songs or albums. The songs will be used to promote the concert tour of the artist and thus be given out for free. I will be shocked if in 20 years music is actually still being sold.

Well said. :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123