New business model: tubes offering revshare when their software recognises partner's content
 

Some content providers on YouTube are allowing user uploaded content to stay, rather than filing a DMCA to have it removed. The YT software recognises it as their content and they get paid revshare for the ads shown next to their content - even though someone else (and possibly many other people) has uploaded it.

Why can't pr0n tubes do the same? Sure, it's not ideal, but it does mean that providers are being compensated for use of their content.

Perhaps this will be the next shift as adult tubes start feeling real heat.

Discuss.

Guess this model fails

More fun to have high hopes and sue.

Or bitch on GFY.

Lol! Like they care, when they can't get our content for free and hide under some dmca notice. That's the business plan, don't you get it.

It's already being done on many large tube sites. This isn't a new development